Comparative Analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Türkiye’s Secondary Geography Curriculums

Year 2024, , 28 - 53, 28.06.2024

Caner Aladağ , Baştürk Kaya

https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1401366

Abstract

The study was made as a qualitative document analysis. The geography curriculums implemented in secondary education in Türkiye since 2018 and in Kyrgyzstan since 2020 were compared by applying document analysis and content analysis. The curriculums were subjected to a comparative analysis in terms of achievements, content, learning and teaching approaches and assessment-evaluation features. Due to the difference in the educational levels of both countries, there are some difficulties in comparing only at the high school level. According to the findings, it was observed that the subjects included in the curriculum were more limited in Kyrgyzstan. In this context, it was more appropriate to make comparisons on the basis of human systems, global environment: regions and countries, and environment and society units in the Turkish geography curriculum. It is noteworthy that the geography curriculum in Kyrgyzstan has an approach that addresses geographical, geocological, social-humanitarian aspects in teaching the outcomes. When evaluated in this respect, it can be said that there is a great overlap in terms of the geographical perspective intended to be gained by students. It is noteworthy that the similarities in the updated constructivist teaching philosophy are also intense in terms of objectives and some guidance, educational situations and assessment-evaluation. In the Kyrgyzstan geography curriculum, there are a lot of details about educational situations and assessment-evaluation. The most important difficulty experienced in the comparison was the difference in the educational levels at which geography courses were taught in the two countries.

Keywords

•Kyrgyzstan, • Türkiye, • Geography course curriculum, Content, Educational situations, Assessment-evaluation

