Rotasyon ve resiprokasyon hareketi ile çalışan farklı eğe sisteminin apikal transportasyon ve kanal düzleşmesine etkisinin karşılaştırılması

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 402 - 408, 24.08.2022

Ali Türkyılmaz , Deniz Erdoğan , Gözde Akbal Dinçer , Ali Erdemir

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.887570

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma, farklı apikal çaplara sahip ProTaper Next, HyFlex Electric Discharge Machining, Reciproc ve Reciproc Blue nikel-titanyum (NiTi) eğelerin apikal transportasyonu ve kanal düzleştirmesini karşılaştırmayı amaçlamıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kırk sekiz mandibular molar insan dişi çalışmaya dahil edildi. Dişler NiTi eğe tiplerine göre (n = 12) dört gruba ayrıldı. Image J yazılımı ile üst üste çakıştırılmış ilk ve son radyografik görüntüler kullanarak bukkolingual ve meziodistal yönlerde apikal transportasyonu ve kanal düzleştirmeyi karşılaştırmak için dijital radyografik yöntem kullanıldı. Analizlerde Bonferroni düzeltmeli Kruskal-Wallis testi ve Wilcoxon testi kullanıldı; P değeri %5 olarak belirlendi. Bulgular: Hem apikal transportasyon hem de kanal düzeltme için eğeler arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli farklılıklar bulundu. Eğe çapının #40'a çıkarılması apikal transportasyon ve kanal düzleşmesini arttırdı (P <0.05). Sonuç: ProTaper Next, HyFlex Electric Discharge Machining ve Reciproc Blue eğeleri benzer sonuçlar verdi. Daha büyük bir enstrüman kullanmak apikal transportasyonu ve kanal düzleşmesini arttırdı.

Keywords

Apikal transportasyon, Hyflex EDM, kanal düzleşmesi, Reciproc Blue, ProTaper Next

Comparison of Apical Transportation and Canal Straightening Between Protaper Next, Hyflex, Reciproc and Reciproc Blue Instruments

Abstract

Background: The effective bonding of fiber posts which are recommended in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth with excessive coronal damage is of critical importance for the long-term success. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of various irrigation activation protocols on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts in different parts of the post space.
Methods: Forty-eight endodontically treated mandibular first premolar teeth were divided into 4 groups according to irrigation protocol (n=12): passive irrigation(PI); manual-dynamic irrigation(MDI); sonic irrigation(SI), ultrasonic irrigation(UI). Fiber posts were bonded with a self-adhesive resin cement. Three transvers sections, were obtained from the coronal, middle, and apical regions of the root, in 2 mm thich each. Push-out bond strength in each section was calculated in MPa using a universal-testing machine. Each sample was examined under a stereomicroscope and failure types were classified as follows: adhesive failure between cement and dentin-Adhesive(C/D); adhesive failure between cement and fiber post-Adhesive(C/F); the combination of both adhesive failure types-mix.
Results: The lowest bond strength was obtained for PI group (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the other groups (p>0.05). Coronal region showed higher bond strength than the apical region regardless of test group (p<0.05). While mixed failure was observed dominantly in the MDI, SI and UI groups, PI was the group that showed the adhesive(C/D) failure type in most.
Conclusion: After preparing the post space, the use of any of the manual-dynamic, sonic or ultrasonic irrigation activation methods increases the bond strength of fiber posts to root canal dentin compared to passive irrigation. Regardless of the irrigation method applied, the bond strength of the fiber post to the root canal was higher in the coronal region compared to the apical region.

