A Netnographic Study on The Reasons Why People Fail to Learn English

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 6, 134 - 151, 01.11.2024

Sibel Can Acar , Kürşat Cesur , Tatyana Mikhailova , Bibigul Akshulakova

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.83.11.6

Abstract

In a global and digital world, learning a language, especially English is essential for people to keep up with the developments in science, business, technology, etc. Despite starting to learn English early, students might not always reach desired proficiency levels. Therefore, the present study aims to find out some of the reasons why people fail to learn English. Employing a netnographic approach, the researchers examined asynchronous comments posted in online communities on a social media platform. Within the scope of this study, 198 comments answering the question of why people fail to learn English were obtained from three online groups of English language teachers on Facebook. The findings show that 154 out of 198 comments aimed to answer the question. They were analyzed through content analysis, which revealed that there are educational, social, personal, and linguistic reasons why people fail to learn English. Educational reasons were among the most mentioned reasons by the members of the communities. In addition, the analysis indicates a balanced representation of linguistic and personal factors, with social factors slightly less prominent in comparison. Considering the existing literature review, several implications are highlighted to overcome the difficulties and challenges of learning English. Finally, this study is limited by its reliance on Facebook posts collected within a specific timeframe; future research could enhance depth and scope by incorporating longitudinal methods, diverse social media platforms, and in-depth interviews.

Keywords

learning English, failure reasons, netnographic study, social media

Ethical Statement

Authors have no conflict of interest. It has received ethical approval from the Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University School of Graduate Studies Ethics Committee (Approval No. E-84026528-050.99-2400099675).

