Farklı İrreversibl Hidrokolloid Ölçü Materyallerinin Zamana Bağlı Boyutsal Değişimlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 70 - 74, 27.04.2023

Ayşe Gözde Türk , Övül Kümbüloğlu , Akın Aladağ

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1109526

Abstract

Amaç: İrriversibl-hidrokolloid ölçü materyallerinin, firmaların belirttiği bekleme zamanlarının, model netliğini ve ölçünün boyutsal stabilitesini etkileyip etkilemediğinin araştırılmasıdır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: İki aljinat ölçü materyali Hydrocolor 5 (Zhermack), Colorchange (Cavex) ve 1 polivinilsiloksan ölçü materyali (kontrol) kullanıldı. Her materyal için paslanmaz çelikten ana modelden 50 ölçü alındı. Ölçü materyalleri hemen alçısı dökülen ve 1, 2, 3, 5 gün sonra alçısı dökülen gruplar oluşturuldu (n=10). Modellerden dijital kaliper ile ölçümler yapılarak ölçü materyallerinin boyutsal stabiliteleri karşılaştırıldı. Data tek yönlü ANOVA, Bonferroni ve t testleri ile istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi.
Bulgular: Boyutsal stabiliteyi açısından materyal-zaman etkileşimi anlamlı bulundu (p=0.007). 1. gün, Affinis-DCode – Hydracolor (p=0.015) ve Affinis-DCode – Cavex (p=0.011) arasındaki fark anlamlı; Hydracolor - Cavex arasındaki fark istatistiksel anlamsızdır. 5. gün, Affinis-DCode – Hydracolor (p=0.012), Affinis-DCode – Cavex (p<0.001) ve Hydracolor – Cavex (p<0.001) ölçü maddeleri arasında fark anlamlı bulundu. Hydrocolor (p=0.189) ve Affinis-DCode (p=0.436) için boyutsal değişim istatistiksel olarak anlamsız iken, Cavex 2. ve 5. gün değerlerinde boyutsal değişim anlamlı düzeyde artmıştır. (p=0.003). Bağımsız iki grup t testi ile yapılan değerlendirmede ise başlangıç da gruplar arası fark yok iken 1. 2. 3. ve 5. günlerde farklar istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır.
Sonuç: Başlangıçta irreversibl-hidrokolloid ölçü maddeleri benzer davranış gösterse de, 5. Gün değerlendirmelerinde Cavex en fazla boyutsal değişime uğradı. Farklı marka ve bekleme zamanları irreversibl-hidrokolloid ölçü materyallerinin boyutsal stabilitesini etkilemektedir. Klinik açıdan en doğru yaklaşım, alınan ölçülerden en kısa sürede model eldesinin yapılması boyutsal değişimi minimum seviyede tutacaktır.

Keywords

boyutsal stabilite, irreversibl hidrokolloid, ölçü maddeleri.

Supporting Institution

Ege Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi

Project Number

18-DİŞ-012

Thanks

Bu çalışma, Ege Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi tarafından 18-DİŞ-012 Proje numarası ile desteklenmiştir.