References

• Ağgün, K., & Amasya, E. (2020). History of Kırgızistan education (innovation and developments). TURAN-CSR: TURAN Center for Strategic Researches, 12(48), 394-401. https://doi.org/10.15189/1308-8041
• Akınoğlu, O. (2004). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme ve coğrafya öğretimi [Constructivist learning and geography teaching]. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, (10), 73-94. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3088
• Alimbekov, A., & Dumanaeva, N. (2017). Kırgızistan eğitim raporu [Kyrgyzstan education report] part ed. Tayyip Duman, Türk Dünyasının eğitim sistemleri ve sorunları eğitim raporu içinde, ed. Erdal Bay. Pegem Akademi, 2-71. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786052411575
• Arı, Y. (2022). Coğrafyanın tanımı, kapsamı ve neden coğrafya? [Definition and scope of geography and why geography?] Eğitimde Coğrafya Okuryazarlığı-1 içinde (p.89-108). ed. Ramazan Sever, first edition, Pegem Akademi,
• Batdı, V. (2014). Analysıs of hıgh school math currıculum content through rasch measurement model and nvıvo. International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9(11), 93-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.7074
• Bi̇lgi̇li̇, M., & Kocalar, A.O. (2020). What is geography? Liberal Düşünce Dergisi, 25(99), 145-62. Retrieved from: https://www.acarindex.com/pdfs/161582
• Boobekova, K. (2001). Türkiye ve Kırgızistan ilköğretim sistemlerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi (1. kademe) [The Comparative analysis of Turkish and Kyryz primary education systems]. Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, unpublished doctoral thesis. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/11424/208211
• Büyükkaragöz, S. (1997). Program geliştirme [Program development]. Kuzucular Ofset.
• Cin, M., Bayram, N., & Topal, T. (2011). An investigation of geography undergraduate programs: a sample of Giresun University. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(4), 55-64. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ksbd/issue/16227/169939
• Doğan, S. (2015). Eğitimin işlevleri [Functions of education]. Eğitim bilimine giriş içinde (p.39-53). edit. Celal Teyyar Uğurlu, second edition, Eğiten Kitap.
• Engin, İ., Akbaş, Y., & Gençtürk, E. (2003). I. coğrafya kongresinden günümüze liselerimizde müfredat programlarındaki değişimler [Changes in the curriculum of our high schools from the first geography congress to the present day]. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, (157). Retrieved from: https://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/ dergiler/milli_egitim_dergisi/157/ergin.htm
• Ergin, İ., Cömert, R., & Sarı, M. (2021). Comparative study on the education systems in the Turkic Countries. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(3), 67-80. Retrieved from: https://openaccess.artvin.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11494/3311/ismet_ergin.pdf
• Geçi̇t, Y., & Yarar, S. (2010). The questions in the 9th class geography textbook and the analysis of several geography questions according to the Bloom taxonomy. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, (22), 154-67. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3216
• Gül, Y. E. (2015). Comparative analysis of teacher education system of Germany and Kyrgyzstan. International Journal of Türkish Education Sciences, (4), 68-83. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/407438
• Gülderen Alacapınar, F. (2019). Validity and reliability study of the teacher value scale. Research on Education and Psychology (REP), 3(2), 111-126. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/rep/issue/47401/576702
• Jumaşova, G., & Abdurasulova, A. (2019). Кыргыз Республикасынын билим берyy реформасындагы жаңылануу багыты [Renewal aspect of education reform in the Kyrgyz Republic]. Uluslararası Kriz ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 132-65. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/723264
• Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Karataş, M., & Çalıkan, Ö. (2023). Teachers’ views on the achievement level of the learning outcomes in the new 2017-2018 grade five social studies curriculum. Research on Education and Psychology (REP), 7(1), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1280901
• Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı. (2018). Ortaöğretim coğrafya dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Secondary education geography course (grades 9, 10, 11 and 12) curriculum]. Retrieved from: http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=336
• Ministry of Education and Science of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2020). Кыргыз Республикасынын билим берүү системасына санариптик билим берүүнү киргизүү боюнча методикалык колдонмо, Бишкек [Methodical guide on introducing digital education into the education system of the Kyrgyz Republic, Bishkek]. Retrieved from: https://kao.kg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/руководство_МОиК_кырг.pdf
• Ministry of Education and Science of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2020). Предметный стандарт «география» для 10-11 классов общеобразовательных организаций Кыргызской Республики, Бишкек [Subject standard "geography" for 10-11 classes of educational organizations of the Kyrgyz Republic, Bishkek]. Retrieved from: https://www.kgma.kg/pdf/geografiya.pdf
• Osmanoğlu, A. E., & Yıldırım, G. (2013). Comparison of Egypts’ and Türkiyes’ sixth class social studies curriculum program. Journal of Turkish Studies, 8(6), 511-35. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.4667
• Özbay, M., & Melanlıoğlu, D. (2012) An evaluation of Turkish education programs in terms of listening skills. Journal of Turkish Studies, 7(1), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.2941
• Özgen, N. (2010). Geography as a science and its evaluative paradigms. Aegean Geographical Journal, 19(2), 1-26 Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/56753
• Polat, F. A. (2011). Research on post-independence of Kyrgyzstan’s education policies and practices. Atatürk University Faculty of Divinity Review, (36), 1-18. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/atauniilah/issue/2753/36705
• Purtaş, F. (2013). A new threshold in the Turkish-Russian relations: The Northern Caucasus as an area of cooperation. Orta Asya ve Kafkasya Araştırmaları, 8(15), 134-50. Retrieved from: https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/164040/
• Sezer, A., & Şanlı, C. (2017). The phenomenon of migration in curriculum and textbooks of geography lesson. Marmara Geographical Review, (36), 16-25. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/34155162
• Tanrıkulu, M., & Gümüşçü, O. (2021). History of geography in Türkiye between 1940 and 2000. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, 19(37), 467-512. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1546273
• Tuna, M., Özyurt, B., Dülger, A. S., Türkmen, F., & Uyanık, N. (2022). A qualitative research on the cooperation-based development of tourism in the Turkic World Countries. Bilig, (100), 137-176. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.10007
• Yavuz, M. (2018). Eğitimle ilgili temel kavramlar [Basic concepts about education]. Eğitim bilimine giriş içinde (p.1-26). ed. Mustafa Yavuz, Anı Yayıncılık.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] Expanded 10th edition. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yılmaz, H., & Temirbekova, C. (2019). Окуучулардын баалоосуна караганда кыргызстандагы билим-берүү системасындагы көрүнгөн көйгөйлөр [Problems of the education system of Kyrgyzstan according to students’ evaluations]. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 1549-72. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.528420