Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 122 - 132, 30.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1624

Abstract

References

  • Aaby, N.E. and Slater, S.F. (1989). Management influence on export performance: a review of the empirical literature 1978-88. International Marketing Review, 6 (4), 7-25.
  • Adu-Gyamfi, N. and Korneliussen, T. (2013). Antecedents of export performance: the case of an emerging market. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 8 (4), 354-372.
  • Albaum, G. Strandcov, J. & Duerr, E. (2015). International Marketing and Export Management. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
  • Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Boston. Cadogan, J.W., Diamantopoulos, A. and De Mortanges, C.P. (1999). A measure of export market orientation: scale development and crosscultural validation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (4), 689-707.
  • Cavusgil, S.T. and Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58 (1), 1-21.
  • Christensen, C.H. and Da Rocha, A. (1994). The export experience of a developing country: a review of empirical studies of export behavior and the performance of Brazilian firms. Advances in International Marketing, 6, 112-132.
  • Escandon-Barbosa, D., et al. (2019). "Born global: the influence of international orientation on export performance." Heliyon 5(11): 1-12.
  • Garaham, M., Lane, H. and White, R. (2006). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 1-18.
  • Hanvanich, S., Sivakumar, K. and Hult, G.T.M. (2006). The relationship of learning and memory with organizational performance: the moderating role of turbulence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (4), 600-612.
  • Helfat, C.E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: the case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (5), 339-360.
  • Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M.A., Singh, H., Teece, D.J. and Winter, S.G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Chance in Organizations, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
  • Herington, C., Lester W.J., and Scott, D. (2006). Internal relationships: Linking practitioner literature and relationship marketing theory. European Business. 18(5): 364-381.
  • Ibeh, K.I.N. (2004). Furthering export participation in less performing developing countries: the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and managerial capacity factors. International Journal of Social Economics, 3 (1/2), 94-110.
  • Jaworski, B.J. and Kohli, A.K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57 (3), 53-70.
  • Jiménez-Jiménez, D. and Cegarra-Navarro, J.G. (2007). The performance effect of organizational learning and market orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 36 (6), 694-708.
  • Johnson, J.L., Lee, R.P., Saini, A. and Grohmann, B. (2003). Market-focused strategic flexibility: conceptual advances and integrative model. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (1), 74-89.
  • Kirca, A.H., Jayachandran, S. and Bearden, W.O. (2005). Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69 (2), 24-41.
  • Kohli, A.K. and Jaworski, B.J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 1-18.
  • Kwon, Y.C. and Hu, M.Y. (2000). Market orientation among small Korean exporters. International Business Review, 9 (1), 61-75.
  • Lado, A.A. and Wilson, M.C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: a competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19 (4), 699-727.
  • Lages, L.F., Jap, S.D. and Griffith, D.A. (2008). The role of past performance in export ventures: a short-term reactive approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (2), 304-326.
  • Leonidou, L.C. (2004). An analysis of the barriers hindering small business export development. Journal of Small Business Management, 42 (3), 279-303.
  • Madsen, T.K. (1987). Empirical export performance studies: a review of conceptualizations and findings, in Cavisgil, S.T. and Axinn, C. (Eds). Advances in International Marketing, 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 177-198.
  • Mataveli, M., et al. (2022). "An analysis of export barriers for firms in Brazil." European Research on Management and Business Economics 28(3): 1-11.
  • Modsen, T. (1998). Successful export marketing management: Some empirical evidence. International Marketing Review, 6(4): 41-57.
  • Moorman, C. and Miner, A.S. (1997). The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (1), 91-106.
  • Narver, J.C. and Slater, S.F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54 (4), 20-35.
  • Olabode, O. E., et al. (2018). "The effect of export market-oriented culture on export performance." International Marketing Review 35(4): 637-660.
  • Niazi, M. A. K., et al. (2019). "Effect of Export Market Environment Turbulence on Firm’s Export Performance: The Mediating Role of Firm’s Strategic Orientation Capabilities." City University Research Journal 8(2): 220-242.
  • Noureen, S. and Z. Mahmood (2022). "The effects of trade cost components and uncertainty of time delay on bilateral export growth." Heliyon 8(1): 1-13.
  • Ortigueira-Sánchez, L. C., et al. (2022). "Innovation drivers for export performance." Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship 1(2): 1- 11.
  • Papadopoulos, N. and O. Martín Martín (2010). "Toward a model of the relationship between internationalization and export performance." International Business Review 19(4): 388-406.
  • Stanleigh, M. (2008). "Effecting successful change management initiatives." Industrial and Commercial Training 40(1): 34-37.
  • Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13), 1319-1350.
  • Templeton, G.F., Lewis, B.R. and Synder, C.A. (2002). Development of a measure for the organizational learning contrast. Journal of Management Information System, 19(2): 175-218.
  • Tesfom, G. and Clemens, L. (2006). A classification of export marketing problems of small and medium sized manufacturing firms in developing countries. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 1 (3), 262-281.
  • Van Leemput, E. (2021). "A passage to India: Quantifying internal and external barriers to trade." Journal of International Economics 131: 1- 21.
  • Zou, S. and Stan, S. (1998). The determinants of export performance: a review of the empirical literature between 1987 and 1997. International Marketing Review, 15 (5), 333-356.

