Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

PRETERM VE TERM BEBEKLERDE DUYUSAL İŞLEMLEME BECERİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Year 2018, Volume: 29 Issue: 2, 31 - 36, 27.08.2018

Halil İbrahim Çelik , Bülent Elbasan , Kıvılcım Gücüyener Hülya Kayıhan , Meral Huri

https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.343255
Cited By: 2

Abstract






Amaç: Preterm bebekler, santral sinir sistemi immatürasyonu ve yeni doğan yoğun bakım ünitelerinin aşırı duyusal uyarıları nedeniyle duyusal işlemleme problemlerine (DİP) sahip olabilirler. Bu çalışmanın amacı, preterm ve term bebeklerde duyusal işlemleme becerisini karşılaştırmak ve preterm bebeklerin DİP’lerini incelemekti.

Yöntem: Çalışmaya düzeltilmiş yaşları 10-12 ay arasında olan 30 preterm ve yaşları 10-12 ay arasında olan 30 term bebek dahil edildi. Bebeklerin sosyodemografik özellikleri ve doğum bilgileri kaydedildikten sonra, duyusal işlemleme değerlendirmesi için Bebeklerde Duyusal Fonksiyonlar Testi (BDFT) kullanıldı.

Sonuçlar: Gruplar karşılaştırıldığında, term bebeklerin BDFT total puanının daha yüksek olduğu görüldü (p<0,001). BDFT total puanına göre; preterm bebeklerin % 60’ının, term bebeklerin ise % 13’ünün DİP’e sahip olduğu bulundu. Preterm bebeklerin taktil işlemleme, motor praksis, vizüeltaktil bütünleme (p<0,05) ve vestibüler işlemleme (p<0,01) puanlarının term bebeklerden daha düşük olduğu saptandı.

Tartışma: Term bebeklerle karşılaştırıldığında, preterm bebeklerin duyusal işlemleme becerisi açısından yetersiz olduğu görüldü. Erken dönemde yapılan gelişimsel değerlendirme ve müdahalelerde, duyusal işlemleme becerisinin dikkate alınması preterm bebeklerin gelişimlerinin desteklenmesine katkı sağlayacaktır.

Keywords

Duyu Bütünlüğü; Duyusal İşlemleme; Preterm; Term.

References

  • 1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, Oestergaard M, Say L, Moller A-B, et al. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 2013;10(Suppl 1):S2.
  • 2. Lickliter R. The integrated development of sensory organization. Clin Perinatol . 2011;38(4):591-603.
  • 3. Als H, B McAnulty G. The newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program (NIDCAP) with kangaroo mother care (KMC): comprehensive care for preterm infants. Curr Womens Health Rev. 2011;7(3):288-301.
  • 4. Blackburn S. Environmental impact of the NICU on developmental outcomes. J Pediatr Nurs. 1998;13(5):279-89.
  • 5. Mitchell AW, Moore EM, Roberts EJ, Hachtel KW, Brown MS. Sensory Processing Disorder in Children Ages Birth–3 Years Born Prematurely: A Systematic Review. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;69(1):1-11.
  • 6. Graven SN, Browne JV. Visual development in the human fetus, infant, and young child. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2008;8(4):194-201.
  • 7. Volpe JJ. Neurology of the newborn: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008; p. 51-54.
  • 8. Cabral TI, da Silva LGP, Martinez CMS, Tudella E. Analysis of sensory processing in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev . 2016;103:77-81.
  • 9. Graven SN, Browne JV. Sensory development in the fetus, neonate, and infant: introduction and overview. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2008;8(4):169-72.
  • 10. Lickliter R. The role of sensory stimulation in perinatal development: insights from comparative research for care of the high-risk infant. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2000;21(6):437-47.
  • 11. Als H. A synactive model of neonatal behavioral organization: framework for the assessment of neurobehavioral development in the premature infant and for support of infants and parents in the neonatal intensive care environment. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1986;6(3-4):3-53.
  • 12. Critz C, Blake K, Nogueira E. Sensory Processing Challenges in Children. J Nurse Pract. 2015;11(7):710-6.
  • 13. Crozier SC, Goodson JZ, Mackay ML, Synnes AR, Grunau RE, Miller SP, et al. Sensory Processing Patterns in Children Born Very Preterm. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(1):1-7.
  • 14. Jirikowic TL, Engel JM, Deitz JC. The Test of Sensory Functions in Infants: Test–Retest Reliability for Infants With Developmental Delays. Am J Occup Ther. 1997;51(9):733-8.
  • 15. DeGangi G, Greenspan S. Test of sensory functions in infants (TSFI). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. 1989.
  • 16. Chorna O, Solomon JE, Slaughter JC, Stark AR, Maitre NL. Abnormal sensory reactivity in preterm infants during the first year correlates with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed . 2014;99(6):F475-F9.
  • 17. Bart O, Shayevits S, Gabis L, Morag I. Prediction of participation and sensory modulation of late preterm infants at 12 months: A prospective study. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(6):2732-8.
  • 18. Case-Smith J, Butcher L, Reed D. Parents’ report of sensory responsiveness and temperament in preterm infants. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52(7):547-55.
  • 19. Wiener AS, Long T, DeGangi GA, Battaile B. Sensory processing of infants born prematurely or with regulatory disorders. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1996;16(4):1-18.
  • 20. Cabral TI, da Silva LGP, Tudella E, Martinez CMS. Motor development and sensory processing: A comparative study between preterm and term infants. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;36:102-7.
  • 21. Wickremasinghe A, Rogers E, Johnson B, Shen A, Barkovich A, Marco E. Children born prematurely have atypical Sensory Profiles. J Perinatol. 2013;33(8):631-5.
  • 22. DeSantis A, Coster W, Bigsby R, Lester B. Colic and fussing in infancy, and sensory processing at 3 to 8 years of age. Infant Ment Health J. 2004;25(6):522-39.
  • 23. Eeles AL, Anderson PJ, Brown NC, Lee KJ, Boyd RN, Spittle AJ, et al. Sensory profiles obtained from parental reports correlate with independent assessments of development in very preterm children at 2years of age. Early Hum Dev . 2013;89(12):1075-80.

