Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2018, , 237 - 240, 01.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.888

Abstract

References

  • Boyton, J., Ayscough, P., Kaveri, D., Chiong, R. (2015). Suboptimal business intelligence implementations: understanding and addressing the problems. Journal of Systems & Information Technology, 17(3), 307-320.
  • Hobek, R., Ariyachandra, T. R., Frolick, M. N. (2009). The importance of soft skills in business intelligence implementations. Business Intelligence Journal, 14(1), 28-36.
  • Hou, C. (2012). Examining the effect of user satisfaction on system usage and individual performance with business intelligence systems: an empirical study of Taiwan’s electronics industry. International Journal of Information Management, 32, 560-573.
  • Isik, O., Jones, M. C., Sidorova, A. (2012). Business intelligence (BI) success and the role of BI capabilities. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management, 18(4), 161- 176.
  • LaValle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M. S., Kruschwitz, N. (2011). Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 21-31.
  • Mettler, T., Vimarlund, V. (2009). Understanding business intelligence in the context of healthcare. Health Informatics Journal, 15(3), 254– 264.
  • Perez, A. (2015). Seven best practices to make BI adoption pervasive. Business Intelligence Journal, 20(3), 43-58.
  • Stangarone, J. (2015). 7 practical ways to improve BI user adoption [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.mrc-productivity.com/blog/2015/03/7-practical-ways-to-improve-bi- user-adoption/
  • Williams, S., Williams, N. (2003). The business value of business intelligence. Business Intelligence Journal, 8(4), 30-39.
  • Wixom, B. H., Watson, H. J., Werner, T. (2011). Developing an enterprise business intelligence capability: the Norfolk Southern journey. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(2), 61-71.
  • Wixom, B. H., Yen, B., Relich, M. (2013). Maximizing value from business analytics. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12(2), 111-123.
  • Woodside, J. (2011). Business intelligence best practices for success. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information management & Evaluation, 556-562.
  • Yeoh, W., Koronios, A., Gao, J. (2008). Managing the implementation of business intelligence systems: a critical success factors framework. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 4(3), 79-94.
  • Yeoh, W., Koronios, A. (2010). Critical success factors for business intelligence systems. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(Pt. 3), 23-32.
  • Yogev, N., Even, A., Fink, L. (2013). How business intelligence creates value: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research, 4(3), 16-31.
  • Yoon, T. E., Ghosh, B., Jeong, B. (2014). User acceptance of business intelligence (BI) application: technology, individual difference, social influence, and situational constraints. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 53758-3766.

STRATEGIES FOR BI ACCEPTANCE: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS

Year 2018, , 237 - 240, 01.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.888

Abstract

Purpose- The purpose of this study is to propose recommendations for organizations on creating strategies for BI adoption at both the organizational and individual level to help maximize the value of the BI investment.

Methodology- A significant literature review is conducted to identify key success factors. Thereafter, a model is introduced that will help to construct a strategy for BI adoption at both the organizational and the individual level.

Findings- The solution model presented in this work is separated into three sections: people, process, and technology. Working with a BI team and collaborating with department leadership, the Analytics Advisor creates and successfully implements a BI solution through an iterative and agile process.

Conclusion- This paper has demonstrated how an organization can increase its BI adoption rates by developing solutions for one department at a time. The solution enables the departments to implement a BI program that will provide value and a competitive advantage by improving the timeliness and quality of the decision-making process.

References

  • Boyton, J., Ayscough, P., Kaveri, D., Chiong, R. (2015). Suboptimal business intelligence implementations: understanding and addressing the problems. Journal of Systems & Information Technology, 17(3), 307-320.
  • Hobek, R., Ariyachandra, T. R., Frolick, M. N. (2009). The importance of soft skills in business intelligence implementations. Business Intelligence Journal, 14(1), 28-36.
  • Hou, C. (2012). Examining the effect of user satisfaction on system usage and individual performance with business intelligence systems: an empirical study of Taiwan’s electronics industry. International Journal of Information Management, 32, 560-573.
  • Isik, O., Jones, M. C., Sidorova, A. (2012). Business intelligence (BI) success and the role of BI capabilities. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management, 18(4), 161- 176.
  • LaValle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M. S., Kruschwitz, N. (2011). Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 21-31.
  • Mettler, T., Vimarlund, V. (2009). Understanding business intelligence in the context of healthcare. Health Informatics Journal, 15(3), 254– 264.
  • Perez, A. (2015). Seven best practices to make BI adoption pervasive. Business Intelligence Journal, 20(3), 43-58.
  • Stangarone, J. (2015). 7 practical ways to improve BI user adoption [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.mrc-productivity.com/blog/2015/03/7-practical-ways-to-improve-bi- user-adoption/
  • Williams, S., Williams, N. (2003). The business value of business intelligence. Business Intelligence Journal, 8(4), 30-39.
  • Wixom, B. H., Watson, H. J., Werner, T. (2011). Developing an enterprise business intelligence capability: the Norfolk Southern journey. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(2), 61-71.
  • Wixom, B. H., Yen, B., Relich, M. (2013). Maximizing value from business analytics. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12(2), 111-123.
  • Woodside, J. (2011). Business intelligence best practices for success. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information management & Evaluation, 556-562.
  • Yeoh, W., Koronios, A., Gao, J. (2008). Managing the implementation of business intelligence systems: a critical success factors framework. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 4(3), 79-94.
  • Yeoh, W., Koronios, A. (2010). Critical success factors for business intelligence systems. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(Pt. 3), 23-32.
  • Yogev, N., Even, A., Fink, L. (2013). How business intelligence creates value: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research, 4(3), 16-31.
  • Yoon, T. E., Ghosh, B., Jeong, B. (2014). User acceptance of business intelligence (BI) application: technology, individual difference, social influence, and situational constraints. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 53758-3766.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Naciye Guliz Ugur 0000-0003-2364-5445

Aykut Hamit Turan 0000-0002-8855-4643

Publication Date September 1, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018

Cite

APA Ugur, N. G., & Turan, A. H. (2018). STRATEGIES FOR BI ACCEPTANCE: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS. PressAcademia Procedia, 7(1), 237-240. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.888
AMA Ugur NG, Turan AH. STRATEGIES FOR BI ACCEPTANCE: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS. PAP. September 2018;7(1):237-240. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.888
Chicago Ugur, Naciye Guliz, and Aykut Hamit Turan. “STRATEGIES FOR BI ACCEPTANCE: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS”. PressAcademia Procedia 7, no. 1 (September 2018): 237-40. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.888.
EndNote Ugur NG, Turan AH (September 1, 2018) STRATEGIES FOR BI ACCEPTANCE: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS. PressAcademia Procedia 7 1 237–240.
IEEE N. G. Ugur and A. H. Turan, “STRATEGIES FOR BI ACCEPTANCE: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS”, PAP, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 237–240, 2018, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.888.
ISNAD Ugur, Naciye Guliz - Turan, Aykut Hamit. “STRATEGIES FOR BI ACCEPTANCE: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS”. PressAcademia Procedia 7/1 (September 2018), 237-240. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.888.
JAMA Ugur NG, Turan AH. STRATEGIES FOR BI ACCEPTANCE: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS. PAP. 2018;7:237–240.
MLA Ugur, Naciye Guliz and Aykut Hamit Turan. “STRATEGIES FOR BI ACCEPTANCE: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 7, no. 1, 2018, pp. 237-40, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.888.
Vancouver Ugur NG, Turan AH. STRATEGIES FOR BI ACCEPTANCE: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS. PAP. 2018;7(1):237-40.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.