Pediatrik Kaudal Anestezi İle İlgili Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Year 2023, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 7 - 12, 29.03.2023

Ali Özgül Saltalı , Emine Aslanlar

https://doi.org/10.21765/pprjournal.1228593

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Abstract
Background: Bibliyometrik analiz çalışmaları, bir konu hakkındaki literatürü sayısal ve bütünsel olarak inceleyen ve son zamanlarda tıp alanında oldukça ilgi gören çalışmalardır. Pediatrik kaudal anestezi ile ilgili makalelerin sayısı son birkaç dekatta kademeli olarak artmıştır. Ancak literatürde pediatrik kaudal anestezi ile ilgili bibliyometrik analiz çalışması bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışmada pediatrik kaudal anestezi ile ilgili olarak Web of Science (WoS) Core veritabanında yayınlanan makalelerin bibliyometrik analizinin sunulması amaçlanmıştır.
Method: WoS arama motorunu kullandık ve her türlü katkıyı (orijinal makaleler, incelemeler, mektuplar vb.) bibliyometrik analize dahil ettik. Makalelere ulaşmak için kullanılan anahtar kelimeler “pediatrik, kaudal, anestezi, analjezi ve blok” kelimeleridir. Analizler için VOSViewer 1.6.13. versiyonu kullanıldı.
Results: Pediatrik kaudal anestezi ile ilgili en çok atıf yapılan yayınlar Pediatric Anesthesia (84 makale, 1892 atıf), Anesthesia and Analgesia (26 makale, 884 atıf) ve Anesthesiology (7 makale, 537 atıf) dergilerinde yer aldı. Pediatrik kaudal anestezi ile ilgili yayın yapan ve sırasıyla en çok atıf alan ülkeler ABD, Fransa, İsveç, Türkiye, Kanada'dır.
Conclusion: Pediatrik kaudal anestezi hakkındaki makalelerin kapsamlı analizinde ‘’yayın tarihi, alıntı sayısı, dergi adı, konu ve ülke’’ gibi parametrelere odaklanılmıştır. Pediatrik kaudal anestezinin şu anda pediatrik anestezi araştırmalarında çok önemli bir rol oynaması dikkat çekicidir. Bununla birlikte, literatürde pediatrik kaudal anestezi konusunda farklı ülkelerden farklı vakalar üzerinde yeni çalışmalara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

Keywords

Analjezi, Anestezi Kaudal, Bibliyometrik, Pediatri

Bibliometric analysis on pediatric caudal anesthesia

Abstract

Abstract
Background: Bibliometric analysis studies are studies that examine the literature on a subject numerically and holistically, and have recently attracted a lot of attention in the field of medicine. The number of articles about pediatric caudal anesthesia has increased gradually over the past few decades. However, there is no bibliometric analysis study on pediatric caudal anesthesia in the literature. This study aimed to present a bibliometric analysis of articles published in the Web of Science (WoS) Core database related to pediatric caudal anesthesia.
Method: We used the search engine of WoS and included all types of contributions (original articles, reviews, letters, etc.) in the bibliometric analysis. The keywords used to access articles are ‘’pediatric, caudal, anesthesia, analgesia, and block’’ words. For the analyses, VOSViewer 1.6.13. version was used.
Results: The most cited publications on pediatric caudal anesthesia were in the following journals: Pediatric Anesthesia (84 articles, 1892 citations), Anesthesia and Analgesia (26 articles, 884 citations) and Anesthesiology (7 articles, 537 citations). The countries that publish and receive the most citations about pediatric caudal anesthesia starting from the highest are the USA, France, Sweden, Turkey, Canada.
Conclusion: The following parameters were the foci of a thorough analysis of articles on pediatric caudal anesthesia: publication date, number of citations, journal name, theme, and country. It is noteworthy that pediatric caudal anesthesia currently plays a crucial role in pediatric anesthesia research. However, there is still a need for new studies from different countries on different cases in the literature on pediatric caudal anesthesia.

