Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Üçüncü Basamak Bir Hastanenin Transfüzyon Merkezine Başvuran Donörlerde Sifiliz Tarama Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2024, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 117 - 122, 28.03.2024
https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1445369

Abstract

Amaç: Kan bankacılığında Treponema pallidum'un neden olduğu sifiliz tanısı halk sağlığı açısından önemlidir. Donörler arasındaki olası vakaların yakalanması ve böylece donör kaybının en aza indirilmesi için en uygun algoritmanın benimsenmesi gerekmektedir. 2003 yılında Dünya Sağlık Örgütü ve 2010 yılında Avrupa Hastalık Önleme ve Kontrol Merkezi, sifiliz taramalarına Treponemal testlerle başlanmasını tavsiye etti. Bu çalışmada, kan bağışçısı adaylarında sifiliz taramasında reaktif Enzime Bağlı İmmünosorbent Test (ELISA) sonuçları ile yapılan doğrulayıcı testlerin sonuçlarının araştırılması amaçlandı.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Retrospektif olarak yapılan bu çalışmada, 2014-2021 yılları arasında Ankara Gülhane Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinin kan bankasına kan bağışçısı olarak başvuran 69.127 bağışçı incelendi. Sifiliz tarama testinde reaktif çıkan donör adaylarından alınan örnekler, doğrulama testleri için Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu Mikrobiyoloji Referans Laboratuvarı'na gönderildi. Doğrulama testleri olarak Floresan Treponemal Antikor Emilimi (FTA-ABS) veya Treponema Pallidum Hemaglütinasyon Testi (TPHA) testleri kullanıldı.
Bulgular: 128 donörde (%0,18) tekrar tekrar reaktif test sonuçları elde edildi. Doğrulayıcı bir test olarak 32 donöre TPHA uygulandı ve 11 pozitif sonuç (%34,3) elde edildi (Yanlış pozitiflik oranı = %65,7). FTA-ABS, doğrulama testi olarak 96 donörde yapıldı ve 59'unun (%61,4) testi pozitif çıktı (Yanlış pozitiflik oranı = %38,6). ELISA sinyal-kesme oranı beşin üzerinde olan 48 donörden 42'sinde FTA-ABS testi yapıldı ve 41 pozitif ve bir negatif sonuç elde edildi.
Sonuçlar: Kan transfüzyonu ile ilişkili Treponema pallidum bulaşması önemli bir istenmeyen olay olduğundan, kan donörlerinin taranması için en uygun testlerin kullanılması gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma, FTA-ABS'nin ELISA-reaktif donörler için doğrulayıcı bir test olarak kullanılmasının, sifiliz tespit doğrulanmasını arttırdığını göstermektedir.

