Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

KAMU HARCAMALARININ ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: BIMSTEC ÜLKELERİ ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2022, Issue: 127, 693 - 716, 12.01.2023

Gamze Çimen

https://doi.org/10.52836/sayistay.1213790
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Kamu harcamalarının etkin yönetimi, bir ülkenin çevre politikalarının ve kurumsal çerçevesinin oluşturulmasında kilit unsurlar arasındadır. Bu çalışmada, 1990-2019 dönemi verileri kullanılarak BIMSTEC ülkelerinde kamu harcamalarının çevresel bozulma üzerine etkisinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Çevresel bozulma göstergesi ve bağımlı değişken olarak karbondioksit emisyonu, bağımsız değişken olarak kamu harcamaları kullanılmıştır. Çalışmaya ayrıca kentleşme oranı, nüfus artış hızı ve ticari dışa açıklık oranı gibi kontrol değişkenleri dahil edilmiş ve panel regresyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada çoklu doğrusal bağlantı, klasik modelin sınanması, Hausman testi, değişen varyans, otokorelasyon ve birimler arası korelasyon testleri gerçekleştirildikten sonra Driscoll-Kraay dirençli tahmincisiyle model tahmin edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarında BIMSTEC ülkelerinde kamu harcamalarının karbon emisyonlarını artırdığı tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Kamu Harcamaları Çevresel Bozulma Panel Regresyon Analizi BIMSTEC Ülkeleri

