DEVELOPMENT OF AN EFFICIENT T-TYPE STRAINER WITH ITS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Year 2020, , 420 - 433, 01.12.2020

Gaurav Mahajan Ram Subhash Maurya

https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.836499

Abstract

Strainers are devices used in process industry to protect mechanical equipment from getting damaged due the impurities in process fluid. Hence, performance of a strainer has a direct impact on the performance of the process plant. Present work deals with a methodology to model a T-type strainer using CFD tools, investigating its performance, proposing more efficient model and investigating their performance. Numerical model compares well with the experimental data. Five modifications in the existing strainer are proposed by introducing additional punch plate ahead of meshing element. Another significant modification proposed is creating offset across strainer for inlet and outlet of flow. These arrangement increases the net pressure drop across strainer but significantly improves the flow distribution for longer life of the strainer. Increasing body size of strainer and hole of the punch plate is found to reduce the impact of increased pressure drop. These conclusions are important for improving and redesigning an efficient T-strainer.

Keywords

Porous Jump, CFD, Strainer, Porous Media, Pressure Drop

References

• [1] Carlomagno M, Rossin S, Delvecchio M, Anichini A. Experimental and numerical validation of conical strainer fluid/structural performance model. Proc. ASME Turbo Expo, vol. 6, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection; 2012, p. 155–71. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2012-69751.
• [2] JW K, JA K, EY K, CM J, DH K, HN C. CFD Analysis of Liquid Stream Going Through the Wire-Screen Mesh. 5th Int Conf Heat Transf Fluid Mech Thermodyn 2007.
• [3] Erdal A, Andersson HI. Numerical aspects of flow computation through orifices. Flow Meas Instrum 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(97)00017-4.
• [4] Iliev O, Laptev V. On numerical simulation of flow through oil filters. Comput Vis Sci 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00791-003-0118-8.
• [5] Malavasi S, Messa G, Fratino U, Pagano A. On the pressure losses through perforated plates. Flow Meas Instrum 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2012.07.006.
• [6] Barros Filho JA, Navarro MA, Dos Santos A, Jordão E. Experimental and CFD Simulations of Pressure Loss through Perforated Plates. J Energy 2011.
• [7] Tekam SM, Demoulin M, Tekam SM, Daru V. Comparison of numerical and experimental methods for predicting the efficiency of an automotive oil strainer. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Fluids Eng. Div. FED, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2004-59971.
• [8] Gaurav PM, Maurya RS, Mujumdar K. Numerical investigation and performance evaluation of T-type industrial strainer. Int. Conf. Therm. Fluid Eng., 2017.
• [9] Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook. Choice Rev Online 2008. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-4393.
• [10] Weber LJ, Cherian MP, Allen ME, Muste M. Headloss characteristics for perforated plates and flat bar screens. 2000.
• [11] Miller DS. Internal flow systems. CRANFIELD, UK, BHRA (INFORMATION Serv 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(80)90104-0.