ROLE OF RHIZOBACTERIA INOCULATIONS ON AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) UNDER UNFERTILIZED CONDITIONS

Year 2023, Volume: 28 Issue: 1, 79 - 86, 21.06.2023

Muhammet Tonguç , Sercan Önder , Murat Mutlucan , Sabri Erbaş

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1229432

Abstract

Safflower is an important, but ignored oil crop species in Türkiye and it is necessary to increase seed yields to increase the cultivation of the crop. The present study was carried out to determine the effects of rhizobacteria seed inoculation on agronomic characteristics and fatty acid contents of safflower cultivars in 2019-2020 crop seasons in Isparta. Seeds of Dincer 5-18-1, Linas and Montola 2000 were inoculated with Bacillus species before sowing. Results showed that year, cultivar and applications had significant effects on 1000-seed weight, seed and oil yields. Seed weights of the rhizobacteria inoculated cultivars increased significantly and was higher (38.5 g) than uninoculated seeds (36.3 g). Seed yields were higher for both years for rhizobacteria inoculation. Seed and oil yields increased in rhizobacteria inoculated seeds by 20% and 18%, and reached to 128.8 and 34.0 kg da-1, respectively compared to uninoculated seeds (107.2 and 28.6 kg da-1). Seed inoculations increased linoleic acid and decreased oleic acid contents in Dincer 5-18-1 and Linas. Seed inoculations with rhizobacteria could be used as an easy, practical and efficient approach to improve plant growth, seed and oil yields of safflower under field conditions.

