Konut Tasarımında Katılımcı Planlamanın Önemi: Bakü Örneği

Year 2022, , 92 - 107, 30.06.2022

Solmaz Ahmadova , Ruşen Yamaçlı

https://doi.org/10.51764/smutgd.1058574

Abstract

Katılımcı planlama; kentsel planlamayı erişilebilir, topluluk odaklı ve eğlenceli hale getiren aktif, yaşanabilir şehirler tasarlamaya yönelik bir yaklaşım olmaktadır. Yerel bilgi ile uzmanlık bilgisinin harmanlanmasının güçlü sonuçlara yol açtığı inancına dayanmaktadır. Bu nedenle çalışma, mevcut bilginin çeşitli biçimlerini bütünleştiren ve kentsel planlamada paydaş katılımı için gelişmiş destek sağlayan kentsel planlama için kavramsal bir katılımcı tasarım çerçevesini açıklamaktadır. Bu çalışma, katılımcı planlama süreçlerinin başarısını artırmayı amaçlayan benzer çalıştayların uygulanması için fikir ve öneriler sunmaktadır. Araştırma metodolojisi, mevcut mevzuat çerçevesinde yerel yönetimler tarafından kabul edilen şehirlerin normatif yasal düzenlemelerinin sistemleştirilmesinden, bunların kentsel planlama faaliyetleri, yatırım ortamı, çevre üzerindeki etkilerinin analiz edilmesinden oluşan ve ele alınan soruna entegre bir yaklaşıma dayanmaktadır. Temel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri deneysel tasarım yöntemidir. Çalışma, Azerbaycan'ın Bakü şehrinde gerçekleştirilen pratik tasarım ve kural koyma çalışmalarına dayanmaktadır.

Keywords

Katılımcı Planlama, Konut Planlaması, Bakü Beyaz Şehir Projesi

The Importance of Participatory Planning in Housing Design: The Example of Baku

Abstract

Participatory planning is an approach to designing active, livable cities that make urban planning accessible, community-focused and enjoyable. It is based on the belief that blending local knowledge with specialist knowledge leads to powerful results. Therefore, this paper describes a conceptual participatory design framework for urban planning that integrates various forms of existing knowledge and provides enhanced support for stakeholder engagement in urban planning. This study offers ideas and suggestions for the implementation of similar workshops aimed at increasing the success of participatory planning processes. The research methodology is based on an integrated approach to the problem under consideration, which consists in systematizing the normative legal acts of cities adopted by local governments within the framework of current legislation, analyzing their impact on urban planning activities, investment climate and environment. One of the main research methods is the experimental design method. The study is based on practical design and rule-making studies carried out in Baku, Azerbaijan.

Keywords

Participatory Planning, Housing Planning, Baku White City Project.

References

• Alpan, Açalya. 2013. Urban Restructuring Process of Antalya Walled-Town and the Roles of Stakeholders, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, City and Regional Planning Department, ODTÜ, Ankara.
• Arnstein Sherry R. 1969. “A ladder of citizen participation.” Journal of the American Institute of planners 35, (4): 216-224
• Calderon, Camilo. 2013. Politicising participation. PhD diss., Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
• Cilliers, Elizelle J., and Wim Timmermans. 2014. "The importance of creative participatory planning in the public place-making process." Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 41, no. 3: 413-429.
• Creighton, James L. 1994. Involving citizens in community decision making: A guidebook. Program for Community Problem Solving.
• Laurini R., (2001) "Computer Systems for Public Participation," in Information Systems For Urban Planning: A Hypermedia Co-Operative Approach, ed: Crc Press, , pp. 245-264.
• Lee J.-H. and Li T.-C., (2011) "Supporting user participation design using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach," Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 24, pp. 850-865,.
• Richter K.-F., et al.,(2010) "Supporting the designer's and the user's perspectives in computer-aided architectural design," Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 24, pp. 180-187,.
• Sanoff H.,( 2008) "Multiple Views of Participatory Design," International Journal of Architectural Research, vol. 2, pp. 57–69,.
• Sanoff Henry. 2005. “Community participation in riverfront development.” CoDesign 1, no. 1: 61-78.
• Sanoff Henry.2000. Community participation methods in design and planning. John Wiley and Sons, 2000
• Schroth O., et al.,( 2005) "From Information to Participation – Applying Interactive Features in Landscape Visualizations," in Trends in Real-Time Landscape Visualization and Participation, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Dessau, Germany, , pp. 2 - 15.
• Tesch, et al., D. (2009) "User and developer common knowledge: Effect on the success of information system development projects," International Journal of Project Management, vol. 27, pp. 657- 664.
• Towers G., (1995.) Building Democracy, Community architecture in the inner city. London: Routledge,
• URL-1. (2021). temel.az: http://www.temel.az/az/about.php
• URL-2. (2011). bakuwhitecity.com: http://www.bakuwhitecity.com/az/newsd/23-ilham-aliev-prinyal- uchastie v-ceremonii-zakladkifundamenta-baku-belogo-goroda
• URL-3. (2021). From bakuwhitecity.com: https://www.bakuwhitecity.com/az/bakumap
• Wulz Fredrik. 1986. “The concept of participation.” Design studies 7, no. 3: 153-162.