Geleneksel Yöntemlerle Geliştirilen Yıllık Planların ChatGPT ile İyileştirilmesi: Doktora Öğrencilerinin Deneyimleri

Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 56 - 122, 15.03.2025

Emine Aruğaslan , Hanife Çivril

https://doi.org/10.29250/sead.1567698

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, doktora öğrencilerinin geliştirdikleri yıllık planlarını iyileştirmek amacıyla kullandıkları yapay zekâ aracı olan ChatGPT'nin sağladığı katkıları ve bu süreçte ortaya çıkan avantajlar ile zorlukları değerlendirmektir. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden durum çalışması kullanılmış ve çalışma 13 doktora öğrencisi ile yürütülmüştür. Veriler içerik analizi ile analiz edilmiş ve analiz sonucundan elde edilen temalar öğrenci alıntılarıyla detaylandırılarak açıklanmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda ChatGPT'nin yıllık plan iyileştirmesine katkıları, eğitimde avantaj ve dezavantajları ile kullanım engelleri başlıklarında temalar belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca öğrencilerin ChatGPT'ye karşı bakış açıları da incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, öğrencilerin ChatGPT kullanımına yönelik bakış açıları genel olarak olumlu olduğu görülmüştür. Ancak bazı öğrenciler temkinli ve eleştirel yaklaşımlar sergilemiş, yapay zekâ kullanımına yönelik endişelerini dile getirmişlerdir. Bunun yanı sıra ChatGPT’nin eğitimde kullanımı, eksikliklerin giderilmesi, yeni fikirlerin üretilmesi, ders kazanımlarının netleştirilmesi ve zaman tasarrufu sağlama gibi avantajlar sunarken; öğretmen-öğrenci etkileşiminin azalması, objektiflik sorunları ve eleştirel düşünme becerilerini köreltmesi gibi dezavantajları da ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca, erişim sınırlamaları, dil bariyeri ve teknik altyapı sorunları gibi engellerin bu teknolojinin etkili kullanımını kısıtladığı görülmüştür.

Keywords

Yapay zekâ, Yapay zekâ araçları, ChatGPT, Yıllık plan geliştirme, Doktora öğrenci deneyimleri

Ethical Statement

ÇIKAR ÇATIŞMASI BEYANI Yazarlar bu çalışmalarında herhangi bir şekilde çıkar çatışması olmadığını beyan ederler. ARAŞTIRMA VE YAYIN ETİĞİ BEYANI Yazarlar bu çalışmalarında araştırma ve yayın etiğine uyulduğunu beyan ederler. Araştırma için Isparta Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulundan (07.06.2024 tarih ve 196/06 Karar numaralı) etik kurul izni alınmıştır. YAZAR SORUMLULUK BEYANI Yazarlar bu çalışmanın tüm süreçlerine eşit derecede katkı sağladığını beyan eder.

Improving Annual Plans Developed through Traditional Methods with ChatGPT: The Experiences of Doctoral Students

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the contributions of the AI tool, ChatGPT, used by doctoral students to improve their annual plans, and to examine the advantages and challenges that arise throughout the process. The research was conducted using a qualitative case study approach and carried out with 13 doctoral students. The data were analyzed by content analysis, the themes obtained from the analysis result were explained in detail using student quotes. The study identified themes related to ChatGPT's contributions to annual plan improvement, its advantages and disadvantages in education, and the barriers to its usage. Additionally, students' perspectives on ChatGPT were examined. The findings reveal that students generally have a positive outlook on using ChatGPT although some students expressed cautious and critical attitudes, voicing concerns about AI usage. While ChatGPT offers advantages such as addressing shortcomings, generating new ideas, clarifying learning outcomes, and saving time, it also presents disadvantages, including a reduction in teacher-student interaction, issues with objectivity, and the potential stifling of critical thinking skills. Furthermore, challenges such as access limitations, language barriers, and technical infrastructure issues were found to restrict the effective use of this technology.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, Artificial intelligence tools, ChatGPT, Annual plan development, Doctoral student experiences

Ethical Statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this study. RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION ETHICS STATEMENT The authors declare that research and publication ethics are followed in this study. The necessary permission to conduct the study was obtained from Social and Human Sciences Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Isparta University of Applied Sciences (07.06.2024-196/06) AUTHOR LIABILITY STATEMENT The authors declared that they assumed equal responsibility at all stages of the research.

