SWARA Yönteminde Sınıflandırma ve SMAA-2 Yöntemi ile Uygulama

Year 2021, Volume: 24 Issue: 4, 1707 - 1718, 01.12.2021

Özer Eroğlu , Cevriye Gencer

https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.907712

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri karar vericilere gerçek hayat problemlerinde rehberlik eden karar destek sistemleridir. SWARA Metodu da bir çok kriterli karar verme yöntemi olarak önerilmiştir. Önerilen çok kriterli karar yöntemlerine birçok değişiklik, ek adım veya matematiksel işlem ilave edilmiştir. SWARA Metodu da değişikliğe uğrayan yöntemlerdendir. Ancak birçok çalışmada yapılan değişikliklerle ilgili herhangi bir bilgi verilmemiştir. Bu çalışmada; SWARA Yöntemin adımlarında yapılan değişiklikler değerlendirilmiş ve başka bir çok kriterli karar verme yöntemi olan SMAA-2 ile bir uygulama yapılmıştır. Uygulama sonucunda kriter ağırlıklarının ve alternatif seçimlerin değiştiği görülmüştür.

Keywords

SWARA, SMAA-2, karar destek, yenilenebilir enerji

Classification on SWARA Method and an Application with SMAA-2

Abstract

Multi criteria decision making methods are decision support systems guiding decision makers in real life problems. The SWARA Method is one of the multi criteria decision making methods proposed in the literature. Many changes, additional steps or mathematical operations have been added to proposed multi criteria decision methods. SWARA Method is also one of the methods that have changed in various ways. However, many studies have not provided any information on these changes. In this study, the changes/variations implemented in the steps of the method were evaluated and an application was practised with another multi criteria decision making method, SMAA-2. As a result of the application, it was observed that the criterion weights and alternative choices have changed.