References

  • Abdullah, H., Azam, M. ve Zakariya, S. K. (2016). The Impact of Environmental Quality on Public Health Expenditure in Malasiya. Asia Pacific Journal of Advance Business and Social Studies, 2(2), 365-379.
  • Adewuyi, A. O. (2016). Effects of Public and Private Expenditures on Environmental Pollution: A Dynamic Heterogeneous Panel Data Analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 489-506.
  • Avrupa Birliği Türkiye Delegasyonu (2016). Geleceğe Dair: Paris İklim Anlaşması. https://bit. ly/3WP3cPZ. Erişim: 22.09.2022.
  • Bernauer, T. ve Koubi, V. (2006). States as Providers of Public Goods: How does Government Size Affect Environmental Quality?. CIS Working Paper, 14, 2-33.
  • BIMSTEC (2022). History the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation, Bangladesh, https://bimstec.org/?page_id=4863. Erişim: 21.10.2022.
  • Boachie, M.K., Mensah, I.O., Sobiesuo, P., Immurana, M., Iddrisu, A.A. ve Kyei-Brobbey, I. (2014). Determinants of Public Health Expenditure in Ghana: A Cointegration Analysis. Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport, 2(2), 35-40.
  • Carlsson, F. ve Lundström, S. (2001). Political and Economic Freedom and the Environment: The Case of CO2 Emissions. Working Paper in Economics, 29, 2-19.
  • Chaabouni, S., Zghidi, N. ve Mbarek, M. B. (2016). On the Causal Dynamics between CO2 Emissions, Health Expenditures and Economic Growth. Sustainable Cities and Society, 22, 184-191.
  • Dogaru, L. (2013). The Importance of Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1344-1348.
  • Erataş, F. ve Uysal, D. (2014). Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Yaklaşımının “BRICT” Ülkeleri Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi. İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 64(1), 1-25.
  • Farzanegan, M. R. ve Markwardt, G. (2018). Development and Pollution in the Middle East and North Africa: Democracy Matters. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(2), 350-374.
  • Galinato, G. I. ve Galinato, S. P. (2016). The Effects of Government Spending on Deforestation due to Agricultural Land Expansion and CO2 Related Emissions. Ecological Economic, 122, 43-53.
  • Galinato, G. I. ve Islam, A. (2017). The Challenge of Addressing Consumption Pollutants with Fiscal Policy. Environment and Development Economics, 22(5), 624-647.
  • Göksu, G. G. (2022). A Cross-Country Analysis of Green Public Finance Management and Budgeting in Supporting Sustainable Development. Sayıştay Dergisi, 33(126), 409- 441.
  • GCF (Green Climate Fund) (2021). Annual Results Report. https://bit.ly/3jCcPTO.
  • GCF, (2022). GCF: Financing Climate Action. https://bit.ly/3VtFYh9.
  • Gray, W. ve Shimshack, J. (2011). The Effectiveness of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement: A Review of the Empirical Evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(1): 3-24.
  • Halkos, G. ve Paizanos, E.A. (2012). The Effect of Government Expenditure on the Environment: An Empirical Investigation. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper, No. 39957, 3-33.
  • Halkos, G. ve Paizanos, E.A. (2016). The Effects of Fiscal Policy on CO2 Emissions: Evidence from the U.S.A. Energy Policy, 88, 317-328.
  • Hao, Y., Chen, Y.F., Liao, H. ve Wei, Y.M. (2020). China’s Fiscal Decentralization and Environmental Quality: Theory and an Empirical Study. Environment and Development Economics, 25 (2), 159-181.
  • Huang, J. T. (2018). Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Emissions and Government Spending on Environmental Protection in China-Evidence from Spatial Econometric Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 432-441.
  • Ike, G. N., Usman, O. ve Asumadu, S. (2020). Fiscal Policy and 2 Emissions From Heterogeneous Fuel Sources in Thailand: Evidence From Multiple Structural Breaks Cointegration Test. Science of the Total Environment, 702, 1-11.
  • Islam, F. ve Lopez, R. (2015). Government Spending and Air Pollution in the U.S. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 8(2), 139-189.
  • Jerret, M., Eyles, J., Dufournound, C. ve Birch, S. (2003). Environment Influence on Healthcare Expenditure: An Explarotary Analysis from Ontorio, Canada. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 334-338.
  • Konuk, T. ve Eryer, A. (2021). Ekonomik Büyüme ve Co2 Emisyonunun Sağlık Harcamaları Üzerine Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği. International Journal of Disciplines Economics & Administrative Scienves Studies, 7(30), 402-410.
  • Köse, H. Ö. (2022). Çevresel Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçlarının Denetimi ve INTOSAI Rehberliği. Sayıştay Dergisi, 33(126), 501-516.
  • Lopez, R. ve Palacios, A. (2014). Why has Europe Become Environmentally Cleaner? Decomposing the Roles of Fiscal, Trade and Environmental Policies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 58(1), 91-108.
  • Lyu, W., Li, Y., Guan, D., Zhao, H., Zhang, Q. ve Liu, Z. (2016). Driving Forces of Chinese Primary Air Pollution Emissions: An Index Decomposition Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 136-144.
  • Mohammed Saud, M.A., Guo, P., Haq, I., Pan, G. ve Khan, A. (2019). Do Government Expenditure and Financial Development Impede Environmental Degradation in Venezuela?. PLoS One, 14(1), 1-13.
  • Mohan, N.C. (2016). BIMSTEC: An Idea whose Time has Come?. Observer Research Foundation Issue Brief, 164, 2-7.
  • Morshed, A.M.M., Porna, A.K. ve Amin, S. B. (2018). The Causal Relationship between Government Spending and Environmental Quality: The Case for Bangladesh. Journal of Business and Policy Research,13(1), 104-118.
  • Oktavilia, S., Setyadharma, A., Wahyuningrum, I.F.S. ve Damayanti, N. (2021). Analysis of Government Expenditure and Environmental Quality: An Empirical Study Using Provincial Data Levels in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 623, 1-7.
  • Özcan, G. ve Karter, Ç. (2020). Çevresel Bozulmalarda Terörizm ve Kamu Harcamalarının Etkisi. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 4(2), 255-268.
  • Solarin, S.A., Al-Mulali, U. ve Ozturk, I. (2017). Validating the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in India and China: The Role of Hydroelectricity Consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 1578-1587.
  • Tamazian, A. ve Rao, B.B. (2010). Do Economic, Financial and Institutional Developments Matter for Environmental Degradation? Evidence from Transitional Economies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137-145.
  • Topalhan, T. ve Yeşilkaya, F. (2017). Kadın Yoksulluğunu Etkileyen Faktörlerin Panel Veri Analizi ile Belirlenmesi. Karatahta İş Yazıları Dergisi, 9, 55-82.
  • UNDP (2022). Human Development Index (HDI). http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/humandevelopment- index-hdi. Erişim: 26.12.2022.
  • Wang, J. ve Li, H. (2019). The Mystery of Local Fiscal Expenditure and Carbon Emission Growth in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 12335-12345.
  • Yazdi, S.K., Tahmasebi, Z. ve Mastorakis, N. (2014). Public Healthcare Expenditure and Environmental Quality in Iran. Recent Advances in Applied Economics, 126-134.
  • Yuelan, P., Akbar, M.W., Hafeez, M., Ahmad, M., Zia, Z. ve Ullah, S. (2019). The Nexus of Fiscal Policy Instruments and Environmental Degradation in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 28919-28932.
  • Yuxiang, K. ve Chen, Z. (2010). Government Expenditure and Energy Intensity in China. Energy Policy, 38(2), 691-694.

