Öğrencilerin Sorgulama Becerilerine Yönelik Bir Karşılaştırma Araştırması: Takım-Oyun-Turnuva ve Birleştirme Teknikleri

Year 2020, , 127 - 139, 31.01.2020

Ayfer Mutlu

https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.551112

Abstract

Hormonlar konusu fen eğitiminde önemli bir yere
sahiptir. Eğitimin her kademesinde yer alan bu konu soyut kavramlardan oluşması
sebebiyle öğrencileri ezbere yönlendirmekte ve öğrenme sürecinde becerilerini
kullanmalarını kısıtlamaktadır. Bu sebeple hormonlar konusunun öğreniminde
öğrencilerin becerilerini kullanmalarına ve geliştirmelerine imkân sağlayan
etkinlikler önem arz etmektedir. Sunulan çalışmada hormonlar
konusunda işbirlikli öğrenme yaklaşımın iki farklı tekniği olan
Takım-Oyun-Turnuva ve Birleştirme tekniklerine dayalı gerçekleştirilen
etkinliklerin üniversite öğrencilerinin sorgulama becerilerine etkisinin
karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla öğrenciler Grup-1 (N=23) ve Grup-2
(N=29) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Grup-1’de Takım-Oyun-Turnuva,
Grup-2’de ise Birleştirme tekniği kullanılmıştır. Uygulamalar 9 hafta sürmüş ve
veri toplama amacıyla uygulamalardan önce ve sonra olmak üzere Sorgulama
Becerileri Ölçeği (Aldan-Karademir & Saracaloğlu, 2013) kullanılmıştır.
Bulgulara göre, grupların ön test ve son test puanları arasında anlamlı gelişme
bulunurken, son test puanları arasında anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmemiştir.
Elde edilen sonuçlara göre her iki tekniğin de sorgulama becerilerini
geliştirdiği fakat aralarında anlamlı bir farklılığın olmadığı sonucuna
varılmıştır. 

Keywords

Birleştirme, Hormon Biyokimyası, İşbirlikli Öğrenme, Sorgulama Becerileri, Takım-Oyun-Turnuva

