Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, , 9 - 13, 30.07.2019
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1056

Abstract

References

  • Ahmed, A. S., Takeda, C., & Thomas, S. (1999). Bank loan loss provisions: a re-examination of capital management, earnings management and signalling effects. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28, 1-25.
  • Anandarajan, A., Hasan, I., & McCarthy, C. (2007). Use of loan loss provisions for capital, earnings management and signalling by Australian banks, Accounting & Finance, 47(3), 357-379.
  • Avramidis, P., Cabolis, C., & Serfes, K. (2018). Bank size and market value: the role of direct monitoring and delegation costs. Journal of Banking & Finance, 93, 127-138.
  • Beaver, W. H., Ryan, S. G., & Wahlen, J. M. (1997). When is ‘‘bad news” viewed as ‘‘good news”? Financial Analysts Journal, 53(1), 45-54.
  • Burke, Q. L., & Wieland, M. M. (2017). Value relevance of banks' cash flows from operations. Advances in accounting, 39, 60-78.
  • Calomiris, C. W., & Nissim, D. (2014). Crisis-related shifts in the market valuation of banking activities. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 23(3), 400-435.
  • Cheng, G., & Dirk, M. (2018). What happened to profitability? Shocks, challenges and perspectives for euro area banks. The European Journal of Finance, 25(1), 54-78.
  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2013). Are banks too big to fail or too big to save? International evidence from equity prices and CDS spreads. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(3), 875-894.
  • Ferretti, R., Gallo, G., Landi, A., & Venturelli, V. (2018). Market-book ratios of European banks: What does explain the structural fall? CEFIN Working Papers, No 65.
  • Fiordelisi, F., & Molyneux, P. (2010). The determinants of shareholder value in European banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(6), 1189-1200.
  • Fu, X. M., Lin, Y. R., & Molyneux, P. (2014). Bank efficiency and shareholder value in Asia Pacific. Journal of international financial markets, institutions and money, 33, 200-222.
  • Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2007). Is there a diversification discount in financial conglomerates? Journal of Financial Economics, 85(2), 331-367.
  • Liu, C., Ryan, S., & Wahlen, J. (1997). Differential valuation implications of loan loss provisions across banks and fiscal quarters. The Accounting Review. 72(1), 133-146.
  • Lobo, G. J. (2017). Accounting research in banking: A review. China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(1), 1-7.
  • Minton, B. A., Stulz, R. M., & Taboada, A. G. (2017). Are larger banks valued more highly? (No. w23212). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Radić, N. (2015). Shareholder value creation in Japanese banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 52, 199-207.
  • Sawada, M. (2013). How does the stock market value bank diversification? Empirical evidence from Japanese banks. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 25, 40-61.
  • Shawtari, F. A., Saiti, B., Abdul Razak, S. H., & Ariff, M. (2015). The impact of efficiency on discretionary loans/finance loss provision: a comparative study of Islamic and conventional banks. Borsa Istanbul Review, 15(4), 272-282.
  • Vo, X. V. (2017). How does the stock market value bank diversification? Evidence from Vietnam. Finance Research Letters, 22, 101-104.

DOES EFFICIENCY CONTRIBUTE TO MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS? EVIDENCE FROM TURKISH BANKING SYSTEM

Year 2019, , 9 - 13, 30.07.2019
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1056

Abstract

Purpose- Operational efficiency is one of the strategic
concerns for bank management. The aim of our study is to investigate the effect
of operational efficiency on banks’ market valuation.

Methodology- We empirically examine the way in which the financial
market evaluates different efficiency measures of banks, using a panel data of
listed banks at Borsa Istanbul for the years 2010 – 2017. We employ three
different efficiency measures as proxies. Those are i) operating expenses
compared to total net income, ii) total net income per branch, and iii) total
net income per employee.

Findings- We find that cost efficiency, interest income as
return on equity (ROE) and loan loss provisions (LLPs) are found to be
statistically significant drivers of market valuation of banks.  We use
risk-weighted assets to total assets as a measure for risk-taking behavior of
banks. The results suggest tentative findings for risk-taking behavior of
banks. The findings also suggest that bank size and non-interest income as ROE
do not significantly influence bank market valuation.







Conclusion- We conclude that operating expenses compared to total
net income as an efficiency measure is a determinant of market valuation of
banks while income per branch and income per employee as efficiency measures
are not related to market valuation of banks. Thus, we recommend bank managers
boost net interest income while avoiding credit losses, and drop off operating
costs compared to revenue in order to maximize bank’s market valuation. 

