BibTex RIS Cite

Determination of Genetic Diversity among Phaseolus vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populations Collected from Konya Region by SDS-PAGE

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 35, 59 - 64, 01.12.2010

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the genetic diversity among 17 Phaseolus vulgaris populations collected from districts of Konya by SDS-PAGE. Seed storage protein profiles were scored visually as present (1) or absent (0). In all, 37 polypeptide bands of different sizes ranging from 14.4 to ~135 kDa were observed in the 17 Phaseolus vulgaris populations. Cluster analysis was performed using the UPGMA in Bio 1 D ++ computer program. Similarity among genotypes was estimated basing on Nei’s homology and a dendrogram was obtained. According to dendrogram, 17 populations belonging to Phaseolus vulgaris were similar in rates ranging from 68 to 100 %. While the highest similarity was found between Kanada (Çumra) and Sarnıç (Altınekin) genotypes, the most distant genotype was Sarhoş (Washington) (Derbent).

References

  • Babaoğlu, S., Açık, L., Çelebi, A., Adıgüzel, N. Molecular Analysıs Of Turkısh Alyssum L. (Brassıcaceae) Specıes By Rapd-Pcr And Sds-Page Methods. G.U. Journal of Science 17(3):25-33, (2004).
  • Beyazbenli, Ş., Dural, H., Arslan, E., Ertuğrul, K. Konya Bölgesindeki bazı Vicia L. (Leguminosae) Türlerinin Tohum Protein Profillerinin SDS-PAGE Yöntemiyle İle Belirlenmesi. S.Ü. Fen Edebiyat Fak. Fen Dergisi, 28: 117-122, ( 2006).
  • Chen L.F.O., Cheng M.C., Chen S.C.G. Similarity and diveristy of seed proteins in rice varieties. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 28: 169–183, (1987).
  • Fujiwara, T., Nambarab E., Yamagishib K., Gotoc D. B., Naitoc , S. Storage Proteins. American Society of Plant Biologists, 1-12, (2002).
  • Ghafoor, A, Ahmad, Z, Qureshi, A.S, Bashir, M. Genetic relationship in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and V. radiata (L.) R. Wilczek based on morphological traits and SDS-PAGE. Euphytica, 123:367-378, (2000).
  • Ladizinsky G.W., Hymowitz T. Seed protein electrophoresis in taxonomic and evolutionary studies. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 54: 680–685, (1979).
  • Sözen, Ö. Artvin ili yerel fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) populasyonlarının toplanması, tanımlanması ve morfolojik varyabilitesinin belirlenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Samsun, sayfa 1, (2006).
  • Liang, X.Q., Luo, M., Holbrook, C.C., Guo, B.Z. Storage protein profiles in Spanish and runner market type peanuts and potential markers. BMC Plant Biology, 6:24, (2006).
  • Singh S.P., Nodari R., Gepts P. Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean I. allozymes. Crop Science, 31:19-23, (1991).
  • 0] Yupsanis T.M., Moustakes M., Karakoli S. Seed protein electrophoresis for varietal identification in rice (Oryza sativa L.), Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 168:95–99, (1992).
  • 1] Przybylska J., Zimniak-Przybylska Z., Krajewski P. Diversity of seed albumins in the grass pea (Lathyrus sativus): an electrophoretic study, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 45: 423–431, (1998).
  • 2] Ertugrul, K., Arslan, E., Tugay, O. Characterization of Consolida S.F. Gray (Ranunculaceae) taxa in Turkey by seed storage protein electrophoresis. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 35(2);97-102, (2010).
  • 3] Tamkoc, A., Arslan, E. Comparison of Agronomic Characters, Total Seed Storage Proteins and Their Use For Genotypes Discrimination in the Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 24(1):1573-1576, (2010).
  • 4] Parisi, E., Agulari D., Methods Differentiating Meats of Different Species of Animals. “Biochemical İdentification of Meat Species” R.L.S. Patterson (Ed). Elselvier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., p. 40-49, England, (1985)
  • 5] Saraswati, R., Matoh, T., Phupaibul, P., Lumpkin, T.A., Kobayashi, M. Identification of Sesbania Species from Electrophoretic Patterns of Seed Protein, Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad), 70(3): 282-285, (1993).
  • 6] Laemmli, U.K., Cleavage of structural proteins during the Assembly of bacteriophage T4., Nature, 277:680-684, (1970).
  • 7] Nei, M. Estimation of average heterozygosities and genetic distances from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590, (1978) .
  • 8] Sammour, R.H., Radwan, S.A., El-Koly, A. Genetic diversity in Phaseolus spp. as revealed by SDS-PAGE markers. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, 151:69-75, (2007).
  • 9] Martins, S.R., Vences, F.J., Saenz de Miera, L.E., Barrosa, M.R., Carnide, V. RAPD Analysis of genetic diversity among and within Portuguese landraces of common white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Scientia Horticulturae, 108:133–142, (2006).
  • 0] Svetleva, D., Pereira, G., Carlier, J., Cabrita, L., Leitão, J., Genchev, D. Molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes included in Bulgarian collecti on by ISSR and AFLP™ analyses. Scientia Horticulturae 109: 198–206, (2006).
  • 1] Papa, R., Gepts, P. Asymmetry of gene flow and differential geographical structure of molecular diversity in wild and domesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Mesoamerica. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106:239–250, (2003).
  • 2] Lioi, L., Piergiovanni A. R., Pignone, D., Puglisi, S., Santantonio, M., Gabriella S., Genetic diversity of some surviving on-farm Italian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces. Plant Breeding. 124(6):576 – 581, (2005).
  • 3] Rosales-Serna, R., Herna´ndez-Delgado, S., Gonza´lez-Paz, M., Acosta-Gallegos, J.A., Mayek-Pe´rez, N. Genetic Relationships and Diversity Revealed by AFLP Markers in Mexican Common Bean Bred Cultivars, Crop Science, 45:1951-1957, (2005).
  • 4] Sicard, D., Nanni, L., Porfiri, O., Bulfon, D., Papa, R. Genetic diversity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus L. landraces in central Italy. Plant Breeding, 124 :464-472, (2005).