Keywords

Analgesia, Anesthesia Caudal, Bibliometrics, Pediatrics, Analjezi, Anestezi Kaudal, Bibliyometrik, Pediatri

References

• 1. Trifa M, Tumin D, Tobias JD. Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct for caudal anesthesia and analgesia in children. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018;84(7):836-847.
• 2. Jöhr M, Berger TM. Caudal blocks. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(1):44-50.
• 3. Suresh S, Polaner DM, Coté CJ. Regional Anesthesia. Coté CJ, Lerman J, Anderson BJ, editors. A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children (Sixth Edition). Elsevier; 2019:941-987.e9.
• 4. Candido KD, Winnie AP. Chapter 15. Caudal Anesthesia. Hadzic A. eds. NYSORA Textbook of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. McGraw Hill; 2007. Accessed November 09, 2022.
• 5. Goyal S, Sharma A, Goswami D, Kothari N, Goyal A, Vyas V, et al. Clonidine and Morphine as Adjuvants for Caudal Anaesthesia in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Aug;48(4):265-272.
• 6. Leydesdorff L. How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 2009 60: 1327-1336.
• 7. Yang K, Meho LI. Citation analysis: a comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2006;43(1), 1-15.
• 8. Garner RM, Hirsch JA, Albuquerque FC, Fargen KM. Bibliometric indices: defining academic productivity and citation rates of researchers, departments and journals. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(2):102–6.
• 9. Ramos MB, Koterba E, Rosi Júnior J, Teixeira MJ, Figueiredo EG. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Cited Articles in Neurocritical Care Research. Neurocrit Care. 2019 Oct;31(2):365-372.
• 10. Hennessey K, Afshar K, Macneily AE. The top 100 cited articles in urology. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009 Aug;3(4):293-302.
• 11. Pagni M, Khan NR, Cohen HL, Choudhri AF. Highly cited works in radiology: the top 100 cited articles in radiologic journals. Acad Radiol. 2014 Aug;21(8):1056-66.
• 12. Khan MS, Ullah W, Riaz IB, Bhulani N, Manning WJ, Tridandapani S, Khosa F. Top 100 cited articles in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a bibliometric analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Nov 21;18(1):87.
• 13. Dolan RS, Hanna TN, Warraich GJ, Johnson JO, Khosa F. The top 100 articles in the radiology of trauma: a bibliometric analysis. Emerg Radiol. 2015 Dec;22(6):667-75.
• 14. Zhang W, Tang N, Li X, George DM, He G, Huang T. The top 100 most cited articles on total hip arthroplasty: a bibliometric analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 4;14(1):412.
• 15. Almutairi O, Albakr A, Al-Habib A, Ajlan A. The Top-100 Most-Cited Articles on Meningioma. World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:1025-1032.e5.
• 16. Yin X, Cheng F, Wang X, Mu J, Ma C, Zhai C et al. Top 100 cited articles on rheumatoid arthritis: A bibliometric analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(8):e14523.
• 17. Wang Y, Zhang H, Fang R, Tang K, Sun Q. The top 100 most cited articles in rosacea: a bibliometric analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Oct;34(10):2177-2182.
• 18. Doğan G, Karaca O. Análise bibliométrica no campo da anestesiologia no período de 2009‐2018 [A bibliometric analysis of the field of anesthesia during 2009-2018]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar-Apr;70(2):140-152.
• 19. Büyükçoban S, Öner Ö, Hancı V. A Bibliometrıc Analysis of the Most Cited Articles in Geriatric Anesthesia. TURK J GERIATR /Türk Geriatri Derg. 2020;23(3), 410-418.
• 20. Ayvat P. A bibliometric analysis in the field of pediatric ID anesthesia and Turkey's contribution to research. J of Dr. Behcet Uz Child Hosp. 2021;11(2), 159-166.
• 21. Kayir S, Kisa A. The evolution of the regional anesthesia: a holistic investigation of global outputs with bibliometric analysis between 1980-2019. Korean J Pain. 2021 Jan 1;34(1):82-93.
• 22. Zupic I, Čater T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ Res Methods. 2015;18(3), 429–472.
• 23. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. (Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, and D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice 2014;285–320.
• 24. Ball R, Tunger D. Bibliometric analysis - A new business area for information professionals in libraries?. Scientometrics 2006;66, 561–577.
• 25. Hallinger P, Kovačević J. A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 2019;89(3), 335–369.
• 26. Hosseini MR, Martek I, Zavadskas EK, Aibinu AA, Arashpour M, Chileshe N. Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: A scientometric analysis. Autom Constr. 2018;87, 235–247.
• 27. Ho YS. The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Scientometrics. 2013;94(3):1297-312.
• 28. Silvani P, Camporesi A, Agostino MR, Salvo I. Caudal anesthesia in pediatrics: an update. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006;72(6):453-459.
• 29. Juang G. D, Lin S. M, Ho Y. S. Highly cited publications in the Web of Science category of anesthesiology in the Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis. J. Scientometr. Res. 2021;10(2), 251-258.
• 30. Alkhatip AAAMM, Younis M, Holmes C, Sallam A. Research Output from the Irish Paediatric Hospitals in the Field of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Over 10 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020;48(3):223-228.