Keywords

SWARA, SMAA-2, decision support, renewable energy

References

• [1] Keršuliene V., Zavadskas E. K., Turskis Z., “Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA).” Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11, 243-258 (2010).
• [2] Keršulienė V., Turskis Z., “Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17, 645-666 (2011).
• [3] Aghdaie M. H., Zolfani S. H., Zavadskas E. K., “Decision making in machine tool selection: An integrated approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G methods”, Engineering Economics, 24, 5-17 (2013).
• [4] Zolfani S. H., Saparauskas J., “New application of SWARA method in prioritizing sustainability assessment indicators of energy system”, Engineering Economics, 24, 408-414 (2013).
• [5] Zolfani S. H., Zavadskas E. K., Turskis Z. “Design of products with both International and Local perspectives based on Yin-Yang balance theory and SWARA method”, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 26, 153-166 (2013).
• [6] Zolfani S. H., Aghdaie M. H., Derakhti A., Zavadskas E. K. Varzandeh M. H. M. “Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating”, Expert Systems With Applications, 40, 7111-7121 (2013).
• [7] Ruzgys A., Volvačiovas R., Ignatavičius Č., Turskis Z. “Integrated evaluation of external wall insulation in residential buildings using SWARA-TODIM MCDM method”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20, 103-110 (2014).
• [8] Zolfani H.S., Bahrami M. “Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARA-COPRAS approach”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20, 534-553 (2014).
• [9] Vafaeipour M., Zolfani S. H., Varzandeh M. H. M., Derakhti A. Eshkalag, M. K. “Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar projects in Iran: New application of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach”, Energy Conversion and Management, 86, 653-663 (2014).
• [10] Karabasevic D., Stanujkic D., Urosevic S., Maksimovic M. “Selection of candidates in the mining industry based on the application of the SWARA and the MULTIMOORA methods”, Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 20 (2015).
• [11] Zolfani S. H., Salimi J., Maknoon R., Kildiene S., “Technology foresight about R&D projects selection; application of SWARA method at the policy making level”, Engineering Economics, 26, 571-580 (2015).
• [12] Dehnavi A., Aghdam I. N., Pradhan B., Varzandeh M. H. M., “A new hybrid model using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) technique and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for regional landslide hazard assessment in Iran”, Catena, 135, 122-148 (2015).
• [13] Zarbakhshnia N., Soleimani H., Ghaderi, H., “Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria”, Applied Soft Computing, 65, 307-319 (2018).
• [14] Yurdoglu H., Kundakci N. “Server selection with SWARA and WASPAS methods”, Balikesir University, Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 38, 253-269 (2017).
• [15] Yücenur G. N., Çaylak Ş., Gönül G., Postalcıoğlu M. “An integrated solution with SWARA&COPRAS methods in renewable energy production: City selection for biogas facility”, Renewable Energy, 145, 2587-2597 (2020).
• [16] Karabašević D., Stanujkić D., Urošević S. “The MCDM Model for Personnel Selection Based on SWARA and ARAS Methods”, Management (1820-0222), 20 (2015).
• [17] Özbek A., Erol. E. “Weighting Of The Occupational Health And Safety Criteria In The Feed Sector Using AHS And SWARA Methods”, AKU Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20, 51-66 (2018).
• [18] Özbek A., Demirkol İ. “Performance Analysis of Companies in the Logistics Sector by SWARA and GRA Methods” Kırıkkale University Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 71-86 (2018).
• [19] Stanujkic D., Djordjevic B., Karabasevic D. “Selection of candidates in the process of recruitment and selection of personnel based on the SWARA and ARAS methods” Quaestus, 7, 53 (2015).
• [20] Toklu M. C., Çağıl G., Pazar E., Faydali R., “Supplier Selection Based on SWARA-WASPAS Methodology: The Case of the Steel Industry in Turkey”, Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Science, 6, 113-120 (2018).
• [21] Adalı E.A., Işık A.T., “The Decision Making Approach Based On Swara and Waspas Methods For The Supplier Selection Problem”, International Review of Economics and Management, 5, 56-77 (2017).
• [22] Akhanova G., Nadeem A., Kim J. R. Azhar, S., “A multi-criteria decision-making framework for building sustainability assessment in Kazakhstan”, Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101842 (2020).
• [23] Eghbali-Zarch M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R., Esfahanian F., Sepehri M. M., Azaron A. “Pharmacological therapy selection of type 2 diabetes based on the SWARA and modified MULTIMOORA methods under a fuzzy environment”, Artificial Intelligence In Medicine, 87, 20-33 (2018).