Keywords

Bacillus, bacteria, fatty acid, safflower, seed, yield

References

• Arslan, B. 2007. The path analysis of yield and its components in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). J. Biol. Sci. 7:668-672.
• Arslan, H. and D. Guler. 2022. The effect of different row spacing on yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). ISPEC J. Agric. Sci. 6(2):294–306.
• Ashraf, M. and M.R. Foolad. 2005. Pre‐sowing seed treatment-A shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth, and crop yield under saline and non‐saline conditions. Adv. Agron. 88:223-271.
• Aslantas, R., R. Cakmakci and F. Sahin. 2007. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on young apple trees growth and fruit yield under orchard conditions. Sci. Hortic. 111:271- 277.
• Bidgoli, A.M., G.A. Akbari, M.J. Mirhadi, E. Zand and S. Soufizadeh. 2006. Path analysis of the relationships between seed yield and some morphological and phenological traits in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Euphytica 148:261-268.
• Cakmakci, R., F. Kantar and F. Sahin. 2001. Effect of N2‐fixing bacterial inoculations on yield of sugar beet and barley. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 164:527-531.
• Cakmakci, R., F. Donmez, A. Aydın and F. Sahin. 2006. Growth promotion of plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two different field soil conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38:1482-1487.
• Camas, N. and E. Esendal. 2006. Estimates of broad sense heritability for seed yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Hereditas. 143:55-57.
• Camas, N., C. Cirak and E. Esendal. 2007. Seed yield, oil content and fatty acids composition of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) grown in northern Turkey conditions. Anadolu J. Agric. Sci. 22:98-104 (in Turkish).
• Choudhury, A.T.M.A. and I.R. Kennedy. 2004. Prospects and potentials for systems of biological nitrogen fixation in sustainable rice production. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 39:219-227.
• Celikoglu, F. 2004. Determination of yield characters of some safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) lines under Eskisehir conditions. MS Thesis, Ankara University.
• Dajue, L. and H.H. Mundel. 1996. Safflower, Carthamus tinctorius L. Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.
• Dowdy, S.M. and S. Wearden. 1983. Statistics for Research. 2. ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Ebert, W.W. and P.F. Knowles. 1966. Inheritance of pericarp types, sterility, and dwarfhess in several safflower crosses. Crop Sci. 6:579-582.
• Ekin, Z. 2020. Co-application of humic acid and bacillus strains enhances seed and oil yields by mediating nutrient acquisition of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) plants in a semi-arid region. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 18:1883-1900.
• Erbas, S. and M. Tonguc. 2009. Determination of yield and yield components of domestic and foreign safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) accessions. VIIIth Field Crops Congress, Hatay, Turkiye (October 19-22): 120-124 (in Turkish).
• Erbas, S., M. Tonguc and A. Sanli. 2016. Variations in the agronomic and quality characteristics of domestic and foreign safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes. Turkish Journal of Field Crop 21:110-119.
• Hatipoglu, H., H. Arslan, M. Karakus, and A. Kose. 2012. Determination of appropriate planting times of different safflower varieties (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in Sanliurfa conditions. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Agriculture. 26:1-16.
• Heidari, E., K. Mohammadi, B. Pasari, A. Rokhzadi and Y. Sohrabi. 2020. Combining the phosphate solubilizing microorganisms with biochar types in order to improve safflower yield and soil enzyme activity. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 66:255-267.
• Johnson, R.C., J.W. Bergman and C.R. Flynn. 1999. Oil and meal characteristics of core and non-core safflower accessions from the USDA collection. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 46:611-618.
• Katar, D., Y. Arslan and I. Subası. 2012. Effect of different doses of nitrogen on the yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under Ankara ecological conditions. J. Fac. Agric. 7:56-64.
• Keles, R. and O. Ozturk. 2012. Effect of different sowing dates on the seed yield and quality of safflower. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 1:112-117.
• Khademian, R., S. Ghassemi and B. Asghari. 2019. Bio-fertilizer improves physio-biochemical characteristics and grain yield of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under drought stress. Russ. Agric. Sci. 45:458-463.
• Kotecha, A. 1981. Inheritance of seed yield and its components in safflower. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 23:111-117.
• Knowles, P.F. 1989. Genetics and breeding of oil crops. In: Oil crops of the world: their breeding and utilization, ed. Robbelen, G., Downey, R.K. and Ashri, A., 363-374, McGraw-Hill Publ. Company, New York.
• Mahmood, A., O.C. Turgay, M. Farooq and R. Hayat. 2016. Seed biopriming with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a review. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92:1-14.
• Naseri, R. and A. Mirzaei. 2010. Response of yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to seed inoculation with Azotobacter and Azospirillum and different nitrogen levels under dry land condition. Agric. Environ. Sci. 9:445-449.
• Naserzadeh, Y., D. Kartoolinejad, N. Mahmoudi, M. Zargar, E. Pakina, M. Heydari, T. Astarkhanova and N.J. Kavhiza. 2018. Nine strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens and P. putida: Effects on growth indices, seed and yield production of Carthamus tinctorius L. Res. Crops. 19:622-632.
• Nosheen, A., A. Bano, F. Ullah, U. Farooq, H. Yasmin and I. Hussain. 2011. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on root morphology of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10:12638-12649.
• Nosheen, A., A. Bano, H. Yasmin, R. Keyani, R. Habib, S.T. Shah and R. Naz. 2016. Protein quantity and quality of safflower seed improved by NP fertilizer and Rhizobacteria (Azospirillum and Azotobacter spp.). Front. Plant Sci. 7:104.
• Nosheen, A., H. Yasmin, R. Naz, A. Bano, R. Keyani and I. Hussain. 2018a. Pseudomonas putida improved soil enzyme activity and growth of kasumbha under low input of mineral fertilizers. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 64:520-525.
• Nosheen, A., R. Naz, A.T. Tahir, H. Yasmin, R. Keyani, B. Mitrevski, A. Bano, S.T. Chin, P.J. Marriott and I. Hussain. 2018b. Improvement of safflower oil quality for biodiesel production by integrated application of PGPR under reduced amount of NP fertilizers. PLoS One, 13: e0201738.
• Ozturk, G. and Z. Yildirim. 2013. Effect of bio-activators on the tuber yield and tuber size of potatoes. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 18(1): 82-86.
• Ramakrishna, W., R. Yadav and K. Li. 2019. Plant growth promoting bacteria in agriculture: two sides of a coin. Appl. Soil Ecol. 138:10-18.
• Reddy, M.V.S., P. Chand, B. Vidyadhar and I.S.L. Devi. 2004. Estimation of genetic parameters for yield and its component in F4 generation of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Prog. Agric. 4:16-18.
• Rowell, D.L. 1996. Soil Science: Methods & Applications. 1. ed. London: Routledge.
• Sharifi, R.S., A. Namvar and R.S. Sharifi. 2017. Grain filling and fatty acid composition of safflower fertilized with integrated nitrogen fertilizer and biofertilizers. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 52:236-243.
• Senates, A. and S. Erbas. 2020. Determination of agricultural and technological characters of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) lines developed by single seed descent selection methods. SDU J. Nat. Appl. Sci. 24:143-151.
• TUIK, 2021. Turkish Statistical Institute, https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr (Accessed December 20, 2021)
• Tuncturk, M. and B. Yildirim. 2004. Effects of different forms and doses of nitrogen fertilizers on safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 7:1385-1389.
• Weiss, E.A. 2000. Oil Seed Crops. Australia: Blackwell Science Ltd.
• Yau, S.K. 2007. Winter versus spring sowing of rain-fed safflower in a semi-arid, high-elevation Mediterranean environment. Eur. J. Agron. 26:249-256.
• Zhang, T., F. Hu and L. Ma. 2018. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from safflower rhizosphere and their effect on seedling growth. Open Life Sci. 14:246-254.