EFFECT OF EXPORT LEARNING CAPABILITY AND MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE ON EXPORT PERFORMANCE

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 122 - 132, 30.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1624

Abstract

Purpose- All firms strive for a competitive advantage in their domestic and international markets, and they are constantly looking for new
methods to differentiate themselves from competitors. Exports can be viewed as a strategic activity at the firm, industry, and national levels.
However, some tactics are required to be successful in exporting. The goal of this study was to see how export learning capability and
management experience affected export performance in Iranian handmade carpet enterprises, with the chaotic environment acting as a
moderator and internal export barriers acting as a mediating factor.
Methodology-This study's statistical population includes 129 managers from Iranian handmade carpet export enterprises. The questionnaire
was distributed to all managers, and 124 questionnaires were distributed. During the pre-test, the questionnaire's validity and reliability were
assessed.
Findings- Data analysis by using PLS software and research findings demonstrate that export learning capability and management experience
have an impact on export performance, with the turbulent environment moderating and internal export barriers mediating.
Conclusion- Exporting is a critical initial step for firms to develop and invest in in order to reach global markets and extend their international
activities.

References

  • Aaby, N.E. and Slater, S.F. (1989). Management influence on export performance: a review of the empirical literature 1978-88. International Marketing Review, 6 (4), 7-25.
  • Adu-Gyamfi, N. and Korneliussen, T. (2013). Antecedents of export performance: the case of an emerging market. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 8 (4), 354-372.
  • Albaum, G. Strandcov, J. & Duerr, E. (2015). International Marketing and Export Management. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
  • Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Boston. Cadogan, J.W., Diamantopoulos, A. and De Mortanges, C.P. (1999). A measure of export market orientation: scale development and crosscultural validation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (4), 689-707.
  • Cavusgil, S.T. and Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58 (1), 1-21.
  • Christensen, C.H. and Da Rocha, A. (1994). The export experience of a developing country: a review of empirical studies of export behavior and the performance of Brazilian firms. Advances in International Marketing, 6, 112-132.
  • Escandon-Barbosa, D., et al. (2019). "Born global: the influence of international orientation on export performance." Heliyon 5(11): 1-12.
  • Garaham, M., Lane, H. and White, R. (2006). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 1-18.
  • Hanvanich, S., Sivakumar, K. and Hult, G.T.M. (2006). The relationship of learning and memory with organizational performance: the moderating role of turbulence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (4), 600-612.
  • Helfat, C.E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: the case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (5), 339-360.
  • Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M.A., Singh, H., Teece, D.J. and Winter, S.G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Chance in Organizations, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
  • Herington, C., Lester W.J., and Scott, D. (2006). Internal relationships: Linking practitioner literature and relationship marketing theory. European Business. 18(5): 364-381.
  • Ibeh, K.I.N. (2004). Furthering export participation in less performing developing countries: the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and managerial capacity factors. International Journal of Social Economics, 3 (1/2), 94-110.
  • Jaworski, B.J. and Kohli, A.K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57 (3), 53-70.
  • Jiménez-Jiménez, D. and Cegarra-Navarro, J.G. (2007). The performance effect of organizational learning and market orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 36 (6), 694-708.
  • Johnson, J.L., Lee, R.P., Saini, A. and Grohmann, B. (2003). Market-focused strategic flexibility: conceptual advances and integrative model. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (1), 74-89.
  • Kirca, A.H., Jayachandran, S. and Bearden, W.O. (2005). Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69 (2), 24-41.
  • Kohli, A.K. and Jaworski, B.J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 1-18.
  • Kwon, Y.C. and Hu, M.Y. (2000). Market orientation among small Korean exporters. International Business Review, 9 (1), 61-75.
  • Lado, A.A. and Wilson, M.C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: a competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19 (4), 699-727.
  • Lages, L.F., Jap, S.D. and Griffith, D.A. (2008). The role of past performance in export ventures: a short-term reactive approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (2), 304-326.
  • Leonidou, L.C. (2004). An analysis of the barriers hindering small business export development. Journal of Small Business Management, 42 (3), 279-303.
  • Madsen, T.K. (1987). Empirical export performance studies: a review of conceptualizations and findings, in Cavisgil, S.T. and Axinn, C. (Eds). Advances in International Marketing, 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 177-198.
  • Mataveli, M., et al. (2022). "An analysis of export barriers for firms in Brazil." European Research on Management and Business Economics 28(3): 1-11.
  • Modsen, T. (1998). Successful export marketing management: Some empirical evidence. International Marketing Review, 6(4): 41-57.
  • Moorman, C. and Miner, A.S. (1997). The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (1), 91-106.
  • Narver, J.C. and Slater, S.F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54 (4), 20-35.
  • Olabode, O. E., et al. (2018). "The effect of export market-oriented culture on export performance." International Marketing Review 35(4): 637-660.
  • Niazi, M. A. K., et al. (2019). "Effect of Export Market Environment Turbulence on Firm’s Export Performance: The Mediating Role of Firm’s Strategic Orientation Capabilities." City University Research Journal 8(2): 220-242.
  • Noureen, S. and Z. Mahmood (2022). "The effects of trade cost components and uncertainty of time delay on bilateral export growth." Heliyon 8(1): 1-13.
  • Ortigueira-Sánchez, L. C., et al. (2022). "Innovation drivers for export performance." Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship 1(2): 1- 11.
  • Papadopoulos, N. and O. Martín Martín (2010). "Toward a model of the relationship between internationalization and export performance." International Business Review 19(4): 388-406.
  • Stanleigh, M. (2008). "Effecting successful change management initiatives." Industrial and Commercial Training 40(1): 34-37.
  • Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13), 1319-1350.
  • Templeton, G.F., Lewis, B.R. and Synder, C.A. (2002). Development of a measure for the organizational learning contrast. Journal of Management Information System, 19(2): 175-218.
  • Tesfom, G. and Clemens, L. (2006). A classification of export marketing problems of small and medium sized manufacturing firms in developing countries. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 1 (3), 262-281.
  • Van Leemput, E. (2021). "A passage to India: Quantifying internal and external barriers to trade." Journal of International Economics 131: 1- 21.
  • Zou, S. and Stan, S. (1998). The determinants of export performance: a review of the empirical literature between 1987 and 1997. International Marketing Review, 15 (5), 333-356.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Nader Salehı 0000-0001-5424-1801