Project Number

2023-213

References

  • Tsimis ME, Sheffield JS. Update on syphilis and pregnancy. Birth defects research. 2017;109:347-352.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2020. Access address: https://www.cdc.gov/ std/statistics/2020/2020-SR-4-10-2023.pdf, Access date: 10.01.2024.
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü Bulaşıcı Hastalıklar ve Erken Uyarı Dairesi Başkanlığı. Sifiliz İstatistik. 2022. Access address: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/ bulasici-hastaliklar-ve-erken-uyari-db/Dokumanlar/Istatistikler/ sifiliz_istatistikleri.pdf, Access date: 10.01.2024.
  • Singh AE, Romanowski B. Syphilis: review with emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, and some biologic features. Clinical microbiology reviews. 1999;12:187-209.
  • Soreng K, Levy R, Fakile Y. Serologic testing for syphilis: benefits and challenges of a reverse algorithm. Clinical microbiology newsletter. 2014;36:195-202.
  • Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports. 2015;64:1.
  • World Health Organization. Guidelines for the management of sexually transmitted infections. Switzerland 2003. Access address: https://applications.emro.who.int/aiecf/web79.pdf, Date of access: 20.02.2024
  • French P, Gomberg M, Janier M, Schmidt B, van Voorst Vader PYoung H. IUSTI: 2008 European guidelines on the management of syphilis. International journal of STD & AIDS. 2009;20:300-309.
  • Tuddenham S, Katz SS, Ghanem KG. Syphilis laboratory guidelines: performance characteristics of nontreponemal antibody tests. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020;71:21-42.
  • Huh HJ, Chung J-W, Park SY, Chae SL. Comparison of automated treponemal and nontreponemal test algorithms as first-line syphilis screening assays. Annals of laboratory medicine. 2016;36:23.
  • Binder SR, Theel ES. Syphilis testing algorithms: A review. World Journal of Immunology. 2016;6:1-8.
  • Control CfD, Prevention. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2011;60:133-137.
  • Loeffelholz MJ, Binnicker MJ. It is time to use treponema- specific antibody screening tests for diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:2-6.
  • Ghanem KG. Management of adult syphilis: key questions to inform the 2015 centers for disease control and prevention sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015;61:S818-S836.
  • Janier M, Unemo M, Dupin N, Tiplica G, Potočnik MPatel R. 2020 European guideline on the management of syphilis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2021;35:574-588.
  • Kebede E, Getnet G, Enyew G, Gebretsadik D. Transfusion Transmissible Infections Among Voluntary Blood Donors at Dessie Blood Bank, Northeast Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:4569-4576.
  • Kumari S. Prevalence and trends of hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis C virus, Human immunodeficiency virus 1, 2 and syphilis infections among blood donors in a regional transfusion center in Punjab, India: A 3 years study. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2020;41:22-29.
  • Chen X, Liu Q, Sun P, Yuan S, Liao HZhang X. Prevalence of Syphilis Infections Among Volunteer Blood Donors in Jinan Blood Center, China: A 15-Year Retrospective Study. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:6431-6440.
  • Siraj N, Achila OO, Issac J, et al. Seroprevalence of transfusion- transmissible infections among blood donors at National Blood Transfusion Service, Eritrea: a seven-year retrospective study. BMC infectious diseases. 2018;18:1-9.
  • Baiao AM, Kupek E, Petry A. Syphilis seroprevalence estimates of Santa Catarina blood donors in 2010. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2014;47:179-185.
  • Kane MA, Bloch EM, Bruhn R, Kaidarova Z, Murphy EL. Demographic determinants of syphilis seroprevalence among U.S. blood donors, 2011-2012. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:63.
  • Vera L, Milka D, Nurith SL, Eilat S. Prevalence and Incidence of Syphilis among Volunteer Blood Donors in Israel. J Blood Transfus. 2014;2014:154048.
  • PARLAK M, ÖZLÜK S, DEMİR C, RAĞBETLİ C. Kan Donörlerinde HBsAg, Anti-HCV, Anti-HIV ve Sifiliz Seroprevalansı. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015;17:1-6.
  • Lee S, Yu H-J, Lim S, Park H, Kwon M-JWoo H-Y. Evaluation of the Elecsys syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the reverse algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019;80:98-104.
  • Peng J, Lu Y, Yu H, et al. Analysis of 2 reverse syphilis testing algorithms in diagnosis of syphilis: a large-cohort prospective study. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2018;67:947-953.
  • Morshed MG, Singh AE. Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis. Clinical and vaccine immunology. 2015;22:137-147.

Evaluation of syphilis screening results in donors applying to a transfusion center of a tertiary hospital

Year 2024, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 117 - 122, 28.03.2024
https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1445369