Konya Bölgesinden Toplanan Phaseolus vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populasyonları Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 35, 59 - 64, 01.12.2010

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Konya’nın ilçelerinden toplanan 17 Phaseolus vulgaris populasyonu arasındaki genetik çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE ile belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Tohum depo protein profilleri görsel şekilde var (1) ya da yok (0) olarak skorlanmıştır. On yedi Phaseolus vulgaris populasyonunda, 14.4 ve ~135 kDa arasında değişen farklı büyüklüklerde toplamda 37 polipeptit bant gözlenmiştir. Bio1D++ bilgisayar programında UPGMA kullanılarak kümeleme analizi yapılmıştır. Genotipler arasındaki benzerlik Nei’nin homolojisine dayanarak tahmin edilmiş ve bir dendrogram elde edilmiştir. Dendrograma göre Phaseolus vulgaris’e ait 17 populasyon %68-100 arasında değişen oranlarda benzer bulunmuştur. En yüksek benzerlik Kanada (Çumra) ve Sarnıç (Altınekin) genotipleri arasında bulunurken, en uzak genotip Sarhoş (Washington) (Derbent) olmuştur.

References

  • Babaoğlu, S., Açık, L., Çelebi, A., Adıgüzel, N. Molecular Analysıs Of Turkısh Alyssum L. (Brassıcaceae) Specıes By Rapd-Pcr And Sds-Page Methods. G.U. Journal of Science 17(3):25-33, (2004).
  • Beyazbenli, Ş., Dural, H., Arslan, E., Ertuğrul, K. Konya Bölgesindeki bazı Vicia L. (Leguminosae) Türlerinin Tohum Protein Profillerinin SDS-PAGE Yöntemiyle İle Belirlenmesi. S.Ü. Fen Edebiyat Fak. Fen Dergisi, 28: 117-122, ( 2006).
  • Chen L.F.O., Cheng M.C., Chen S.C.G. Similarity and diveristy of seed proteins in rice varieties. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 28: 169–183, (1987).
  • Fujiwara, T., Nambarab E., Yamagishib K., Gotoc D. B., Naitoc , S. Storage Proteins. American Society of Plant Biologists, 1-12, (2002).
  • Ghafoor, A, Ahmad, Z, Qureshi, A.S, Bashir, M. Genetic relationship in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and V. radiata (L.) R. Wilczek based on morphological traits and SDS-PAGE. Euphytica, 123:367-378, (2000).
  • Ladizinsky G.W., Hymowitz T. Seed protein electrophoresis in taxonomic and evolutionary studies. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 54: 680–685, (1979).
  • Sözen, Ö. Artvin ili yerel fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) populasyonlarının toplanması, tanımlanması ve morfolojik varyabilitesinin belirlenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Samsun, sayfa 1, (2006).
  • Liang, X.Q., Luo, M., Holbrook, C.C., Guo, B.Z. Storage protein profiles in Spanish and runner market type peanuts and potential markers. BMC Plant Biology, 6:24, (2006).
  • Singh S.P., Nodari R., Gepts P. Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean I. allozymes. Crop Science, 31:19-23, (1991).
  • 0] Yupsanis T.M., Moustakes M., Karakoli S. Seed protein electrophoresis for varietal identification in rice (Oryza sativa L.), Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 168:95–99, (1992).
