Türkiye'de akademik radyolojide cinsiyet eşit(siz)liği: Nerede duruyoruz?

Year 2024, , 256 - 263, 01.07.2024

Gözde Özer

https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1488817

Abstract

Amaç- Çalışma, Türkiye'deki akademik radyoloji bölümlerinde cinsiyet dağılımını özetlemeyi ve cinsiyet ile akademik derece, araştırma verimliliği ve liderlik pozisyonları arasındaki ilişkileri analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Gereç ve Yöntemler- Bu kesitsel çalışmada, Türkiye'deki akademik radyologları belirlemek için Yükseköğretim Kurulu akademik araştırma veri tabanı kullanılarak veritabanında yer alan her radyoloğun cinsiyeti, akademik derecesi, aktif araştırma yılı ve araştırma üretkenliği parametreleri (yayın ve alıntı sayısı, h-indeksi) Scopus veri tabanından kaydedildi. Akademik radyoloji bölümlerinin ve radyoloji topluluklarının liderlik pozisyonlarını belirlemek için internet araştırması yapıldı.

Bulgular- Toplamda 653 akademisyen (profesör n=292; doçent n=211; doktor öğretim üyesi n=150) veri tabanından belirlendi. Araştırma verimliliği parametrelerine güvenilir bir şekilde erişilebilen 642 akademisyen çalışmaya dahil edildi. Kadın akademisyenlerin sayısı (n=245) erkeklere göre daha azdı (χ2 =35,988, p<0,001). Akademik derecelendirmeye göre yapılan gruplarda erkekler daha yüksekti ve akademik derece arttıkça kadınların temsili azaldı. Kadın akademisyenlerin toplam yayın sayısı (p<0,001), atıf sayısı (p<0,001), h-indeksi (p<0,001) ve aktif araştırma yılları (p<0,001) erkek akademisyenlere göre düşüktü. M-indeksi kadın ve erkek akademisyenler arasında anlamlı farklılık göstermedi (p=0,492). Profesör ve doctor öğretim üyesi düzeyinde M-indeksi açısından cinsiyetler arasında fark yoktu. Doçent düzeyindeki kadınların M-indeksi erkeklere göre daha yüksekti (p=0,046). Akademik bölümlerdeki liderlik pozisyonlarında kadınların temsili erkeklere göre anlamlı derecede düşüktü (χ2 =18,325, p<0,001) ve Türkiye'deki yedi radyoloji derneğindeki mevcut başkanlık pozisyonlarının erkekler tarafından yürütüldüğü tespit edildi.

Sonuç - Türkiye’de akademide kadın radyologların özellikle üst düzey akademik pozisyonlarda ve yönetici pozisyonunda erkeklere kıyasla daha az temsil edilmektedir.

Keywords

cinsiyet eşitsizliği, radyoloji, akademik derece

Ethical Statement

-

Supporting Institution

-

Thanks

-

Gender Disparity in Academic Radiology in Turkey: Where are we now?

Abstract

Aim - The study aims to summarize the gender distribution in academic radiology departments in Turkey and analyze the relationships between gender and academic rank, research productivity, and leadership positions.

Methods – In this cross-sectional study, the Council of Higher Education academic search database was used to identify academic radiologists in Turkey. Each radiologist’s gender, academic rank, years of active research, and research productivity metrics (number of publications and citations, h-index) were recorded from the Scopus database. An Internet search was conducted to identify the leadership positions of academic radiology departments and radiology societies.

Results – Overall, 653 academics (professor n=292; associate professors n=211; assistant professors n=150) were identified from the database; 642 academics with reliable research productivity parameters were enrolled in the study. There were fewer female academics (n=245) than male peers (χ2 =35.988, p<0.001). Regarding academic ranking, men were higher in all groups, and female representation decreased as academic rank increased. Overall number of publications (p<0.001), number of citations (p<0.001), h-index (p<0.001), and active years of research (p<0.001) of female academics were significantly lower than male counterparts. The m-index did not differ significantly between male and female academics (p=0.492). There was no difference between genders in terms of m-index at the professor and assistant professor levels. The m-index of women at the associate professor level was higher than that of men (p=0.046). Women’s representation in leadership positions in academic departments was significantly lower than that of men (χ2 =18,325, p<0.001), and current presidential positions in seven radiology societies in Turkey were held by men.

