Tarımsal atıklardan elde edilen biyokömürün buğday bitkisinin gelişimi ve bazı toprak özellikleri üzerine etkileri

Year 2017, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 39 - 47, 30.06.2017

Ayten Namlı , Muhittin Onur Akça Hanife Akça

Abstract

Tavuk altlığı ve fındık kabuğu biyokömürü uygulamalarının, toprağın bazı kimyasal özellikleri ve buğday verim parametreleri üzerine olan etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla, Ankara İli Haymana ilçesinde bir yıl süreli tarla denemesi kurulmuştur. Bu kapsamda, biyokömür materyalleri tek başlarına 150 ve 300 kg da-1 dozlarında ve kimyasal gübrelerle birlikte (kaç cm?) toprak derinliğine tesadüf parselleri deneme desenine göre uygulanmıştır. Hasat sonrası alınan toprak örneklerinde yapılan analizlere göre, toprağa uygulanan biyokömürler, toprağın organik madde, azot, kireç, pH, EC, iz element ve ağır metal kapsamları üzerinde önemli etkide bulunmamış, ancak fosfor, potasyum, kalsiyum ve magnezyum kapsamlarını önemli derecede artırmıştır. Tavuk altlığı biyokömürünün fındıkkabuğu biyokömürüne göre daha etkili olmuş, biyokömürlerin tek başlarına uygulanmasından ziyade DAP gübresiyle birlikte uygulanması durumunda verim, bitki boyu ve başakta tane sayısı üzerinde en fazla etkiye sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Toprağa uygulanan biyokömürler danenin P, K, Ca ve Mg kapsamına etki etmiş ve danede en yüksek element içerikleri ise biyokömürlerin kimyasal gübreyle birlikte uygulandığında elde edilmiştir.

Keywords

Biyokömür, tavul altlığı, fındık kabuğu, buğday, toprak özellikleri

The effects of biochars obtained from agricultural wastes on wheat plant growth and some soil properties

Abstract

In order to determine the effects of poultry litter and hazelnutshell biochar applications on some soil chemical properties and wheat growth criteria, a field experiment had been conducted in Haymana District of Ankara for one year. Within this scope, biochar materials were applied to 0-? cm soil depth in doses of 150 and 300 kg da-1 alone and together with chemical fertilizers according to the randomized plot experimental design. According to the test results of soil samples taken after harvest, biochar applications did not have significant impact on organic matter, nitrogen, lime, pH, EC, trace element and, heavy metal contents of soil, but significantly increased phosphorous, potassium, calcium and magnesium contents. It was found that poultry litter biochar was more effective than the nutshell biochar, and the applications of biochars together with DAP (diammonium phosphate) fertilizer to soil rather than the application of biochars alone were more effective on plant length and wheat grain number on spike. The biochars applications into soil affected P, K, Ca and Mg contents of grain, and the highest nutrient contents in grain were obtained when biochars applied together with the chemical fertilizers.

