BibTex RIS Cite

Girişimsel Fırsat Tiplerinin Firma Büyüme Performansı

Year 2014, Volume: 19 Issue: 1, 167 - 189, 01.03.2014

 Üzerindeki Etkisi: TR Bölgesinde Bir İn Özkul Gökhan Özkul , Prof.dr.murat Ali Dulupçu

Abstract

Entrepreneurial opportunities which are discovered and used by entrepreneurs, is one of the most important driving factors of the firm growth. Because firm growth emerging as a result of the discovery of the entrepreneurial opportunities. Therefore increasing the opportunities means increasing firm growth performance. However, the quality of the used opportunities diversifies firm growth performance. In this context, it is quite important to know how an entrepreneurial opportunity is understood and where does it come from. In this framework, the main purpose of the study is to demonstrate the entrepreneurial opportunity types and examine the impact of the entrepreneurial opportunity types on firm growth performance which are used in the manufacturing industry sector in Antalya, Burdur and Isparta provinces of the TR61 region. In this study, 633 firms that operating under the manufacturing sector in TR61 Region were examined. 315 of these firms are in Antalya, 134 of these firms are in Burdur and 184 of these firms are in Isparta. In this study, the growth performance of firm are discussed as the increase of firms' sales volume, cash flow, profit margin, employment level, investments and the recognition. Logit and odds ratio analysis were carried out to measure the effect on each dimension that defines the firm growth performance of entrepreneurial

