BibTex RIS Cite

Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi

Year 2016, Volume: 24 Issue: 27, 33 - 56, 22.01.2016
https://doi.org/10.17233/se.81444

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, enflasyonun faiz oranı üzerindeki etkilerini doğrudan ve altı kontrol değişkeni yardımıyla dolaylı olarak Türkiye ekonomisinde 1980-2012 dönemi için test edebilmek amacıyla Dinamik En Küçük Kareler (DOLS) analizi kullanılmıştır. İlk olarak, ilgili değişkenlere uygulanan Johansen-Juselius eşbütünleşme testi sonucunda, uzun dönemli ilişkiler elde edilmiştir. Değişkenler arasında nedensellik ilişkilerini belirleyebilmek için Granger nedensellik testi uygulanmış ve beklentilerle uyumlu olan nedensellik ilişkilerinin varlığı kanıtlanmıştır. DOLS analizi tahmin sonuçları; enflasyon, cari denge, dış borç servisi, para arzı, döviz kuru ve ekonomik büyüme sürecinin faiz oranı üzerinde istatistiki bakımdan anlamlı etkiler yarattığını ortaya koymuştur.

References

  • Atkins, F.J. & P.J. Coe (2002), “An ARDL Bounds Test of the Long-Run Fisher Effect in the United States and Canada”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 24(2), 255-266.
  • Atkins, F.J. & M. Chan (2004), “Trend Breaks and the Fisher Hypothesis in Canada and the United States”, Applied Economics, 36(17), 1907-1913.
  • Barthold, T.A. & W.R. Dougan (1986), “The Fisher Hypothesis under Different Monetary Regimes”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 674-679.
  • Berument, H. & M.M. Jelassi (2002), “The Fisher Hypothesis: A Multi-Country Analysis”, Applied Economics, 34(13), 1645-1655.
  • Berument, H. & N.B. Ceylan & H. Olgun (2007), “Inflation Uncertainty and Interest Rates: Is the Fisher Relation Universal?”, Applied Economics, 39(1), 53-68.
  • Beyer, A. & A.A. Haug & W.G. Dewald (2009), “Structural Breaks, Cointegration and the Fisher Effect”, European Central Bank Working Paper, No: 1013.
  • Brouwer, G. & J. Gilbert (2005), “Monetary Policy Reaction Functions in Australia”, The Economic Record, 81(253), 124-134.
  • Carneiro, F.G. & J. Angelo & C.A. Divino & C.H. Rocha (2002), “Revisiting the Fisher Hypothesis for the Cases of Argentina, Brazil and Mexico”, Applied Economics Letters, 9(2), 95-98.
  • Charemza, W.W. & D.F. Deadman (1993), New Directions in Econometric Practice, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Choi, W.G. (2002), “The Inverted Fisher Hypothesis: Inflation Forecastability and Asset Substitution”, IMF Staff Papers, 49(2), 212-241.
  • Coppock, L. & M. Poitras (2000), “Evaluating the Fisher Effect in Long-Term Cross-Country Averages”, International Review of Economics & Finance, 9(2), 181-192.
  • Crowder, W.J. (1997), “The Long-Run Fisher Relation in Canada”, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 30(4), 1124-1142.
  • Cumby, R.E. (1980), “Exchange-Rate Expectations and Nominal Interest Differentials: A Test of the Fisher Hypothesis”, NBER Working Paper, No: 537.
  • Çakmak, E. & H. Aksu & S. Başar (2002), “Fisher Hipotezinin Türkiye Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: 1989-2001”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 16(3-4), 31-40.
  • Çetin, M. & F. Seker (2012), “Enerji Tüketiminin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği”, Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), 85-106.
  • Çil-Yavuz, N. (2006), “Türkiye’de Turizm Gelirlerinin Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisinin Testi: Yapısal Kırılma ve Nedensellik Analizi”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(2), 162-171.
  • Daniels, J.P., F. Nourzad & R.K. Toutkoushian (1996), “Testing the Fisher Effect as a Long-Run Equilibrium”, Applied Financial Economics, 6(2), 115-120.
  • Demirag, I. & S. Goddard (1995), Financial Management for International Business, USA: McGraw-Hill Co.
  • Dickey, D.A. & W.A. Fuller (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
  • Dickey, D.A. & W.A. Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
  • Dutt, S.D. & D. Ghosh (1995), “The Fisher Hypothesis: Examining the Canadian Experience”, Applied Economics, 27(11), 1025-1030.
  • Enders, W. (1995), Applied Econometric Time Series, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Engsted, T. (1996), “Non-Stationarity and Tax Effects in the Long-Term Fisher Hypothesis”, Applied Economics, 28(7), 883-887.
  • Fisher, I. (1896), “Appreciation and Interest”, Publications of the American Economic Association, 11(4), 331-442.
  • Fisher, I. (1930), The Theory of Interest: As Determined by Impatience to Spend Income and Opportunity to Invest It, USA: Kelley Publishing.
  • Graham, F.C. (1988), “The Fisher Hypothesis: A Critique of Recent Results and Some New Evidence”, Southern Economic Journal, 54(4), 961-968.
  • Granger, C.W.J. & P. Newbold (1974), “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.
  • Granville, B. & S. Mallick (2004), “Fisher Hypothesis: UK Evidence Over a Century”, Applied Economics Letters, 11(2), 87-90.
  • Gupta, K.L. (1991), “Interest Rates, Inflation Expectations and the Inverted Fisher Hypothesis”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 15(1), 109-116.
  • Gül, E. & S. Açıkalın (2008), “An Examination of the Fisher Hypothesis: The Case of Turkey”, Applied Economics, 40(24), 3227-3231.
  • Gültekin, N.B. (1983), “Stock Market Returns and Inflation: Evidence from Other Countries”, The Journal of Finance, 38(1), 49-65.
  • Herwartz, H. & H.E. Reimers (2006), “Modelling the Fisher Hypothesis: Wold Wide Evidence”, CAU Working Paper, No: 2006-04.
