Abstract
Aktarma merkezi yeri seçimi problemi, bölgenin nüfus yoğunluğu, bölgede bulunan ulaşım imkanları, bölgede bulunan alt yapı hizmetleri, bölgede kullanılan farklı ulaşım modalarının entegrasyonu gibi farklı kriterlere bağlı bir problemdir. Yer seçiminde dikkate alınması gereken önemli noktalardan birisi de İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesinin ön görmüş olduğu atıl alanlardır. Bu çalışmada yapılması planlanan aktarma merkezleri için en uygun yerin belirlenmesi amacıyla Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) yöntemini içeren bir çözüm yaklaşımı önerilmiştir. İlk olarak imar planı doğrultusunda aktarma merkezi olabilecek askeri araziler incelenmiştir. Bu inceleme doğrultusunda bu arazilerin farklı ulaşım modaları ile entegre puanları yeterli gelmediği görülmüştür. Kısıtlara göre hat puanlarının hesaplarak bulunan yerler ArcGIS programı kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı CBS kullanarak Avrupa ve Anadolu yakasında olmak üzere en yüksek puan alan 3’er aktarma merkezi yerlerini saptamaktır.
Supporting Institution
İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi
References
- [1] Heilig, G.K., World Urbanization Prospects, the Revision Report. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Population Division, Population Estimates and Projections Section, New York. (2012).
- [2] Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A.C., Mangano, G., Scorrano, F., Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 38: 25–36, (2014).
- [3] Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Household Report (2006).
- [4] Edwards, B. Sustainability and the design of transport interchanges, Routledge. (2011).
- [5] Desiderio, N. "Requirements of users and operators on the design and operation of intermodal interchanges." Technishe Universitat Darmstadt, Fachgebiet Verkehrsplanung und Verkehrstechnik: Darmstadt, Germany (2004).
- [6] Chen, C. L., Hickman, R., & Saxena, S Improving Interchanges: Toward Better Multimodal Railway İnterchanges in the People’s Republic of China. Asian Development Bank, (2015).
- [7] Olszewski, P., & Krukowski, P."Quantitative assessment of public transport interchanges." 40th European Transport Conference, Glasgow (2012).
- [8] Transport, Auckland. "Public transport interchange design guidelines." An Auckland Council Organisation (2013).
- [9] Transport for London, “Interchange Best Practice Guidelines,” Transport for London., London, (2009).
- [10] Hernandez, S., & Monzon, A. Key factors for defining an efficient urban transport interchange: Users' perceptions. Cities, 50: 158-167 (2016).
- [11] Brail, R. K., & Klosterman, R. E. Planning support systems: Integrating geographic information systems, models, and visualization tools. ESRI, Inc, (2001).
- [12] https://web.itu.edu.tr/~coskun/contents/lessons/gismanagement/CBS%20TERIMLERI%20SOZLUGU.pdf, (2020).
- [13] Uslu, A., Kızıloğlu, K., İşleyen, S. K., & Kahya, E. Okul yeri seçiminde coğrafi bilgi sistemine dayalı AHP-TOPSIS yaklaşımı: Ankara ili örneği. Politeknik Dergisi, 20(4), 933-943, (2017).
- [14] Ludin, A. N. M., Yaakup, A., Bakar, S. Z. A., Maidin, A., & Ramle, L. H. GIS and planning support system for Klang Valley region, Malaysia. In Asia GIS 6th International Conference:‘GIS in Asia: Think Global Act Local’, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia 1-7, (2006).
- [15] Gökkaya, M. A. Coğrafi bilgi sistemleri (CBS) ve analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi (AHY) ile üretilen deprem tehlike haritalarının duyarlılık analizi (Doctoral dissertation, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü), (2014).
Determining the Location of The Urban Transport Interchanges Based on the Geographic Information System: the Case Study for Istanbul
Abstract
Interchange location problem is a problem that depends on different criteria such as population density of the region, transportation facilities, infrastructure services, integration of different transportation modes used in the region. One of the important points to be taken into consideration in the choice of location is the idle areas that the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality has foreseen. A solution approach that includes the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) method has been proposed in order to determine the most suitable location for the interchanges planned to be carried out in this study. First of all, military lands that could be a interchange places were examined in line with the zoning plan. In line with this review, it was seen that these lands were not enough to integrate with different transportation modes. Locations found by calculating line scores according to constraints were determined by using ArcGIS program. Accordingly, the aim of the study is the arrangement of the interchanges planned to be established in Istanbul by means of GIS and finding the locations of the primary 3 interchanges of top priority in Anatolian part and 3 interchange of top priority in European part.
References
- [1] Heilig, G.K., World Urbanization Prospects, the Revision Report. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Population Division, Population Estimates and Projections Section, New York. (2012).
- [2] Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A.C., Mangano, G., Scorrano, F., Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 38: 25–36, (2014).
- [3] Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Household Report (2006).
- [4] Edwards, B. Sustainability and the design of transport interchanges, Routledge. (2011).
- [5] Desiderio, N. "Requirements of users and operators on the design and operation of intermodal interchanges." Technishe Universitat Darmstadt, Fachgebiet Verkehrsplanung und Verkehrstechnik: Darmstadt, Germany (2004).
- [6] Chen, C. L., Hickman, R., & Saxena, S Improving Interchanges: Toward Better Multimodal Railway İnterchanges in the People’s Republic of China. Asian Development Bank, (2015).
- [7] Olszewski, P., & Krukowski, P."Quantitative assessment of public transport interchanges." 40th European Transport Conference, Glasgow (2012).
- [8] Transport, Auckland. "Public transport interchange design guidelines." An Auckland Council Organisation (2013).
- [9] Transport for London, “Interchange Best Practice Guidelines,” Transport for London., London, (2009).
- [10] Hernandez, S., & Monzon, A. Key factors for defining an efficient urban transport interchange: Users' perceptions. Cities, 50: 158-167 (2016).
- [11] Brail, R. K., & Klosterman, R. E. Planning support systems: Integrating geographic information systems, models, and visualization tools. ESRI, Inc, (2001).
- [12] https://web.itu.edu.tr/~coskun/contents/lessons/gismanagement/CBS%20TERIMLERI%20SOZLUGU.pdf, (2020).
- [13] Uslu, A., Kızıloğlu, K., İşleyen, S. K., & Kahya, E. Okul yeri seçiminde coğrafi bilgi sistemine dayalı AHP-TOPSIS yaklaşımı: Ankara ili örneği. Politeknik Dergisi, 20(4), 933-943, (2017).
- [14] Ludin, A. N. M., Yaakup, A., Bakar, S. Z. A., Maidin, A., & Ramle, L. H. GIS and planning support system for Klang Valley region, Malaysia. In Asia GIS 6th International Conference:‘GIS in Asia: Think Global Act Local’, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia 1-7, (2006).
- [15] Gökkaya, M. A. Coğrafi bilgi sistemleri (CBS) ve analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi (AHY) ile üretilen deprem tehlike haritalarının duyarlılık analizi (Doctoral dissertation, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü), (2014).
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Engineering |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | September 1, 2021 |
| Submission Date | August 13, 2020 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2021 Volume: 24 Issue: 3 |
Cite
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.