Statü Kaygısı Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Year 2022, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 226 - 235, 30.04.2022

Lütfi Sürücü , Ahmet Maslakcı , Şenay Sahil Ertan

https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.1076257

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Literatürde statü kaygısını ölçmeye yönelik olarak tek maddeye dayalı ve çok genel bir ölçü kullanılmaktadır. Karmaşık psikolojik yapıları ölçmek için tek bir maddenin kullanılması, ölçüm aracının kapsam geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği açısından yeterli görülmemektedir. Literatürdeki bu boşluğu kapatmak ve bu yapıyı sağlam güvenirlik ve geçerlik göstergeleriyle ölçebilmek için Day ve Fiske (2016) tarafından İngilizce olarak kısa bir “Statü Kaygısı Ölçeği” geliştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın temel amacı Day ve Fiske (2016) tarafından geliştirilen statü kaygısı ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlaması, çeviri, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması yapılarak Türkçe yazınına kazandırılmasıdır. Bu maksatla KKTC’deki 323 akademisyenden veri elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler SPSS 23 ve AMOS 18 programları kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular statü kaygısı ölçeğinin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir. Araştırmanın ileride statü kaygısına yönelik yapılacak çalışmalara kaynak teşkil edeceği değerlendirilmektedir.

Keywords

Statü Kaygısı, Geçerlik, Güvenirlik

Supporting Institution

Yoktur

Project Number

Yoktur

Thanks

Yoktur.

Adaptation of the Status Anxiety Scale to Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study

Abstract

In the literature, a very general measure based on a single item is often used to measure "Status Anxiety". The use of a single item to measure complex psychological structures is not considered sufficient in terms of content validity and reliability of the measurement tool. A short “Status Anxiety Scale” in English was developed by Day and Fiske (2016) to close this gap in the literature and to measure this structure with robust reliability and validity indicators. The main purpose of the research is to adapt the status anxiety scale developed by Day and Fiske (2016) into Turkish and to bring it into Turkish literature by making translation, validity, and reliability studies. For this purpose, data were obtained from 323 academicians in the TRNC. The data were analyzed with SPSS 23 and AMOS 18 programs. The findings reveal that the status anxiety scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool. It is considered that the research will be a source for future studies on status anxiety.

