Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Inclusive, collaborative and personalised professional development process for the post–emergency remote teaching era: The importance of virtual professional learning networks

Year 2022, , 175 - 187, 15.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1028020

Abstract

Emergency remote teaching process was initiated as a solution to the crisis of Covid–9 pandemic in order to ensure the sustainability of education. While being expected to quickly adapt to the sudden changes brought by the pandemic, educational institutions, teachers, students and parents were observed to come across many challenges during this process. The review article aims to focus on the types of challenges teachers experience during the emergency remote teaching process and identify the characteristics of the professional development process they require in this period. Considering the pedagogical, psychological and student–related difficulties, it is suggested that the professional development support teachers need should be provided with a multidimensional and holistic approach. Specifically, this paper highlights how virtual professional learning networks can play an important role in meeting the professional development needs of teachers arising both during and in the post Covid–19 pandemic period.

References

  • Abaci, S., Robertson, J., Linklater, H., & McNeill, F. (2021). Supporting school teachers’ rapid engagement with online education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 29–34.
  • Aguilera–Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID–19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011.
  • Akkoyunlu, B., & Bardakcı, S. (2020). Pandemi döneminde uzaktan eğitim. https://portal.yokak. gov.tr/makale/pandemi–doneminde–uzaktan–egitim/#acil–uzaktan–ogretimin–degerlendirilme–sureci.
  • Aktaş– Salman, U. (2020). Türkiye’de koronavirüsün eğitime etkileri–V, Dijital uçurumu öğrenciler anlatıyor. https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/turkiyede–koronavirusun–egitime–etkisi–v–dijital–ucurumu–ogrenciler–anlatiyor/ [15.10.2021].
  • Bakator, M., & Radosav, D. (2020). Managing education in the COVID–19 era. BMJ, 370.
  • Balaman, F., & Hanbay– Tiryaki, S. (2021). Coronavirüs (Covid–19) nedeniyle mecburi yürütülen uzaktan eğitim hakkında öğretmen görüşleri. Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches, 10(1).
  • Barbour, M. K., LaBonte, R., Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., Bond, A., Kelly, K. & Hill, P. (2020). Understanding pandemic pedagogy: Differences between emergency remote, remote, and online teaching. State of the Nation: K–12 e–Learning in Canada.
  • Bozkurt, A. (2020). Koronavirüs (Covid–19) pandemi süreci ve pandemi sonrası dünyada eğitime yönelik değerlendirmeler: Yeni normal ve yeni eğitim paradigması. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 112–142.
  • Bozkurt, A., ve Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi.
  • Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Rethinking education in the new normal post–covid–19 era: A curriculum studies perspective. Aquademia, 4(2), ep20018. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8315.
  • Can, E. (2020). Coronavirüs (Covid–19) pandemisi ve pedagojik yansımaları: Türkiye’de açık ve uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 11–53.
  • Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2015). Engagement through microblogging: Educator professional development via Twitter. Professional development in education, 41(4), 707–728.
  • Capogna, S. (2010, October). Learning and Social Networks: new forms of sociability. In ESA Research Network Sociology of Culture Midterm Conference: Culture and the Making of Worlds.
  • Chari,R. (2020). Teacher wellbeing & self–care in Covid times. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/edutrends–india/teacher–wellbeing–self–care–in–covid–times/.
  • Chen, J. Q., & McCray, J. (2012). A conceptual framework for teacher professional development: The whole teacher approach. NHSA dialog, 15(1), 8–23.
  • Cipriano, C., & Brackett, M. (2020). How to support teachers’ emotional needs right now. Gt. Good Mag. Sci. Insights Meaningful Life, 1–10.
  • Colao, A., Piscitelli, P., Pulimeno, M., Colazzo, S., Miani, A., & Giannini, S. (2020). Rethinking the role of the school after COVID–19. The Lancet Public Health, 5(7), e370.
  • Crowley, B. (2014). 3 steps for building a professional learning network. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/opinion–3–steps–for–building–a–professional–learning–network/2014/12 .
  • Davis, K. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of Twitter for professional development. Disability and rehabilitation, 37(17), 1551–1558.
  • Derri, V., Vasiliadou, O., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2015). The effects of a short–term professional development program on physical education teachers’ behaviour and students’ engagement in learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 234–262.