References

• 1. Marković D, Puškar T, Hadžistević M, Potran M, Blažić L, Hodolič J. The Dimensional Stability of Elastomerıc Dental Impression Materials. Contemporary Materials 2012;III, 1:105-10.
• 2. Kümbüloğlu O, Türk AG. Geçmişten günümüze ölçü maddeleri ve yöntemleri. Turkiye Klinikleri J Prosthodont-Special Topics 2018;4(1):51-6.
• 3. Rubel BS. Impression Materials: A Comparative Review of Impression Materials Most Commonly Used in Restorative Dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51(3):629-42.
• 4. Impressions. In: Shillingburg HT, Sather DA, Wilson EL, Cain JR, Mitchell DL, Blanco LJ, Kessler JC. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2012. p. 291-306
• 5. Erbe C, Ruf S, Wöstmann B, Balkenhol M. Dimensional stability of contemporary irre-versible hydrocolloids: humidor versus wet tissue storage. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108(2):114-22
• 6. Zarb G, Jacob RF. The potentially edentul-ous patient to be treated with immediateden-tures. In: Zarb G, Hobkirk JA, Eckert S, Jacob RF. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 13th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2013. 112-18
• 7. The first diagnostic appointment. In: Phoe-nix RD, Cagna DR, DeFreest CF. Stewart's clinical removable partial prosthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 2008. p. 147-8
• 8. Replicating materials-impression and casting. In: Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig’s Restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Phila-delphia: Mosby; 2012. p. 277-325.
• 9. Impression Materials. In: VanNoort R. Introduction to dental materials. 3rd ed. Edin-burgh: Mosby; 2007. p. 186-208
• 10. Khaknegar B, Ettinger RL. Removal time: a factor in the accuracy of irreversible hydrocol-loid impressions. J Oral Rehabil 1977;4(4):369-76.
• 11. Schleier PE, Gardner FM, Nelson SK, Pash-ley DH. The effect of storage time on the ac-curacy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86(3):244-50.
• 12. Eriksson A, Ockert-Eriksson G, Lock-owandt P. Accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloids (alginates) for fixed prosthodontics. A comparison between irreversible hydrocolloid, reversible hydrocolloid, and addition silicone for use in the syringe-tray technique. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:651-60.
• 13. Peters MC, Tieleman A. Accuracy and dimensional stability of a combined hydrocolloid impression system. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67(6):873-8.
• 14. Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Deutsch AS, Musi-kant BL. Dimensional accuracy of three different alginate impression materials. J Prosthodon. 1995;4(3):195-9.
• 15. Nassar U, Hussein B, Oko A, Carey JP, Flores-Mir C. Dimensional accuracy of 2 irreversible hydrocolloid alternative impression materials with immediate and delayed pour-ing. J Can Dent Assoc 2012;78:c2.
• 16. Farzin M, Panahandeh H. Effect of pouring time and storage temperature on dimen-sional stability of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid. J Dent (Tehran). 2010;7(4):179-84.
• 17. Rodrigues SB, Augusto CR, Leitune VC, Samuel SM, Collares FM. Influence of de-layed pouring on irreversible hydrocolloid properties. Braz Oral Res 2012;26(5):404-9.
• 18. Mosharraf R, Nasouhian S, Salehi M. Effect of storage time on the dimensional stability of Extended-Pour irreversible hydrocolloid materials. J Isfahan Dent Sch 2011;7(3):246-55.
• 19. Imbery TA, Nehring J, Janus C, Moon PC. Accuracy and dimensional stability of extended-pour and conventional alginate impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141(1):32-9.
• 20. Reddy CG, Gujjari KA, Shambhu HS. In-fluence of long term storage on the linear di-mensional accuracy of improved alginate impressions-an in vitro study. TPDI 2010;1:34–7.
• 21. Todd JA, Oesterle LJ, Newman SM, Shellhart WC. Dimensional changes of ex-tended-pour alginate impression materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:55-63.
• 22. Taylor RL, Wright PS, Maryan C. Disinfection procedures: their effect on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and gypsum casts. Dent Mater 2002;18:103-10.
• 23. Bayindir F, Yanikoglu N, Duymus Z. Thermal and pH changes, and dimensional stability in irreversible hydrocolloid impression material during setting. Dent Mater J 2002;21:200-9.
• 24. Jones ML, Newcombe RG, Bellis H, Bottomley J. The dimensional stability of self-disinfecting alginate impressions compared to various immersion regimes. Angle Orthod 1990;60:123-8.
