SOL VENTRİKÜL DESTEK CİHAZLARININ (LVAD) MALİYET ETKİLİLİĞİ: SİSTEMATİK BİR İNCELEME

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 13 - 27, 29.06.2024

Mustafa Zeybek , Vahit Yiğit

Abstract

Son dönem kalp yetmezliği, kalbin görevini tam olarak yerine getirememesi sonucu ortaya çıkan bir sendromdur. Vücuda yeterli kanın pompalanamaması nedeniyle çeşitli rahatsızlıklarda son dönem kalp yetmezliğine eşlik etmektedir. Son dönem kalp yetmezliğinin altın tedavisi kalp naklidir ancak yeterli donör bulunamaması nedeniyle LVAD tedavisi uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, LVAD tedavisinin ekonomik değerlendirmesini ortaya koyan araştırmaların sistematik taramasını gerçekleştirmektir. Sistematik tarama kapsamında 2000-2023 yılları arasını içerecek şekilde dört veri tabanı (PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, EBSCHO ve Ulakbim) taranmıştır. Tarama kapsamında 165 makale bulunmuş ve çeşitli dâhil etme ve dışlama kriterleri kapsamında 20 makale çalışmaya alınmıştır. Dâhil edilen makalelerin kaliteleri CHEERS puanı ile araştırmacılar tarafından değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmaların en çok 2012-2017 yılları arasında yapıldığı (%35), geri ödeyici perspektiften gerçekleştirildiği (%80) ve genellikle ömür boyu zaman dilimi (%70) alındığı görülmüştür. Çalışmalarda çoğunlukla %3 indirim oranı uygulanmış (%40) ve genellikle markov modeli (%75) kullanılmıştır. Sistematik tarama sonucunda Japonya’da yapılan çalışma haricinde LVAD hem hedef tedavi olarak hem de köprü tedavi olarak, ülkelerin maliyet etkililik eşiklerinin üzerinde bulunmuştur. LVAD’ın maliyet etkili olabilmesi için alış maliyetinin düşürülmesi önerilmektedir.

Keywords

Kalp Yetmezliği, Kalp Nakli, LVAD, Ekonomik Değerlendirme, Sistematik Tarama

COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE (LVAD): A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Abstract

End-stage heart failure is a syndrome that occurs when the heart is unable to fully perform its function. Due to the inability to pump enough blood to the body, various disorders accompany end-stage heart failure. The gold treatment for end-stage heart failure is heart transplantation, but LVAD treatment is applied due to the lack of sufficient donors. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of studies that reveal the economic evaluation of LVAD treatment. Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, EBSCHO and Ulakbim) were searched for the period 2000-2023. The search yielded 165 articles and 20 articles were included in the study based on various inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the included articles was evaluated by the researchers using the CHEERS score. It was observed that most of the articles were conducted between 2012-2017 (35%), were conducted from a reimbursement perspective (80%), and generally took a lifetime time frame (70%). The studies mostly applied a 3% discount rate (40%) and generally used the Markov model (75%). In the systematic review, LVAD was found to be above the cost-effectiveness thresholds of the countries, both as a target treatment and as a bridge treatment, with the exception of the Japanese study. For LVAD to be cost-effective, it is recommended to reduce the acquisition cost.

Keywords

Heart Failure, Heart Transplantation, LVAD, Economic Evaluation, Systematic Review

