Anatomical and histological structure of cervix uteri, corpus uteri and cornu uteri of the Anatolian wild goat

Year 2020, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 63 - 68, 30.10.2020

Gülseren Kırbaş Doğan , Mushap Kuru , Buket Bakır , Ebru Karadağ Sarı

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the anatomical and histological structure of the uterus of the Anatolian wild goat.
Materials and Methods: Measurements were taken from the uterine segments using digital calipers.
Results: The mean length of cervix uteri was 33.99 ± 1.22 mm, width of the cervix uteri was 13.39 ± 0.92 mm, thickness of the cervix uteri was 8.42 ± 1.68 mm and weight of the cervix uteri was 5.45 ± 0.80 g. The mean corpus uteri length was 29.61 ± 5.14 mm, corpus uteri width was 21.22 ± 1.98 mm, corpus uteri thickness was 9.05 ± 1.45 mm and corpus uteri weight was 4.30 ± 0.77 g. The mean cornu uteri length was 41.34 ± 8.02 mm, the cornu uteri width was 12.49 ± 2.59 mm, the cornu uteri thickness was 6.73 ± 0.86 mm and the cornu uteri weight was 5.46 ± 0.31 g. Histologically, the uterine tissue was consist of three different regions, namely, cervix uteri, corpus uteri and cornu uteri also this parts were composed of endometrium, myometrium and perimetrium layers were located from the inside to the outside.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the findings of this study related to the Anatolian wild goat, which contributes to the wildlife diversity in Turkey, however, the population of which has been decreasing due to illegal and uncontrolled hunting or traffic accidents in recent years.

Keywords

Anatomy, Anatolian wild goat, Histology, Uterus

References

• Abiaezute CN, Nwaogu IC, Okoye CN. Morphological features of the uterus during postnatal development in the West African Dwarf goat (Capra hircus). Anim.Reprod, 2017;14 (4): 1062-1071. DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR886.
• Adigwe PI, Fayemi OA. Biometric study of the reproductive tract of the red sokoto (maradi) goats of Nigeria. Pak Vet J, 2005; 25: 3.
• Agrawal KP, Bhattacharya NK. (1980) Pre and post pubertal development of uterus in Barbari goats. Indian J Anim Sci, 1980; 50: 46-52.
• Agrawal P, Laloraya MM. Comparative histochemical study of the enzyme changes in the ovary and uterus of mammals with special reference to steroidogenesis. Am J Occup Ther, 1978; 102: 276-293.
• Alaçam E. Obstetrics and Infertility in Domestic Animals. 5th edn. Medisan, Ankara, Turkey, pp 5-10, 2005.
• Albayrak İ, Pamukoğlu N, Kaya MA. Bibliography of Turkish Even-toed Ungulates (Mammalia: artiodactyla). Mun Ent Zool, 2007; 12 (1): 43-162.
• Anonymous (2019) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Capra aegagrus aegagrus. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/3786/10076632. Accessed: 12.10.2019.
• Bahadır A, Yıldız H. Veterinary anatomy, locomotor system & internal organs, 5th ed. Ezgi Bookstore, Bursa, pp 325, 2014.
• Bhattacharya M, Saigal RP. Phophorylase histochemistry of the uterine wall of the goat (Capra hircus). Indian J Anim Sci, 1984; 54: 517-518.
• Budras KD, Wünsche A. Atlas of Veterinary Anatomy (Cattle). Medipress Publishing, 2th ed, Malatya: pp 92-93, 2009.
• Cinar Kul B, Bilgen N, Lenstra JA, Korkmaz Agaoglu O, Akyuz B, Ertugrul O. The Research of Genetic Relationship in Local Goat Breeds of Turkey by Chromosomal Y DNA. J Anim Breed Genet, 2015; pp 1–5. doi:10.1111/jbg.12154.
• Dayan MO, Beşoluk K, Eken E, Özkadif S. Anatomy of the cervical canal in the Angora goat (Capra hircus). Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 2010;16: 847-850. DOI:10.9775/kvfd.2010.1827.
• Gupta MD, Akter MM, Gupta AD, Das A. Biometry of female genital organs of Black bengal goat. Int J Nat Sci, 2011; 1: 12-16.
• Gültiken N, Gültiken ME, Anadol E, Kabak M, Fındık M. Morphometric study of the cervical canal in Karakaya ewe. J AnimVet Adv, 2009; 8: 2247-2250.
• Harris DR. The Distribution and Ancestry of the Domestic Goat, Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London: 1962; 173, 79-91, (Abstract).
• Hyacinth AA, Terzungwe A, Daniel OL, Oluwabamise NJ. Biometrical study of the Kano brown goats and Yankasa sheep. I J A V M S, 2016;10: 3-8.
• Kershaw CM, Khalid M, McGowan MR et al. The anatomy of the sheep cervix and its influence on the transcervical passage of an inseminating pipette into the uterine lümen. Theriogenology, 2005; 64: 1225–1235.
• Kırbaş Doğan G, Kuru M, Bakır B, Karadağ Sarı E. Anatomical and histological analysis of the salpinx and ovary in Anatolian wild goat (Capra aegagrus aegagrus). Folia Morphol, 2019; 78 (4): 827–832. DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2019.0032.
• König HE, Liebich HG. Veterinary Anatomy (Domestic mammals). Medipres, 6. print, pp 440-444; 2015.
• Mahre MB, Wahid H, Rosnina Y et al. Anatomy of the female reproductive system of Rusa deer (Rusa timorensis). S J V S, 2016;14: 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sokjvs.v14i1.3
• Naqvi SMK, Pandey GK, Gautam KK, Joshi A, Geethalakshmi V, Mittal JP. Evaluation of gross anatomical features of cervix of tropical sheep using cervical silicone moulds. Anim Reprod Sci, 2005; 85: 337–344.
• Pellicena MAG. Estudio de la macrofauna de los niveles holocenos del yacimiento de El Portalón (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos). PhD thesis, Madrid, pp 153-155; 2014.
• Popesko P. Topographic Atlas of Domestic Animals, Vol. 3 Pelvis and Limbs, Nobel Medical Bookstore, pp 51-55; 2010.
• Saleem R, Suri S, Sarma K. Gross and biometrical studies on internal female genitalia of adult Bakerwali goat in different phases of estrus cycle. Indian J Vet Anat, 2017; 229: 23-25. http://epubs.icar.org.in/ejournal/index.php/IJVA/article/view/83266.
• Salih KA, Abass KS. Anatomical and histological study of glands in uterine cervix of Black goat (Capra hircus). J Nat Sci Res, 2014; 4: 3.
• Semacan A, Kaymaz M, Fındık M. Obstetrics and Gynecology in Farm Animals. Medipres Publishing, Malatya, Turkey: 525-530, 2012.
• Shalini S. Anatomical studies on the female genital system of Gaddi goat. Masters Dissertation, Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya. Palampur, pp 49-63, 1997.
• Trautmann A, Fiebiger J. Fundalmentals of the Histology of Domestic Animals. Comstock publishing Associates, New York, 1957.
• Zeuner FE. A History of Domesticated Animals, Hutchinson, London, Pp 352-353, 1963.