  • 1] Przybylska J., Zimniak-Przybylska Z., Krajewski P. Diversity of seed albumins in the grass pea (Lathyrus sativus): an electrophoretic study, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 45: 423–431, (1998).
  • 2] Ertugrul, K., Arslan, E., Tugay, O. Characterization of Consolida S.F. Gray (Ranunculaceae) taxa in Turkey by seed storage protein electrophoresis. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 35(2);97-102, (2010).
  • 3] Tamkoc, A., Arslan, E. Comparison of Agronomic Characters, Total Seed Storage Proteins and Their Use For Genotypes Discrimination in the Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 24(1):1573-1576, (2010).
  • 4] Parisi, E., Agulari D., Methods Differentiating Meats of Different Species of Animals. “Biochemical İdentification of Meat Species” R.L.S. Patterson (Ed). Elselvier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., p. 40-49, England, (1985)
  • 5] Saraswati, R., Matoh, T., Phupaibul, P., Lumpkin, T.A., Kobayashi, M. Identification of Sesbania Species from Electrophoretic Patterns of Seed Protein, Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad), 70(3): 282-285, (1993).
  • 6] Laemmli, U.K., Cleavage of structural proteins during the Assembly of bacteriophage T4., Nature, 277:680-684, (1970).
  • 7] Nei, M. Estimation of average heterozygosities and genetic distances from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590, (1978) .
  • 8] Sammour, R.H., Radwan, S.A., El-Koly, A. Genetic diversity in Phaseolus spp. as revealed by SDS-PAGE markers. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, 151:69-75, (2007).
  • 9] Martins, S.R., Vences, F.J., Saenz de Miera, L.E., Barrosa, M.R., Carnide, V. RAPD Analysis of genetic diversity among and within Portuguese landraces of common white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Scientia Horticulturae, 108:133–142, (2006).
  • 0] Svetleva, D., Pereira, G., Carlier, J., Cabrita, L., Leitão, J., Genchev, D. Molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes included in Bulgarian collecti on by ISSR and AFLP™ analyses. Scientia Horticulturae 109: 198–206, (2006).
  • 1] Papa, R., Gepts, P. Asymmetry of gene flow and differential geographical structure of molecular diversity in wild and domesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Mesoamerica. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106:239–250, (2003).
  • 2] Lioi, L., Piergiovanni A. R., Pignone, D., Puglisi, S., Santantonio, M., Gabriella S., Genetic diversity of some surviving on-farm Italian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces. Plant Breeding. 124(6):576 – 581, (2005).
  • 3] Rosales-Serna, R., Herna´ndez-Delgado, S., Gonza´lez-Paz, M., Acosta-Gallegos, J.A., Mayek-Pe´rez, N. Genetic Relationships and Diversity Revealed by AFLP Markers in Mexican Common Bean Bred Cultivars, Crop Science, 45:1951-1957, (2005).
  • 4] Sicard, D., Nanni, L., Porfiri, O., Bulfon, D., Papa, R. Genetic diversity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus L. landraces in central Italy. Plant Breeding, 124 :464-472, (2005).
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA58CB24PV
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Elif Gülbahçe