Supporting Institution

None

Thanks

None

References

• Ağçam, R., & Babanoğlu, M. P. (2018). The solo analysis of EFL teaching programmes: Evidence from Turkey. Turkish Studies Educational Sciences, 13(27), 1-18. doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.14255
• Akdoğan, S. (2010). Teachers and instructors’ views about the problems experienced in foreign language teaching in Turkey and foreign language schools as a proposal. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Fırat University, Türkiye.
• Akkuş, O. (2009). Problems in English learning and teaching in Turkey: Sample of Sivas (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Türkiye.
• Aksoy, E. (2020). Evaluation of the 2017 updated secondary school English curriculum of Turkey by means of theory-practice link. Turkish Journal of Education, 9(1), 1-21. doi: 10.19128/turje.575392
• Alsalihi, H. D. (2020). Main difficulties faced by EFL students in language learning. Journal of the College of Education for Women, 31(2), 19-34.
• Avery, P., & Ehrlich, S. (1992). Teaching American English pronunciation: Oxford handbooks for language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Aydemir, Ö. (2007). The learning strategies and success failure attributions of primary school 2nd level students that they use in English lesson. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Trakya University, Türkiye.
• Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
• Brewer, J. D. (2000). Ethnography. UK: Open University Press.
• Brodkey, L. (1987). Academic writing as social practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• Cihan, T., & Gürlen, E. (2013). Teachers’ opinions on the English language curriculum of the 5th grade of primary education. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 131-146.
• Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104
• Council of Higher Education (2007). Türkiye’nin yükseköğretim stratejisi. [Turkey’s higher education strategy] Retrieved from: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/Turkiyenin-yuksekogretim-stratejisi.pdf
• Cosgun, G., & Hasırcı, B. (2017). The impact of English medium instruction (EMI) on students’ language abilities. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 9(2), 11-20.
• Coşkun, A. (2016). Causes of the "I Can Understand English but I Can’t Speak" syndrome in Turkey. Journal on English Language Teaching, 6(3), 1-12.
• Creswell, J. (2014). Research design. Sage publications.
• Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222-251.
• Demir-Ayaz, A., Özkardaş, S., & Özturan, T. (2019). Challenges with English language teaching in high schools in Turkey and possible suggestions to overcome them. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 41-55. doi: 10.32601/ejal.543778
• Demirtaş, Z., & Erdem, S. (2015). Teachers’ opinions about the renewed fifth grade mathematics curriculum and opinions of teachers. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(2), 55-80.
• Dinçer, A., & Koç, H. K. (2020). The implementation of an intensive English language program in the fifth grade in Turkey: A qualitative evaluation. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 13(1), 25-43.
• Education First (2023). Education First English Proficiency Index (EF EPI). Retrieved April 16, 2024, from https://www.ef.com/assetscdn/WIBIwq6RdJvcD9bc8RMd/cefcom-epi-site/reports/2023/ef-epi-2023-english.pdf
• Er, K. O. (2006). Evaluation of English curricula in 4th and 5th grade primary schools. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 39(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000137
• Gobel, P., & Mori, S. (2007). Success and failure in the EFL classroom: Exploring students’ attributional beliefs in language learning. EUROSLA Yearbook, 7(1), 149-169.
• Gürel, E., & Demirhan-İşcan, C. (2020). Reviewing the 9th grade English curriculum with stake’s responsive evaluation model according to teachers’ opinions. Çukurova University Faculty of Educational Journal, 49(1), 501-554.
• Hamid, M. O., & Baldauf, J. R. B. (2011). English and socio-economic disadvantage: Learner voices from rural Bangladesh. Language Learning Journal, 39(2), 201-217.
• Hayırlı, O. (2019). Cultural reasons behind Turkish speakers having difficulty in learning English. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 10(36), 528-537.
• Humaera, I. (2015). Inhibition in speaking performance. LANGKAWI: Journal of the Association for Arabic and English, 1(1), 31-50.
• Hunutlu, S. (2011). Communicative Language Teaching in Turkey: Teachers’ Views and Classroom Practices. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Atatürk University, Türkiye.
• Işık, A. (2008). Yabancı dil eğitimimizdeki yanlışlıklar nereden kaynaklanıyor? [Where do the mistakes in our foreign language education stem from?] Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2), 15-26.
• Kessler, M., De Costa, P., Isbell, D.R., & Gajasinghe, K. (2021). Conducting a netnography in second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 71, 1122-1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.124
• Khalilzadeh, A. (2014). Phonetic and non-phonetic languages: A contrastive study of English and Turkish phonology focusing on the orthography-induced pronunciation problems of Turkish learners of English as a foreign language (Turkish EFL learners). International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 2(1), 1-16.
• Kırkgöz, Y. (2008). Globalization and English language policy in Turkey. Educational Policy, 23(5), 663-684.
• Kozinets, R. V. (1998). On netnography: Initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 366–371.
• Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. New York: SAGE.
• Krashen, S. D. (1980). The theoretical and practical relevance of simple codes in second language acquisition. In Scarcella, R. & Krashen, S.D. (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition (pp. 7-18). New York: Newburry House.
• Kulavuz-Onal, D. (2015). Using netnography to explore the culture of online language teaching communities. CALICO Journal, 32(3), 426–448. https://www.jstor.org/stable/calicojournal.32.3.426
• Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2021). How languages are learned 5th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Liu, G. Z. (2005). The trend and challenge for teaching EFL at Taiwanese universities. RELC Journal, 36(2), 211-221.
• Meyer, D. Z., & Avery, L. M. (2009). Excel as a qualitative data analysis tool. Field Methods, 21(1), 91–112.
• Ministry of National Education (2013). English Language Teaching Program for Primary and Secondary Schools. Retrieved April 16, 2024, from https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812411191321-İNGİLİZCE%20ÖĞRETİM%20PROGRAMI%20Klasörü.pdf
• Mutlu, G., & Kaşlıoğlu, Ö. (2015). Examining the role of context in the implementation of CLT in Turkey. ELT Research Journal, 4(1), 43-55.
• Özmat, D., & Senemoğlu, N. (2021). Difficulties in learning English by EFL students in Turkey. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 54(1), 141-173.
• Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Reiss, M. A. (1983). Helping the unsuccessful language learner. Canadian Modern Language Review, 39(2), 257-266.
• Sawir, E. (2005). Language difficulties of international students in Australia: The effects of prior learning experience. International Education Journal, 6(5), 567-580.
• Sevinç, K. Ü. (2006). The analysis of teachers’ views regarding the difficulties in teaching of English as a foreign language in Turkish primary schools. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Dicle University, Türkiye.
• Suryani, I., Suarnaja, I. W., & Pratiwi, N. P. A. (2020). Investigating the inhibiting factors in speaking English faced by senior high school students in Singaraja. International Journal of Education, 4(1), 48-58.
• Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304-318.
• Toni, A., & Rostami, M. (2012). Overall motivation and the promotion of EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS), 2(11), 2336-2341.
• Wang, Z. (1993). Factors that affect Chinese EFL learner’s acquisition. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED363130 on June 30, 2017.
• Wang, Y. (2006). An examination on the problems existing in the teaching and learning of oral English. SinoUS English Teaching, 9(3), 47-50.
• Yavuz, A., & Höl, D. (2017). Investigation of Turkish EFL learners’ attributions on success and failure in learning English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 379-396.
• Yiğit, E., Keser, Ö., & Uzun, L. (2020). Why can’t we learn foreign languages in Turkey? Some psychological reasons behind it. IDE-Online Journal (International Dialogues on Education: Past and Present), 7(2), 94-116.
• Yurtsever Bodur, G., & Arıkan, A. (2017). Why can’t we learn English? Students’ opinions at Akdeniz University. Gaziantep University Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 1-7.