Refah Seviyesini Belirleyen Eğitim Göstergeleri: AB Üye Ülkeleri ve Türkiye

Year 2025, Volume: 39 Issue: 1, 52 - 61, 08.01.2025

Gonca Yüzbaşı

https://doi.org/10.16951/trendbusecon.1479660

Abstract

Günümüzde ekonomi kavramı sadece sayısal verilerle ifade edilememektedir. Refah kavramı içerisindeki ekonomi anlayışı sayısal verilerin ötesinde yer almaktadır. Eğitim değişkeni ise hem refahın hem de ekonominin temel belirleyicilerinden biridir. Bu çalışmada veri madenciliği tekniklerinden karar ağaçları kullanılmıştır. Avrupa Birliği üye ülkeleri ve Türkiye için refahı belirleyen eğitim göstergeleri bu yöntemle incelenmiştir. 2016-2020 dönemine ait refah endeksi değerleri ve 13 eğitim göstergesi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular doktora mezun sayısı göstergesinin söz konusu ayırımı sağlayan en önemli değişken olduğunu göstermiştir.

Keywords

Refah, Yükseköğretim, Karar Ağaçları, Veri Madenciliği, Eğitim

Education Indicators That Determine Welfare Level: EU Countries and Turkey

Abstract

Today, the concept of economy both expresses quantitative data ant includes factors that cannot be expressed in numbers. Economy and welfare indicators are now considered together. Education is one of the main determinants of both concepts. This study examines educational indicators that distinguish welfare states and non-welfare states by applying decision trees that are data mining techniques. Values of welfare index of EU countries and Turkey and its thirteen education indicators were used for the period of 2016-2020. Findings suggest that doctorate graduate indicator is the most important variable which discriminates welfare states and non-welfare states.

Keywords

Welfare, Higher Education, Decision Tree, Data Mining, Education

References

• Apple, M. W. (2013). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. (!st Edition), New York and London: Routledge [CrossRef]
• Baum, D. N. & Lin, S. (1993). The Differential Effects on Economic Growth of Government Expenditures on Education. Journal of Economic Development, 18(1), 175-1985. [CrossRef]
• Bak, H. (2018). Beyond the economy: Education for development. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences.46 (4), 1-5. [CrossRef]
• Barrett, G. F. (2000). The effect of educational attainment on welfare dependence: Evidence from Canada. Journal of Public Economics, 77(2), 209-232. [CrossRef]
• Brown, P., Lauder, H., Ashton, D., Yingje, W., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2008). Education, globalization and the future of the knowledge economy. European Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 131-156. [CrossRef]
• Cheung, H. Y., & Chan, A. W. H. (2010). Education and competitive economy: how do cultural dimensions fit in?. Higher Education, 59(5), 525-541. [CrossRef]
• Dede, C. (1981). Education and the Economy. Theory In to Practice, 20(4), 245-249. [CrossRef]
• Del Rey, E., & Lopez-Garcia, M. A. (2016). Endogenous growth and welfare effects of education subsidies and intergenerational transfers. Economic Modeling, 52, 531-539. [CrossRef]
• Di Pietro, G. (2003). Equality Of Opportunity In Italian University Education: Is There Any Role for social welfare spending?. International Journal of Educational Development, 23(1), 5-15. [CrossRef]
• Fernandez, R., & Rogerson, R. (1998). Public education and income distribution: A dynamic quantitative evaluation of education-finance reform. American Economic Review, 813-833. [CrossRef]
• Franke, T., Bagdasaryan, S., & Furman, W. (2009). A multivariate analysis of training, education, and readiness for public child welfare practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(12), 1330-1336. [CrossRef]
• Gamlath, S., & Lahiri, R. (2018). Public and private education expenditures, variable elasticity of substitution and economic growth. Economic Modeling, 70, 1-14. [CrossRef]
• Guardiola, J., & Guillen-Royo, M. (2015). Income, unemployment, higher education and wellbeing in times of economic crisis: Evidence from Granada (Spain). Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 395-409. [CrossRef]
• Hand, D. J. (1998). Data mining: statistics and more?. The American Statistician, 52(2), 112-118. [CrossRef]
• Hega, G. M., & Hokenmaier, K. G. (2002). The welfare state and education: a comparison of social and educational policy in advanced industrial societies. German Policy Studies, 2(1), 143-173. [CrossRef]
• Jacklin, A., & Robinson, C. (2007). What is meant by ‘support’ in higher education? Towards a model of academic and welfare support. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 7(2), 114-123. [CrossRef]
• Jones-Deweever, A. A. (2006). When the spirit blooms: Acquiring higher education in the context of welfare reform. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 27(3-4), 113-133. [CrossRef]
• Khan, A. J., & Ahmed, H. R. (2016). Prosperity and Instability: An Evaluation of Legatum Prosperity Index. Papers and Proceedings, 407-431. [CrossRef]
• Ku, I. (2001). The effect of welfare on children's education. Social Service Review, 75(2), 245-270. [CrossRef]
• Lauder, H. (2012). Education, democracy and the crisis of the welfare state. Towards Successful Schooling (RLE Edu L Sociology of Education), 33. [CrossRef]
• Li, Z., & Wu, M. (2018). Education and welfare program compliance: Firm-level evidence from a pension reform in China. China Economic Review, 48, 1-13. [CrossRef]
• Lykins, C. (2011). The political economy of education research. American Journal of Education, 117(2), 211-232. [CrossRef]
• Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher education quarterly, 65(4), 411-433.
• Mehta, N. (2018). The potential output gains from using optimal teacher incentives: An illustrative calibration of a hidden action model. Economics of Education Review, 66, 67-72. [CrossRef]
• Mihaela, M., & Ţiţan, E. (2014). Education and innovation in the context of economies globalization. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 1042-1046. [CrossRef]
• Moldovan, L. (2012). Integration of strategic management and quality assurance in the Romanian higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1458-1465. [CrossRef]
• Özekes, S. (2003). Data mining models and application areas. Journal of Istanbul Trade University, 3(12), 65-82.
• Özkan, Y. (2008). Data mining methods. (2. Baskı), İstanbul:Papatya Publishing Education.
• Öztemel, E. (2003). Artificial Neural Network, (2. Baskı), Istanbul.:Papatya Publishing Education
• Pechar, H., & Andres, L. (2011). Higher-education policies and welfare regimes: International comparative perspectives. Higher education policy, 24(1), 25-52. [CrossRef]
• Peter, T., Edgerton, J. D., & Roberts, L. W. (2010). Welfare regimes and educational inequality: a cross‐national exploration. International studies in Sociology of Education, 20(3), 241-264. [CrossRef]
• Silahtaroğlu, G. (2008). Data mining. Papatya Publishing Education. (3. Baskı), İstanbul: Papatya Yayıncılık.
• Skrtic, T. M. (2005). A political economy of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 149-155. [CrossRef]
• Šipilova, V. (2015). Education for structural change and innovativeness of the economy in Latvia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1270-1277. [CrossRef]
• Turner, L. J. (2016). The returns to higher education for marginal students: Evidence from Colorado welfare recipients. Economics of Education Review, 51, 169-184. [CrossRef]
• Willemse, N., & De Beer, P. (2012). Three worlds of educational welfare states? A comparative study of higher education systems across welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(2), 105-117. [CrossRef]
• Woodhall, M. (2013). Education Economics: A Collective View. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 6 (6), 281-294.