Conclusion - Women academic radiologists are underrepresented in Turkey, especially at senior academic levels and leadership positions.

Keywords

Gender, Radiology, Academic Rank, Leadership, Disparity

References

• Kuzuca IG, Arda B. What can we say about gender discrimination in medicine? A limited research from Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 2010;63:1.
• The State of Gender (In)Equality in Academia in Turkey, 2019 (https://www.khas.edu.tr/The-State-of-Gender-Inequality-in-Academia-in-Turkey.pdf) accessed on January 15, 2024
• Bennett CL, Baker O, Rangel EL, Marsh RH. The Gender Gap in Surgical Residencies. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(9):893-894.
• Khurshid K, Shah S, Ahmadi M, et al. Gender Differences in the Publication Rate Among Breast Imaging Radiologists in the United States and Canada. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(1):2-7.
• Qamar SR, Khurshid K, Jalal S, et al. Academic musculoskeletal radiology: influences for gender disparity. Skeletal Radiol. 2018;47(3):381-387.
• Ahmadi M, Khurshid K, Sanelli PC, et al. Influences for Gender Disparity in Academic Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(1):18-23.
• Rad AE, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. The H-index in academic radiology. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(7):817-821.
• Rezek I, McDonald RJ, Kallmes DF. Is the h-index predictive of greater NIH funding success among academic radiologists?. Acad Radiol. 2011;18(11):1337-1340.
• https://akademik.yok.gov.tr/AkademikArama/ accessed on December 15, 2023
• Lee J, Kraus KL, Couldwell WT. Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(2):387-392.
• Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126, 5113-5142.
• Goswami AK, Kokabi N, Khaja MS, et al. Academic Radiology in the United States: Defining Gender Disparities in Faculty Leadership and Academic Rank. Acad Radiol. 2022;29(5):714-725.
• Vernuccio F, Crimì F, Pepe A, Quaia E. Women in Radiology: Perceived or True Barrier?. Tomography. 2022;8(4):1881-1884.
• Vernuccio F, Arzanauskaite M, Turk S, et al. Gender discrepancy in research activities during radiology residency. Insights Imaging. 2019;10(1):125.
• Gunderman RB, Houk JL. The Importance of Role Models in Increasing Women in Radiology. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(2):230-231.
• Edmunds LD, Ovseiko PV, Shepperd S, et al. Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence. Lancet. 2016;388(10062):2948-2958.
• Molwitz I, Yamamura J, Ozga AK, et al. Gender trends in authorships and publication impact in Academic Radiology-a 10-year perspective. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(12):8887-8896. doi:10.1007/s00330-021-07928-4
• Ha GL, Lehrer EJ, Wang M, Holliday E, Jagsi R, Zaorsky NG. Sex Differences in Academic Productivity Across Academic Ranks and Specialties in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(6):2112404.
• Jolly S, Griffith KA, DeCastro R, Stewart A, Ubel P, Jagsi R. Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):344-353.
• Jones RD, Griffith KA, Ubel PA, Stewart A, Jagsi R. A Mixed-Methods Investigation of the Motivations, Goals, and Aspirations of Male and Female Academic Medical Faculty. Acad Med. 2016;91(8):1089-1097.
• Guille C, Frank E, Zhao Z, et al. Work-Family Conflict and the Sex Difference in Depression Among Training Physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(12):1766-1772.
• Zheng X, Yuan H, Ni C. How parenthood contributes to gender gaps in academia. Elife. 2022;11:e78909.
• Grimm LJ, Ngo J, Pisano ED, Yoon S. Men (and Women) in Academic Radiology: How Can We Reduce the Gender Discrepancy?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(4):678-680.
• Jalilianhasanpour R, Chen H, Caffo B, Johnson P, Beheshtian E, Yousem DM. Are Women Disadvantaged in Academic Radiology?. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(12):1760-1766.
• Bluth EI, Bansal S, Macura KJ, Fielding J, Truong H. Gender and the radiology workforce: results of the 2014 ACR workforce survey. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(2):155-157.
• Hamidizadeh R, Jalal S, Pindiprolu B, et al. Influences for Gender Disparity in the Radiology Societies in North America. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211(4):831-838.
• Qamar SR, Khurshid K, Jalal S, et al. Gender Disparity Among Leaders of Canadian Academic Radiology Departments. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(1):3-9.