References

• Abdullah, S., & Shariff, A. (2008). The effects of inquiry-based computer simulation with cooperative learning on scientific thinking and conceptual understanding of gas laws. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(4), 387–398.
• Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2014). Aktif öğrenme. İzmir: Biliş Özel Eğitim, Danışmanlık, Araştırma Hizmetleri ve Yayın.
• Aldan-Karademir, Ç., & Saracaloglu, A. S. (2013). The development of inquiry skills scale: Reliability and validity study. Asya Öğretim Dergisi, 1(2), 56-65.
• Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J. & Snapp, M. (1978). The Jigsaw Classroom. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage
• Arslan, A., & Zengin, R. (2016). İşbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin bilimsel ve sosyal beceriler üzerindeki etkisi. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 23-45.
• Cooper, J. L., & Mueck, R. (1990). Student involvement in learning cooperative learning and college instruction. Journal on Excellence College Teaching, 1, 68–76.
• Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61-71.
• De Vries, D. L., & Edwards, K. J. (1974). Student teams and learning games: Their effects on cross-race and cross-sex interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 741-749.
• De Vries, D. L., Edwards, K. J. & Wells, E. H. (1974). Teams-games-tournament in the social studies classroom: effects on academic achievement, student attitudes, cognitive beliefs, and classroom climate. Center for Social Organization of Schools, The Johns Hopkins University, Report Number 173.
• De Vries, D. L., & Slavin, R. E. (1978). Teams-games-tournaments (TGT): Review of ten classroom experiments. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), 28-38.
• Doymus, K. (2008a). Teaching chemical equilibrium with the jigsaw technique. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 249-260.
• Doymus, K. (2008b). Teaching chemical bonding through jigsaw cooperative learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 47-57.
• Doymus, K., Karacop, A., & Simsek, U. (2010). Effects of jigsaw and animation techniques on students’ understanding of concepts and subjects in electrochemistry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 671-691.
• González, A., Jennings, D., & Manriquez, L. (2014). Multi-faceted impact of a team game tournament on the ability of the learners to engage and develop their own critical skill set. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(5), 1213-1224.
• Hedeen, T. (2003). The reverse jigsaw: A process of cooperative learning and discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31(3), 325–332.
• Holliday, D. C. (1995). Jigsaw IV: Using student/ teacher concerns to improve Jigsaw III. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED495687, 08.04.2019 tarihinde https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED465687.pdf adresinden den alınmıştır.
• Johnson D. W. & Johnson R. T. (1994). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Boston: Allynand Bacon.
• Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T & Holubec, E. J. (1993). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. ERIC Document Number: ED 241 516, 8.04.2019 tarihinde http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED241516.pdf adresinden alınmıştır
• Kaplan Parsa, M. (2016). İşbirlikli sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenme ortamının yaratıcı düşünmeye, sorgulayıcı öğrenme becerilerine, fen ve teknoloji dersine yönelik tutuma etkisi(Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi), Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Karaçöp, A., & Diken, E. H. (2017). The effects of jigsaw technique based on cooperative learning on prospective science teachers' science process skill. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(6), 86-97.
• Karacop, A., & Doymus, K. (2013). Effects of jigsaw cooperative learning and animation techniques on students’ understanding of chemical bonding and their conceptions of the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 186-203.
• Koç, Y., Doymuş, K., Karaçöp, A., & Şimşek, Ü. (2010). The effects of two cooperative learning strategies on the teaching and learning of the topics of chemical kinetics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2) 52-65.
• Kumar, C. V., Kalasuramath, S., Patil, S., Kumar, K. R., Taj, K. S., Jayasimha, V. L., Basavarajappa1, K.G., Shashikala, P., Kukkamalla, A., & Chacko, T. (2017). Effect of jigsaw co-operative learning method in improving cognitive skills among medical students. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(3), 164-173.
• Lazarowitz R. & Penso, S. (1992). High school students’ difficulties in learning biology concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 26(3), 215-224.
• Newmann, F. M., & Thompson, J. A. (1987). Effects of cooperative learning on achievement in secondary schools: a summary of research. ERIC Document number: ED 288 853, 08.04.2019 tarihinde https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED288853.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
• Oludipe, D., & Awokoy, O. J. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning teaching strategy on the reduction of students’ anxiety for learning chemistry. Türk Fen Eğitim Dergisi, 7(1), 1-36.
• Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival manual, a step by step a guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. England: McGraw-HillEducation.
• Phillips, J., & Fusco J. (2015). Using the jigsaw technique to teach clinical controversy in a clinical skills course. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 79(6), 1-7.
• Sharan S. & Hertz-Lazarowitz R. (1980). A group-investigation method of cooperative learning in the classroom. In S. Sharan, P. Hare, C. Webb and R. Hertz Lazarowitz (eds.) Cooperation in Education. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press.
• Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Education Research, 50, 315–342.
• Slavin, R. E. (1986). Using student team learning. Baltimore, MD.: Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
• Solihatin, E., & Öztürk, A. (2014). Increasing civics learning achievement by applying cooperative learning: team game tournament method. Sociology, 4(11), 949-954.
• Souvignier, E., & Kronenberger, J. (2007). Cooperative learning in third graders' jigsaw groups for mathematics and science with and without questioning training. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 755-771.
• Stahl, R. J. (1994). Cooperative learning in social studies: A handbook for teachers. Addison-Wesley.
• Tarhan, L., & Acar Şeşen, B. (2012). Jigsaw cooperative learning: acid–base theories. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 307-313.
• Tarhan, L., Ayyıldız, Y., Ogunc, A., & Acar-Sesen, B. (2013). A jigsaw cooperative learning application in elementary science and technology lessons: physical and chemical changes. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(2), 184-203.
• Tekkaya, C., Özkan, Ö., & Sungur, S. (2001). Biology concepts perceived as difficult by Turkish high school students. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 145-150.
• Van Wyk, M. M. (2011). The effects of Teams-Games-Tournaments on achievement, retention, and attitudes of economics education students. Journal of Social Sciences, 26(3), 183-193.
• Veloo, A., & Chairhany, S. (2013). Fostering students’ attitudes and achievement in probability using teams-games-tournaments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 59-64.
• Yılar, M. B., & Şimşek, U. (2016). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde farklı işbirlikli öğrenme uygulamalarının sosyal beceriler üzerindeki etkileri. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 17(3), 835-854.