Comparison of different universal adhesives’ bond strength to laser-assisted bleached enamel

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 30 - 37, 01.04.2019

Fatma Dilsad Oz , Ayşe Rüya Yazıcı , Cansu Atalay

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.419367

Abstract

Objective:
The aim
of this in vitro study was to
evaluate the bond strength of several universal adhesives used in different
application modes to laser-assisted bleached enamel.

Materials
and Methods: Freshly
extracted 72 sound bovine incisors were used for the study. The teeth were
bleached with 38% of hydrogen peroxide gel that was activated with a diode
laser (Epic). The diode laser
with a 949nm wavelength was used at 7 W in continuous mode for 30 s. After
bleaching procedure, the teeth were kept in artificial saliva for 2 weeks. The bleached teeth were randomly assigned into three groups according to
different universal adhesive systems (n=24); Single Bond Universal-SU,
All-Bond Universal-ABU and Adhese Universal-ADU. All
adhesives were applied in two modes: a- etch&rinse (ER); and b- self etch
(SE). A cylinder-shaped resin composite was placed on treated surfaces and
cured. After storage of specimen in distilled water for 24 h, they were
subjected to shear bond strength test. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA
followed by Bonferroni test (α = 0.05)

Results: The
highest mean shear bond strength values were obtained in Single
Bond Universal group used in self-etch mode (p<0.05). No difference was
observed between All-Bond Universal and Adhese Universal. In etch&rinse
application mode, Adhese Universal resulted in significantly lower bond
strength values (p<0.05) than Single Bond Universal and All-Bond Universal. For all groups, etch&rinse application mode caused significantly
higher bond strength values.

Conclusion: The
bonding performance of tested universal adhesives was enhanced with the
etch&rinse mode application  to diode
laser- assisted bleached enamel. 

Key Words: Diode
laser, universal adhesives, bleaching

Keywords

Diode laser, universal adhesives, bleaching

Farklı üniversal adezivlerin lazerle beyazlatılmış mineye bağlanma dayanıklılıklarının karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Amaç: Bu in
vitro çalışmanın amacı farklı universal adezivlerin kesme-bağlanma
dayanıklılıklarının  farklı uygulama
şekillerinde, lazerle beyazlatma sonrası değerlendirilmesidir.

Gereç ve
Yöntem: Bu çalışmada yeni çekilmiş 72 kesici sığır dişi kullanılmıştır. Dişler,
diyot lazerle (Epic) aktive edilen %38'lik hidrojen peroksit jel
beyazlatılmıştır. Diyot lazer   949 nm
dalga boyu ve 7 W'lık devamlı modda 30 saniye kullanılmıştır. Beyazlatma
sonrası, dişler yapay tükürükte 2 hafta bekletilmiştir. Beyazlatılmış dişler,
farklı universal adeziv sistemlere göre rastgele 3 gruba ayrılmıştır (n=24): Single Bond
Universal-SU, All-Bond Universal-ABU ve Adhese Universal-ADU. Tüm adezivler 2
modda uygulanmıştır: a- etch&rinse (ER); ve b- self etch (SE). Silindir
şekilli kompozit rezin beyazlatma uygulanmış yüzeylere yerleştirilmiş ve ışıkla
polimerize edilmiştir. Örnekler 24 saat distile suda bekletildikten sonra kesme
bağlanma dayanıklılığı testine maruz bırakılmıştır. Veriler 2 yönlü ANOVA ve
Bonferroni testi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir(α
= 0.05).

Bulgular: Self-etch modda en yüksek kesme bağlanma dayanıklılığı
değerleri Single
Bond Universal grubunda görülmüştür (p<0.05). All-Bond Universal ve Adhese
Universal gruplarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark görülmemiştir.
Etch&rinse uygulama modunda Adhese Universal, anlamlı bir şekilde Single
Bond Universal ve All-Bond Universal'den daha düşük kesme bağlanma
dayanıklılığı değerleri göstermiştir (p<0.05). Tüm gruplarda etch&rinse
uygulama modu anlamlı bir şekilde daha yüksek 
kesme bağlanma dayanıklılığı değerleri göstermiştir.