Abstract

Aim: In blood banking, the significance of diagnosing syphilis, a condition caused by Treponema pallidum, cannot be overstated. It necessitates the adoption of the most appropriate algorithm for catching possible cases among donors, thereby minimizing donor loss. The World Health Organization in 2003, and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control in 2010, advised starting syphilis screenings with Treponemal tests. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of confirmatory tests conducted on blood donor candidates with reactive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) test results in syphilis screening.
Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 69,127 donors who applied as blood donors to the blood bank of Ankara Gülhane Training and Research Hospital between 2014 and 2021 were examined. Specimens from donor candidates who tested reactive in the syphilis screening test were dispatched to the Microbiology Reference Laboratory of the Turkey Public Health Institution for verification tests. The Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody Absorption (FTA-ABS) or Treponema Pallidum Hemagglutination Assay (TPHA) tests were utilized as the verification tests.
Results: Reactive test results were obtained repeatedly in 128 donors (0.18%). As a confirmatory test, TPHA was administered to 32 donors, resulting in 11 positive outcomes (34.3%) (False positivity ratio = 65.7%). FTA-ABS was performed as a verification test on 96 donors, with 59 (61.4%) testing positive (False positivity ratio = 38.6%). Out of 48 donors with an ELISA signal-to- cutoff ratio above five, the FTA-ABS test was conducted on 42, yielding 41 positive and one negative result.
Conclusion: The transmission of Treponema pallidum through blood transfusion is a significant adverse event, so the most suitable tests should be used for the screening of blood donors. This study suggests that using FTA-ABS as a confirmatory test for ELISA-reactive donors improves syphilis detection accuracy.

Ethical Statement

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Ankara Gülhane Training and Research Hospital Ethics Committee (Date: 16.05.2023, Decision No: 2023-213).

Project Number

2023-213

References

  • Tsimis ME, Sheffield JS. Update on syphilis and pregnancy. Birth defects research. 2017;109:347-352.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2020. Access address: https://www.cdc.gov/ std/statistics/2020/2020-SR-4-10-2023.pdf, Access date: 10.01.2024.
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü Bulaşıcı Hastalıklar ve Erken Uyarı Dairesi Başkanlığı. Sifiliz İstatistik. 2022. Access address: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/ bulasici-hastaliklar-ve-erken-uyari-db/Dokumanlar/Istatistikler/ sifiliz_istatistikleri.pdf, Access date: 10.01.2024.
  • Singh AE, Romanowski B. Syphilis: review with emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, and some biologic features. Clinical microbiology reviews. 1999;12:187-209.
  • Soreng K, Levy R, Fakile Y. Serologic testing for syphilis: benefits and challenges of a reverse algorithm. Clinical microbiology newsletter. 2014;36:195-202.
  • Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports. 2015;64:1.
  • World Health Organization. Guidelines for the management of sexually transmitted infections. Switzerland 2003. Access address: https://applications.emro.who.int/aiecf/web79.pdf, Date of access: 20.02.2024
  • French P, Gomberg M, Janier M, Schmidt B, van Voorst Vader PYoung H. IUSTI: 2008 European guidelines on the management of syphilis. International journal of STD & AIDS. 2009;20:300-309.
  • Tuddenham S, Katz SS, Ghanem KG. Syphilis laboratory guidelines: performance characteristics of nontreponemal antibody tests. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020;71:21-42.
  • Huh HJ, Chung J-W, Park SY, Chae SL. Comparison of automated treponemal and nontreponemal test algorithms as first-line syphilis screening assays. Annals of laboratory medicine. 2016;36:23.
  • Binder SR, Theel ES. Syphilis testing algorithms: A review. World Journal of Immunology. 2016;6:1-8.
  • Control CfD, Prevention. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2011;60:133-137.
  • Loeffelholz MJ, Binnicker MJ. It is time to use treponema- specific antibody screening tests for diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:2-6.
  • Ghanem KG. Management of adult syphilis: key questions to inform the 2015 centers for disease control and prevention sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015;61:S818-S836.
  • Janier M, Unemo M, Dupin N, Tiplica G, Potočnik MPatel R. 2020 European guideline on the management of syphilis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2021;35:574-588.
  • Kebede E, Getnet G, Enyew G, Gebretsadik D. Transfusion Transmissible Infections Among Voluntary Blood Donors at Dessie Blood Bank, Northeast Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:4569-4576.
  • Kumari S. Prevalence and trends of hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis C virus, Human immunodeficiency virus 1, 2 and syphilis infections among blood donors in a regional transfusion center in Punjab, India: A 3 years study. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2020;41:22-29.
  • Chen X, Liu Q, Sun P, Yuan S, Liao HZhang X. Prevalence of Syphilis Infections Among Volunteer Blood Donors in Jinan Blood Center, China: A 15-Year Retrospective Study. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:6431-6440.
  • Siraj N, Achila OO, Issac J, et al. Seroprevalence of transfusion- transmissible infections among blood donors at National Blood Transfusion Service, Eritrea: a seven-year retrospective study. BMC infectious diseases. 2018;18:1-9.
  • Baiao AM, Kupek E, Petry A. Syphilis seroprevalence estimates of Santa Catarina blood donors in 2010. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2014;47:179-185.
  • Kane MA, Bloch EM, Bruhn R, Kaidarova Z, Murphy EL. Demographic determinants of syphilis seroprevalence among U.S. blood donors, 2011-2012. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:63.
  • Vera L, Milka D, Nurith SL, Eilat S. Prevalence and Incidence of Syphilis among Volunteer Blood Donors in Israel. J Blood Transfus. 2014;2014:154048.
  • PARLAK M, ÖZLÜK S, DEMİR C, RAĞBETLİ C. Kan Donörlerinde HBsAg, Anti-HCV, Anti-HIV ve Sifiliz Seroprevalansı. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015;17:1-6.
  • Lee S, Yu H-J, Lim S, Park H, Kwon M-JWoo H-Y. Evaluation of the Elecsys syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the reverse algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019;80:98-104.
  • Peng J, Lu Y, Yu H, et al. Analysis of 2 reverse syphilis testing algorithms in diagnosis of syphilis: a large-cohort prospective study. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2018;67:947-953.
  • Morshed MG, Singh AE. Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis. Clinical and vaccine immunology. 2015;22:137-147.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Infectious Diseases
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Yavuz Çekli 0000-0002-0925-925X