  • Deyamport III, W. H. (2013). An implementation of a Twitter–supported personal learning network to individualize teacher professional development. Yayınlanmamış Doktora tezi, Capella Üniversitesi.
  • Dias, M. J., Almodóvar, M., Atiles, J. T., Vargas, A. C., & Zúñiga León, I. M. (2020). Rising to the Challenge: Innovative early childhood teachers adapt to the COVID–19 era. Childhood Education, 96(6), 38–45.
  • Ehren, M., Madrid, R., Romiti, S., Armstrong, P. W., Fisher, P., ve McWhorter, D. L. (2021). Teaching in the COVID–19 era: Understanding the opportunities and barriers for teacher agency. Perspectives in Education, 39(1), 61–76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i1.5.
  • Faisal, S. L. (2015). Personal Learning Network: A powerful Tool for Professional Development. Paradigm Shift in Libraries, 59.
  • Ferguson, M. (2020). Teaching during a pandemic hit teachers who were already burned out the hardest. http://www.boredteachers.com
  • Flynn R, Riches E, Reid G, Rosenberg S, Niedzwiedz C. Rapid review of the impact of COVID–19 on mental health. Edinburgh: Public Health Scotland; 2020.
  • Goktalay, S. B., & Ozdilek, Z. (2016). Social networking in higher education in Turkey: students’ use and perceptions. In Social Networking and Education (pp. 167–187). Springer, Cham.
  • Greenhow, C., Staudt Willet, K. B., & Galvin, S. (2021). Inquiring tweets want to know:# Edchat supports for# RemoteTeaching during COVID‐19. British Journal of Educational Technology.
  • Heitz, C., Laboissiere, M., Sanghvi, S., & Sarakatsannis, J. (2020). Getting the next phase of remote learning right in higher education. McKinsey Insights.
  • Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause review, 27, 1–12.
  • Kavuk, E., & Demirtaş, H. (2021). COVID–19 Pandemisi Sürecinde Öğretmenlerin Uzaktan Eğitimde Yaşadığı Zorluklar. E–Uluslararası Pedandragoji Dergisi, 1(1), 55–73.
  • Kelly, N., & Antonio, A. (2016). Teacher peer support in social network sites. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 138–149.
  • Keskin, M., ve Özer– Kaya, D. (2020). COVID–19 sürecinde öğrencilerin web tabanlı uzaktan eğitime yönelik geri bildirimlerinin değerlendirilmesi. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 59–67.
  • Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A., & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and collective knowledge construction with social media: A process–oriented perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 120–137.
  • Kitsantas, T., Chirinos, D. S., Hiller, S. E., & Kitsantas, A. (2016). An examination of Greek college students’ perceptions of positive and negative effects of social networking use. In Social Networking and Education (pp. 129–143). Springer, Cham.
  • Košir, K., Dugonik, Š., Huskić, A., Gračner, J., Kokol, Z., & Krajnc, Ž. (2020). Predictors of perceived teachers’ and school counsellors’ work stress in the transition period of online education in schools during the COVID–19 pandemic. Educational Studies, 1–5.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2020). Language teachers’ coping strategies during the Covid–19 conversion to online teaching: Correlations with stress, wellbeing and negative emotions. System, 94, 102352.
  • Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and teacher education, 55, 291–307.
  • Marek, M. W. ve Chew, C. S. (2021). Teacher experiences in converting classes to distance learning in the covid–19 pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(1). DOI: 10.4018/IJDET.20210101.oa3.
  • McKenzie, L. (2020, 27 Mayıs).Ramping up for remote instruction. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/05/27/new–resources–help–support–faculty–quality–online–instruction.
  • Mohan, G., McCoy, S., Carroll, E., Mihut, G., Lyons, S., & Mac Domhnaill, C. (2020). Learning for all? Second–level education in Ireland during COVID–19. Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) Research Series.
  • Morgan, B., & Simmons, L. (2021, May). A ‘PERMA’Response to the Pandemic: An Online Positive Education Programme to Promote Wellbeing in University Students. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 172). Frontiers.
  • Munasinghe, S., Sperandei, S., Freebairn, L., Conroy, E., Jani, H., Marjanovic, S., & Page, A. (2020). The impact of physical distancing policies during the COVID–19 pandemic on health and well–being among Australian adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(5), 653–661.
  • OECD (2020), Lessons for Education from COVID–19: A Policy Maker’s Handbook for More Resilient Systems, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0a530888–en.
  • Ozamiz–Etxebarria, N., Berasategi Santxo, N., Idoiaga Mondragon, N., & Dosil Santamaría, M. (2021). The psychological state of teachers during the COVID–19 crisis: The challenge of returning to face–to–face teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3861.