• [24] Radović D., Stević Ž. “Evaluation and selection of KPI in transport using SWARA method”, Transport & Logistics: The International Journal, 8, 60-68 (2018).
• [25] Vesković S., Stević Ž., Stojić G., Vasiljević M., Milinković S. “Evaluation of the railway management model by using a new integrated model DELPHI-SWARA-MABAC”, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1, 34-50 (2018).
• [26] Zavadskas E. K., Bausys R., Juodagalviene B., Garnyte-Sapranaviciene I., “Model for residential house element and material selection by neutrosophic MULTIMOORA method”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 64, 315-324 (2017).
• [27] Ayyıldız E., Demirci E., “Determining The Quality of Life The Cities In Turkey Using Swara Integrated Topsis Method”, Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 1 (2018).
• [28] Bakır M., “Analysis of Satisfaction Level Based on eWOM in Airlines through SWARA and MABAC Methods”, İzmir Journal of Economics, 34, 51-66 (2019).
• [29] Balki M. K., Erdoğan S., Aydın S., Sayin C. “The optimization of engine operating parameters via SWARA and ARAS hybrid method in a small SI engine using alternative fuels”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120685 (2020).
• [30] Çakır E., “Determining The Weights of Criteria with SWARA-COPELAND Method: A Case Study On a Manufacturing Company”, Adnan Menderes University, Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 4, 42-56 (2017).
• [31] Çakır E., Akel G., Doğaner M. “Evaluation Of Private Shopping Sites in Turkey By Integrated Swara-Waspas Method”, Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 1 599-616 (2018).
• [32] Haralambopoulos, D.A., Polatidis, H., “Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework”, Renewable Energy, 28(6), 961-973 (2003).
• [33] Tsoutsos, T., Drandaki, M., Frantzeskaki, N., Losifidis, E., Kiosses, I., “Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete”, Energy Policy, 37(5), 1587-1600 (2009).
• [34] Mohamadabadi, H. S., Tichkowsky, G., Kumar, A., “Development of a multi-criteria assessment model for ranking of renewable and non-renewable transportation fuel vehicles”, Energy, 34(1), 112-125, (2009).
• [35] Cavallaro, F., “Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies”, Renewable Energy, 34(7), 1678-1685 (2009).
• [36] Lerche, N., Wilkens, I., Schmehl, M., Eigner-Thiel, S., Geldermann, J., “Using methods of multi-criteria decision making to provide decision support concerning local bioenergy projects”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68, 100594 (2019).
• [37] Kahraman, C., Kaya, İ., Cebi, S., “A comparative analysis for multi attribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process”, Energy, 34(10), 1603-1616 (2009).
• [38] Heo, E., Kim, J., Boo, K. J., “Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(8), 2214-2220, (2010).
• [39] Shen, Y. C., Lin, G. T., Li, K. P., Yuan, B. J., “An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology”, Energy Policy, 38(8), 4604-4616 (2010).
• [40] Reza, B., Sadiq, R., Hewage, K., “Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the city of Tehran: An AHP-based life cycle analysis”, Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 2053-2066 (2011).
• [41] Davoudpour, H., Rezaee, S., Ashrafi, M., “Developing a framework for renewable technology portfolio selection: A case study at a R&D center”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(6), 4291-4297 (2012).
• [42] Pons, O., Aguado, A., “Integrated value model for sustainable assessment applied to technologies used to build schools in Catalonia, Spain”, Building and Environment, 53, 49-58 (2012).
• [43] Saraçoğlu, B. O., “An AHP application in the investment selection problem of small hydropower plants in Turkey”, International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 7(2) (2015).
• [44] Haddad, B., Liazid, A., Ferreira, P., “A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system”, Renewable Energy, 107, 462-472 (2017).
• [45] Doukas, H., Karakosta, C., Psarras, J., “A linguistic TOPSIS model to evaluate the sustainability of renewable energy options”, International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 32(1-2), 102-118 (2009).
• [46] Cavallaro, F. “Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for assessing thermal-energy storage in concentrated solar power (CSP) systems”, Applied Energy, 87(2), 496-503 (2010).
• [47] Lozano-Minguez, E., Kolios, A. J., Brennan, F. P. “Multi-criteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures”, Renewable Energy, 36(11), 2831-2837 (2011).
• [48] Perera, A. T. D., Attalage, R. A., Perera, K. K. C. K., Dassanayake, V. P. C., “A hybrid tool to combine multi-objective optimization and multi-criterion decision making in designing standalone hybrid energy systems”, Applied Energy,107, 412-425 (2013).