Keywords

Status Anxiety, Validity, Reliability

Project Number

Yoktur

References

• Anderson, Cameron, Hildreth, John Angus ve Howland, Laura (2015) “Is The Desire For Status A Fundamental Human Motive? A Review Of The Empirical Literature”, Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), s. 574–601.
• Ansari, Mohammed Ve Yousefabad, Ahmadi (2020) “Potential Threats Of COVID-19 On Quarantined Families”, Public Health, 183(1), s.1.
• Balsamo, Michela, Romanelli, Roberta, Innamorati, Marco, Ciccarese, Gabriele, Carlucci, Leonardo ve Saggino, Aristide (2013) “The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Shadows And Lights On Its Construct Validity”, Journal Of Psychopathology And Behavioral Assessment, 35(4), s. 475–486.
• Blake, Khandis ve Brooks, Robert (2019) “Status Anxiety Mediates The Positive Relationship Between Income Inequality And Sexualization”, Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences, 116(50), s. 25029-25033.
• Brooks, Samantha, Webster, Rebecca, Smith, Louise, Woodland, Lisa, Wessely, Simon, Greenberg, Neil ve Rubin, Gideon James (2020) “The Psychological Impact Of Quarantine And How To Reduce It: Rapid Review Of The Evidence”, The Lancet, 395(10227), s. 912–920.
• Byrne, Barbara (2010) Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, And Programming (2nd Ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group
• Casey, Emma (2020) “Gambling, Status Anxiety Andiınter-Generational Social Mobility: Findings From The Mass Observation Archive”, Sociology, 54(2), s. 380-396.
• Dağlı, Abidin ve Baysal, Nigah (2016) “Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanmasi: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59), s. 1250-1262.
• Day, Martin ve Fiske, Susan (2016) “What Is Status Anxiety? Exploring A Mechanism Of The Consequences Of Income Inequality”, Presentation At The International Society For Justice Research (ISJR), 16th Biennual Conference, University Of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
• De Botton, Alain (2004) Status Anxiety. London: Penguin.
• De Vogli, Roberto, Ferrie, Jane, Chandola, Tarani, Kivimäki, Mika ve Marmot, Michael (2007) “Unfairness And Health: Evidence From The Whitehall II Study”, Journal Of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61(6), s. 513–518.
• Delhey, Jan, Schneickert, Christian ve Steckermeier, Leonie (2017) “Sociocultural Inequalities And Status Anxiety: Redirecting The Spirit Level Theory” International Journal Of Comparative Sociology, 58(3), s. 215-240.
• Diener, Ed, Emmons, Robert, Larsen, Randy ve Griffin, Sharon (1985) “The Satisfaction With Life Scale”, Journal Of Personality Assessment, 49(1), s. 71-75.
• Doğan, Tayfun ve Çötok, Nesrin Akıncı (2011) “Oxford Mutluluk Ölçeği Kısa Formunun Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”, Türk Psikolojik Danışma Ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(36), s. 165-172.
• Hair, Joseph, William Black, Barry Babin ve Rolph Anderson (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (7th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River.
• Faisal, Rajib Ahmed, Jobe, Mary, Ahmed, Oli ve Sharker, Tanima (2021) “Mental Health Status, Anxiety, And Depression Levels Of Bangladeshi University Students During The COVID-19 Pandemic”, International Journal Of Mental Health And Addiction, s. 1-16.
• Fisher, Gwenith, Matthews, Russell ve Gibbons, Alyssa Mitchell (2016) “Developing And Investigating The Use Of Single-Item Measures In Organizational Research”, Journal Of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(3), s. 3–23.
• Gruenewald, Tara, Kemeny, Margaret ve Aziz, Najib (2006) “Subjective Social Status Moderates Cortisol Responses To Social Threat”, Brain, Behavior, And Immunity, 20(4), s. 410–419.
• Hills, Peter ve Argyle, Michael (2002) “The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A Compact Scale For The Measurement Of Psychological Well-Being”, Personality And Individual Differences, 33(7), s. 1073-1082.
• Hodge, Edwin (2019) “The Sovereign Ascendant: Financial Collapse, Status Anxiety, And The Rebirth Of The Sovereign Citizen Movement”, Frontiers In Sociology, 4, 76.
• Kalleberg, Arne (2018) Precarious Lives: Job Insecurity And Well-Being In Rich Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
• Keshabyan, Anna ve Day, Martin (2020) “Concerned Whether You’ll Make It In Life? Status Anxiety Uniquely Explains Job Satisfaction”, Frontiers In Psychology, 11, s. 1523.
• Layte, Richard ve Whelan, Christopher (2014). “Who Feels İnferior? A Test Of The Status Anxiety Hypothesis Of Social Inequalities In Health”, European Sociological Review, 30(4), s. 525-535.
• Melita, Davide, Velandia-Morales, Andrea, Iruela-Toros, David, Willis, Guillermo ve Rodríguez-Bailón, Rosa (2020) “Spanish Version Of The Status Anxiety Scale (Versión Española De La Escala De Ansiedad Por El Estatus)”, International Journal Of Social Psychology, 35(2), s. 342-369.
• Melita, Davide, Willis, Guillermo ve Rodríguez-Bailón, Rosa (2021). “Economic Inequality Increases Status Anxiety Through Perceived Contextual Competitiveness”, Frontiers In Psychology, 12, s. 1895.
• Muñiz, José, Elosua, Paula ve Hambleton, Ronald (2013) “Directrices Para La Traducción Y Adaptación De Los Tests: Segunda Edición [International Test Commission Guidelines For Test Translation And Adap- Tation: Second Edition]”, Psicothema, 25(2), s. 151–157.
• Nunnally, Jum (1994) Psychometric Theory 3E. Tata Mcgraw-Hill Education.
• Öner, Necla ve Le Compte, Ayhan (1983) Durumluluk-Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri Elkitabı. İstanbul: Bogazici Üniversitesi Matbaasι.
• Paskov, Marii , Gerxhani, Klarita ve Van De Werfhorst, Herman (2013) Income Inequality And Status Anxiety, Amsterdam.
• Scheepers, Daan, Ellemers, Naomi ve Sintemaartensdijk, Nieska (2009) “Suffering From The Possibility Of Status Loss: Physiological Responses To Social İdentity Threat In High Status Groups”, European Journal Of Social Psychology, 39(6), s. 1075–1092.
• Spielberger, C.D., R.C. Gorsuch ve R.E. Luschene. (1970) Manual For The State-Trait Anxiety İnvenntory. California : Consultingpsychologists Press
• Sürücü, Lütfi, Şeşen, Harun, ve Maşlakcı Ahmet (2021) SPSS, AMOS Ve PROCESS Macro İle İlişkisel, Aracı / Düzenleyici Ve Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Uygulamalı Analizler, Detay Yayıncılık
• Tabachnick, Barbara ve Fidell, Linda (2001) SAS For Windows Workbook For Tabachnick And Fidell Using Multivariate Statistics. Allyn And Bacon.
• White, Judith, Langer, Ellen, Yariv, Leeat ve Welch, John (2006) F”requent Social Comparisons And Destructive Emotions And Behaviors: The Dark Side Of Social Comparisons”, Journal Of Adult Development, 13(1), s. 36-44.
• Woody, Alex, Hooker, Emily, Zoccola Peggy ve Dickerson, Sally (2018) “Social-Evaluative Threat, Cognitive Load, And The Cortisol And Cardiovascular Stress Response”, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 97, s. 149-155.