BİLGİ YÖNETİMİNİN İNOVASYON YETENEĞİ İLE İLİŞKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ: DOĞU MARMARA BÖLGESİNDEKİ AR-GE MERKEZLERİNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Year 2020, , 322 - 335, 31.12.2020

Selvi Gulyaz Alper Erturk

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1327

Abstract

Amaç – Bu çalışmanın amacı, Doğu Marmara bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren Ar-Ge merkezlerinde, bilgi yönetimi uygulamaları ile inovasyon yeteneği arasındaki ilşkinin, uygulamalı bir araştırma ile incelenmesidir.
Yöntem – Çalışmada kullanılan veriler, web-tabanlı bir anket kullanılarak, Doğu Marmara bölgesinde yer alan ve bu bölgede faaliyet gösteren Ar-Ge merkezlerinin yöneticilerinden toplanmıştır. Örneklem yöntemi olarak tam sayım yöntemi kullanılmış ve bölgede bulunan 120 Ar-Ge merkezi yöneticisi ile iletişime geçilmiştir. İrtibat kurulan yöneticilerden sadece 32 yönetici çalışmaya dahil olmuş ve veri sağlamıştır. Elde edilen verilerin analiz edilmesi için çoklu hiyerarşik regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular- Analizlerin neticesinde, bilginin elde edilmesi boyutunun, öğrenme yeteneği, üretim yeteneği, pazarlama yeteneği ve stratejik planlama yeteneği ile anlamlı pozitif ilişkisinin olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, sonuçlar, bilginin saklanması ve paylaşılmasının üretim yeteneği ile bilginin dönüştürülmesinin ise hem pazarlama hem de organizasyon yeteneği ile anlamlı ve pozitif ilişkisinin olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.
Sonuç- Bu çalışmada, bilgi yönetiminin Ar-Ge merkezlerinin inovasyon yeteneği ile olumlu ve anlamlı bir ilişkisinin olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. Özellikle bilginin elde edilmesi ve paylaşılmasının, inovasyon yeteneğinin öğrenme, üretim, pazarlama ve stratejik planlama boyutları açısından önemli olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Keywords

Bilgi yönetimi, inovasyon yeteneği, Ar-Ge merkezleri, inovasyon, Doğu Marmara Bölgesi

INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION CAPABILITY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON R&D CENTERS IN EASTERN MARMARA REGION

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to explore the associations between knowledge management practices and innovation capability in R&D centers that operate in Eastern Marmara Region, using an empirical research.
Methodology – Data were gathered using a web-based questionnaire from the senior managers of R&D centers located and operating in Eastern Marmara Region. Total population sampling method was utilized and 120 managers were contacted. From those contacted, a total of 32 managers participated in our study. In order to test our hypotheses, multiple hierarchical regression analysis was used.
Findings- Findings of our analyses have shown that knowledge acquisition has a significant positive relationship with learning capability, production capability, marketing capability, and strategic planning capability. Moreover, results have also revealed a significant positive association between knowledge storing & sharing and production capability, as well as between knowledge transformation and both marketing capability and organization capability.
Conclusion- We conclude that knowledge management is significantly and positively associated with innovation capability of R&D centers. Specifically, knowledge acquisition and sharing have significant impact on learning, production, marketing and strategic planning components of innovation capability.

Keywords

Knowledge management, innovation capability, R&D centers, innovation, Eastern Marmara Region