• [49] Şengül, Ü., Eren, M., Shiraz, S. E., Gezder, V., Şengül, A. B., “Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey”, Renewable Energy,75, 617-625 (2015).
• [50] Papapostolou, A., Karakosta, C., Doukas, H. “Analysis of policy scenarios for achieving renewable energy sources targets: A fuzzy TOPSIS approach”, Energy Environment, 28(1-2), 88-109 (2017).
• [51] Shiue, Y. C., Lin, C. Y., “Applying analytic network process to evaluate the optimal recycling strategy in upstream of solar energy industry”, Energy and Buildings, 54, 266-277, (2012).
• [52] Kabak, M., Dağdeviren, M., “Prioritization of renewable energy sources for Turkey by using a hybrid MCDM methodology”, Energy Conversion and Management, 79, 25-33 (2014).
• [53] Cannemi, M., García-Melón, M., Aragonés-Beltrán, P., Gómez-Navarro, T., “Modeling decision making as a support tool for policy making on renewable energy development”, Energy Policy, 67, 127-137 (2014).
• [54] Aydın, N. Y. “GIS-based site selection approach for wind and solar energy systems: a case study from Western Turkey”, Middle East Technical University, İnonu Bulvarı, Ankara (2009).
• [55] San Cristóbal, J. R. “Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The Vikor method”, Renewable Energy, 36(2), 498-502 (2011).
• [56] Vučijak, B., Kupusović, T., Midžić-Kurtagić, S., Ćerić, A., “Applicability of multicriteria decision aid to sustainable hydropower” Applied Energy, 101, 261-267, (2013).
• [57] Balezentiene, L., Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., “Fuzzy decision support methodology for sustainable energy crop selection”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 17, 83-93, (2013).
• [58] Sánchez-Lozano, J. M., Antunes, C. H., García-Cascales, M. S., Dias, L. C., “GIS-based photovoltaic solar farms site selection using ELECTRE-TRI: Evaluating the case for Torre Pacheco, Murcia, Southeast of Spain”, Renewable Energy, 66, 478-494 (2014).
• [59] Kabak, M., Dağdeviren, M., Burmaoğlu, S., “A hybrid SWOT-FANP model for energy policy making in Turkey”, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 11(6), 487-495, (2016).
• [60] Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., Kaya, İ., “Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives using MACBETH and fuzzy AHP multicriteria methods: the case of Turkey”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(1), 38-62, (2013).
• [61] Al-Yahyai, S., Charabi, Y., Al-Badi, A., Gastli, A., “Wind resource assessment using numerical weather prediction models and multi-criteria decision making technique: case study (Masirah Island, Oman)”, International Journal of Renewable Energy Technology, 4(1), 17-33, (2013).
• [62] Yeh, T. M., Huang, Y. L., “Factors in determining wind farm location: Integrating GQM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and ANP”, Renewable Energy, 66, 159-169, (2014).
• [63] Vafaeipour, M., Zolfani, S. H., Varzandeh, M. H. M., Derakhti, A., Eshkalag, M. K., “Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar projects in Iran: New application of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach”, Energy Conversion and Management, 86, 653-663, (2014).
• [64] Georgiou, D., Mohammed, E. S., Rozakis, S., “Multi-criteria decision making on the energy supply configuration of autonomous desalination units”, Renewable Energy, 75, 459-467, (2015).
• [65] Çelikbilek, Y., Tüysüz, F., “An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources”, Energy, 115, 1246-1258, (2016).
• [66] Hokkanen J., Lahdelma R., Miettinen K., Salminen P., “Determining the implementation order of a general plan by using a multicriteria method”, Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 7, 273-284 (1998).
• [67] Lahdelma R., Salminen P. “SMAA-2: Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making”, Operations Research, 49, 444-454 (2001).
• [68] Tervonen T., “JSMAA: open source software for SMAA computations”, International Journal of Systems Science, 45, 69-81 (2014).
• [69] Ehrgott M., Figueira J.R., Greco S. “Trends In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis”, Vol.142, Springer (2010).
• [70] Eroğlu Ö., Gencer C. “Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and SMAA-2 for maintenance expenses”, International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 6, 60-71 (2017).
• [71] Makkonen S., Lahdelma R., Asell A. M., Jokinen A., “Multi‐criteria decision support in the liberalized energy market”, Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 12, 27-42 (2003).
• [72] van Valkenhoef G., Tervonen T., Zhao J., de Brock B., Hillege H. L., Postmus D., “Multicriteria benefit–risk assessment using network meta-analysis”, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65, 394-403 (2012).