Buğra Özkubat This is me

Emine Arslan This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2010
Submission Date December 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 2 Issue: 35

Cite

APA Gülbahçe, E., Özkubat, B., & Arslan, E. (2010). Konya Bölgesinden Toplanan Phaseolus vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populasyonları Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, 2(35), 59-64.
AMA Gülbahçe E, Özkubat B, Arslan E. Konya Bölgesinden Toplanan Phaseolus vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populasyonları Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi. sufefd. December 2010;2(35):59-64.
Chicago Gülbahçe, Elif, Buğra Özkubat, and Emine Arslan. “Konya Bölgesinden Toplanan Phaseolus Vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populasyonları Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE Yöntemi Ile Belirlenmesi”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi 2, no. 35 (December 2010): 59-64.
EndNote Gülbahçe E, Özkubat B, Arslan E (December 1, 2010) Konya Bölgesinden Toplanan Phaseolus vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populasyonları Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi 2 35 59–64.
IEEE E. Gülbahçe, B. Özkubat, and E. Arslan, “Konya Bölgesinden Toplanan Phaseolus vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populasyonları Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi”, sufefd, vol. 2, no. 35, pp. 59–64, 2010.
ISNAD Gülbahçe, Elif et al. “Konya Bölgesinden Toplanan Phaseolus Vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populasyonları Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE Yöntemi Ile Belirlenmesi”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi 2/35 (December 2010), 59-64.
JAMA Gülbahçe E, Özkubat B, Arslan E. Konya Bölgesinden Toplanan Phaseolus vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populasyonları Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi. sufefd. 2010;2:59–64.
MLA Gülbahçe, Elif et al. “Konya Bölgesinden Toplanan Phaseolus Vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populasyonları Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE Yöntemi Ile Belirlenmesi”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 35, 2010, pp. 59-64.
Vancouver Gülbahçe E, Özkubat B, Arslan E. Konya Bölgesinden Toplanan Phaseolus vulgaris (Leguminosae) Populasyonları Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin SDS-PAGE Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi. sufefd. 2010;2(35):59-64.

Journal Owner: On behalf of Selçuk University Faculty of Science, Rector Prof. Dr. Hüseyin YILMAZ
Selcuk University Journal of Science Faculty accepts articles in Turkish and English with original results in basic sciences and other applied sciences. The journal may also include compilations containing current innovations.

It was first published in 1981 as "S.Ü. Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi" and was published under this name until 1984 (Number 1-4).
In 1984, its name was changed to "S.Ü. Fen-Edeb. Fak. Fen Dergisi" and it was published under this name as of the 5th issue.
When the Faculty of Letters and Sciences was separated into the Faculty of Science and the Faculty of Letters with the decision of the Council of Ministers numbered 2008/4344 published in the Official Gazette dated 3 December 2008 and numbered 27073, it has been published as "Selcuk University Journal of Science Faculty" since 2009.
It has been scanned in DergiPark since 2016.

88x31.png

Selcuk University Journal of Science Faculty is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.