Sonuçlar: Universal
adezivlerin bağlanma dayanıklılıkları, diyot lazerle beyazlatma sonrası
etch&rinse uygulama şeklinde  daha
yüksek değerler göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Diyot lazer,
universal adezivler, beyazlatma

Keywords

Diyot lazer, universal adezivler, beyazlatma

References

• References1. de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Kossatz S, Loguercio AD, Reis A. At-home vs in-office bleaching: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent 2016;41:341-56.
• 2. Calderini A, Sciara S, Semeria C, Pantaleo G, Polizzi E. Comparative clinical and psychosocial benefits of tooth bleaching: different light activation of a 38% peroxide gel in a preliminary case-control study. Clin Case Rep 2016;4:728-35.
• 3. Gurgan S, Cakir FY, Yazici E. Different light-activated in-office bleaching systems: a clinical evaluation. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25:817-22.
• 4. Wetter NU, Barroso MC, Pelino JE. Dental bleaching efficacy with diode laser and LED irradiation: an in vitro study. Lasers Surg Med 2004;35:254-8.
• 5. Buchalla W, Attin T. External bleaching therapy with activation by heat, light or laser--a systematic review. Dent Mater 2007;23:586-96.
• 6. Strobl A, Gutknecht N, Franzen R, Hilgers RD, Lampert F, Meister J. Laser-assisted in-office bleaching using a neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser: an in vivo study. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25:503-9.
• 7. Dostalova T, Jelinkova H, Housova D, Sulc J, Nemec M, Miyagi M, et al. Diode laser-activated bleaching. Braz Dent J 2004;15:3-8.
• 8. Foong J, Lee K, Nguyen C, Tang G, Austin D, Ch'ng C, et al. Comparison of microshear bond strengths of four self-etching bonding systems to enamel using two test methods. Aust Dent J 2006;51:252-7.
• 9. Yadav D, Golchha V, Paul R, Sharma P, Wadhwa J, Taneja S. Effect of tooth bleaching on orthodontic stainless steel bracket bond strength. J Orthod Sci 2015;4:72-6.
• 10. Yavuz T, Ozyilmaz OY, Ozturk AN, Aykent F. Bond strength of resin composite to light activated bleached enamel. Niger J Clin Pract 2016;19:766-71.
• 11. Mirhashemi A, Emadian Razavi ES, Behboodi S, Chiniforush N. Effect of laser-assisted bleaching with Nd:YAG and diode lasers on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Lasers Med Sci 2015;30:2245-9.
• 12. Hajizadeh H, Nemati-Karimooy A, Nasseh A, Rahmanpour N. Evaluating the shear bond strength of enamel and dentin with or without etching: A comparative study between dimethacrylate-based and silorane-based adhesives. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7:563-8.
• 13. Juloski J, Goracci C, Rengo C, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Vulicevic ZR, et al. Enamel and dentin bond strength of new simplified adhesive materials with and without preliminary phosphoric acid-etching. Am J Dent 2012;25:239-43.
• 14. Silva e Souza MH, Jr., Carneiro KG, Lobato MF, Silva e Souza Pde A, de Goes MF. Adhesive systems: important aspects related to their composition and clinical use. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:207-14.
• 15. Peumans Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-81.
• 16. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Wilwerding TM, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Interfacial characteristics and bond durability of universal adhesive to various substrates. Oper Dent 2017;42:59-70.
• 17. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles? J Dent 2015;43:525-36.
• 18. Imai A, Takamizawa T, Sai K, Tsujimoto A, Nojiri K, Endo H, et al. Influence of application method on surface free-energy and bond strength of universal adhesive systems to enamel. Eur J Oral Sci 2017;125:385-95.
• 19. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa M, Cadenaro M, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent 2014;42:603-12.
• 20. Suzuki S, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Tsujimoto A, Sai K, Takimoto M, et al. Bond durability of universal adhesive to bovine enamel using self-etch mode. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:1113-22.
• 21. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014;42:800-807.
• 22. Can-Karabulut DC, Karabulut B. Influence of activated bleaching on various adhesive restorative systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23:399-408.
• 23. Gurgan S, Alpaslan T, Kiremitci A, Cakir FY, Yazici E, Gorucu J. Effect of different adhesive systems and laser treatment on the shear bond strength of bleached enamel. J Dent 2009;37:527-34.