References

• Alba, A. C., Alba, L. F., Delgado, D. H., Rao, V., Ross, H. J., ve Goeree, R. (2013). Cost-effectiveness of ventricular assist device therapy as a bridge to transplantation compared with nonbridged cardiac recipients. Circulation, 127(24), 2424-2435.
• Alcaraz, A., Pichon-Riviere, A., Rojas-Roque, C., González, J. M., Prina, D., Solioz, G., Augustovski, F., ve Palacios, A. (2022). Cost-effectiveness of a centrifugal-flow pump for patients with advanced heart failure in Argentina. Plos one, 17(8), e0271519.
• Baras Shreibati, J., Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D., Banerjee, D., Owens, D. K., ve Hlatky, M. A. (2017). Cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices in ambulatory patients with advanced heart failure. JACC: Heart Failure, 5(2), 110-119.
• Chang, H. H., Chen, P. L., Chen, I. M., Kuo, T. T., Weng, Z. C., Huang, P. J., Wu, N. Y., ve Cheng, C. L. (2017). Cost‐utility analysis of direct ventricular assist device vs double bridges to heart transplantation in patients with refractory heart failure. Clinical Transplantation, 31(12), e13124.
• Chew, D. S., Manns, B., Miller, R. J., Sharma, N., ve Exner, D. V. (2017). Economic evaluation of left ventricular assist devices for patients with end stage heart failure who are ineligible for cardiac transplantation. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 33(10), 1283-1291.
• Clarke, A., Pulikottil-Jacob, R., Connock, M., Suri, G., Kandala, N. B., Maheswaran, H., Banner, N. R., ve Sutcliffe, P. (2014). Cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for patients with advanced heart failure: analysis of the British NHS bridge to transplant (BTT) program. International Journal of Cardiology, 171(3), 338-345.
• Clegg, A. J., Scott, D. A., Loveman, E., Colquitt, J. L., Royle, P., ve Bryant, J. (2006). Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to heart transplantation for people with end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation. European Heart Journal, 27(24), 2929-2938.
• Clegg, A. J., Scott, D. A., Loveman, E., Colquitt, J., Royle, P., ve Bryant, J. (2007). Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for people with end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 23(2), 261-268.
• Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., ve Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford University Press.
• Fontenay, S., Catarino, L., Snoussi, S., van den Brink, H., Pineau, J., Prognon, P., ve Martelli, N. (2020). Quality of economic evaluations of ventricular assist devices: A systematic review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 36(4), 380-387.
• Fukunaga, N., ve Rao, V. (2018). Left ventricular assist device as destination therapy for end stage heart failure: The right time for the right patients. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 33(2), 196-201.
• Hunt ,S. A., Baker, D. W., Chin, M. H., ve vd. (2001) ACC/AHA guidelinesfor the evaluation and management of heart failure in theadult; full text; a report of the American Collage of Cardi-ology/American Heart Association Task Force on PracticeGuidelines. http://www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/failu-re/hf--_index.htm
• Huserau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustowski, F., Briggs, A., Mauskopf, J., Loder, E., ve CHEERS Task Force, (2013). Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (cheers) statement. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 11 (1).
• Kepez, A., and Kabakçı, G. (2004). Kalp yetersizliği tedavisi. Acta Medica, 35(2), 69–81
• Lim, H. S., Shaw, S., Carter, A. W., Jayawardana, S., Mossialos, E., ve Mehra, M. R. (2022). A clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device for transplant-ineligible patients: a United Kingdom perspective. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 41(2), 174-186.
• Long, E. F., Swain, G. W., ve Mangi, A. A. (2014). Comparative survival and cost-effectiveness of advanced therapies for end-stage heart failure. Circulation: Heart Failure, 7(3), 470-478.
• Magnetta, D. A., Kang, J., Wearden, P. D., Smith, K. J., ve Feingold, B. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of ventricular assist device destination therapy for advanced heart failure in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Pediatric cardiology, 39, 1242-1248.
• Mehrez, A., ve Gafni, A. (1992). Preference based outcome measures for economic evaluation of drug interventions: quality adjusted life years (QALYs) versus healthy years equivalents (HYEs). Pharmacoeconomics, 1(5), 338-345.