  • Hutchison, M.M. & M.C. Keeley (1989), “Estimating the Fisher Effect and the Stochastic Money Growth Process”, Economic Inquiry, 27(2), 219-239.
  • Inder, B. & P. Silvapulle (1993), “Does the Fisher Effect Apply in Australia?”, Applied Economics, 25(6), 839-843.
  • Ito, T. (2009), “Fisher Hypothesis in Japan: Analysis of Long-Term Interest Rates Under Different Monetary Policy Regimes”, The World Economy, 32(7), 1019-1035.
  • Jaffe, J.F. & G. Mandelker (1976), “The Fisher Effect for Risky Assets: An Empirical Investigation”, The Journal of Finance, 31(2), 447-458.
  • Johansen, S. (1988), “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254.
  • Johansen, S. (1991), “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models”, Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580.
  • Johansen, S. (1995), Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Johansen, S. & K. Juselius (1990), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Applications to the Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
  • Junttila, J. (2001), “Testing an Augmented Fisher Hypothesis for a Small Open Economy: The Case of Finland”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 23(4), 577-599.
  • Kane, A. & L. Rosenthal & G. Ljung (1983), “Tests of the Fisher Hypothesis with International Data: Theory and Evidence”, The Journal of Finance, 38(2), 539-551.
  • Kasman, S. & A. Kasman & E. Turgutlu (2006), “Fisher Hypothesis Revisited: A Fractional Cointegration Analysis”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 42(6), 59-76.
  • Kutan, A.M. & T. Aksoy (2003), “Public Information Arrival and the Fisher Effect in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Stock and Bond Markets in Turkey”, Journal of Financial Services Research, 23(3), 225-239.
  • Lardic, S. & V. Mignon (2003), “Fractional Cointegration between Nominal Interest Rates and Inflation: A Re-Examination of the Fisher Relationship in the G7 Countries”, Economics Bulletin, 3(14), 1-10.
  • Linden, M. (1995), “Interest Rate and Inflation Expectations in Finland 1987-1994: A Case for the Inverted Fisher Hypothesis”, Finnish Economic Papers, 8(2), 108-115.
  • Madsen, J.B. (2005), “The Fisher Hypothesis and the Interaction between Share Returns, Inflation and Supply Shocks”.Journal of International Money and Finance, 24(1), 103-120.
  • Masih, R., & A.M.M. Masih (1996), “Stock-Watson Dynamic OLS (DOLS) and Error-Correction Modelling Approaches to Estimating Long-and Short-Run Elasticities in a Demand Function: New Evidence and Methodological Implications from an Application to the Demand for Coal in Mainland China”, Energy Economics, 18(4), 315-334.
  • Mcdonald, R. & P.D. Murphy (1989), “Testing for the Long Run Relationship Between Nominal Interest Rates and Inflation Using Cointegration Techniques”, Applied Economics, 21(4), 439-447.
  • Million, N. (2004), “Central Bank’s Interventions and the Fisher Hypothesis: A Threshold Cointegration Investigation”, Economic Modelling, 21(6), 1051-1064.
  • Mishkin, F.S. (1993), “Is the Fisher Effect for Real? A Reexamination of the Relationship between Inflation and Interest Rates”, NBER Working Paper, No: 3632.
  • Moazzami, B. (1991), “The Fisher Equation Controversy Re-Examined”, Applied Financial Economics, 1(3), 129-133.
  • Olekalns, N. (1996), “Further Evidence on the Fisher Effect”, Applied Economics, 28(7), 851-856.
  • Pelaez, R.F. (1995), “The Fisher Effect: Reprise”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 17(2), 333-346.
  • Peng, W. (1995), “The Fisher Hypothesis and Inflation Persistence: Evidence from Five Major Industrial Countries”, IMF Woking Paper, No: 95/118.
  • Phillips, P.C.B. & M. Loretan (1991), “Estimating Long-Run Economic Equilibria”, The Review of Economic Studies, 58(3), 407-436.
  • Phylaktis, K. & D. Blake (1993), “The Fisher Hypothesis: Evidence from Three High Inflation Economies”, Review of World Economics, 129(3), 591-599.
  • Saikkonen, P. (1991), “Asymptotically Efficient Estimation of Cointegration Regressions”, Econometric Theory, 7(1), 1-21.
  • Stock, J.H. & M.W. Watson (1993), “A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems”, Econometrica, 61(4), 783-820.
  • Summers, L.H. (1982), “The Non-Adjustment of Nominal Interest Rates: A Study of the Fisher Effect”, NBER Working Paper, No: 836.
  • Sun, Y. & P.C.B. Phillips (2004), “Understanding the Fisher Equation”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(7), 869-886.
  • Şimşek, M. & C. Kadılar (2006), “Fisher Etkisinin Türkiye Verileri ile Testi”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(1), 99-111.
  • Tarı, R. (2005), Ekonometri, 3. Baskı, İstanbul: Kocaeli Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Turgutlu, E. (2004), “Fisher Hipotezinin Tutarlılığının Testi: Parçalı Durağanlık ve Parçalı Koentegrasyon Analizi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 55-74.
  • Wong, K.F. & H.J. Wu (2003), “Testing Fisher Hypothesis in Long Horizons for G7 and Eight Asian Countries”, Applied Economics Letters, 10(14), 917-923.
  • Woodward, G.T. (1992), “Evidence of the Fisher Effect from U.K.Indexed Bonds”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(2), 315-320.
  • Yılancı, V. (2009), “Fisher Hipotezinin Türkiye İçin Sınanması: Doğrusal Olmayan Eşbütünleşme Analizi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23(4), 205-213.
  • Zivot, E. & D.W.K. Andrews (1992), “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock and the Unit-Root Hypothesis”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.

Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi

Year 2016, Volume: 24 Issue: 27, 33 - 56, 22.01.2016
https://doi.org/10.17233/se.81444

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, enflasyonun faiz oranı üzerindeki etkilerini doğrudan ve altı kontrol değişkeni yardımıyla dolaylı olarak Türkiye ekonomisinde 1980-2012 dönemi için test edebilmek amacıyla Dinamik En Küçük Kareler (DOLS) analizi kullanılmıştır. İlk olarak, ilgili değişkenlere uygulanan Johansen-Juselius eşbütünleşme testi sonucunda, uzun dönemli ilişkiler elde edilmiştir. Değişkenler arasında nedensellik ilişkilerini belirleyebilmek için Granger nedensellik testi uygulanmış ve beklentilerle uyumlu olan nedensellik ilişkilerinin varlığı kanıtlanmıştır. DOLS analizi tahmin sonuçları; enflasyon, cari denge, dış borç servisi, para arzı, döviz kuru ve ekonomik büyüme sürecinin faiz oranı üzerinde istatistiki bakımdan anlamlı etkiler yarattığını ortaya koymuştur.

References

  • Atkins, F.J. & P.J. Coe (2002), “An ARDL Bounds Test of the Long-Run Fisher Effect in the United States and Canada”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 24(2), 255-266.
  • Atkins, F.J. & M. Chan (2004), “Trend Breaks and the Fisher Hypothesis in Canada and the United States”, Applied Economics, 36(17), 1907-1913.
  • Barthold, T.A. & W.R. Dougan (1986), “The Fisher Hypothesis under Different Monetary Regimes”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 674-679.
  • Berument, H. & M.M. Jelassi (2002), “The Fisher Hypothesis: A Multi-Country Analysis”, Applied Economics, 34(13), 1645-1655.
  • Berument, H. & N.B. Ceylan & H. Olgun (2007), “Inflation Uncertainty and Interest Rates: Is the Fisher Relation Universal?”, Applied Economics, 39(1), 53-68.
  • Beyer, A. & A.A. Haug & W.G. Dewald (2009), “Structural Breaks, Cointegration and the Fisher Effect”, European Central Bank Working Paper, No: 1013.
  • Brouwer, G. & J. Gilbert (2005), “Monetary Policy Reaction Functions in Australia”, The Economic Record, 81(253), 124-134.
  • Carneiro, F.G. & J. Angelo & C.A. Divino & C.H. Rocha (2002), “Revisiting the Fisher Hypothesis for the Cases of Argentina, Brazil and Mexico”, Applied Economics Letters, 9(2), 95-98.
  • Charemza, W.W. & D.F. Deadman (1993), New Directions in Econometric Practice, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Choi, W.G. (2002), “The Inverted Fisher Hypothesis: Inflation Forecastability and Asset Substitution”, IMF Staff Papers, 49(2), 212-241.
  • Coppock, L. & M. Poitras (2000), “Evaluating the Fisher Effect in Long-Term Cross-Country Averages”, International Review of Economics & Finance, 9(2), 181-192.
  • Crowder, W.J. (1997), “The Long-Run Fisher Relation in Canada”, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 30(4), 1124-1142.
  • Cumby, R.E. (1980), “Exchange-Rate Expectations and Nominal Interest Differentials: A Test of the Fisher Hypothesis”, NBER Working Paper, No: 537.
  • Çakmak, E. & H. Aksu & S. Başar (2002), “Fisher Hipotezinin Türkiye Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: 1989-2001”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 16(3-4), 31-40.
  • Çetin, M. & F. Seker (2012), “Enerji Tüketiminin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği”, Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), 85-106.
  • Çil-Yavuz, N. (2006), “Türkiye’de Turizm Gelirlerinin Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisinin Testi: Yapısal Kırılma ve Nedensellik Analizi”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(2), 162-171.
  • Daniels, J.P., F. Nourzad & R.K. Toutkoushian (1996), “Testing the Fisher Effect as a Long-Run Equilibrium”, Applied Financial Economics, 6(2), 115-120.
