Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

COMPARISON OF THERMOECONOMIC COST CALCULATION FOR A BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT

Year 2018, Volume: 4 Issue: 5, 2355 - 2370, 25.06.2018
https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.439073

Abstract

This
paper presents a comparison of the three thermoeconomic methodologies, SPECO
(Specific exergy costing), MOPSA (Modified productive structure analysis) and
Moran for an existing binary geothermal power plant
in western Turkey. Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of the
Dora II binary geothermal power plant with 9543 kW net power output is carried out by using actual plant data to
evaluate plant performances and thermoeconomic costs. The objective of
the study is to perform the advantages and disadvantages of the presented
thermoeconomic methods with respect to the one other using a binary geothermal
plant data. The presented thermoeconomic methodologies are used to reveal and
compare the cost flows and products interactions between the system components.
The overall energy and exergy efficiencies of the plant are calculated to be
47.3% and 13.5%. The unit exergetic costs of electricity are calculated to be
0.0436 $/kWh for MOPSA method, 0.0367 $/kWh for SPECO method and 0.0355 $/kWh
for MORAN method, respectively.

References

  • [1] Kanoglu, M., Yilmaz, C. (2013). Thermal Design of Alkaline Water Electrolysis Assisted by Combined Flash Binary Geothermal Power Plant. In ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
  • [2] Cengel, Y. A., Boles, M. A., (2015). Thermodynamics: an engineering approach, 8th edition.
  • [3] Yilmaz, C. (2017). Thermoeconomic modeling and optimization of a hydrogen production system using geothermal energy. Geothermics, 65, 32-43.
  • [4] Erkan, K., Holdmann, G., Benoit, W., Blackwell, D. (2008). Understanding the Chena Hot Springs, Alaska, geothermal system using temperature and pressure data from exploration boreholes. Geothermics, 37(6), 565-585.
  • [5] Coskun, A., Bolatturk, A., Kanoglu, M. (2014). Thermodynamic and economic analysis and optimization of power cycles for a medium temperature geothermal resource. Energy conversion and management, 78, 39-49.
  • [6] Ganjehsarabi, H., Gungor, A., Dincer, I. (2012). Exergetic performance analysis of Dora II geothermal power plant in Turkey. Energy, 46(1), 101-108.
  • [7] Zare, V. (2015). A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of different ORC configurations for binary geothermal power plants. Energy Conversion and Management, 105, 127-138.
  • [8] Yildirim, D., Ozgener, L. (2012). Thermodynamics and exergoeconomic analysis of geothermal power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 6438-6454.
  • [9] Rašković, P., Guzović, Z., Cvetković, S. (2013). Performance analysis of electricity generation by the medium temperature geothermal resources: Velika Ciglena case study. Energy, 54, 11-31.
  • [10] Coskun, C., Oktay, Z., Dincer, I. (2011). Modified exergoeconomic modeling of geothermal power plants. Energy, 36(11), 6358-6366.
  • [11] http://enerjienstitusu.com/category/haber/yesil-enerji/jeotermal-enerji/
  • [12] Lazzaretto, A., Tsatsaronis, G. (2006). SPECO: a systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy, 31(8), 1257-1289.
  • [13] Lazzaretto, A., Tsatsaronis, G. (2001). Comparison between SPECO and functional exergoeconomic approaches. In Proceedings of the ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition-IMECE-23656.
  • [14] Kwak, H. Y., Kim, D. J., Jeon, J. S. (2003). Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of power plants. Energy, 28(4), 343-360.
  • [15] Moran, M. J. (1999). Fundamentals of exergy analysis and exergy-aided thermal systems design. In Thermodynamic Optimization of Complex Energy Systems (73-92).
  • [16] Yildirim, D., Ozgener, L. (2012). Thermodynamics and exergoeconomic analysis of geothermal power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 6438-6454.
  • [17] Kanoglu, M., Bolatturk, A. (2008). Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy. Renewable Energy, 33(11), 2366-2374.
  • [18] Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G. (1996). Thermal design and optimization. John Wiley and Sons.
  • [19] Dhillon, B. S. (2009). Life cycle costing for engineers. CRC Press.
  • [20] Dickson, M. H., Fanelli, M. (2013). Geothermal energy: utilization and technology. Routledge.
  • [21] Durmuş, T. (2017). Salavatlı Jeotermal Santralinin Ekserji Analizi (PhD dissertation).
Year 2018, Volume: 4 Issue: 5, 2355 - 2370, 25.06.2018
https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.439073