Year 2018, Volume: 29 Issue: 2, 31 - 36, 27.08.2018

Halil İbrahim Çelik , Bülent Elbasan , Kıvılcım Gücüyener Hülya Kayıhan , Meral Huri

https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.343255
Cited By: 2

Abstract

References

  • 1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, Oestergaard M, Say L, Moller A-B, et al. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 2013;10(Suppl 1):S2.
  • 2. Lickliter R. The integrated development of sensory organization. Clin Perinatol . 2011;38(4):591-603.
  • 3. Als H, B McAnulty G. The newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program (NIDCAP) with kangaroo mother care (KMC): comprehensive care for preterm infants. Curr Womens Health Rev. 2011;7(3):288-301.
  • 4. Blackburn S. Environmental impact of the NICU on developmental outcomes. J Pediatr Nurs. 1998;13(5):279-89.
  • 5. Mitchell AW, Moore EM, Roberts EJ, Hachtel KW, Brown MS. Sensory Processing Disorder in Children Ages Birth–3 Years Born Prematurely: A Systematic Review. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;69(1):1-11.
  • 6. Graven SN, Browne JV. Visual development in the human fetus, infant, and young child. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2008;8(4):194-201.
  • 7. Volpe JJ. Neurology of the newborn: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008; p. 51-54.
  • 8. Cabral TI, da Silva LGP, Martinez CMS, Tudella E. Analysis of sensory processing in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev . 2016;103:77-81.
  • 9. Graven SN, Browne JV. Sensory development in the fetus, neonate, and infant: introduction and overview. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2008;8(4):169-72.
  • 10. Lickliter R. The role of sensory stimulation in perinatal development: insights from comparative research for care of the high-risk infant. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2000;21(6):437-47.
  • 11. Als H. A synactive model of neonatal behavioral organization: framework for the assessment of neurobehavioral development in the premature infant and for support of infants and parents in the neonatal intensive care environment. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1986;6(3-4):3-53.
  • 12. Critz C, Blake K, Nogueira E. Sensory Processing Challenges in Children. J Nurse Pract. 2015;11(7):710-6.
  • 13. Crozier SC, Goodson JZ, Mackay ML, Synnes AR, Grunau RE, Miller SP, et al. Sensory Processing Patterns in Children Born Very Preterm. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(1):1-7.
  • 14. Jirikowic TL, Engel JM, Deitz JC. The Test of Sensory Functions in Infants: Test–Retest Reliability for Infants With Developmental Delays. Am J Occup Ther. 1997;51(9):733-8.
  • 15. DeGangi G, Greenspan S. Test of sensory functions in infants (TSFI). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. 1989.
  • 16. Chorna O, Solomon JE, Slaughter JC, Stark AR, Maitre NL. Abnormal sensory reactivity in preterm infants during the first year correlates with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed . 2014;99(6):F475-F9.
  • 17. Bart O, Shayevits S, Gabis L, Morag I. Prediction of participation and sensory modulation of late preterm infants at 12 months: A prospective study. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(6):2732-8.
  • 18. Case-Smith J, Butcher L, Reed D. Parents’ report of sensory responsiveness and temperament in preterm infants. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52(7):547-55.
  • 19. Wiener AS, Long T, DeGangi GA, Battaile B. Sensory processing of infants born prematurely or with regulatory disorders. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1996;16(4):1-18.
  • 20. Cabral TI, da Silva LGP, Tudella E, Martinez CMS. Motor development and sensory processing: A comparative study between preterm and term infants. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;36:102-7.
  • 21. Wickremasinghe A, Rogers E, Johnson B, Shen A, Barkovich A, Marco E. Children born prematurely have atypical Sensory Profiles. J Perinatol. 2013;33(8):631-5.
  • 22. DeSantis A, Coster W, Bigsby R, Lester B. Colic and fussing in infancy, and sensory processing at 3 to 8 years of age. Infant Ment Health J. 2004;25(6):522-39.
  • 23. Eeles AL, Anderson PJ, Brown NC, Lee KJ, Boyd RN, Spittle AJ, et al. Sensory profiles obtained from parental reports correlate with independent assessments of development in very preterm children at 2years of age. Early Hum Dev . 2013;89(12):1075-80.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Halil İbrahim Çelik

