Örtük Zekâ Teorisi: Gelişime Açık Zihin İnancı

Year 2023, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 451 - 457, 30.09.2023

Mehmet Ali Padır , Mehmet S. Vangölü

https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1163630

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bilim insanlarınca zekânın doğuştan gelen, somut, sabit ve nispeten değişmez bir şey mi, yoksa zekânın sabit ve değişmez olmadığını aksine zekânın geliştirilebilir, dinamik, şekil verilebilir ve çaba ile güçlendirilebilir bir şey olduğu yönelik tartışma uzun zamandan beri süregelmiştir. Özellikle bu alanda çalışmalarını yoğunlaştıran Carol Dweck ve arkadaşları da bu konuyu ele alan örtük zekâ teorisini geliştirmişlerdir. İnsanların zekâlarının doğasına ilişkin inançlarını temel alan örtük zekâ teorisine göre bu inançlar bireylerin sahip oldukları entelektüel yeteneklerinin sabit olup olmadığına ya da geliştirip geliştirilmeyeceğine dair bakış açılarıdır. Örtük zekâ teorisi; insanların zihin yapılarıyla ilişkili inançlarını gelişime açık zihin (growth mindset) ve sabit zihin (fixed mindset) olmak üzere iki kısımdan oluşan bir yapı olarak ifade eder. Örtük zeka teorisi zekayı ya istikrarlı, sabit, değişmez ve doğuştan gelen (sabit) ya da geliştirilebilir, dinamik, şekillendirilebilir ve çaba ya da sıkı çalışma ile değiştirilebilir olmak arasında değişen bir şey olarak görür. Bu kuram yakın dönemde daha çok gelişime açık zihin olarak kullanılmaktadır. Kısaca gelişime açık zihin yapısına yönelik uygulamalar insan yeteneklerinin sabit olmadığını ve bu yeteneklerin geliştirilebildiğini ifade eder. Fakat ulusal alan yazında yapılan detaylı tarama sonucunda gelişime açık zihin inancına yönelik herhangi bir çalışmanın olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Bu yüzden de bu çalışmada Türkiye’de akademik alanda çalışan özellikle genç araştırmacılara ve saha çalışanlarına böylesi etkililiği çok fazla çalışma ile test ediliş ve kanıta dayalı olan gelişime açık zihin inancının tanıtılması amaçlanmıştır.

Keywords

örtük zeka teorisi, zeka, öğrenme, gelişime açık zihin inancı, sabit zihin inancı

Implicit Theory of Intelligence: Growth Mindset

Abstract

There has been a long-standing debate among scientists as to whether intelligence is something innate, tangible, fixed, and relatively unchanging, or whether intelligence is not fixed and unchanging, but rather something that can be developed, dynamic, shaped, and strengthened with effort. Carol Dweck and her colleagues, who have focused their studies in this field, have developed the implicit theory of intelligence, which deals with this topic. According to the implicit theory of intelligence, which is based on people's beliefs about the nature of their intelligence, these beliefs are the perspectives on whether the intellectual abilities of individuals are fixed or whether they can be developed or not. Implicit theory of intelligence; expresses people's beliefs related to their intelligence as a structure consisting of two parts: the growth mindset and the fixed mindset. The implicit theory of intelligence see intelligence as ranging from either being stable, fixed, unchangeable, and innate (fixed mindset) or being improvable, dynamic, malleable, and could be changed by effort or hard work (growth mindset). This theory has been renamed as growth mindset in the recent period. Shortly, growth mindset interventions. Express that human abilities are not fixed and these abilities can be developed. However, as a result of a detailed search in the national literature, it has been determined that there is no study growth mindset. Therefore, in this study, it is aimed to introduce growt mindset, whose effectiveness has been tested by many studies and evidence-based, especially to young researchers working in the academic field and field workers in Türkiye.

Keywords

Implicit theory intelligence, intelligence, learning, growth mindset, fixed mindset

References

• Aronson E (1999) The power of self-persuasion. American Psychologist, 54: 875–884.
• Blackwell LS, Trzesniewski KH, Dweck CS et al. (2007) Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78: 246–263.
• De Castella K, Byrne D (2015) My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: The revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30: 245-267.
• Dweck CS (1986) Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41: 1040-1048. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
• Dweck CS (1999) Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press
• Dweck CS (2000) Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
• Dweck CS (2006) Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
• Dweck CS (2007) The perils and promises of praise. Ascd, 65: 34-39.
• Dweck CS, Leggett EL (1988) A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
• Dweck CS, Master A (2009) Self-Theories and Motivation: Students’ Beliefs About Intelligence. In Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 137-154). Routledge.
• Dweck, CS, Yeager DS (2019) Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological science, 14: 481-496.
• Dweck CS, Chiu CY, Hong YY et al. (1995). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological inquiry, 6: 322-333.
• Dweck C, Yeager D (2020). A growth mindset about intelligence. Handbook of wise interventions: How social psychology can help people change, 9-35.
• Hecht CA, Yeager, DS, Dweck CS, Murphy MC et al. (2021). Beliefs, affordances, and adolescent development: Lessons from a decade of growth mindset interventions. In Advances in child development and behavior, 61: 169-197.
• Hong Y, Chiu C, Dweck CS, Lin DM, Wan W et al. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,77: 588–599.
• Miele DB, Son LK, Metcalfe J et al. (2013). Children's naive theories of intelligence influence their metacognitive judgments. Child development, 84:1879-1886.
• Nussbaum AD, Dweck C S (2008) Defensiveness versus remediation: Self-theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34: 599-612.
• Paunesku D, Walton GM, Romero C, Smith EN, Yeager DS, Dweck C S et al. (2015) Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological science, 26: 784-793.
• Yeager DS, Dweck CS (2020) What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American psychologist, 75: 1269.
• Yeager DS, Carroll JM, Buontempo J, Cimpian A, Woody S, Crosnoe, R, ... Dweck CS et al. (2022) Teacher Mindsets Help Explain Where a Growth-Mindset Intervention Does and Doesn’t Work. Psychological Science, 33:18-32.
• Yeager DS, Hanselman P, Walton GM, Murray JS, Crosnoe R, Muller C, ... Dweck, CS et al. (2019) A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573: 364-369