Abstract

References

  • [1] Kanoglu, M., Yilmaz, C. (2013). Thermal Design of Alkaline Water Electrolysis Assisted by Combined Flash Binary Geothermal Power Plant. In ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
  • [2] Cengel, Y. A., Boles, M. A., (2015). Thermodynamics: an engineering approach, 8th edition.
  • [3] Yilmaz, C. (2017). Thermoeconomic modeling and optimization of a hydrogen production system using geothermal energy. Geothermics, 65, 32-43.
  • [4] Erkan, K., Holdmann, G., Benoit, W., Blackwell, D. (2008). Understanding the Chena Hot Springs, Alaska, geothermal system using temperature and pressure data from exploration boreholes. Geothermics, 37(6), 565-585.
  • [5] Coskun, A., Bolatturk, A., Kanoglu, M. (2014). Thermodynamic and economic analysis and optimization of power cycles for a medium temperature geothermal resource. Energy conversion and management, 78, 39-49.
  • [6] Ganjehsarabi, H., Gungor, A., Dincer, I. (2012). Exergetic performance analysis of Dora II geothermal power plant in Turkey. Energy, 46(1), 101-108.
  • [7] Zare, V. (2015). A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of different ORC configurations for binary geothermal power plants. Energy Conversion and Management, 105, 127-138.
  • [8] Yildirim, D., Ozgener, L. (2012). Thermodynamics and exergoeconomic analysis of geothermal power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 6438-6454.
  • [9] Rašković, P., Guzović, Z., Cvetković, S. (2013). Performance analysis of electricity generation by the medium temperature geothermal resources: Velika Ciglena case study. Energy, 54, 11-31.
  • [10] Coskun, C., Oktay, Z., Dincer, I. (2011). Modified exergoeconomic modeling of geothermal power plants. Energy, 36(11), 6358-6366.
  • [11] http://enerjienstitusu.com/category/haber/yesil-enerji/jeotermal-enerji/
  • [12] Lazzaretto, A., Tsatsaronis, G. (2006). SPECO: a systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy, 31(8), 1257-1289.
  • [13] Lazzaretto, A., Tsatsaronis, G. (2001). Comparison between SPECO and functional exergoeconomic approaches. In Proceedings of the ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition-IMECE-23656.
  • [14] Kwak, H. Y., Kim, D. J., Jeon, J. S. (2003). Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of power plants. Energy, 28(4), 343-360.
  • [15] Moran, M. J. (1999). Fundamentals of exergy analysis and exergy-aided thermal systems design. In Thermodynamic Optimization of Complex Energy Systems (73-92).
  • [16] Yildirim, D., Ozgener, L. (2012). Thermodynamics and exergoeconomic analysis of geothermal power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 6438-6454.
  • [17] Kanoglu, M., Bolatturk, A. (2008). Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy. Renewable Energy, 33(11), 2366-2374.
  • [18] Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G. (1996). Thermal design and optimization. John Wiley and Sons.
  • [19] Dhillon, B. S. (2009). Life cycle costing for engineers. CRC Press.
  • [20] Dickson, M. H., Fanelli, M. (2013). Geothermal energy: utilization and technology. Routledge.
  • [21] Durmuş, T. (2017). Salavatlı Jeotermal Santralinin Ekserji Analizi (PhD dissertation).
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ceyhun Yılmaz

Publication Date June 25, 2018
Submission Date November 9, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 4 Issue: 5

Cite

APA Yılmaz, C. (2018). COMPARISON OF THERMOECONOMIC COST CALCULATION FOR A BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 4(5), 2355-2370. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.439073
AMA Yılmaz C. COMPARISON OF THERMOECONOMIC COST CALCULATION FOR A BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT. Journal of Thermal Engineering. June 2018;4(5):2355-2370. doi:10.18186/thermal.439073
Chicago Yılmaz, Ceyhun. “COMPARISON OF THERMOECONOMIC COST CALCULATION FOR A BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT”. Journal of Thermal Engineering 4, no. 5 (June 2018): 2355-70. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.439073.
EndNote Yılmaz C (June 1, 2018) COMPARISON OF THERMOECONOMIC COST CALCULATION FOR A BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT. Journal of Thermal Engineering 4 5 2355–2370.
IEEE C. Yılmaz, “COMPARISON OF THERMOECONOMIC COST CALCULATION FOR A BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT”, Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 2355–2370, 2018, doi: 10.18186/thermal.439073.
ISNAD Yılmaz, Ceyhun. “COMPARISON OF THERMOECONOMIC COST CALCULATION FOR A BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT”. Journal of Thermal Engineering 4/5 (June 2018), 2355-2370. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.439073.
JAMA Yılmaz C. COMPARISON OF THERMOECONOMIC COST CALCULATION FOR A BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2018;4:2355–2370.
MLA Yılmaz, Ceyhun. “COMPARISON OF THERMOECONOMIC COST CALCULATION FOR A BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT”. Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 4, no. 5, 2018, pp. 2355-70, doi:10.18186/thermal.439073.
Vancouver Yılmaz C. COMPARISON OF THERMOECONOMIC COST CALCULATION FOR A BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2018;4(5):2355-70.

IMPORTANT NOTE: JOURNAL SUBMISSION LINK http://eds.yildiz.edu.tr/journal-of-thermal-engineering