  • Demirag, I. & S. Goddard (1995), Financial Management for International Business, USA: McGraw-Hill Co.
  • Dickey, D.A. & W.A. Fuller (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
  • Dickey, D.A. & W.A. Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
  • Dutt, S.D. & D. Ghosh (1995), “The Fisher Hypothesis: Examining the Canadian Experience”, Applied Economics, 27(11), 1025-1030.
  • Enders, W. (1995), Applied Econometric Time Series, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Engsted, T. (1996), “Non-Stationarity and Tax Effects in the Long-Term Fisher Hypothesis”, Applied Economics, 28(7), 883-887.
  • Fisher, I. (1896), “Appreciation and Interest”, Publications of the American Economic Association, 11(4), 331-442.
  • Fisher, I. (1930), The Theory of Interest: As Determined by Impatience to Spend Income and Opportunity to Invest It, USA: Kelley Publishing.
  • Graham, F.C. (1988), “The Fisher Hypothesis: A Critique of Recent Results and Some New Evidence”, Southern Economic Journal, 54(4), 961-968.
  • Granger, C.W.J. & P. Newbold (1974), “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.
  • Granville, B. & S. Mallick (2004), “Fisher Hypothesis: UK Evidence Over a Century”, Applied Economics Letters, 11(2), 87-90.
  • Gupta, K.L. (1991), “Interest Rates, Inflation Expectations and the Inverted Fisher Hypothesis”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 15(1), 109-116.
  • Gül, E. & S. Açıkalın (2008), “An Examination of the Fisher Hypothesis: The Case of Turkey”, Applied Economics, 40(24), 3227-3231.
  • Gültekin, N.B. (1983), “Stock Market Returns and Inflation: Evidence from Other Countries”, The Journal of Finance, 38(1), 49-65.
  • Herwartz, H. & H.E. Reimers (2006), “Modelling the Fisher Hypothesis: Wold Wide Evidence”, CAU Working Paper, No: 2006-04.
  • Hutchison, M.M. & M.C. Keeley (1989), “Estimating the Fisher Effect and the Stochastic Money Growth Process”, Economic Inquiry, 27(2), 219-239.
  • Inder, B. & P. Silvapulle (1993), “Does the Fisher Effect Apply in Australia?”, Applied Economics, 25(6), 839-843.
  • Ito, T. (2009), “Fisher Hypothesis in Japan: Analysis of Long-Term Interest Rates Under Different Monetary Policy Regimes”, The World Economy, 32(7), 1019-1035.
  • Jaffe, J.F. & G. Mandelker (1976), “The Fisher Effect for Risky Assets: An Empirical Investigation”, The Journal of Finance, 31(2), 447-458.
  • Johansen, S. (1988), “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254.
  • Johansen, S. (1991), “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models”, Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580.
  • Johansen, S. (1995), Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Johansen, S. & K. Juselius (1990), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Applications to the Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
  • Junttila, J. (2001), “Testing an Augmented Fisher Hypothesis for a Small Open Economy: The Case of Finland”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 23(4), 577-599.
  • Kane, A. & L. Rosenthal & G. Ljung (1983), “Tests of the Fisher Hypothesis with International Data: Theory and Evidence”, The Journal of Finance, 38(2), 539-551.
  • Kasman, S. & A. Kasman & E. Turgutlu (2006), “Fisher Hypothesis Revisited: A Fractional Cointegration Analysis”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 42(6), 59-76.
  • Kutan, A.M. & T. Aksoy (2003), “Public Information Arrival and the Fisher Effect in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Stock and Bond Markets in Turkey”, Journal of Financial Services Research, 23(3), 225-239.
  • Lardic, S. & V. Mignon (2003), “Fractional Cointegration between Nominal Interest Rates and Inflation: A Re-Examination of the Fisher Relationship in the G7 Countries”, Economics Bulletin, 3(14), 1-10.