• 25. Jones ML, Newcombe RG, Barry G, Bellis H, Bottomley J. A Reflex Plotter investigation into the dimensional stability of alginate impressions following disinfection by varying regimes employing 2.2 per cent glutaraldehyde. Br J Orthod 1988;15:185-92. 50.
• 26. Hiraguchi H, Nakagawa H, Wakashima M, Miyanaga K, Sakaguchi S, Nishiyama M. Effect of storage period of alginate impressions following spray with disinfectant solutions on the dimensional accuracy and deformation of stone models. Dent Mater J 2005;24:36-42.
• 27. Jagger DC, Al Jabra O, Harrison A, Vowles RW, McNally L. The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy of some impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2004;12:154-60.
• 28. Hiraguchi H, Nakagawa H, Uchida H, Tanabe N. Effect of rinsing alginate impressions using acidic electrolyzed water on dimensional change and deformation of stone models. Dent Mater J 2003;22:494-506.
• 29. Smith SJ, McCord JF, Macfarlane TV. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:423-30.
• 30. Brosky ME, Pesun IJ, Lowder PD, Delong R, Hodges JS. Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:204-9.
• 31. Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Saunders; 2003. p. 205-254.
• 32. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc.; 2006. p. 35-48.
• 33. Coleman RM, Hembree JH, Jr, Weber FN. Dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Am J Orthod 1979;75:438-46.
• 34. Doubleday B. Impression materials. Br J Orthod 1998;25:133-40.
• 35. Nassar U, Chow AK. Surface Detail Reproduction and Effect of Disinfectant and Long-Term Storage on the Dimensional Stability of a Novel Vinyl Polyether Silicone Impression Material. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(6):494-8.
• 36. Fellows CM, Thomas GA. Determination of bound and unboundwater in dental alginate irreversible hydrocolloid by nuclear magneticresonance spectroscopy. Dent Mater 2009;25(4):486-93.
• 37. Varvara G, Sinjari B, Bernardi S, Turkyilmaz I, Malvezzi V, Piattelli M, et al. Comparative surface detail reproduction for elastomeric impression materials: Study on reproducibility performance. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021 Jan-Feb;35(1):161-169.
• 38. Roberts H. Three-dimensional Change of Elastomeric Impression Materials During the First 24 Hours: A Pilot Study. Oper Dent. 2021 Dec 17. doi: 10.2341/20-265-L. Epub ahead of print.
• 39. Gumus HO, Dincel M, Buyuk KS, Kilinc IH, Bilgin MS, Zortuk M. The effect of pouring time on the dimensional stability of casts made from conventional and extended-pour irreversible hydrocolloids by 3D modelling. J Dent Sci 2015;10:275–81.
• 40. Frey G, Lu H, Powers J. Effect of mixing methods on mechanical properties of alginate impression materials. J Prosthodont 2005;14:221e5.
• 41. Sayed ME, Gangadharappa P. Three-dimensional evaluation of extended pour alginate impression materials following variable storage time intervals and conditions. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29(4):477-86.
• 42. Imbery TA, Nehring J, Janus C, Moon P C. Accuracy and dimensional stability of extended-pour and conventional alginate impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141(1):32–9.
• 43. Cesur MG, Omurlu IK, Ozer T. Evaluation of Digital Model Accuracy and Time-dependent Deformation of Alginate Impressions. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20:1175-81.
• 44. Guiraldo RD, Moreti AF, Martinelli J, Berger SB, Meneghel LL, Caixeta RV, et al. Influence of alginate impression materials and storage time on surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of stone models. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2015;28(2):156-61.
• 45. Rios MP, Morgano SM, Stein RS, Rose L. Effects of chemical disinfectant solutions on the stability and accuracy of the dental impression complex. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:356–62
• 46. Samra RK, Bhide SV. Comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of impression materials from developing countries and developed countries after disinfection with different immersion disinfectant systems and ultraviolet chamber. Saudi Dent J. 2018;30(2):125–141.
• 47. Steinhäuser-Andresen S, Detterbeck A, Funk C, Krumm M, Kasperl S, Holst A, et al. Pilot study on accuracy and dimensional stability of impression materials using industrial CT technology. J Orofac Orthop. 2011;72(2):111-24. 48. Buchan S, Peggie RW. Role of ingredients in alginate impression compounds. J Dent Res 1966;45:1120-9.