Universal adezivlerin iki tabaka uygulanmasının bağlanma performansına etkisi

Year 2020, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 305 - 310, 21.09.2020

Muhittin Uğurlu

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın
amacı, universal adezivlerin iki tabaka uygulanmasının dentine bağlanma
dayanımı üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem:
Yetmiş adet çürük içermeyen insan üçüncü azı dişi kullanıldı. Dişler rastgele
yedi gruba ayrıldı (n = 10). Universal adezivler Single Bond Universal (3M Oral
Care), Gluma Bond Universal (Heraeus Kulzer) ve Prime&Bond Universal
(Dentsply) üreticinin talimatlarına göre ve iki tabaka halinde kullanıldı.
Kontrol grubu olarak iki basamaklı kendinden asitli adeziv Clearfil SE Bond
(Kuraray Noritake) kullanıldı. Kompozit üst yapılar orta-koronal oklüzal dentin
yüzeylerine bağlandıktan sonra örnekler distile su içinde saklandı (37 °C/24
saat) ve mikro örneklere ayrıldı. Örnekler mikrogerilme bağlanma dayanımı testine
(1,0 mm / dakika) tabi tutuldu. Başarısızlık tiplerinin analizi ışık mikroskobu
ve taramalı elektron mikroskobu kullanılarak yapıldı. Veriler tek yönlü ANOVA
ve Duncan testi ile analiz edildi (p=0,05).

Bulgular:
İki tabaka halinde uygulama, üç universal adezivin dentine bağlanma dayanımını arttırdı
(p<0,05). Clearfil SE Bond, universal adezivler tek kat halinde
uygulandığında universal adezivlere kıyasla daha yüksek bağlanma dayanımı
değerleri gösterdi (p<0,05). Tek tabaka halinde uygulandığında, Prime&Bond
Universal ile, Single Bond Universal ve Gluma Bond Universal'den daha yüksek
bağlanma dayanımı değerleri elde edildi (p<0,05).

Sonuç: İki tabaka uygulama,
universal adezivlerin dentine bağlanma dayanımının arttırılmasında faydalı
olmuştur. Clearfil SE Bond, universal adezivlerden daha iyi bağlanma dayanımı sonuçları
göstermiştir.

Keywords

Dental adeziv, Dental bağlanma, Dentin

Thanks

Yazar bu çalışmanın materyal desteği için, 3M Oral Care, Heraeus Kulzer ve Dentsply’a teşekkür eder.

References

• 1. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore's Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):7–34.
• 2. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004;83(6):454–458.
• 3. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):17–28.
• 4. Wei S, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J. Effect of double-application of three single-step self-etch adhesives on dentin bonding and mechanical properties of resin-dentin area. Oper Dent. 2009;34(6):716–724.
• 5. Reis A, Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, et al. Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin?. J Dent. 2008;36(5):309–315.
• 6. Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effect of double-application or the application of a hydrophobic layer for improved efficacy of one-step self-etch systems in enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2008;33(5):564–570.
• 7. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, et al. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(2):133–141.
• 8. Taschner M, Kümmerling M, Lohbauer U, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent. 2014;39(4):416–426.
• 9. de Silva AL, Lima DA, de Souza GM, dos Santos CT, Paulillo LA. Influence of additional adhesive application on the microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2006;31(5):562–568.
• 10. Cuevas-Suárez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesives: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):7–26.
• 11. Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J. Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019;107(6):2121–2131.
• 12. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(7):765–776.
• 13. Ahmed MH, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Yoshihara K, Van Meerbeek B. Do Universal Adhesives Benefit from an Extra Bonding Layer?. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(2):117–132.
• 14. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014;42(7):800–807.
• 15. Ermis RB, Ugurlu M, Ahmed MH, Van Meerbeek B. Universal Adhesives Benefit from an Extra Hydrophobic Adhesive Layer When Light Cured Beforehand. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(2):179–188.
• 16. Yiu CK, Pashley EL, Hiraishi N, et al. Solvent and water retention in dental adhesive blends after evaporation. Biomaterials. 2005;26(34):6863–6872.
• 17. Loguercio AD, Loeblein F, Cherobin T, Ogliari F, Piva E, Reis A. Effect of solvent removal on adhesive properties of simplified etch-and-rinse systems and on bond strengths to dry and wet dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(3):213–219.
• 18. Fujiwara S, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, et al. Effect of double-layer application on bond quality of adhesive systems. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;77:501–509.
• 19. Chowdhury AFMA, Saikaew P, Alam A, Sun J, Carvalho RM, Sano H. Effects of Double Application of Contemporary Self-Etch Adhesives on Their Bonding Performance to Dentin with Clinically Relevant Smear Layers. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):59–66.
• 20. Hashimoto M, De Munck J, Ito S, et al. In vitro effect of nanoleakage expression on resin-dentin bond strengths analyzed by microtensile bond test, SEM/EDX and TEM. Biomaterials. 2004;25(25):5565–5574.
• 21. Pashley DH. Smear layer: overview of structure and function. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1992;88 Suppl 1:215–224.
• 22. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16(3):265–273.
• 23. Yamazaki PC, Bedran-Russo AK, Pereira PN. Importance of the hybrid layer on the bond strength of restorations subjected to cyclic loading. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;84(1):291–297.
• 24. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Endo K, Kaga M, Sano H, Oguchi H. The effect of hybrid layer thickness on bond strength: demineralized dentin zone of the hybrid layer. Dent Mater. 2000;16(6):406–411.
• 25. Takamizawa T, Imai A, Hirokane E, et al. SEM observation of novel characteristic of the dentin bond interfaces of universal adhesives. Dent Mater. 2019;35(12):1791–1804.
• 26. Saikaew P, Matsumoto M, Chowdhury A, Carvalho RM, Sano H. Does Shortened Application Time Affect Long-Term Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to Dentin?. Oper Dent. 2018;43(5):549–558. 27. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res. 2000;79(3):812–817.
• 28. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent. 2001;26(1):97–104.
• 29. Sai K, Shimamura Y, Takamizawa T, et al. Influence of degradation conditions on dentin bonding durability of three universal adhesives. J Dent. 2016;54:56–61.
• 30. Bacelar-Sá R, Giannini M, Ambrosano GMB, Bedran-Russo AK. Dentin Sealing and Bond Strength Evaluation of Hema-Free and Multi-Mode Adhesives to Biomodified Dentin. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(6):731–737.
• 31. Takahashi M, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Long-term evaluation of water sorption and ultimate tensile strength of HEMA-containing/-free one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent. 2011;39(7):506–512.
• 32. Yoshihara K, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Etching Efficacy of Self-Etching Functional Monomers. J Dent Res. 2018;97(9):1010–1016.
• 33. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, et al. Influence of water storage on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives. J Dent. 2015;43(12):1416–1427.
• 34. Sato K, Hosaka K, Takahashi M, et al. Dentin Bonding Durability of Two-step Self-etch Adhesives with Improved of Degree of Conversion of Adhesive Resins. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(1):31–37.