  • Özmen, F., Aküzüm, C., & Sünkür, M. (2012). Sosyal ağ sitelerinin eğitsel ortamlardaki işlevselliği. Education Sciences, 7(2), 496–506.
  • Peters, M. A., Rizvi, F., McCulloch, G., Gibbs, P., Gorur, R., Hong, M., ... & Misiaszek, L. (2020). Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post–Covid–19: An EPAT Collective Project. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–44. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1777655.
  • Pöysä, S., Pakarinen, E., & Lerkkanen, M. K. (2021). Patterns of Teachers’ Occupational Well–Being During the COVID–19 Pandemic: Relations to Experiences of Exhaustion, Recovery, and Interactional Styles of Teaching. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6). Frontiers Media SA.
  • Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID–19 Pandemic of 2020. OECD.
  • Sancar, R., Atal, D., ve Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305.
  • Sánchez–Cruzado, C., Santiago Campión, R., & Sánchez–Compaña, M. (2021). Teacher Digital Literacy: The Indisputable Challenge after COVID–19. Sustainability, 13(4), 1858.
  • Schleicher, A. (2021). The state of education– one year into covid. OECD Education and Skills Today. https://oecdedutoday.com/state–of–education–one–year–into–covid [15.10.2021].
  • Sohaei, S., & Iahad, N. A. (2014). Review on Social Network Sites for Teaching and Learning. Journal of information systems research and innovation, 7(1), 10–16.
  • Şen Akbulut, M. (2020). Dijital teknolojilerin eğitimde etkin kullanımı. Bilim ve Teknik, 53(631), 48–55. Talidong, K. J. B., & Toquero, C. M. D. (2020). Philippine teachers’ practices to deal with anxiety amid COVID–19. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 25(6–7), 573–579.
  • TEDMEM. (2020). COVID–19 sürecinde eğitim: Uzaktan öğrenme, sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri (TEDMEM Analiz Dizisi 7). Ankara: Türk Eğitim Derneği Yayınları.
  • Telli– Yamamoto, G., ve Altun, D. (2020). Coronavirüs ve çevrimiçi (online) eğitimin önlenemeyen yükselişi. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 25–34.
  • Tonbuloglu, B., (2021). Türkiye’de Acil Durum Uzaktan Öğretim ve Eğitim Bilişim Ağı (EBA) İncelemesi, (Politika Notu: 2021/26). İstanbul: İLKE İlim Kültür Eğitim Vakfı.
  • Trikoilis, D., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2020). The potential of research for professional development in isolated settings during the covid–19 crisis and beyond. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 295–300.
  • Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & education, 102, 15–34.
  • Tsiotakis, P., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2016). Critical factors towards analysing teachers' presence in on–line learning communities. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 45–58.
  • Tugend, A. (2020). On the Verge of Burnout: Covid19’s impact on faculty well–being and career plans. https://connect.chronicle.com/rs/931–EKA–218/images/Covid%26FacultyCareerPaths_Fidelity_ResearchBrief_v3%20%281%29.pdf [15.10.2021].
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2021). ED COVID–19 handbook: Strategies for safe operation and addressing the impact of Covid–19 on higher education students, faculty, and staff. https://www2.ed.gov/documents/coronavirus/reopening–3.pdf.
  • Uçan, S. (2016). The role of continuous professional development of teachers in educational change: A literature review. Harran Education Journal, 1(1), 36-43. DOI: 10.22596/2016.0101.36.43.
  • Uçan, S. (2021). Öğretmenler ve Öğretmen Adayları İçin Sanal Mesleki Öğrenme Ağları. In İ. Yıldırım (Eds.), Teknoloji Destekli Öğretim: Güncel Gelişmeler. Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Visser, R. D., Evering, L. C., & Barrett, D. E. (2014). # TwitterforTeachers: The implications of Twitter as a self–directed professional development tool for K–12 teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 396–413.
  • Wang, C. X. (2021). CAFE: An Instructional Design Model to Assist K–12 Teachers to Teach Remotely during and beyond the Covid–19 Pandemic. TechTrends, 65(1), 8–16.
  • Whitaker, T., Zoul, J., ve Casas, J. (2015). What Connected Educators Do Differently. Routledge.
  • Yıldız, S., ve Kartal, G. (2020). Uzaktan eğitim–Acil. https://sarkac.org/2020/06/uzaktan–egitim–acil/ [15.10.2021].
  • Yılmaz, E., Güner, B., Mutlu, H. ve Doğanay, G. (2020). Veli algısına göre pandemi dönemi uzaktan eğitim sürecinin niteliği. Konya: Palet Yayınları.
  • Yokuş, G. (2018). Çevrimiçi mesleki öğrenme ağlarının öğretmen adaylarının araştırmacı kimlik eğilimleri, sosyal sorumluluk temelli liderlik algıları ve sosyal ağlara dayalı öğrenme algıları üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi: Dijital öğretmen topluluğu. Yayınlanmamış Doktora tezi, Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mersin.