Bülent Elbasan

Kıvılcım Gücüyener This is me

Hülya Kayıhan

Meral Huri

Publication Date August 27, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 29 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Çelik, H. İ., Elbasan, B., Gücüyener, K., Kayıhan, H., et al. (2018). PRETERM VE TERM BEBEKLERDE DUYUSAL İŞLEMLEME BECERİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, 29(2), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.343255
AMA Çelik Hİ, Elbasan B, Gücüyener K, Kayıhan H, Huri M. PRETERM VE TERM BEBEKLERDE DUYUSAL İŞLEMLEME BECERİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. August 2018;29(2):31-36. doi:10.21653/tjpr.343255
Chicago Çelik, Halil İbrahim, Bülent Elbasan, Kıvılcım Gücüyener, Hülya Kayıhan, and Meral Huri. “PRETERM VE TERM BEBEKLERDE DUYUSAL İŞLEMLEME BECERİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ”. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 29, no. 2 (August 2018): 31-36. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.343255.
EndNote Çelik Hİ, Elbasan B, Gücüyener K, Kayıhan H, Huri M (August 1, 2018) PRETERM VE TERM BEBEKLERDE DUYUSAL İŞLEMLEME BECERİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 29 2 31–36.
IEEE H. İ. Çelik, B. Elbasan, K. Gücüyener, H. Kayıhan, and M. Huri, “PRETERM VE TERM BEBEKLERDE DUYUSAL İŞLEMLEME BECERİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ”, Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 31–36, 2018, doi: 10.21653/tjpr.343255.
ISNAD Çelik, Halil İbrahim et al. “PRETERM VE TERM BEBEKLERDE DUYUSAL İŞLEMLEME BECERİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ”. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 29/2 (August 2018), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.343255.
JAMA Çelik Hİ, Elbasan B, Gücüyener K, Kayıhan H, Huri M. PRETERM VE TERM BEBEKLERDE DUYUSAL İŞLEMLEME BECERİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2018;29:31–36.
MLA Çelik, Halil İbrahim et al. “PRETERM VE TERM BEBEKLERDE DUYUSAL İŞLEMLEME BECERİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ”. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, vol. 29, no. 2, 2018, pp. 31-36, doi:10.21653/tjpr.343255.
Vancouver Çelik Hİ, Elbasan B, Gücüyener K, Kayıhan H, Huri M. PRETERM VE TERM BEBEKLERDE DUYUSAL İŞLEMLEME BECERİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2018;29(2):31-6.

Cited By

Erken ve Geç Prematüre Doğan Bebeklerin Duyusal Fonksiyonlarının İncelenmesi: Randomize Kontrollü Bir Çalışma
Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1016305
Duyuların Gelişimi ve Duyu Bütünleme
Gelişim ve Psikoloji Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.51503/gpd.879070