NASAL OBSTRUCTION, QUALITY OF LIFE AND COMFORT LEVEL IN SEPTORINOPLASTY PATIENTS: SIX-MONTHLY MONITORING STUDY

Year 2023, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 119 - 125, 31.05.2023

Hesna Gürler , Pervin Demir

https://doi.org/10.51972/tfsd.1181779

Abstract

Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of study is to determine the nasal obstruction, quality of life, and comfort level before and after surgery in the 6th month in patients who underwent septorhinoplasty.
Material and Methods: Study carried out to determine the nasal obstruction, quality of life, and comfort level in 161 patients who underwent septorhinoplasty. Research data were collected using Nasal Obstruction Symptom Scale (NOSE), Rhinoplasty Quality of Life Scale (ROE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Median, standard deviation, number, percentage, Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test, and Spearmen correlation tests were used.
Results: The NOSE score of the patients was 70.12±27.71 preoperatively decreased to 22.98±21.40 in the 6th month postoperatively, ROE score increased from 18.68±10.06 to 70.78±19.10, the comfort level increased from 3.03±1.57 to 7.32±1.69.
Conclusion: The respiratory function of the patients improved, and the patient comfort and quality of life increased after septorhinoplasty. The evaluation of respiratory function, quality of life, and comfort level after septorhinoplasty will contribute to the planning of education and counseling interventions for patients and the effective management of postoperative home care.
Keywords: Nasal Obstruction, Quality of Life, Septorhinoplasty

Keywords

Nasal Obstruction, Quality of Life, Septorhinoplasty

References

• Alsarraf, R., Larrabee, W.F., Anderson, S. et al. (2001). Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg, 3, 198–201.
• Antoszweski, B., Cyniak, D., Trojan, & Kasielska, A. (2017). An algorithm for nursing care of a patient prior and post rhinoplasty. Polish Nursing,4(66).
• Arslankılıç, Ç., & Göl, E. (2020). The use of Kolcaba’s Comfort Theory in patients undergoing surgical operation: A systematic review. Turkish Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 3(1), 34-44.
• Balikci, H.H., & Gurdal, M.M. (2014). Satisfaction Outcomes in Open Functional Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Analysis. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 25(2), 377-379.
• Bulut, O.C., Wallner, F., Oladokun, D. et al. (2017). Long-term quality of life changes after primary septorhinoplasty. Quality of Life Research, 27(4), 987-991.
• Büyükünal, Şahin, P., & Rızalar, S. (2018). Perianesthesia comfort levels of the patients undergone operation and it’s affecting factors. Journal of Health Sciences and Professions, 5(3), 404-413.
• Çelik, M., & Altıntaş, A. (2019). The Turkish Version of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire: Validation and cinical application. Balkan Med J, 36, 129-133.
• Chavan, R.P., Ingole, S.M., & Birajdar, S.N. (2017). Assessment of surgical outcomes of septorhinoplasty patients: a clinical study. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 3(2), 268-272.
• Cingi, C., Songu, M., & Bal, C. (2011). Outcomes research in rhinoplasty: Body image and quality of life. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, 25, 263–267.
• Gerecci, D., Casanueva, F.J., Mace, J.C. et al. (2019). Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) score outcomes after septorhinoplasty. Laryngoscope, 129(4), 841-846.
• Ishii, L.E., Tollefson, T.T., Basura, G.J. et al. (2017). Clinical Practice Guideline: Improving nasal form and function after rhinoplasty. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 156(2S), 1-30.
• Kalakuntla, M., Patil, Prashant, H.et al. (2019). Outcome of septorhinoplasty in deviated nose deformity: One year cross-sectional study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 71(3), 1953-1956.
• Karahatay, S., Taşlı, H., Karakoç, Ö. et al. (2018). Reliability and validity of the Turkish Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 48, 212-216.
• Kütük, S.G., & Arıkan, O.K. (2019). Evaluation of the effects of open and closed rhinoplasty on the psychosocial stress level and quality of life of rhinoplasty patients. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 72, 1347–1354.
• Ma, Q., Sua, K., Fua, Z. et al. (2020). Anxiety and depression in patients with nasal septal deviation. Am J Otolaryngol, 41(102450), 1-4.
• Oppermann, P.O., Rabaioli, L., Feijó, C. et al. (2022). Overall quality of life impact on candidates for septorhinoplasty according to the World Health Organization quality of life brief questionnaire (WHOQOL-Brief). Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 88(4), 570-575.
• Price, D.D., McGrath, P.A., Rafii, A. Et al. (1983). The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain, 17(1), 45-56.
• Spiekermann, C., Savvas, E., Rudack, C. et al. (2018). Adaption and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale in German language (D-NOSE). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 16(172), 1-6.
• Stewart, M.G., Witsell, D.L., Smith, T.L. et al. (2004). Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 130(2), 157-163.
• Taylan, S., Özkan, I., & Kar, M. (2021). The relationship of preseptoplasty and postseptoplasty early period comfort level with nasal obstruction, sleep quality, and fatigue severity: A prospective study. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 36(3), 268-274.
• Valsamidis, K., Printza, A., Titelis, K. (2019) Olfaction and quality of life in patients with nasal septal deviation treated with septoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol, 40, 747–754.
• Wähmann, M.S., Bulut, O.C., Bran, G.M. et al. (2018). Systematic review of quality-of-life measurement after aesthetic rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg, 42(6), 1635-1647.
• Zojaji, R., Sobhani, E., Meshkat, M. et al. (2018). Quality of life after cosmetic rhinoplasty in Iran: A systematic review. Fundamentals of Mental Health, 20(5), 320-324.