• 24. Anil M, Ponnappa KC, Nitin M, Ramesh S, Sharanappa K, Nishant A. Effect of 10% Sodium ascorbate on shear bond strength of bleached teeth - An in-vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:31-3.
• 25. Oskoee SS, Bahari M, Kimyai S, Navimipour EJ, Firouzmandi M. Shear bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems with different pH values to bleached and/or CPP-ACP-treated enamel. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:447-52.
• 26. McLean DE, Meyers EJ, Guillory VL, Vandewalle KS. Enamel bond strength of new universal adhesive bonding agents. Oper Dent 2015;40:410-7.
• 27. Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent 2015;40:282-92.
• 28. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 2000;79:709-14.
• 29. Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Erickson RL, et al. Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2016;41:520-30.
• 30. Vermelho PM, Reis AF, Ambrosano GMB, Giannini M. Adhesion of multimode adhesives to enamel and dentin after one year of water storage. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1707-15.
• 31. Ouchi H, Tsujimoto A, Nojiri K, Hirai K, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, et al. Effect of oxygen inhibition Layer of universal adhesives on enamel bond fatigue durability and interfacial characteristics with different etching modes. Oper Dent 2017;42:636-45.
• 32. Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012;25:153-8.
• 33. Diniz AC, Bandeca MC, Pinheiro LM, Dos Santosh Almeida LJ, Jr., Torres CR, Borges AH, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength to enamel using universal adhesive systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17:820-5.
• 34. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL, Kimmes NS, Latta MA, Wilwerding TM. Effect of enamel etching time on roughness and bond strength. Oper Dent 2009;34:217-22.
• 35. Moura SK, Pelizzaro A, Dal Bianco K, de Goes MF, Loguercio AD, Reis A, et al. Does the acidity of self-etching primers affect bond strength and surface morphology of enamel? J Adhes Dent 2006;8:75-83.
• 36. Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013;41:404-11.
• 37. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Tsuchiya K, Erickson RL, et al. Influence of pre-etching times on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel. J Adhes Dent 2016;18:501-11.
• 38. Tsujimoto A, Fischer N, Barkmeier W, Baruth A, Takamizawa T, Latta M, et al. Effect of reduced phosphoric acid pre-etching times on enamel surface characteristics and shear fatigue strength using universal adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2017;19:267-75.
• 39. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1459-67.
• 40. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Kimmes NS. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre-etched enamel. Dent Mater 2009;25:1187-94.
• 41. de Goes MF, Shinohara MS, Freitas MS. Performance of a new one-step multi-mode adhesive on etched vs non-etched enamel on bond strength and interfacial morphology. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:243-50.
• 42. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-84.
• 43. Fornaini C, Lagori G, Merigo E, Meleti M, Manfredi M, Guidotti R, et al. Analysis of shade, temperature and hydrogen peroxide concentration during dental bleaching: in vitro study with the KTP and diode lasers. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28:1-6.
• 44. Anaraki SN, Shahabi S, Chiniforush N, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Assadian H, Yousefi B. Evaluation of the effects of conventional versus laser bleaching techniques on enamel microroughness. Lasers Med Sci 2015;30:1013-8.
• 45. Polydorou O, Hellwig E, Hahn P. The efficacy of three different in-office bleaching systems and their effect on enamel microhardness. Oper Dent 2008;33:579-86.
• 46. Can-Karabulut DC, Karabulut B. Shear bond strength to enamel after power bleaching activated by different sources. Eur J Esthet Dent 2010;5:382-96.
• 47. Gorucu-Coskuner H, Yazici AR, Gorucu J, Usumez A, Kara O. The effect of different in-office bleaching techniques and etching procedures on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. J Adhes Sci Tech 2016;31: 1691-9.
• 48. Coluzzi DJ. Fundamentals of dental lasers: science and instruments. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:751-70.
• 49. Swift EJ Jr. Critical appraisal. Reversal of compromised bonding after bleaching. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:357-61.