Keywords

Biochar, poultry litter, hazelnut shell, wheat, soil properties

References

• Ahmed F, Islam M, Iqbal M, 2017. Biochar amendment improves soil fertility and productivity of mulberry plant. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 6(3): 226-237.Akça MO, Namli A, 2015. Effects of poultry litter biochar on soil enzyme activities and tomato, pepper and lettuce plants growth. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 4(3): 161-168.Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA, 2010. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biyokömür application to temperate soils: A review. Plant and Soil 337: 1–18. Barber SA, 1985. Potassium availability at the soil-root interface and factors influencing potassium uptake. In: Potassium in Agriculture. RD Munson (Ed.). ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, USA. pp 309–324.Barut H, 2012. Farklı doz ve zamanlarda uygulanan çinko ve azotun buğdayda tane çinko konsantrasyonu üzerine etkisi. Çukurova Üniv. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora tezi, Adana.Bouyoucos GJ, 1951. A recalibration of hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal 43: 434-438.Bremner JM, 1965. Total nitrogen. In: Methods of soil analysis Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Black, C.A. (ed.), Amer. Soc. Of Agron. Inc. Pub. Agron.Series. No: 9, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 1149-1178. Dönmez E, 2002. Bazı ekmeklik buğday (Triticum aestivum L.) çeşitlerinde genotip x çevre interaksiyonları ve stabilite analizleri üzerine bir araştırma. Doktora tezi (Basılmamış), Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Ens, Tokat. Erdman JA, Moul RC, 1982. Mineral composition of small-grain cultivars from a uniform test plot in South Dakota. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 30: 169-174.Gençtan T, Sağlam N, 1987. Ekim Zamanı ve Ekim Sıklığının Üç Ekmeklik Buğday Çeşidinde Verim ve Verim Unsurlarına Etkisi. Türkiye Tahıl Sempozyumu, 171-183, 6-9 Ekim, Bursa.Gill HS, Singh A, Sethi SK, Behl RK, 2004. Phosphorus Uptake and Use Efficiency in Different Varieties of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 50; 563-572.Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W, 2002. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal: A review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 35: 219–230.Glaser B, Parr M, Braun C, Kopolo G, 2009. Biochar is carbon negative. Nature Geoscience 2(1), 2.Graham R, Senadhira D, Bebe S, Iglesias C, Monasterio I, 1999. Breeding for micronutrient density in edible portions of staple food crops: conventional approaches. Field Crops Research 60; 57-80.Hansen V, Müller-Stöver D, Ahrenfeldt J, Holm J K, Henriksen UB, Hauggaard-Nielsen, H, 2015. Gasification biochar as a valuable by-product for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. Biomass and Bioenergy 72: 300-308.Jackson ML, 1958. Soil Chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, London.Jackson ML, 1969. Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Kacar B, İnal A, 2008. Bitki analizleri, Cilt 1., Nobel yayını, 892 s, Ankara.Kaya M, Atak M, Çiftçi CY, Ünver S, 2005. Çinko ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Ekmeklik Buğday (Triticum aestivum L.)‟da Verim ve Bazı Verim Öğeleri Üzerine Etkileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniv., Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 9(3)Kün E, 1988. Serin İklim Tahılları. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları. No:1032 Ders Kitabı, 299, S. 322, Ankara.Kün E, 1996. Tahılar-I. Ankara Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yayın No:1451, Ders Kitabı: 431, Ankara.Laird AD, 2008. The charcoal vision. A win-win-win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permaneny sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agronomy Journal 100: 178–181.Lavado RS, Porcelli CA, Alvarez R, 2001. Nutrient and heavy metal concentration and distribution in corn, soybean and wheat as affected by different tillage systems in the Argentina Pampas. Soil & Tillage Research 62: 55-60.Lehmann J, 2007a. Bio-energy in the black. Frontiers in Ecology and The Environments 5: 381–387.Lehmann J, 2007b. A handful of carbon. Nature 447: 143–144. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M, 2006. Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems—A review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11(2): 403–427.Mathews JA, 2008. Viewpoint: Carbon-negative biofuels. Energy Policy 36(3): 940–945.Ogawa M, Okimori Y, Takahashi F, 2006. Carbon sequestration by carbonization of biomass and forestation: Three case studies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11: 429–444.Olsen SR, Sommers LE, 1982. Phosphorus, In: Page L A, Miller R H. Keeney D R, ed. Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp.539-579Richards LA, 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. United States Department of Agriculture Handbook, 60.Shackley S, Carter S, Knowles T, Middelink E, Haefele S, Sohi S, Haszeldine S, 2012. Sustainable gasification–biochar systems? A case-study of rice-husk gasification in Cambodia, Part I: Context, chemical properties, environmental and health and safety issues. Energy Policy 42: 49-58.Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R, 2010. A review of biyokömür and its use and function in soil. Advances in Agronomy 105: 47–82.Verheijen F, Jeffery S, Bastos A C, van der Velde M, Diafas F, 2010. Biochar application to soils. A critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes, and functions.EUR 24099 EN Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourgp. 149.Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S, 2010. Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature Communications 1(56): 1–9.Yürür N, Tosun O, Eser D, Geçit H, 1981. Buğdayda anasap verimi ile bazı karakterler arasındaki ilişkiler. Bilimsel Araştırma ve İncelemeler. A.Ü. Zir. Fak. Yayınları 755:443.