Year 2022, Issue: 127, 693 - 716, 12.01.2023

Gamze Çimen

https://doi.org/10.52836/sayistay.1213790
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Kamu Harcamaları Çevresel Bozulma Panel Regresyon Analizi BIMSTEC Ülkeleri

References

  • Abdullah, H., Azam, M. ve Zakariya, S. K. (2016). The Impact of Environmental Quality on Public Health Expenditure in Malasiya. Asia Pacific Journal of Advance Business and Social Studies, 2(2), 365-379.
  • Adewuyi, A. O. (2016). Effects of Public and Private Expenditures on Environmental Pollution: A Dynamic Heterogeneous Panel Data Analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 489-506.
  • Avrupa Birliği Türkiye Delegasyonu (2016). Geleceğe Dair: Paris İklim Anlaşması. https://bit. ly/3WP3cPZ. Erişim: 22.09.2022.
  • Bernauer, T. ve Koubi, V. (2006). States as Providers of Public Goods: How does Government Size Affect Environmental Quality?. CIS Working Paper, 14, 2-33.
  • BIMSTEC (2022). History the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation, Bangladesh, https://bimstec.org/?page_id=4863. Erişim: 21.10.2022.
  • Boachie, M.K., Mensah, I.O., Sobiesuo, P., Immurana, M., Iddrisu, A.A. ve Kyei-Brobbey, I. (2014). Determinants of Public Health Expenditure in Ghana: A Cointegration Analysis. Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport, 2(2), 35-40.
  • Carlsson, F. ve Lundström, S. (2001). Political and Economic Freedom and the Environment: The Case of CO2 Emissions. Working Paper in Economics, 29, 2-19.
  • Chaabouni, S., Zghidi, N. ve Mbarek, M. B. (2016). On the Causal Dynamics between CO2 Emissions, Health Expenditures and Economic Growth. Sustainable Cities and Society, 22, 184-191.
  • Dogaru, L. (2013). The Importance of Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1344-1348.
  • Erataş, F. ve Uysal, D. (2014). Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Yaklaşımının “BRICT” Ülkeleri Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi. İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 64(1), 1-25.
  • Farzanegan, M. R. ve Markwardt, G. (2018). Development and Pollution in the Middle East and North Africa: Democracy Matters. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(2), 350-374.
  • Galinato, G. I. ve Galinato, S. P. (2016). The Effects of Government Spending on Deforestation due to Agricultural Land Expansion and CO2 Related Emissions. Ecological Economic, 122, 43-53.
  • Galinato, G. I. ve Islam, A. (2017). The Challenge of Addressing Consumption Pollutants with Fiscal Policy. Environment and Development Economics, 22(5), 624-647.
  • Göksu, G. G. (2022). A Cross-Country Analysis of Green Public Finance Management and Budgeting in Supporting Sustainable Development. Sayıştay Dergisi, 33(126), 409- 441.
  • GCF (Green Climate Fund) (2021). Annual Results Report. https://bit.ly/3jCcPTO.
  • GCF, (2022). GCF: Financing Climate Action. https://bit.ly/3VtFYh9.
  • Gray, W. ve Shimshack, J. (2011). The Effectiveness of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement: A Review of the Empirical Evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(1): 3-24.
  • Halkos, G. ve Paizanos, E.A. (2012). The Effect of Government Expenditure on the Environment: An Empirical Investigation. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper, No. 39957, 3-33.
  • Halkos, G. ve Paizanos, E.A. (2016). The Effects of Fiscal Policy on CO2 Emissions: Evidence from the U.S.A. Energy Policy, 88, 317-328.
  • Hao, Y., Chen, Y.F., Liao, H. ve Wei, Y.M. (2020). China’s Fiscal Decentralization and Environmental Quality: Theory and an Empirical Study. Environment and Development Economics, 25 (2), 159-181.
  • Huang, J. T. (2018). Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Emissions and Government Spending on Environmental Protection in China-Evidence from Spatial Econometric Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 432-441.
  • Ike, G. N., Usman, O. ve Asumadu, S. (2020). Fiscal Policy and 2 Emissions From Heterogeneous Fuel Sources in Thailand: Evidence From Multiple Structural Breaks Cointegration Test. Science of the Total Environment, 702, 1-11.