  • Linden, M. (1995), “Interest Rate and Inflation Expectations in Finland 1987-1994: A Case for the Inverted Fisher Hypothesis”, Finnish Economic Papers, 8(2), 108-115.
  • Madsen, J.B. (2005), “The Fisher Hypothesis and the Interaction between Share Returns, Inflation and Supply Shocks”.Journal of International Money and Finance, 24(1), 103-120.
  • Masih, R., & A.M.M. Masih (1996), “Stock-Watson Dynamic OLS (DOLS) and Error-Correction Modelling Approaches to Estimating Long-and Short-Run Elasticities in a Demand Function: New Evidence and Methodological Implications from an Application to the Demand for Coal in Mainland China”, Energy Economics, 18(4), 315-334.
  • Mcdonald, R. & P.D. Murphy (1989), “Testing for the Long Run Relationship Between Nominal Interest Rates and Inflation Using Cointegration Techniques”, Applied Economics, 21(4), 439-447.
  • Million, N. (2004), “Central Bank’s Interventions and the Fisher Hypothesis: A Threshold Cointegration Investigation”, Economic Modelling, 21(6), 1051-1064.
  • Mishkin, F.S. (1993), “Is the Fisher Effect for Real? A Reexamination of the Relationship between Inflation and Interest Rates”, NBER Working Paper, No: 3632.
  • Moazzami, B. (1991), “The Fisher Equation Controversy Re-Examined”, Applied Financial Economics, 1(3), 129-133.
  • Olekalns, N. (1996), “Further Evidence on the Fisher Effect”, Applied Economics, 28(7), 851-856.
  • Pelaez, R.F. (1995), “The Fisher Effect: Reprise”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 17(2), 333-346.
  • Peng, W. (1995), “The Fisher Hypothesis and Inflation Persistence: Evidence from Five Major Industrial Countries”, IMF Woking Paper, No: 95/118.
  • Phillips, P.C.B. & M. Loretan (1991), “Estimating Long-Run Economic Equilibria”, The Review of Economic Studies, 58(3), 407-436.
  • Phylaktis, K. & D. Blake (1993), “The Fisher Hypothesis: Evidence from Three High Inflation Economies”, Review of World Economics, 129(3), 591-599.
  • Saikkonen, P. (1991), “Asymptotically Efficient Estimation of Cointegration Regressions”, Econometric Theory, 7(1), 1-21.
  • Stock, J.H. & M.W. Watson (1993), “A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems”, Econometrica, 61(4), 783-820.
  • Summers, L.H. (1982), “The Non-Adjustment of Nominal Interest Rates: A Study of the Fisher Effect”, NBER Working Paper, No: 836.
  • Sun, Y. & P.C.B. Phillips (2004), “Understanding the Fisher Equation”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(7), 869-886.
  • Şimşek, M. & C. Kadılar (2006), “Fisher Etkisinin Türkiye Verileri ile Testi”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(1), 99-111.
  • Tarı, R. (2005), Ekonometri, 3. Baskı, İstanbul: Kocaeli Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Turgutlu, E. (2004), “Fisher Hipotezinin Tutarlılığının Testi: Parçalı Durağanlık ve Parçalı Koentegrasyon Analizi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 55-74.
  • Wong, K.F. & H.J. Wu (2003), “Testing Fisher Hypothesis in Long Horizons for G7 and Eight Asian Countries”, Applied Economics Letters, 10(14), 917-923.
  • Woodward, G.T. (1992), “Evidence of the Fisher Effect from U.K.Indexed Bonds”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(2), 315-320.
  • Yılancı, V. (2009), “Fisher Hipotezinin Türkiye İçin Sınanması: Doğrusal Olmayan Eşbütünleşme Analizi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23(4), 205-213.
  • Zivot, E. & D.W.K. Andrews (1992), “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock and the Unit-Root Hypothesis”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.
There are 68 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Merter Akıncı

