DEVELOPMENT OF TUBULAR WOVEN PREFORM REINFORCED COMPOSITE PIPE AND COMPARISON OF ITS COMPRESSION BEHAVIOR WITH FILAMENT WOUND COMPOSITE

Year 2019, Volume: 29 Issue: 3, 262 - 267, 30.09.2019

Gülşah Pamuk , Uğur Kemiklioğlu Onur Sayman

https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.527519

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In this
research a novel preform for the reinforcement of tubular composite structures
has been developed. The mentioned preform was woven from para aramid yarn in
the tubular form. A mandrel was passed through a certain amount of tubular
woven preform layer then impregnated with resin, cured in an oven and the
resulting composite pipe was removed from the mandrel. By using the same para
aramid yarn, filament wound composite pipes were also manufactured with the
same production parameters. Axial and transverse compression behaviors of
tubular woven preform reinforced composite pipes were compared with the ones
that are manufactured by conventional filament winding method. The test results
indicated that under transverse and axial compression, composite pipes
developed in this study showed superior strength values than filament wound
ones.

Keywords

Industrial textiles, composites, filament winding

References

• 1. Hashmi MSJ, 2006. Aspects of tube and pipe manufacturing processes meter to nanometer diameter., Journal of Materials Processing Technology 179, 5-10.
• 2. Zou GP, Taheri F. 2006. Stress analysis of adhesively bonded sandwich pipe joints subjected to torsional loading. International Journal of Solids and Structures 43, 5953-5968.
• 3. Shen H, Wen J, Yu D, Wen X, 2009. The vibrational properties of a periodic composite pipe in 3D space. Journal of Sound and Vibration 328, 57-70.
• 4. Mertiny P, Ellyin F, Hothan A, 2004. An experimental investigation on the effect of multi angle filament winding on the strength of tubular composite structures. Composites Science and Technology 64, 1-9.
• 5. Use of Composite Pipe Materials in the Transportation of Natural Gas (2002) Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.165.1163&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 12 march 2018).
• 6. Sari M, Karakuzu R, Deniz ME, Icten BM. 2011, Residual failure pressures and fatigue life of filament wound composite pipes subjected to lateral impact. Journal of Composite Materials 46(15), 1787-1794.
• 7. Xia M, Kemmochi K, Takayanagi H. 2002. Bending behavior of filament-wound fiber-reinforced sandwich pipes. Composite Structures 56, 201-210.
• 8. Ma Y, Sugahara T, Yang Y, Hamada H. 2015. A study on the energy absorption properties of carbon/aramid fiber filament winding composite tube. Composite Structures 123, 301-311.
• 9. Xia M, Kemmochi K, Takayanagi H. 2001. Analysis of filament wound fiber reinforced sandwich pipe under combined internal pressure and thermomechanical loading. Composite Structures 51(3), 273-283.
• 10. Deniz ME, Karakuzu R. 2012. Seawater effect on impact behavior of glass epoxy composite pipes. Composites Part B 43(13), 1130-1138.
• 11. Onder A, Sayman O, Dogan T, Tarakcioglu N. 2009. Burst failure load of composite pressure vessels. Composite Structures 89(1), 159-166.
• 12. Sayman O. 2005. Analysis of multi-layered composite cylinders under hygrothermal loading. Composites Part A, 36(7), 923-933.
• 13. Demir I, Sayman O, Dogan A, Arikan V, Arman Y. 2015., The effects of repeated transverse impact load on the burst pressure of composite pressure vessel. Composites Part B 68, 121-125.
• 14. Deniz ME, Ozdemir O, Ozen M, Karakuzu R. 2013. Failure pressure and impact response of glass epoxy pipes exposed to seawater. Composites Part B 53, 355-361.
• 15. Cohen D. 1997. Influence of filament winding parameters on composite vessel quality and strength. Composites Part A 28(12), 1035-1047.
• 16. Velosa JC, Nunesa JP, Antunesa PJ, Silva JF, Marques AT. 2009. Development of a new generation of filament wound composite pressure cylinders. Composites Science and Technology 69(9), 1348-1353.
• 17. Cohen D, Mantell S,, Zhao L. 2001. The effect of fiber volume fraction on filament wound composite pressure vessel strength. Composites Part B 32(5), 413-429.
• 18. Sung J, Chang P, Chun SH, Cheol GK, Kim U. 2002. Analysis of filament wound composite structures considering the change of winding angles through the thickness direction. Composite Structures 55(1), 63-71.
• 19. Jia X, Chen G, Yu Y, Li G, Zhu J, Luo X, Duan C, Yang X, Hui D. 2013. Effect of geometric factor, winding angle and pre-crack angle on quasi-static crushing behavior of filament wound CFRP cylinder. Composites Part B, 45, 1336-1343.
• 20. Peters ST. 2011. Filament winding-introduction and overview. In: Peters ST. (ed.). Composite Filament Winding. USA: ASM International
• 21. Ahmadi MS, Johari MS, Sadighi M, Esfandeh M. 2009. An experimental study on mechanical properties of GFRP braid pultruded composite rods. Polymer Letters 3(9), 560-568.
• 22. Harrocks AR, Anand SC. 2000. Handbook of Technical Textiles. New York: Woodhead Publishing Limited.
• 23. Pastore C. 2000. Opportunities and challenges for textile reinforced composites. Mechanics of Composite Materials 36(2), 97-116.
• 24. Yang B, Kozey V, Adanur S, Kumar S. 2000. Bending, compression, and shear behavior of woven glass fiber epoxy composites. Composites Part B 31, 715-721.
• 25. Hosseinzadeh R, Shokrieh MM, Lessard L. 2006. Damage behavior of fiber reinforced composite plates subjected to drop weight impacts. Composites Science and Technology 66, 61-68.
• 26. Karakuzu R, Gulem T, Icten BM. 2006. Failure analysis of woven laminated glass–vinylester composites with pin-loaded hole. Composite Structures 72, 27-32.
• 27. Zhang J, Chaisombat K, He S, Wang CH. 2012. Hybrid composite laminates reinforced with glass/carbon woven fabrics for lightweight load bearing structures. Materials and Design 36, 75-80.
• 28. Baucom JN, Zikry MA. 2005. Low velocity impact damage progression in woven E-glass composite systems. Composites Part A 36, 658-664.
• 29. Icten BM, Karakuzu R. 2002. Progressive failure analysis of pin-loaded carbon–epoxy woven composite plates. Composites Science and Technology 62, 1259-1271.
• 30. Clark SR, Mouritz A., 2008. Tensile fatigue properties of a 3D orthogonal woven composite. Composites Part A 39, 1018-1024.
• 31. Reis PNB, Ferreira JAM, Santos P, Richardson MOW, Santos B. 2012. Impact response of Kevlar composites with filled epoxy matrix. Composite Structures 94, 3520-3528.
• 32. Ishikawa T, Chou T. 1982. Stiffness and strength behavior of woven fabric composites. Journal of Materials Science 17, 3211-3220.
• 33. Calme O, Bigaud D, Hamelin P. 2005. 3D braided composite rings under lateral compression. Composites Science and Technology 65, 95-106.