Keywords

-

References

  • ANOKHIN, S., TROUTT, M.D., WINCENT, J. ve BRANDYBERRY, A.A. (2010). “Arbitrage Opportunities: A Minimum Performance Inefficiency Estimation Technique”, Organizational Research Methods, 13(1): 55-66.
  • CHELLY, A. (2011). “Searching for Opportunities and Opportunity Discovery: An Extension of Bhave‟s (1994) Work”, 12th International Council for Small Business (ICSB) World Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 15- 18 June 2011.
  • COAD, A. (2009). The Growth of Firms: A Survey of Theories and Empirical Evidence, Edward Elgar.
  • ÇOKLUK, Ö., ġEKERCĠOĞLU, G. ve BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, ġ. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler Ġçin Çok DeğiĢkenli Ġstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları, Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
  • DE JONG, J.P.J. ve MARSILI, O. (2010). Schumpeter Versus Kirzner: An Empirical Investigation of Opportunity Types, EIM Research Reports.
  • DE JONG, J.P.J. ve MARSILI, O. (2011). “Schumpeterian and Kirznerian Opportunities: An Empirical Investigation of Opportunity Types”, Innovation, Strategy, and Structure - Organizations, Institutions, Systems and Regions, DRUID 2011, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, June 15-17, 2011.
  • DUTTA, D.K. ve CROSSAN, M.M. (2005). “The Nature of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: Understanding the Process Using The 4I Organizational Learning Framework”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4): 425-449.
  • GOSS, D. (2007). “Reconsidering Schumpeterian Opportunities: The Contribution of Interaction Ritual Chain Theory”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 13(1): 3-18.
  • GUJARATI, D.N. (2001). Temel Ekonometri, Çev. ġENESEN, Ü. ve ġENESEN, G.G., Literatür Yayıncılık, Ġstanbul.
  • HALL, B.H. (1986). The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in The U.S. Manufacturing Center, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper No.1965.
  • HERMELO, F.D. ve VASSOLO, R. (2007). “The Determinants of Firm‟s Growth: An Empirical Examination”, Revista Abante, 10(1): 3-20.
  • HOLCOMBE, R.G. (2003). “The Origins of Entrepreneurial Opportunities”, The Review of Austrian Economics, 16(1): 25-43.
  • ĠSTATĠSTĠK ANALĠZ (2013). “Örneklem Büyüklüğünün Saptanması”, http://www.istatistikanaliz.com/orneklem_buyuklugunu_saptanmasi.asp, 30.01.2013.
  • KALAYCI, ġ. (2010). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok DeğiĢkenli Ġstatistik Teknikleri, Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • KARAÖZ, M. ve DEMĠRGĠL, H. (2009). “Firma Büyüme Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ġktisadi ve Ġdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2): 47-68.
  • KILIÇKAPLAN, S., ve HAYIRSEVER BAġTÜRK, F. (2007). “Gibrat Yasası ve Firmalarda Büyüme”, 8. Türkiye Ekonometri ve Ġstatistik Kongresi, 24-25 Mayıs 2007, Malatya.
  • KIRZNER, I. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago, IL, US: University of Chicago Pres.
  • KIRZNER, I. (1985). Discovery and The Capitalist Process, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • KUIVANIEMI, L. (2010). Evaluation and Reasoning in The Entrepreneurial Opportunity Process Narratives from Sex Industry Entrepreneurs, University of Jyvaskyla, School of Business and Economics.
  • MOHNEN, A. ve NASEV, J. (2006). “Growth of Small and Medium-Sized Firms in Germany”,http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=852785&http://pap ers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=852785&http://www.google.com.tr/, 12.05.2011.
  • NICHTER, S. ve GOLDMARK, L. (2009). “Small Firm Growth in Developing Countries”, World Development, 37(9): 1453-1463.
  • PRAAG, C.M. (2005). Successful Entrepreneurship Confronting Economic Theory With Empirical Practice, Edward Elgar, Northampton.
  • RANTALA, A. (2006). Growth of New Firms: Evidence From Finland 1996-2003, Pellervo Economic Research Institute, Reports No.197.
  • SAEED, A. (2009). “Formality of Financial Sources and Firm Growth: Empirical Evidence From Brazilian SMES 1999-2005”, Journal of Academic Research in Economics, 1(2): 131-144.
  • SCHUMPETER, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development, Transaction Publishers, London, 1996.
  • SCHUMPETER, J.A. (1943). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Taylor & Francis eLibrary, 2003.
  • SCIASCIA, S. ve DE VITA, R. (2004). The Development of Enrrepreneurship Research, Liuc Papers, No.146, Serie Economia Aziendale 19.
  • SERRASQUEIRO, Z., NUNESA, P.M. ve SEQUEIRA, T.N. (2007). “Firms‟ Growth Opportunities and Profitability: A Nonlinear Relationship”, Applied Financial Economics Letters, 3(6): 373-379.
  • SHANE, S. (2003). A General Theory of Entrepreneurship The Individual-Opportunity Nexus, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton.
  • SHANE, S. ve VENKATARAMAN, S. (2000). “The Promise Of Entrepreneurship As A Field of Research”, Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217-226.
  • SHORT, J.C., KETCHEN, D.J., SHOOK, C.L. ve IRELAND, R.D. (2010). “The Concept of „Opportunity‟ in Entrepreneurship Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges”, Journal of Management, 36(1): 40-65.
  • UZGÖREN, N. (2012). Bilimsel AraĢtırmalarda Kullanılan Temel Ġstatistiksel Yöntemler ve SPSS Uygulamaları, Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa

GİRİŞİMSEL FIRSAT TİPLERİNİN FİRMA BÜYÜME PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: TR61 BÖLGESİNDE BİR İNCELEME

Year 2014, Volume: 19 Issue: 1, 167 - 189, 01.03.2014

 Üzerindeki Etkisi: TR Bölgesinde Bir İn Özkul Gökhan Özkul , Prof.dr.murat Ali Dulupçu