References

• Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
• Biloslavo, R., Kljajić‐Dervić, M. & Dervić, Š. (2018). Factors affecting effectiveness of knowledge management: A case of Bosnia and Herzegovina trade enterprises, Knowledge Process Management, 1-12.
• Calantone, R.J., Cavusgil, S.T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515-524.
• Camisón, C. & Forés, B. (2010). Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement, Journal of Business Research, 63, 707-715.
• Colombo, M.G. & Garrone, P. (1996). Technological cooperative agreements and firm’s R&D intensity: A note on causative relations, Research Policy, 25, 923-932.
• Elçi, Ş. (2007). İnovasyon: Kalkınma ve Rekabetin Anahtarı (2. Basım). İstanbul: Nova Yayınları.
• Ertürk, A. (2012). Linking psychological empowerment to innovation capability: Investigating the moderating effect of supervisory trust, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(14), 153-165.
• Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A. & Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation, European Management Journal, 29, 98–116.
• Fugate, B. S., Stank, T. P. & Mentzer, J.T. (2009). Linking improved knowledge management to operational and organizational performance, Journal of Operational Management, 27, 247-264.
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
• Gupta, B., Lyer, L. S. & Aronson, J. E. (2000). Knowledge management: Practices and challenges, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 10(1), 17-21.
• Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Garrigos, J. A. & Gil-Pechuan, I. (2011). Making sense of innovation by R&D and Non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: A forgotten lesson for policymarkers, Technovation, 31, 427–446.
• Hsu, Y. H. & Fang, W. (2009). Intellectual capital and new product development performance: The mediating role of organizational learning capability, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76, 664–677.
• Ishak, I.S., Abu Hassan R., Alias, R. A., Basaruddin, S. & Surasi, Z. (2013). The status of innovation value chain in one of Malaysia public research institutes and government agencies, Paper presented at the International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems.
• Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch., F. A. J. & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 999–1015.
• Knockaert, M., Spithoven, A. & Clarysse, B. (2014). The impact of technology intermediaries on firm cognitive capacity additionality, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 81, 376–787.
• Korkmaz, S., Ermeç, A. & Yücedağ, N. (2009). İşletmelerin yenilikçi kabiliyetleri ve ihracat performanslarına etkileri, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 83-104.
• Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M. & Ioannou, G. (2011). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance, Journal of Business Research, 64, 1335–1343.
• Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R. & Pathak, S. (2006). The verification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct, Academy of Management Review, 31 (4), 833–863.
• Lau, A.K.W. & Lo, W. (2015). Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: An empirical study, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 92, 99-114.
• Lee, H. S. & Suh, Y. H. (2003), Knowledge conversion with information technology of Korean companies, Business Process Management Journal, 9(3), 317–336.
• Li, X. (2011). Sources of external technology, absorptive capacity and ınnovation capability in Chinese state-owned high-tech enterprises, World Development, 39 (7), 1240–1248.
• Maravelakis, E., Bilalis, N., Antoniadis, A., Jones, K. A. & Moustakis, V. (2006). Measuring and benchmarking the innovativeness of SMEs: A three-dimensional fuzzy logic approach, Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, 17(3), 283-292.
• Narasimhan, O., Rajiv, S. & Dutta, S. (2006). Absorptive capacity in high-technology market: The competitive advantage of the haves, Marketing Science, 25 (5), 510–524.
• Nemanich, L. A., Keller, R. T., Vera, D. & Chin, W. W. (2010). Absorptive capacity in R&D project teams: A conceptualization and empirical test, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57 (4), 674–688.
• Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J. & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs, Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 441-457.
• Rothaermel, F. T. & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity, Organization Science, 20 (4), 759–780.
• Rubenstein-Montano, B., Liebowitz, J., Buchwalter, J., Mccaw, D., Newman, B. & Rebeck, K. (2001). A systems thinking framework for knowledge management, Decision Support Systems, 31, 5-16.
• Tidd, J., Bessant, J. & Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, Third Edition.
• Todorova, G. & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization, Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774–786.
• Tripsas, M., Schrader, S. & Sobrero, M. (1995). Discouraging opportunistic behavior in collaborative R&D: A new role for government, Research Policy, 24, 367-389.
• Vila, N. & Kuster, I. (2007). The importance of international textile firms, European Journal of Marketing, 41(1/2), 17–36.
• Wang, C. & Han, Y. (2011). Linking properties of knowledge with innovation performance: The moderate role of absorptive capacity, Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(5), 802–819.
• Xia, T. & Roper, S. (2008). Form capability to connectivity–absorptive capacity and exploratory alliances in biopharmaceutical firms: A US–Europe comparison, Technovation, 28, 776–785.
• Yam, R. C. M., Lo, W., Tang, E. P. Y. & Lau, A. K. W. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries, Research Policy, 40, 391-402.
• Zahra, S.A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension, Academy of Management Review, 27 (2), 185–203