How Do the Faculty Members Go for Trolls? A View from An Emerging Country

Year 2017, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 66 - 83, 01.07.2017

Elif Bugra Kuzu Demır , Baris Mercımek , Nihal Dulkadır Yaman , H. Ferhan Odabası

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.328935

Abstract

This paper focuses on the findings of an exploratory, qualitative phenomenological study and investigates opinions and evaluations of faculty members about trolls encountered in social media and mass medium. The research was carried out in Anadolu University in Turkey. A total of 18 faculty members from 9 faculties in 12 different departments responded to 4 interview questions. Faculty members' views on trolls were elicited through 2 rounds of semi-structured focus group interviews. Findings were based on content analyses of interview transcripts. Results are presented in four categories which emerged from perceptions, strategies, incidences and feelings. Trolls’ aims and their success in doing so when it comes to the research group are discussed. This research concludes that purity, hazard and intelligence of trolls are still dubious facts for the Anadolu University faculty members.

Keywords

Trolling, social media, faculty members, computer-mediated communication

References

• Binns, A. (2012). Don't feed the trolls! Managing troublemakers in magazines' online communities. Journalism Practice, 6(4), 547-562. Bishop, J. (2012a). The psychology of trolling and lurking: the role of defriending and gamification for increasing participation in online communities using seductive narratives. In H. Li (Ed.), Virtual community participation and motivation: Crossdisciplinary theories (pp. 160-176). Hershey, PA: Information Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0312-7.ch010. Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and individual Differences, 67, 97-102. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research method: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Coles, B. A., & West, M. (2016). Trolling the trolls: Online forum users constructions of the nature and properties of trolling. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 233-244. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253. Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. Communities in cyberspace, 1996, 29-59. Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. London: Sage Publications. Hardaker, C. (2013). Uh.... not to be nitpicky, but... the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 1(1), 58-86. Herring, S., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., & Barab, S. (2002). Searching for safety online: Managing" trolling" in a feminist forum. The Information Society,18(5), 371-384. Karppi, T. (2013). FCJ-166 ‘Change name to no One. Like people’s status’ Facebook trolling and managing online personas. The Fibreculture Journal, 22 (2013: Trolls and The Negative Space of the Internet), 278-300. Maltby, J., Day, L., Hatcher, R. M., Tazzyman, S., Flowe, H. D., Palmer, E. J., ... & Knieps, M. (2015). Implicit theories of online trolling: Evidence that attention‐ seeking conceptions are associated with increased psychological resilience. British Journal of Psychology, 1-19. McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and social psychology review, 4(1), 57-75. McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. MIT press Merritt, E. (2012). An analysis of the discourse of Internet trolling: A case study of Reddit. com (Doctoral dissertation). Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA. 83 Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Moran, M., Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2011). Teaching, learning, and sharing: How today's higher education faculty use social media. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions & Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved March 24, 2016 from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/teaching-learning-and-sharing.pdf. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Ozdemir, Ç., Yuksel, G., Cemaloglu, N., Cakmak, M., Celikoz, N., Erisen, Y., ... & Semiz, M. (2006). Türkiye’de ogretim elemanlari [Faculty in Turkey]. Ankara: Gazi University. Ozsoy, D. (2015). Tweeting political fear: Trolls in Turkey. Journal of History School (JOHS), 12, 535-552. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & Evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Schwartz, M. (August, 2008). The trolls among us. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03trolls-t.html (25.03.2016) Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2013). Social media for teaching and learning. UK: Pearson Learning Systems. Taiwo, R. (2014). Impoliteness in online forums: A study of trolling in Nairaland. In Chiluwa, P. Ifukor, R. Taiwo (Ed.), Pragmatics of Nigerian English in Digital Discourse (pp. 67- 76). Lincom Europa. Varnali, K., & Gorgulu, V. (2015). A social influence perspective on expressive political participation in Twitter: the case of# OccupyGezi. Information, Communication & Society, 18(1), 1-16. Weller, M. (2007). The distance from isolation: Why communities are the logical conclusion in e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(2), 148-159. Williams, Z. (June, 2012). What is an internet troll? Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/jun/12/what-is-an-internet-troll (25.03.2016)