Abstract

Girişimciler tarafından keşfedilen ve kullanılan girişimsel fırsatlar firma büyümesinin en önemli itici faktörlerinden biridir. Çünkü firma büyümesi, girişimsel fırsatların keşfedilmesinin bir sonucu olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Dolayısıyla artan fırsatlar demek artan firma büyüme performansları demektir. Bununla birlikte kullanılan fırsatların niteliği, firma büyüme performanslarını farklılaştırmaktadır. Bu bağlamda girişimsel bir fırsatın nasıl anlaşıldığı ve nereden geldiğini bilmek oldukça önem arz etmektedir. Bu çerçevede çalışmanın temel amacı, TR61 Bölgesinde yer alan Antalya, Burdur ve Isparta illeri imalat sanayi sektöründe kullanılan girişimsel fırsat tiplerini ortaya çıkarmak ve girişimsel fırsat tiplerinin firma büyüme performansı üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Bu kapsamda çalışmada; TR61 Bölgesi imalat sanayi sektöründe faaliyet gösteren Antalya’dan 315, Burdur’dan 134 ve Isparta’dan 184 olmak üzere toplam 633 firma incelenmiştir. Çalışmada firma büyüme performansı; firmaların satış hacminin, nakit akışının, kar marjının, istihdam seviyesinin, yatırımlarının ve tanınırlığının artışı şeklinde ele alınmıştır. Girişimsel fırsat tiplerinin firma büyüme performansını tanımlayan her bir boyut üzerindeki etkisini ölçmek için logit analizi ile birlikte odds ratio analizi yapılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre, TR61 Bölgesinde Schumpeteryen fırsatlardan çok Kirzneryen fırsatların kullanıldığı ve Schumpeteryen fırsatları kullanan firmaların firma büyüme performanslarını arttırma olasılığının daha yüksek olduğusonucuna ulaşılmıştır

Keywords

Girişimsel Fırsat Tipleri Schumpeteryen Fırsatlar Kirzneryen Fırsatlar Firma Büyüme Performansı