Acil Uzaktan Öğretim Dönemi Sonrası İçin Kapsayıcı, İşbirliğine Dayalı ve Kişiselleştirilmiş Mesleki Gelişim Süreci: Sanal Mesleki Öğrenme Ağlarının Önemi

Year 2022, , 175 - 187, 15.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1028020

Abstract

Covid–19 salgını ile birlikte eğitimin sürdürülebilirliğinin sağlanması için kriz durumuna bir çözüm niteliğinde acil uzaktan öğretim sürecine geçilmiştir. Bu ani gelişen duruma eğitim kurumlarının, öğretmenlerin, öğrencilerin ve velilerin hızlı bir şekilde adapte olması beklenmiş, bu süreçte birçok zorlukla karşılaştıkları görülmüştür. Bir derleme çalışması olan bu makalede, Covid–19 salgını sürecinde öğretmenlerin karşılaştıkları pedagojik, psikolojik ve öğrencilerle ilgili zorluklara odaklanılarak ihtiyaç duydukları mesleki gelişim sürecinin niteliklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Farklı alanlarda yaşanılan zorluklar neticesinde hem salgın hem de salgın sonrası dönemde öğretmenlerin ihtiyaç duydukları destek sisteminin çok boyutlu ve bütüncül bir yaklaşım ile sağlanması gerekliliği öne sürülerek, Covid–19 salgını öncesinde kullanımı yaygınlaşan ve salgın sonrasında da oldukça popüler hale gelen sanal mesleki öğrenme ağlarının bu süreçte ortaya çıkan mesleki gelişim ihtiyacını karşılamadaki rolü açıklığa kavuşturulmaktadır.