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., Atkins, D., Barbour, V., Barrowman, N., Berlin, J. A., Clark, J., Clarke, M., Cook, D., D’Amico, R., Deeks, J. J., Devereaux, P. J., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Ernst, E., ve Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1000097
• Moreno, S. G., Novielli, N., ve Cooper, N. J. (2012). Cost-effectiveness of the implantable HeartMate II left ventricular assist device for patients awaiting heart transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 31(5), 450-458.
• Muennig, P., ve Bounthavong, M. (2016). Cost-effectiveness analysis in health: a practical approach. John Wiley and Sons.
• Neyt, M., Van den Bruel, A., Smit, Y., De Jonge, N., Erasmus, M., Van Dijk, D., ve Vlayen, J. (2013). Cost-effectiveness of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 29(3), 254-260.
• NICE. (2013). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/chapter/foreword.
• Nunes, A. J., MacArthur, R. G., Kim, D., Singh, G., Buchholz, H., Chatterley, P., ve Klarenbach, S. W. (2016). A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of long-term mechanical circulatory support. Value in Health, 19(4), 494-504.
• Pulikottil-Jacob, R., Suri, G., Connock, M., Kandala, N. B., Sutcliffe, P., Maheswaran, H., Banner, N. R., ve Clarke, A. (2014). Comparative cost-effectiveness of the HeartWare versus HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices used in the United Kingdom National Health Service bridge-to-transplant program for patients with heart failure. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 33(4), 350-358.
• Rogers, J. G., Bostic, R. R., Tong, K. B., Adamson, R., Russo, M., ve Slaughter, M. S. (2012). Cost-effectiveness analysis of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy. Circulation: Heart Failure, 5(1), 10-16.
• Rose, E. A., Gelijns, A. C., Moskowitz, A. J., Heitjan, D. F., Stevenson, L. W., Dembitsky, W., ... ve Meier, P. (2001). Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. New England Journal of Medicine, 345(20), 1435-1443.
• Rudmik, L., ve Drummond, M. (2013). Health economic evaluation: important principles and methodology. The Laryngoscope, 123(6), 1341-1347.
• Saygın Avşar, T., Yiğit, V., Yiğit, A., Arı, H., Tecirli, G., Dilmaç, E., and Huserau, D., (2023). Konsolide Sağlik Ekonomisi Değerlendirme Raporlama Standartları Türkçe: Sağlık Hizmetlerinin Ekonomik Değerlendirmesinde Raporlama Standartlarının Türkiye Uyarlaması. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 1-17.
• Schmier, J. K., Patel, J. D., Leonhard, M. J., ve Midha, P. A. (2019). A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of left ventricular assist devices: issues and challenges. Applied health economics and health policy, 17, 35-46.
• Schueler, S., Silvestry, S. C., Cotts, W. G., Slaughter, M. S., Levy, W. C., Cheng, R. K., Beckman, J. A., Villinger, J., Ismyrloglou, E., Tsintzos, S. I., ve Mahr, C. (2021). Cost‐effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy in the United Kingdom. ESC Heart Failure, 8(4), 3049-3057.
• Sharples, L. D., Dyer, M., Cafferty, F., Demiris, N., Freeman, C., Banner, N. R., Large, S. R., Tsui, S., Caine, N., ve Buxton, M. (2006). Cost-effectiveness of ventricular assist device use in the United Kingdom: results from the evaluation of ventricular assist device programme in the UK (EVAD-UK). The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 25(11), 1336-1343.
• Shiell, A., Donaldson, C., Mitton, C., ve Currie, G. (2002). Health economic evaluation. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(2), 85.
• Silvestry, S. C., Mahr, C., Slaughter, M. S., Levy, W. C., Cheng, R. K., May, D. M., Ismyrloglou, I., Tsintzos, S., Tuttle, E., Cook, K., Birk, E., Gomes, A., Graham, S., ve Cotts, W. G. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of a small intrapericardial centrifugal left ventricular assist device. Asaio Journal, 66(8), 862-870.
• Sloan, F. A., ve Hsieh, C. R. (2017). Health economics. Mit Press.
• Tadmouri, A., Blomkvist, J., Landais, C., Seymour, J., ve Azmoun, A. (2018). Cost‐effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices for patients with end‐stage heart failure: analysis of the French hospital discharge database. ESC Heart Failure, 5(1), 75-86.
• Takura, T., Kyo, S., Ono, M., Tominaga, R., Miyagawa, S., Tanoue, Y., ve Sawa, Y. (2016). Preliminary report on the cost effectiveness of ventricular assist devices. Journal of Artificial Organs, 19, 37-43.
• Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, vd. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2013;128:1810-52.