References

  • ANOKHIN, S., TROUTT, M.D., WINCENT, J. ve BRANDYBERRY, A.A. (2010). “Arbitrage Opportunities: A Minimum Performance Inefficiency Estimation Technique”, Organizational Research Methods, 13(1): 55-66.
  • CHELLY, A. (2011). “Searching for Opportunities and Opportunity Discovery: An Extension of Bhave‟s (1994) Work”, 12th International Council for Small Business (ICSB) World Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 15- 18 June 2011.
  • COAD, A. (2009). The Growth of Firms: A Survey of Theories and Empirical Evidence, Edward Elgar.
  • ÇOKLUK, Ö., ġEKERCĠOĞLU, G. ve BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, ġ. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler Ġçin Çok DeğiĢkenli Ġstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları, Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
  • DE JONG, J.P.J. ve MARSILI, O. (2010). Schumpeter Versus Kirzner: An Empirical Investigation of Opportunity Types, EIM Research Reports.
  • DE JONG, J.P.J. ve MARSILI, O. (2011). “Schumpeterian and Kirznerian Opportunities: An Empirical Investigation of Opportunity Types”, Innovation, Strategy, and Structure - Organizations, Institutions, Systems and Regions, DRUID 2011, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, June 15-17, 2011.
  • DUTTA, D.K. ve CROSSAN, M.M. (2005). “The Nature of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: Understanding the Process Using The 4I Organizational Learning Framework”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4): 425-449.
  • GOSS, D. (2007). “Reconsidering Schumpeterian Opportunities: The Contribution of Interaction Ritual Chain Theory”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 13(1): 3-18.
  • GUJARATI, D.N. (2001). Temel Ekonometri, Çev. ġENESEN, Ü. ve ġENESEN, G.G., Literatür Yayıncılık, Ġstanbul.
  • HALL, B.H. (1986). The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in The U.S. Manufacturing Center, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper No.1965.
  • HERMELO, F.D. ve VASSOLO, R. (2007). “The Determinants of Firm‟s Growth: An Empirical Examination”, Revista Abante, 10(1): 3-20.
  • HOLCOMBE, R.G. (2003). “The Origins of Entrepreneurial Opportunities”, The Review of Austrian Economics, 16(1): 25-43.
  • ĠSTATĠSTĠK ANALĠZ (2013). “Örneklem Büyüklüğünün Saptanması”, http://www.istatistikanaliz.com/orneklem_buyuklugunu_saptanmasi.asp, 30.01.2013.
  • KALAYCI, ġ. (2010). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok DeğiĢkenli Ġstatistik Teknikleri, Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • KARAÖZ, M. ve DEMĠRGĠL, H. (2009). “Firma Büyüme Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ġktisadi ve Ġdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2): 47-68.
  • KILIÇKAPLAN, S., ve HAYIRSEVER BAġTÜRK, F. (2007). “Gibrat Yasası ve Firmalarda Büyüme”, 8. Türkiye Ekonometri ve Ġstatistik Kongresi, 24-25 Mayıs 2007, Malatya.
  • KIRZNER, I. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago, IL, US: University of Chicago Pres.
  • KIRZNER, I. (1985). Discovery and The Capitalist Process, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • KUIVANIEMI, L. (2010). Evaluation and Reasoning in The Entrepreneurial Opportunity Process Narratives from Sex Industry Entrepreneurs, University of Jyvaskyla, School of Business and Economics.
  • MOHNEN, A. ve NASEV, J. (2006). “Growth of Small and Medium-Sized Firms in Germany”,http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=852785&http://pap ers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=852785&http://www.google.com.tr/, 12.05.2011.
  • NICHTER, S. ve GOLDMARK, L. (2009). “Small Firm Growth in Developing Countries”, World Development, 37(9): 1453-1463.
  • PRAAG, C.M. (2005). Successful Entrepreneurship Confronting Economic Theory With Empirical Practice, Edward Elgar, Northampton.
  • RANTALA, A. (2006). Growth of New Firms: Evidence From Finland 1996-2003, Pellervo Economic Research Institute, Reports No.197.
  • SAEED, A. (2009). “Formality of Financial Sources and Firm Growth: Empirical Evidence From Brazilian SMES 1999-2005”, Journal of Academic Research in Economics, 1(2): 131-144.
  • SCHUMPETER, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development, Transaction Publishers, London, 1996.
  • SCHUMPETER, J.A. (1943). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Taylor & Francis eLibrary, 2003.
  • SCIASCIA, S. ve DE VITA, R. (2004). The Development of Enrrepreneurship Research, Liuc Papers, No.146, Serie Economia Aziendale 19.
  • SERRASQUEIRO, Z., NUNESA, P.M. ve SEQUEIRA, T.N. (2007). “Firms‟ Growth Opportunities and Profitability: A Nonlinear Relationship”, Applied Financial Economics Letters, 3(6): 373-379.
  • SHANE, S. (2003). A General Theory of Entrepreneurship The Individual-Opportunity Nexus, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton.
  • SHANE, S. ve VENKATARAMAN, S. (2000). “The Promise Of Entrepreneurship As A Field of Research”, Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217-226.
  • SHORT, J.C., KETCHEN, D.J., SHOOK, C.L. ve IRELAND, R.D. (2010). “The Concept of „Opportunity‟ in Entrepreneurship Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges”, Journal of Management, 36(1): 40-65.
  • UZGÖREN, N. (2012). Bilimsel AraĢtırmalarda Kullanılan Temel Ġstatistiksel Yöntemler ve SPSS Uygulamaları, Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

 Üzerindeki Etkisi: TR Bölgesinde Bir İn Özkul This is me

Gökhan Özkul

Prof.dr.murat Ali Dulupçu This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 19 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özkul, .E.T.B.B.İ., Özkul, G., & Dulupçu, P. A. (2014). GİRİŞİMSEL FIRSAT TİPLERİNİN FİRMA BÜYÜME PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: TR61 BÖLGESİNDE BİR İNCELEME. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 167-189.