  • Islam, F. ve Lopez, R. (2015). Government Spending and Air Pollution in the U.S. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 8(2), 139-189.
  • Jerret, M., Eyles, J., Dufournound, C. ve Birch, S. (2003). Environment Influence on Healthcare Expenditure: An Explarotary Analysis from Ontorio, Canada. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 334-338.
  • Konuk, T. ve Eryer, A. (2021). Ekonomik Büyüme ve Co2 Emisyonunun Sağlık Harcamaları Üzerine Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği. International Journal of Disciplines Economics & Administrative Scienves Studies, 7(30), 402-410.
  • Köse, H. Ö. (2022). Çevresel Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçlarının Denetimi ve INTOSAI Rehberliği. Sayıştay Dergisi, 33(126), 501-516.
  • Lopez, R. ve Palacios, A. (2014). Why has Europe Become Environmentally Cleaner? Decomposing the Roles of Fiscal, Trade and Environmental Policies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 58(1), 91-108.
  • Lyu, W., Li, Y., Guan, D., Zhao, H., Zhang, Q. ve Liu, Z. (2016). Driving Forces of Chinese Primary Air Pollution Emissions: An Index Decomposition Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 136-144.
  • Mohammed Saud, M.A., Guo, P., Haq, I., Pan, G. ve Khan, A. (2019). Do Government Expenditure and Financial Development Impede Environmental Degradation in Venezuela?. PLoS One, 14(1), 1-13.
  • Mohan, N.C. (2016). BIMSTEC: An Idea whose Time has Come?. Observer Research Foundation Issue Brief, 164, 2-7.
  • Morshed, A.M.M., Porna, A.K. ve Amin, S. B. (2018). The Causal Relationship between Government Spending and Environmental Quality: The Case for Bangladesh. Journal of Business and Policy Research,13(1), 104-118.
  • Oktavilia, S., Setyadharma, A., Wahyuningrum, I.F.S. ve Damayanti, N. (2021). Analysis of Government Expenditure and Environmental Quality: An Empirical Study Using Provincial Data Levels in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 623, 1-7.
  • Özcan, G. ve Karter, Ç. (2020). Çevresel Bozulmalarda Terörizm ve Kamu Harcamalarının Etkisi. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 4(2), 255-268.
  • Solarin, S.A., Al-Mulali, U. ve Ozturk, I. (2017). Validating the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in India and China: The Role of Hydroelectricity Consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 1578-1587.
  • Tamazian, A. ve Rao, B.B. (2010). Do Economic, Financial and Institutional Developments Matter for Environmental Degradation? Evidence from Transitional Economies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137-145.
  • Topalhan, T. ve Yeşilkaya, F. (2017). Kadın Yoksulluğunu Etkileyen Faktörlerin Panel Veri Analizi ile Belirlenmesi. Karatahta İş Yazıları Dergisi, 9, 55-82.
  • UNDP (2022). Human Development Index (HDI). http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/humandevelopment- index-hdi. Erişim: 26.12.2022.
  • Wang, J. ve Li, H. (2019). The Mystery of Local Fiscal Expenditure and Carbon Emission Growth in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 12335-12345.
  • Yazdi, S.K., Tahmasebi, Z. ve Mastorakis, N. (2014). Public Healthcare Expenditure and Environmental Quality in Iran. Recent Advances in Applied Economics, 126-134.
  • Yuelan, P., Akbar, M.W., Hafeez, M., Ahmad, M., Zia, Z. ve Ullah, S. (2019). The Nexus of Fiscal Policy Instruments and Environmental Degradation in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 28919-28932.
  • Yuxiang, K. ve Chen, Z. (2010). Government Expenditure and Energy Intensity in China. Energy Policy, 38(2), 691-694.
There are 41 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Economics
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Gamze Çimen

Publication Date January 12, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2022 Issue: 127

Cite

APA Çimen, G. (2023). KAMU HARCAMALARININ ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: BIMSTEC ÜLKELERİ ÖRNEĞİ. Sayıştay Dergisi, 33(127), 693-716. https://doi.org/10.52836/sayistay.1213790

Cited By

Asymmetric Impact of Fiscal Policies on Environmental Deterioration: Evidence from the NARDL Model for Türkiye
Bucak İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.38057/bifd.1350732
 Download Cover Image