References

  • Ahmed, A. S., Takeda, C., & Thomas, S. (1999). Bank loan loss provisions: a re-examination of capital management, earnings management and signalling effects. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28, 1-25.
  • Anandarajan, A., Hasan, I., & McCarthy, C. (2007). Use of loan loss provisions for capital, earnings management and signalling by Australian banks, Accounting & Finance, 47(3), 357-379.
  • Avramidis, P., Cabolis, C., & Serfes, K. (2018). Bank size and market value: the role of direct monitoring and delegation costs. Journal of Banking & Finance, 93, 127-138.
  • Beaver, W. H., Ryan, S. G., & Wahlen, J. M. (1997). When is ‘‘bad news” viewed as ‘‘good news”? Financial Analysts Journal, 53(1), 45-54.
  • Burke, Q. L., & Wieland, M. M. (2017). Value relevance of banks' cash flows from operations. Advances in accounting, 39, 60-78.
  • Calomiris, C. W., & Nissim, D. (2014). Crisis-related shifts in the market valuation of banking activities. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 23(3), 400-435.
  • Cheng, G., & Dirk, M. (2018). What happened to profitability? Shocks, challenges and perspectives for euro area banks. The European Journal of Finance, 25(1), 54-78.
  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2013). Are banks too big to fail or too big to save? International evidence from equity prices and CDS spreads. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(3), 875-894.
  • Ferretti, R., Gallo, G., Landi, A., & Venturelli, V. (2018). Market-book ratios of European banks: What does explain the structural fall? CEFIN Working Papers, No 65.
  • Fiordelisi, F., & Molyneux, P. (2010). The determinants of shareholder value in European banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(6), 1189-1200.
  • Fu, X. M., Lin, Y. R., & Molyneux, P. (2014). Bank efficiency and shareholder value in Asia Pacific. Journal of international financial markets, institutions and money, 33, 200-222.
  • Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2007). Is there a diversification discount in financial conglomerates? Journal of Financial Economics, 85(2), 331-367.
  • Liu, C., Ryan, S., & Wahlen, J. (1997). Differential valuation implications of loan loss provisions across banks and fiscal quarters. The Accounting Review. 72(1), 133-146.
  • Lobo, G. J. (2017). Accounting research in banking: A review. China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(1), 1-7.
  • Minton, B. A., Stulz, R. M., & Taboada, A. G. (2017). Are larger banks valued more highly? (No. w23212). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Radić, N. (2015). Shareholder value creation in Japanese banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 52, 199-207.
  • Sawada, M. (2013). How does the stock market value bank diversification? Empirical evidence from Japanese banks. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 25, 40-61.
  • Shawtari, F. A., Saiti, B., Abdul Razak, S. H., & Ariff, M. (2015). The impact of efficiency on discretionary loans/finance loss provision: a comparative study of Islamic and conventional banks. Borsa Istanbul Review, 15(4), 272-282.
  • Vo, X. V. (2017). How does the stock market value bank diversification? Evidence from Vietnam. Finance Research Letters, 22, 101-104.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance, Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Serpil Kuzucu This is me 0000-0003-2949-4086

Narman Kuzucu This is me 0000-0003-2265-6492

Publication Date July 30, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Kuzucu, S., & Kuzucu, N. (2019). DOES EFFICIENCY CONTRIBUTE TO MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS? EVIDENCE FROM TURKISH BANKING SYSTEM. PressAcademia Procedia, 9(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1056
AMA Kuzucu S, Kuzucu N. DOES EFFICIENCY CONTRIBUTE TO MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS? EVIDENCE FROM TURKISH BANKING SYSTEM. PAP. July 2019;9(1):9-13. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1056
Chicago Kuzucu, Serpil, and Narman Kuzucu. “DOES EFFICIENCY CONTRIBUTE TO MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS? EVIDENCE FROM TURKISH BANKING SYSTEM”. PressAcademia Procedia 9, no. 1 (July 2019): 9-13. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1056.
EndNote Kuzucu S, Kuzucu N (July 1, 2019) DOES EFFICIENCY CONTRIBUTE TO MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS? EVIDENCE FROM TURKISH BANKING SYSTEM. PressAcademia Procedia 9 1 9–13.
IEEE S. Kuzucu and N. Kuzucu, “DOES EFFICIENCY CONTRIBUTE TO MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS? EVIDENCE FROM TURKISH BANKING SYSTEM”, PAP, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 9–13, 2019, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1056.
ISNAD Kuzucu, Serpil - Kuzucu, Narman. “DOES EFFICIENCY CONTRIBUTE TO MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS? EVIDENCE FROM TURKISH BANKING SYSTEM”. PressAcademia Procedia 9/1 (July 2019), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1056.
JAMA Kuzucu S, Kuzucu N. DOES EFFICIENCY CONTRIBUTE TO MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS? EVIDENCE FROM TURKISH BANKING SYSTEM. PAP. 2019;9:9–13.
MLA Kuzucu, Serpil and Narman Kuzucu. “DOES EFFICIENCY CONTRIBUTE TO MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS? EVIDENCE FROM TURKISH BANKING SYSTEM”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019, pp. 9-13, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1056.
Vancouver Kuzucu S, Kuzucu N. DOES EFFICIENCY CONTRIBUTE TO MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS? EVIDENCE FROM TURKISH BANKING SYSTEM. PAP. 2019;9(1):9-13.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.