Sahar Jamshıdı This is me 0000-0002-5586-5357

Publication Date September 30, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 9 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Salehı, N., & Jamshıdı, S. (2022). EFFECT OF EXPORT LEARNING CAPABILITY AND MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE ON EXPORT PERFORMANCE. Research Journal of Business and Management, 9(3), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1624
AMA Salehı N, Jamshıdı S. EFFECT OF EXPORT LEARNING CAPABILITY AND MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE ON EXPORT PERFORMANCE. RJBM. September 2022;9(3):122-132. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1624
Chicago Salehı, Nader, and Sahar Jamshıdı. “EFFECT OF EXPORT LEARNING CAPABILITY AND MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE ON EXPORT PERFORMANCE”. Research Journal of Business and Management 9, no. 3 (September 2022): 122-32. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1624.
EndNote Salehı N, Jamshıdı S (September 1, 2022) EFFECT OF EXPORT LEARNING CAPABILITY AND MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE ON EXPORT PERFORMANCE. Research Journal of Business and Management 9 3 122–132.
IEEE N. Salehı and S. Jamshıdı, “EFFECT OF EXPORT LEARNING CAPABILITY AND MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE ON EXPORT PERFORMANCE”, RJBM, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 122–132, 2022, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1624.
ISNAD Salehı, Nader - Jamshıdı, Sahar. “EFFECT OF EXPORT LEARNING CAPABILITY AND MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE ON EXPORT PERFORMANCE”. Research Journal of Business and Management 9/3 (September 2022), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1624.
JAMA Salehı N, Jamshıdı S. EFFECT OF EXPORT LEARNING CAPABILITY AND MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE ON EXPORT PERFORMANCE. RJBM. 2022;9:122–132.
MLA Salehı, Nader and Sahar Jamshıdı. “EFFECT OF EXPORT LEARNING CAPABILITY AND MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE ON EXPORT PERFORMANCE”. Research Journal of Business and Management, vol. 9, no. 3, 2022, pp. 122-3, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1624.
Vancouver Salehı N, Jamshıdı S. EFFECT OF EXPORT LEARNING CAPABILITY AND MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE ON EXPORT PERFORMANCE. RJBM. 2022;9(3):122-3.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.