Project Number 2023-213
Publication Date March 28, 2024
Submission Date February 29, 2024
Acceptance Date March 19, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Çekli, Y. (2024). Üçüncü Basamak Bir Hastanenin Transfüzyon Merkezine Başvuran Donörlerde Sifiliz Tarama Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, 15(1), 117-122. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1445369
AMA Çekli Y. Üçüncü Basamak Bir Hastanenin Transfüzyon Merkezine Başvuran Donörlerde Sifiliz Tarama Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. TJCL. March 2024;15(1):117-122. doi:10.18663/tjcl.1445369
Chicago Çekli, Yavuz. “Üçüncü Basamak Bir Hastanenin Transfüzyon Merkezine Başvuran Donörlerde Sifiliz Tarama Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 15, no. 1 (March 2024): 117-22. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1445369.
EndNote Çekli Y (March 1, 2024) Üçüncü Basamak Bir Hastanenin Transfüzyon Merkezine Başvuran Donörlerde Sifiliz Tarama Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 15 1 117–122.
IEEE Y. Çekli, “Üçüncü Basamak Bir Hastanenin Transfüzyon Merkezine Başvuran Donörlerde Sifiliz Tarama Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi”, TJCL, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 117–122, 2024, doi: 10.18663/tjcl.1445369.
ISNAD Çekli, Yavuz. “Üçüncü Basamak Bir Hastanenin Transfüzyon Merkezine Başvuran Donörlerde Sifiliz Tarama Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 15/1 (March 2024), 117-122. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1445369.
JAMA Çekli Y. Üçüncü Basamak Bir Hastanenin Transfüzyon Merkezine Başvuran Donörlerde Sifiliz Tarama Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. TJCL. 2024;15:117–122.
MLA Çekli, Yavuz. “Üçüncü Basamak Bir Hastanenin Transfüzyon Merkezine Başvuran Donörlerde Sifiliz Tarama Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, vol. 15, no. 1, 2024, pp. 117-22, doi:10.18663/tjcl.1445369.
Vancouver Çekli Y. Üçüncü Basamak Bir Hastanenin Transfüzyon Merkezine Başvuran Donörlerde Sifiliz Tarama Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. TJCL. 2024;15(1):117-22.


e-ISSN: 2149-8296

The content of this site is intended for health care professionals. All the published articles are distributed under the terms of

Creative Commons Attribution Licence,

which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.