References

• Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2023). The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858
• Adisaturrahimi, A., & Marlia, S. R. I. (2024). Metacognitive atrategies used in comprehending reading academic texts for doctoral students. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(4), 2025-2029. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V7-i4-05
• Albadarin, Y., Saqr, M., Pope, N., & Tukiainen, M. (2024). A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education. Discover Education, 3(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00138-2
• Ausat, A. M. A., Massang, B., Efendi, M., Nofirman, N., & Riady, Y. (2023). Can chat GPT replace the role of the teacher in the classroom: A fundamental analysis. Journal on Education, 5(4), 16100-16106. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2745
• Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
• Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). ChatGPT in the higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 127(2024), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411
• Barrot, J. S. (2024). ChatGPT as a language learning tool: An emerging technology report. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(2), 1151-1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09711-4
• Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., ... & Liang, P. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258. Erişim adresi: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.07258
• Broutın, M. S. T. (2024). Exploring Mathematics Teacher Candidates' Instrumentation Process of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Developing Lesson Plans. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 14(1), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.53478/yuksekogretim.1347061
• Cengiz, B., Çal, A., Açıl, D., Bahar, Z., & Beşer, A. (2019). Sağlık bilimlerinde eğitim alan doktora öğrencilerinin problem çözme becerileri. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(4), 696-701. https://doi.org/10.31067/0.2018.77
• Deng, J., & Lin, Y. (2022). The benefits and challenges of ChatGPT: An overview. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2(2), 81-83. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465
• Dhara, S., Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Goswami, A., & Ghosh, S. K. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Assessment of Students' Performance. Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education içinde (s. 153-167). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
• Eke, D. O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?. Journal of Responsible Technology, 13(2023), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060
• Eli-Chukwu, N. C. (2019). Applications of artificial intelligence in agriculture: A review. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 9(4), 4377-4383. Erişim adresi: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6e08/7108aa8048da8cfc82cdecb7071a55bab488.pdf
• Glaser, N. (2023). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as an educational technology: An emerging technology report. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(4), 1945-1952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09684-4
• Gupta, P., Raturi, S., & Venkateswarlu, P. (2023). Chatgpt for designing course outlines: A boon or bane to modern technology. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4386113
• Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Khan, I. H. (2019). Current status and applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical field: An overview. Current Medicine Research and Practice, 9(6), 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmrp.2019.11.005
• Hong, W. C. H. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learning: Opportunities in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 5(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.61414/jeti.v5i1.103
• Hsu, H. P., Mak, J., Werner, J., White-Taylor, J., Geiselhofer, M., Gorman, A., & Capurro, C. T. (2024). Preliminary Study on pre-service teachers’ applications and perceptions of generative artificial intelligence for lesson planning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 32(3), 409-437. Erişim adresi: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/224413/
• Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112-131. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/48707971
• İşman, A., & Eskicumalı, A. (2003). Eğitimde planlama ve değerlendirme. İstanbul: Değişim Yayınları.
• Kabak, T., & Kırbaş, İ. (2023). Chatgpt With Risks And Opportunities. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(2), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.29048/makufebed.1271477
• Kanık, M. (2024). The use of ChatGPT in assessment. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 11(3), 608-621. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1379647
• Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business horizons, 62(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
• Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103(102274), 1-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
• Kavak, V. İ., Evis, D., & Ekinci, A. (2024). The Use of ChatGPT in Language Education. Experimental and Applied Medical Science, 5(2), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.46871/eams.1461578
• Koni, I., & Krull, E. (2018). Differences in novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions of planning activities in terms of primary instructional tasks. Teacher Development, 22(4), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2018.1442876
• Korkmaz, İ., & Akbaşlı S. (2004). Göreve Yeni Başlayan Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Karşılaştıkları Güçlükler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 38(38), 266-277. Erişim Adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kuey/issue/10359/126826
• Li, Y. (2019). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Creative Digital Content Production. Journal of Digital Art Engineering and Multimedia, 6(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.29056/jdaem.2019.12.05
• Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publication.
• Moqbel, M. S. S., & Al-Kadi, A. M. T. (2023). Foreign language learning assessment in the age of ChatGPT: A theoretical account. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.62
• Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. FinTech and artificial intelligence for sustainable development: The role of smart technologies in achieving development goals içinde (s. 387-409). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37776-1_17
• Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers, 12(8), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153
• Nti, I. K., Adekoya, A. F., Weyori, B. A., & Nyarko-Boateng, O. (2022). Applications of artificial intelligence in engineering and manufacturing: a systematic review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 33(6), 1581-1601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01771-6
• Nunez Lira, L. A., Soria Perez, Y. F., Collanque Pinto, J. D., & Rivera-Lozada, O. (2020). Development of Critical Thinking in Doctoral Students in Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(9), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n9p71
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2001). Critical thinking skills: A comparison of doctoral-and master's-level students. College Student Journal, 35(3), 477-481.
• OpenAI, (2023). GPT-4. Erişim Tarihi: 8.10.2024. Erişim Adresi: https://openai.com/index/gpt-4-research/
• Pallathadka, H., Ramirez-Asis, E. H., Loli-Poma, T. P., Kaliyaperumal, K., Ventayen, R. J. M., & Naved, M. (2023). Applications of artificial intelligence in business management, e-commerce and finance. Materials Today: Proceedings, 80(2023), 2610-2613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.419
• Panigrahi, C. M. A. (2020). Use of artificial intelligence in education. Management Accountant, 55(5), 64-67. Erişim adresi: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3606936
• Pender, H. L., Bohl, L., Schönberger, M., & Knopf, J. (2022, May). An AI-based lesson planning software to support competence-based learning. 8th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'22) içinde (s. 1033-1041). Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/HEAd22.2022.14599
• Rahman, M. S., Sabbir, M. M. ., Zhang, D. J., Moral, I. H., & Hossain, G. M. S. . (2023). Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT: Does trust matter?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8956
• Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3(2023), 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
• Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of applied learning and teaching, 6(1), 342-363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
• Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 110-121. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4378735
• Yıldırım, A., & Gündoğdu, K. (2004). Teachers’ Perceptions of Long Term Instructional Plans. Educaiton and Science, 29(133), 11-19. Erişim adresi: https://eb.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/5057
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin.
• Yu, H. (2024). The Application and challenges of ChatGPT in educational transformation: New demands for teachers’ roles. Heliyon, 10(2024), e24289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24289
• Zileli, E. N. (2023). Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğreniminde ChatGPT Örneği. Uluslararası Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.47770/ukmead.1296013