Ömer Yılmaz

Publication Date January 22, 2016
Submission Date December 28, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 24 Issue: 27

Cite

APA Akıncı, M., & Yılmaz, Ö. (2016). Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi. Sosyoekonomi, 24(27), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.17233/se.81444
AMA Akıncı M, Yılmaz Ö. Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi. Sosyoekonomi. January 2016;24(27):33-56. doi:10.17233/se.81444
Chicago Akıncı, Merter, and Ömer Yılmaz. “Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi”. Sosyoekonomi 24, no. 27 (January 2016): 33-56. https://doi.org/10.17233/se.81444.
EndNote Akıncı M, Yılmaz Ö (January 1, 2016) Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi. Sosyoekonomi 24 27 33–56.
IEEE M. Akıncı and Ö. Yılmaz, “Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi”, Sosyoekonomi, vol. 24, no. 27, pp. 33–56, 2016, doi: 10.17233/se.81444.
ISNAD Akıncı, Merter - Yılmaz, Ömer. “Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi”. Sosyoekonomi 24/27 (January 2016), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.17233/se.81444.
JAMA Akıncı M, Yılmaz Ö. Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi. Sosyoekonomi. 2016;24:33–56.
MLA Akıncı, Merter and Ömer Yılmaz. “Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi”. Sosyoekonomi, vol. 24, no. 27, 2016, pp. 33-56, doi:10.17233/se.81444.
Vancouver Akıncı M, Yılmaz Ö. Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi. Sosyoekonomi. 2016;24(27):33-56.

Cited By













FİSHER HİPOTEZİNİN GEÇERLİLİĞİNİN OECD ÜLKELERİ İÇİN SINANMASI
Cankiri Karatekin Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi
Nuran COŞKUN
https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.678883



TÜRKİYE’DE DÖVİZ KURU, ENFLASYON VE FAİZ ORANLARININ ETKİLEŞİMİ
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
SEDAT YENİCE
https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.467312

Türkiye’de Fisher Hipotezinin Fourier Yaklaşımı ile İncelenmesi
Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Mustafa Orhan Özer
https://doi.org/10.26745/ahbvuibfd.560403