References

  • Abaci, S., Robertson, J., Linklater, H., & McNeill, F. (2021). Supporting school teachers’ rapid engagement with online education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 29–34.
  • Aguilera–Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID–19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011.
  • Akkoyunlu, B., & Bardakcı, S. (2020). Pandemi döneminde uzaktan eğitim. https://portal.yokak. gov.tr/makale/pandemi–doneminde–uzaktan–egitim/#acil–uzaktan–ogretimin–degerlendirilme–sureci.
  • Aktaş– Salman, U. (2020). Türkiye’de koronavirüsün eğitime etkileri–V, Dijital uçurumu öğrenciler anlatıyor. https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/turkiyede–koronavirusun–egitime–etkisi–v–dijital–ucurumu–ogrenciler–anlatiyor/ [15.10.2021].
  • Bakator, M., & Radosav, D. (2020). Managing education in the COVID–19 era. BMJ, 370.
  • Balaman, F., & Hanbay– Tiryaki, S. (2021). Coronavirüs (Covid–19) nedeniyle mecburi yürütülen uzaktan eğitim hakkında öğretmen görüşleri. Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches, 10(1).
  • Barbour, M. K., LaBonte, R., Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., Bond, A., Kelly, K. & Hill, P. (2020). Understanding pandemic pedagogy: Differences between emergency remote, remote, and online teaching. State of the Nation: K–12 e–Learning in Canada.
  • Bozkurt, A. (2020). Koronavirüs (Covid–19) pandemi süreci ve pandemi sonrası dünyada eğitime yönelik değerlendirmeler: Yeni normal ve yeni eğitim paradigması. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 112–142.
  • Bozkurt, A., ve Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi.
  • Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Rethinking education in the new normal post–covid–19 era: A curriculum studies perspective. Aquademia, 4(2), ep20018. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8315.
  • Can, E. (2020). Coronavirüs (Covid–19) pandemisi ve pedagojik yansımaları: Türkiye’de açık ve uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 11–53.
  • Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2015). Engagement through microblogging: Educator professional development via Twitter. Professional development in education, 41(4), 707–728.
  • Capogna, S. (2010, October). Learning and Social Networks: new forms of sociability. In ESA Research Network Sociology of Culture Midterm Conference: Culture and the Making of Worlds.
  • Chari,R. (2020). Teacher wellbeing & self–care in Covid times. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/edutrends–india/teacher–wellbeing–self–care–in–covid–times/.
  • Chen, J. Q., & McCray, J. (2012). A conceptual framework for teacher professional development: The whole teacher approach. NHSA dialog, 15(1), 8–23.
  • Cipriano, C., & Brackett, M. (2020). How to support teachers’ emotional needs right now. Gt. Good Mag. Sci. Insights Meaningful Life, 1–10.
  • Colao, A., Piscitelli, P., Pulimeno, M., Colazzo, S., Miani, A., & Giannini, S. (2020). Rethinking the role of the school after COVID–19. The Lancet Public Health, 5(7), e370.
  • Crowley, B. (2014). 3 steps for building a professional learning network. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/opinion–3–steps–for–building–a–professional–learning–network/2014/12 .
  • Davis, K. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of Twitter for professional development. Disability and rehabilitation, 37(17), 1551–1558.
  • Derri, V., Vasiliadou, O., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2015). The effects of a short–term professional development program on physical education teachers’ behaviour and students’ engagement in learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 234–262.
  • Deyamport III, W. H. (2013). An implementation of a Twitter–supported personal learning network to individualize teacher professional development. Yayınlanmamış Doktora tezi, Capella Üniversitesi.
  • Dias, M. J., Almodóvar, M., Atiles, J. T., Vargas, A. C., & Zúñiga León, I. M. (2020). Rising to the Challenge: Innovative early childhood teachers adapt to the COVID–19 era. Childhood Education, 96(6), 38–45.
  • Ehren, M., Madrid, R., Romiti, S., Armstrong, P. W., Fisher, P., ve McWhorter, D. L. (2021). Teaching in the COVID–19 era: Understanding the opportunities and barriers for teacher agency. Perspectives in Education, 39(1), 61–76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i1.5.
  • Faisal, S. L. (2015). Personal Learning Network: A powerful Tool for Professional Development. Paradigm Shift in Libraries, 59.
  • Ferguson, M. (2020). Teaching during a pandemic hit teachers who were already burned out the hardest. http://www.boredteachers.com
