İki farklı laterognati vakasında sabit ortodontik tedaviyle birlikte tek çene cerrahi yaklaşımı: Vaka raporu

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 379 - 390, 17.12.2019

Ahmet Ertan Soğancı , Alparslan Esen , Bekir Lale , Doğan Dolanmaz

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.519004

Abstract

Amaç: Bu vaka raporunun amacı; iki
farklı laterognati vakasının, sabit ortodontik tedavi ve sadece alt çeneyi
içeren cerrahi yaklaşım sonrası meydana gelen değişimlerini sunmaktır.

OLGU 1: 20 yaş 2 aylık kadın hasta alt çenesindeki asimetri
sebebiyle kliniğimize başvurmuştur. Yapılan ağız dışı fasiyal cephe değerlendirmesinde
alt çene ucunun yaklaşık 4 mm kadar sola deviye olduğu laterognati görüntüsü
mevcuttu. Hastada underjet ve sol bölgede posterior çapraz kapanış
mevcuttu.
OLGU 2: 20 yaş 3 aylık kadın hasta alt
çenesindeki asimetri sebebiyle kliniğimize başvurmuştur. Yapılan ağız dışı
fasiyal cephe değerlendirmesinde alt çene ucunun 6 mm sağa deviye olduğu laterognati
görüntüsü mevcuttu. Sağ bölgede posterior çapraz kapanış mevcuttu.

Sonuçlar: Tedavi edilen iki farklı laterognati olgusunda; sabit
ortodontik tedaviyle birlikte sadece alt çeneye uygulanan cerrahi yaklaşım;
ciddi asimetriye sahip hastaların fasiyal ve dental laterognati anomalisinin
düzeltilmesini gerçekleştirerek, tatmin edici sonuçlar alınmasını sağlamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Fasiyal Asimetri, Ortodonti,
Ortognatik Cerrahi

Keywords

Fasiyal Asimetri, Ortodonti, Ortognatik

References

• 1. Pirttiniemi PM. Associations of mandibular and facial asymmetries—a review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1994;106:191-200.2. Maheshwari S, Verma SK, Gaur A, Dhiman S. Diagnosis and management of facial asymmetries. Journal of Orthodontic Research 2015;3:81.3. Rajpara Y, Shyagali TR. An assessment of sexual dimorphism in relation to facial asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Acta Informatica Medica 2015;23:44. 164. 19. Troy BA, Shanker S, Fields HW, Vig K, Johnston W. Comparison of incisor inclination in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2009;135:146. e141-146. e149. 20. Capelozza LF, Martins A, Mazzotini R. Effects of dental decompensation on the surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery 1996;11:165-180. 21. Wermker K, Kleinheinz J, Jung S, Dirksen D. Soft tissue response and facial symmetry after orthognathic surgery. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 2014;42:e339-e345. 22. Lauritzen C, Munro IR, Ross RB. Classification and treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery 1985;19:33-39. 23. Pachêco-Pereira C, Abreu LG, Dick BD, De Luca Canto G, Paiva SM, Flores-Mir C. Patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery: A systematic review. The Angle Orthodontist 2016;86:495-508. 24. Lazaridou-Terzoudi T, Kiyak HA, Moore R, Athanasiou AE, Melsen B. Long-term assessment of psychologic outcomes of orthognathic surgery. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2003;61:545-552. 4. Sisman Y, Uysal T, Gelgor IE. Hypodontia. Does the prevalence and distribution pattern differ in orthodontic patients? European journal of dentistry 2007;1:167. 5. Şenışıkα NE, Tunçayα SÖ, Fındık Y, Aydınγ A, Baykulβ T. Fasiyal asimetrinin ortodontik-cerrahi tedavisi: Vaka raporu. 6. dos Santos J, Ash MM, Warshawsky P. Learning to reproduce a consistent functional jaw movement. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1991;65:294-302. 7. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. The Angle Orthodontist 1991;61:43-48. 8. Reyneke J, Tsakiris P, Kienle F. A simple classification for surgical treatment planning of maxillomandibular asymmetry. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1997;35:349-351. 9. Cheong Y-W, Lo L-J. Facial asymmetry: etiology, evaluation, and management. Chang Gung Med J 2011;34:341-351. 10. Vargervik K, Ousterhout DK, Farias M. Factors affecting long-term results in hemifacial microsomia. The Cleft palate journal 1986;23:53-68. 11. Melsen B, Bjerregaard J, Bundgaard M. The effect of treatment with functional appliance on a pathologic growth pattern of the condyle. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1986;90:503-512. 12. Vig PS, Orth D, Vig KW. Hybrid appliances: a component approach to dentofacial orthopedics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1986;90:273-285. 13. Tseng Y-C, Yang Y-H, Pan C-Y, Chou S-T, Ou K-C, Chang H-P. Treatment of adult facial asymmetry with orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery: Receiver operating characteristic analysis. Journal of Dental Sciences 2014;9:235-243. 14. Tai K, Park JH, Ikeda K, Nishiyama A, Sato Y. Severe facial asymmetry and unilateral lingual crossbite treated with orthodontics and 2-jaw surgery: 5-year follow-up. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2012;142:509-523. 15. Severt T, Proffit W. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery 1997;12:171-176. 16. Haraguchi S, Takada K, Yasuda Y. Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity. The Angle Orthodontist 2002;72:28-35. 17. Epker B. Modifications in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Surg 1977;35:157-159. 18. Weaver N, Glover K, Major P, Varnhagen C, Grace M. Age limitation on provision of orthopedic therapy and orthognathic surgery. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 1998;113:156-