Keywords

Bond Strength, Fiber Post, İrrigation Activation, Push-Out Test

References

• 1. Kell, T., Azarpazhooh, A., Peters, O. A., El-Mowafy, O., Tompson, B., Basrani, B. Torsional profiles of new and used 20/. 06 GT series X and GT rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 2009; 35: 1278-81.
• 2. Alrahabi, M., Comparative study of root-canal shaping with stainless steel and rotary NiTi files performed by preclinical dental students. Technol Health Care 2015; 23: 257-65.
• 3. Tan BT, Messer HH. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size. J Endod 2002; 28: 658–64.
• 4. Shuping GB, Ørstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel–titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. J Endod 2000; 26: 751–5.
• 5. Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals: part I—effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod 2000; 26: 210–6
• 6. Paleker, F. and P.J. van der Vyver. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of K-files, ProGlider File, and G-Files: a micro-computed tomography study of curved root canals. J Endod 2016; 42: 1105-9.
• 7. Alapati, S.B., Brantley, W. A., Iijima, M., et al. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 2009; 35: 1589-93.
• 8. Zhou, H., Peng, B., Zheng, Y. F. An overview of the mechanical properties of nickel–titanium endodontic instruments. Endod Topics 2013; 29: 42-54.
• 9. Gutmann, J., Gao, Y. Alteration in the inherent metallic and surface properties of nickel–titanium root canal instruments to enhance performance, durability and safety: a focused review. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 113-28.
• 10. Zhao, D., Shen, Y., Peng, B., Haapasalo, M. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary first molars with Hyflex CM, Twisted Files, and K3 instruments. J Endod, 2013; 39: 385-8.
• 11. Plotino, G., Ahmed, H. M. A., Grande, N. M., Cohen, S., Bukiet, F. Current assessment of reciprocation in endodontic preparation: a comprehensive review—part II: properties and effectiveness. J Endod 2015; 41: 1939-50.
• 12. De-Deus, G., Silva, E. J. N. L., Vieira, V. T. L., et al. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files. J Endod 2017; 43(3); 462-6.
• 13. Schneider, S.W. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32: 271-5. 14. Estrela, C., Bueno, M. R., Sousa-Neto, M. D., Pécora, J. D. Method for determination of root curvature radius using cone-beam computed tomography images. Braz Dent J 2008; 19: 114-8.
• 15. de Oliveira, D.J.F., Leoni, G. B., da Silva Goulart, R., de Sousa-Neto, M. D., Sousa, Y. T. C. S., Silva, R. G. Changes in Geometry and Transportation of Root Canals with Severe Curvature Prepared by Different Heat-treated Nickel-titanium Instruments: A Micro–computed Tomographic Study. J Endod 2019; 45: 768-73.
• 16. Nair, P. N. R. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 249-281. 17. Siqueira Jr, J.F., Lima, K. C., Magalhães, F. A., Lopes, H. P., de Uzeda, M. Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal by three instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1999; 25: 332-5.
• 18. Card, S.J., Sigurdsson, A., Ørstavik, D., Trope, M. The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria. J Endod 2002; 28: 779-83.
• 19. Ram, Z. Effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977; 44 :306-12.
• 20. Schäfer, E., Dammaschke, T. Development and sequelae of canal transportation. Endod Topics 2006; 15: 75-90.
• 21. Swain, M.V., Xue, J. State of the art of Micro-CT applications in dental research. Int J Oral Sci 2009; 1: 177-88.
• 22. Anderson, P., Yong, R., Surman, T. L., Rajion, Z. A., Ranjitkar, S. Application of three‐dimensional computed tomography in craniofacial clinical practice and research. Aust Dental J 2014; 59 (s1): 174-85.
• 23. Domark, J.D., Hatton, J. F., Benison, R. P., Hildebolt, C. F. An ex vivo comparison of digital radiography and cone-beam and micro computed tomography in the detection of the number of canals in the mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars. J Endod 2013; 39: 901-5.
• 24. Celik, D., T. Tasdemir, K. Er. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. J Endod 2013; 39: 278-82.
• 25. Ounsi, H.F., Franciosi, G., Paragliola, R., et al. Comparison of two techniques for assessing the shaping efficacy of repeatedly used nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2011; 37: 847-50.
• 26. Vallaeys, K., Chevalier, V., Arbab-Chirani, R. Comparative analysis of canal transportation and centring ability of three Ni-Ti rotary endodontic systems: Protaper(R), MTwo(R) and Revo-S, assessed by micro-computed tomography. Odontology 2016; 104: 83-8.
• 27. McSpadden, J.T. Mastering endodontic instrumentation. Cloudland Institute 2007; 51-52.
• 28. Saber, S. E. D. M., Nagy, M. M., & Schäfer, E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaC e and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2015; 48(2), 131-136.
• 29. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijma M et al. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 2009; 35, 1589– 93.
• 30 Saber, S. E. D. M., Nagy, M. M., & Schäfer, E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaC e and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2015; 48: 131-136.
• 31. Zanesco, C., Só, M. V. R., Schmidt, S., Fontanella, V. R. C., Grazziotin-Soares, R., Barletta, F. B. Apical Transportation, Centering Ratio, and Volume Increase after Manual, Rotary, and Reciprocating Instrumentation in Curved Root Canals: Analysis by Micro-computed Tomographic and Digital Subtraction Radiography. J Endod 2017; 43: 486-90.
• 32. Venino, P.M., Citterio, C. L., Pellegatta, A., Ciccarelli, M., Maddalone, M. A micro–computed tomography evaluation of the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium instruments, HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next. J Endod 2017; 43: 628-32.