  • Flynn R, Riches E, Reid G, Rosenberg S, Niedzwiedz C. Rapid review of the impact of COVID–19 on mental health. Edinburgh: Public Health Scotland; 2020.
  • Goktalay, S. B., & Ozdilek, Z. (2016). Social networking in higher education in Turkey: students’ use and perceptions. In Social Networking and Education (pp. 167–187). Springer, Cham.
  • Greenhow, C., Staudt Willet, K. B., & Galvin, S. (2021). Inquiring tweets want to know:# Edchat supports for# RemoteTeaching during COVID‐19. British Journal of Educational Technology.
  • Heitz, C., Laboissiere, M., Sanghvi, S., & Sarakatsannis, J. (2020). Getting the next phase of remote learning right in higher education. McKinsey Insights.
  • Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause review, 27, 1–12.
  • Kavuk, E., & Demirtaş, H. (2021). COVID–19 Pandemisi Sürecinde Öğretmenlerin Uzaktan Eğitimde Yaşadığı Zorluklar. E–Uluslararası Pedandragoji Dergisi, 1(1), 55–73.
  • Kelly, N., & Antonio, A. (2016). Teacher peer support in social network sites. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 138–149.
  • Keskin, M., ve Özer– Kaya, D. (2020). COVID–19 sürecinde öğrencilerin web tabanlı uzaktan eğitime yönelik geri bildirimlerinin değerlendirilmesi. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 59–67.
  • Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A., & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and collective knowledge construction with social media: A process–oriented perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 120–137.
  • Kitsantas, T., Chirinos, D. S., Hiller, S. E., & Kitsantas, A. (2016). An examination of Greek college students’ perceptions of positive and negative effects of social networking use. In Social Networking and Education (pp. 129–143). Springer, Cham.
  • Košir, K., Dugonik, Š., Huskić, A., Gračner, J., Kokol, Z., & Krajnc, Ž. (2020). Predictors of perceived teachers’ and school counsellors’ work stress in the transition period of online education in schools during the COVID–19 pandemic. Educational Studies, 1–5.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2020). Language teachers’ coping strategies during the Covid–19 conversion to online teaching: Correlations with stress, wellbeing and negative emotions. System, 94, 102352.
  • Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and teacher education, 55, 291–307.
  • Marek, M. W. ve Chew, C. S. (2021). Teacher experiences in converting classes to distance learning in the covid–19 pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(1). DOI: 10.4018/IJDET.20210101.oa3.
  • McKenzie, L. (2020, 27 Mayıs).Ramping up for remote instruction. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/05/27/new–resources–help–support–faculty–quality–online–instruction.
  • Mohan, G., McCoy, S., Carroll, E., Mihut, G., Lyons, S., & Mac Domhnaill, C. (2020). Learning for all? Second–level education in Ireland during COVID–19. Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) Research Series.
  • Morgan, B., & Simmons, L. (2021, May). A ‘PERMA’Response to the Pandemic: An Online Positive Education Programme to Promote Wellbeing in University Students. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 172). Frontiers.
  • Munasinghe, S., Sperandei, S., Freebairn, L., Conroy, E., Jani, H., Marjanovic, S., & Page, A. (2020). The impact of physical distancing policies during the COVID–19 pandemic on health and well–being among Australian adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(5), 653–661.
  • OECD (2020), Lessons for Education from COVID–19: A Policy Maker’s Handbook for More Resilient Systems, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0a530888–en.
  • Ozamiz–Etxebarria, N., Berasategi Santxo, N., Idoiaga Mondragon, N., & Dosil Santamaría, M. (2021). The psychological state of teachers during the COVID–19 crisis: The challenge of returning to face–to–face teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3861.
  • Özmen, F., Aküzüm, C., & Sünkür, M. (2012). Sosyal ağ sitelerinin eğitsel ortamlardaki işlevselliği. Education Sciences, 7(2), 496–506.
  • Peters, M. A., Rizvi, F., McCulloch, G., Gibbs, P., Gorur, R., Hong, M., ... & Misiaszek, L. (2020). Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post–Covid–19: An EPAT Collective Project. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–44. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1777655.
  • Pöysä, S., Pakarinen, E., & Lerkkanen, M. K. (2021). Patterns of Teachers’ Occupational Well–Being During the COVID–19 Pandemic: Relations to Experiences of Exhaustion, Recovery, and Interactional Styles of Teaching. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6). Frontiers Media SA.
  • Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID–19 Pandemic of 2020. OECD.
  • Sancar, R., Atal, D., ve Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305.
  • Sánchez–Cruzado, C., Santiago Campión, R., & Sánchez–Compaña, M. (2021). Teacher Digital Literacy: The Indisputable Challenge after COVID–19. Sustainability, 13(4), 1858.
  • Schleicher, A. (2021). The state of education– one year into covid. OECD Education and Skills Today. https://oecdedutoday.com/state–of–education–one–year–into–covid [15.10.2021].
  • Sohaei, S., & Iahad, N. A. (2014). Review on Social Network Sites for Teaching and Learning. Journal of information systems research and innovation, 7(1), 10–16.
  • Şen Akbulut, M. (2020). Dijital teknolojilerin eğitimde etkin kullanımı. Bilim ve Teknik, 53(631), 48–55. Talidong, K. J. B., & Toquero, C. M. D. (2020). Philippine teachers’ practices to deal with anxiety amid COVID–19. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 25(6–7), 573–579.
  • TEDMEM. (2020). COVID–19 sürecinde eğitim: Uzaktan öğrenme, sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri (TEDMEM Analiz Dizisi 7). Ankara: Türk Eğitim Derneği Yayınları.
  • Telli– Yamamoto, G., ve Altun, D. (2020). Coronavirüs ve çevrimiçi (online) eğitimin önlenemeyen yükselişi. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 25–34.
  • Tonbuloglu, B., (2021). Türkiye’de Acil Durum Uzaktan Öğretim ve Eğitim Bilişim Ağı (EBA) İncelemesi, (Politika Notu: 2021/26). İstanbul: İLKE İlim Kültür Eğitim Vakfı.
  • Trikoilis, D., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2020). The potential of research for professional development in isolated settings during the covid–19 crisis and beyond. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 295–300.
  • Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & education, 102, 15–34.
  • Tsiotakis, P., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2016). Critical factors towards analysing teachers' presence in on–line learning communities. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 45–58.
  • Tugend, A. (2020). On the Verge of Burnout: Covid19’s impact on faculty well–being and career plans. https://connect.chronicle.com/rs/931–EKA–218/images/Covid%26FacultyCareerPaths_Fidelity_ResearchBrief_v3%20%281%29.pdf [15.10.2021].
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2021). ED COVID–19 handbook: Strategies for safe operation and addressing the impact of Covid–19 on higher education students, faculty, and staff. https://www2.ed.gov/documents/coronavirus/reopening–3.pdf.
  • Uçan, S. (2016). The role of continuous professional development of teachers in educational change: A literature review. Harran Education Journal, 1(1), 36-43. DOI: 10.22596/2016.0101.36.43.
  • Uçan, S. (2021). Öğretmenler ve Öğretmen Adayları İçin Sanal Mesleki Öğrenme Ağları. In İ. Yıldırım (Eds.), Teknoloji Destekli Öğretim: Güncel Gelişmeler. Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Visser, R. D., Evering, L. C., & Barrett, D. E. (2014). # TwitterforTeachers: The implications of Twitter as a self–directed professional development tool for K–12 teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 396–413.
  • Wang, C. X. (2021). CAFE: An Instructional Design Model to Assist K–12 Teachers to Teach Remotely during and beyond the Covid–19 Pandemic. TechTrends, 65(1), 8–16.
  • Whitaker, T., Zoul, J., ve Casas, J. (2015). What Connected Educators Do Differently. Routledge.
  • Yıldız, S., ve Kartal, G. (2020). Uzaktan eğitim–Acil. https://sarkac.org/2020/06/uzaktan–egitim–acil/ [15.10.2021].
  • Yılmaz, E., Güner, B., Mutlu, H. ve Doğanay, G. (2020). Veli algısına göre pandemi dönemi uzaktan eğitim sürecinin niteliği. Konya: Palet Yayınları.
  • Yokuş, G. (2018). Çevrimiçi mesleki öğrenme ağlarının öğretmen adaylarının araştırmacı kimlik eğilimleri, sosyal sorumluluk temelli liderlik algıları ve sosyal ağlara dayalı öğrenme algıları üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi: Dijital öğretmen topluluğu. Yayınlanmamış Doktora tezi, Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mersin.
There are 70 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Zeynep Baltacı 0000-0002-2063-9608

Serkan Ucan 0000-0002-3639-3171

Publication Date April 15, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022

Cite

APA Baltacı, Z., & Ucan, S. (2022). Inclusive, collaborative and personalised professional development process for the post–emergency remote teaching era: The importance of virtual professional learning networks. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 12(1), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1028020