Are Spatial and Systems Thinking Skills Identified in Turkish Primary Science Curriculum Enough for Geography Education?

Year 2021, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 188 - 214, 30.03.2021

Selçuk Şahingöz

https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.857279

Abstract

Today, individuals need a solid understanding of how earth as a system works in order to understand and develop solutions for science-based issues affecting societies on a global scale such as natural disasters, global warming or COVID-19 pandemic. Humans also deliberate space investigations, such as interplanetary travels and life in space. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new skills to meet the requirements of the current world order overcome this kind of issues through science and geography education. Spatial and systems thinking skills are two of 21st century skills in teaching and learning science-related topics. The study purposes to examine current Turkish primary science curriculum regarding these skills. Document analysis method of qualitative research design was implemented in the study. Emergent qualitative analysis methods of content analysis and open coding were used. It is sought to analyze the research literature on geography education in order to delineate competences necessary for understanding societal problems related to earth science and astronomy-based physics units considering Turkish primary science curriculum framework. The findings of the study showed that the competences spatial and systems thinking skills should be more integral part of science curricula. Especially for spatial thinking skills, educators and policy makers should reconsider the learning objectives in primary science curriculum framework. In conclusion, the results indicated that spatial and systems thinking skills were partially acquired in the curricula. Some units should be clarified and enhanced depend on spatial thinking abilities, systems thinking abilities or both of them.

Keywords

Geography Education, Spatial Thinking Skills, Systems Thinking Skills, Turkish Primary Science Curriculum Framework

References

• Anselin, L. (1999). The future of spatial analysis in the social sciences. Geographic Information Sciences, 5(2), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824009909480516
• Anthamatten, P. (2010). Spatial thinking concepts in early grade-level geography standards. Journal of Geography, 109(5), 169-180. DOI:10.1080/00221341.2010.498898
• Assaraf, O. B. & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518-560.
• Bednarz, S.W., Heffron, S., & Huynh, N.T. (Eds.). (2013). A road map for 21st century geography education: Geography education research (A report from the Geography Education Research Committee of the Road Map for 21st Century Geography Education Project). Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
• California State Board of Education. 1998. History–social science content standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/histsocscistnd.pdf
• Cox, M., Steegen, A, Elen, J. & Leuven, K.U. (2018). Using causal diagrams to foster systems thinking in geography education. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 9(1), 34-48.
• Cox, M., Elen, J. & Steegen, A. (2019) Systems thinking in geography: can high school students do it? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(1), 37-52. DOI: 10.1080/10382046.2017.1386413
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches (3nd ed.). USA: Sage.
• Duke, B. A., & Kerski, J. (2010). Geo-cool: Exploring with geotechnologies. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(2), 28-31.
• Elbay, S. (2020). A foundational perspective for spatial thinking in relation to social studies curriculum and middle school textbooks in Turkey. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 10(2), 30-57.
• Epstein, R. A., Patai, E. Z., Julian, J. B., & Spiers, H. J. (2017). The cognitive map in humans: Spatial navigation and beyond. Nature Neuroscience, 20, 1504–1513.
• Favier, T. T., & van der Schee, J. A. (2014). The effects of geography lessons with geospatial technologies on the development of high school students’ relational thinking. Computers and Education,76, 225–236.
• Geography Education Standards Project. (1994). Geography for life: National geography standards. Washington, DC: National Geographic Research and Exploration.
• Gersmehl, P., & P. Anthamatten (2008). Teaching geography CD. In P. Gersmehl (Ed.), Teaching Geography. New York: Guilford Press.
• Gersmehl, P., & C. Gersmehl (2006). Wanted: A concise list of neurologically defensible and assessable spatial thinking skills. Research in Geographic Education 8(1), 5-38.
• Hanson, S. (2004). Who are “we”? An important question for geography’s future. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 715-722.
• Hooghuis, F., van der Schee, J., van der Velde, M., Imants, J., & Volman, M. (2014). The adoption of thinking through geography strategies and their impact on teaching geographical reasoning in Dutch secondary schools. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(3), 242–258.
• Huang, Y., Qu, Y., & Chen, Y. (2020). Research on sustainable science development education of Chinese geography textbook based on GIS visualization system. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 440, 1-15.
• Ikhsan, F. A., Kurnianto, F. A., Apriyanto, B., & Nurdin, E. A. (2018). Geography literacy of observation introduction landscape representation place for student experience (Ethnomethodology Perspective). Geosfera Indonesia, 3(2), 131-145.
• Illinois State Board of Education. 1997. State goal 17: Understand world geography and the effects of geography on society, with an emphasis on the United States. http://my.ilstu.edu/~eostewa/ART309/goal17%20SOCIAL%20STUDIES.pdf
• International Geographical Union. (2016). International charter on geographical education. Retrieved from http://www.igu-cge.org/Charters-pdf/2016/IGUç2016çdef.pdf
• Jo, I., Bednarz, S. & Metoyer, S. (2010). Selecting and designing questions to facilitate spatial thinking. The Geography Teacher, 7(2), 49-55. DOI: 10.1080/19338341.2010.510779
• Kim, M. & Bednarz, R. (2013a). Development of critical spatial thinking through GIS learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(3), 350-366.
• Kim, M. & Bednarz, R. (2013b). Effects of a GIS course on self-assessment of spatial habits of mind (SHOM). Journal of Geography, 112(4), 165-177. DOI: 10.1080/00221341. 2012.684356
• Kinzel, M. & Wright, D. (2008). Using Geovisualizations in the curriculum: Do multimedia tools enhance geography education? Paper presented at Environmental Systems Research Institute Education User’s Conference August, 2008. Paper Number: 1290
• Klein, P., Pawson, E., Solem, M. & Ray, W. (2014) Geography education for “An attainable global perspective”. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38:(1), 17-27. DOI: 10.1080/03098265.2013.801071
• Merç, A. (2011). Spatial cognition and map-reading skills of students studying social studies education and pre-school education (Unpublished Mastery Thesis). Adnan Menderes Universty, Instıtute of Social Science, Aydın.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Milson, A. J., & Curtis, M. D. (2009). Where and why there? Spatial thinking with geographic information systems. Social Education, 73(3), 113-118.
• Ministry of National Education (MoNE), (2018a). Science curriculum (primary and secondary schools 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 grades). Ankara. Retrieved from Ministry of National Education http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=325
• Ministry of National Education (MoNE), (2018b). Social studies curriculum (primary and secondary schools 4, 5, 6 and 7 grades). Ankara. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr.
• National Research Council (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• National Research Council (2012). A Framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• New Hampshire Department of Education. 2006. K–12 social studies New Hampshire curriculum framework. Retrieved from https://www.education.nh.gov/sites/g/files /ehbemt326/files/inline-documents/standards-socialstudies-framework.pdf .
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Öcal, A. (2007). The study of spatial cognition skills of 6th grade students in Primary Education Social Studies course (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Gazi University, Institute of Education, Ankara.
• Öcal, A. (2014). New approaches in teaching social studies-1 in Turan, R., Sünbül, A.M. and Akdağ, H. (Eds.), rethinking the ability to perceive space in the social studies course (pp. 263-278). Ankara: Pegem Academi.
• Schell, E. M. & Mohan, A. (2013). Road map for 21st century geographic education: Instructional materials and professional development. The Geography Teacher, 10(1), 6-14. DOI:10.1080/19338341.2012.758597
• Senge, P. M. (2010). Education for an interdependent world: Developing systems citizens. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 131–151). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
• Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review, 23(2/3), 285–312. http://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.366