Assessment of The Quality And Reliability of Youtube Video Content Related to the Loss of Smell

Year 2023, , 41 - 46, 22.06.2023

Cem Çelik , Yavuz Atar , Ömer Kumaş , Hasan Sami Bircan , Ziya Salturk

https://doi.org/10.26650/Tr-ENT.2023.1262261

Abstract

Objective: Video-sharing sites have recently become a popular means of obtaining medical information. This study aims to analyze the English content quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on the loss of smell. Material and Methods: A search was made on YouTube using the keyword “loss of smell,” “anosmia” and “olfactory dysfunction”. A total of 180 videos, 60 from each category, were reviewed. Ninety videos were excluded due to exclusion criteria, and a total of 90 videos were reviewed. Results: Videos in 5 categories (physician-based, social/professional organizations, patients, health-related websites, and academic origins) were evaluated with DISCERN, GQS, and JAMA scores. Physician-based videos had higher scores for quality and reliability than other videos. Conclusions: YouTube is a universal information tool growing in popularity in the medical field. Physician-based videos on the loss of smell are better in terms of quality and reliability and may be more informative.

Keywords

anosmia, loss, olfactory, smell, video, youtube

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

References

• 1. Chen YY, Li CM, Liang JC, Tsai CC. health information obtained from the internet and changes in medical decision making: questionnaire development and cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res 2018;20(2):e47. google scholar
• 2. Cocco AM, Zordan R, Taylor DM, Weiland TJ, Dilley SJ, Kant J et. al. Dr Google in the ED: searching for online health information by adult emergency department patients. Med J Aust 2018;209(8):342-7 google scholar
• 3. Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz KD, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. 2016;40(10):1995-2002. google scholar
• 4. YouTube for press. https://blog.youtube/press/. Accessed 12 Dec 2020. google scholar
• 5. Celik H, Polat O, Ozcan C, Camur S, Kilinc BE, Uzun M. Assessment of the quality and reliability of the information on rotator cuff repair on YouTube. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020;106(1):31-4. google scholar
• 6. Vincis R, Fontanini A. Central taste anatomy and physiology. Handb Clin Neurol 2019;164:187-204 google scholar
• 7. Sergi G, Bano G, Pizzato S, Veronese N, Manzato E. Taste loss in the elderly: Possible implications for dietary habits. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2017;57(17):3684-9 google scholar
• 8. Doty RL. Treatments for smell and taste disorders: A critical review. Handb Clin Neurol 2019;164:455-79. google scholar
• 9. Sayin İ, Yaşar KK, Yazici ZM. Taste and Smell Impairment in COVID-19: An AAO-HNS anosmia reporting tool-based comparative study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;163(3):473-9. google scholar
• 10. Lee Y, Min P, Lee S, Kim SW. Prevalence and duration of acute loss of smell or taste in COVID-19 patients. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35(18):e174. google scholar
• 11. Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Ekici U, Gurkan A. Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in sleeve gastrectomy videos shared on open access video sharing platform YouTube. Obes Surg 2019;29(5):1477-84 google scholar
• 12. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102(9):2070-7. google scholar
• 13. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 2012;39(5):899-903. google scholar
• 14. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53(2):105-11. google scholar
• 15. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997;277(15):1244-5. google scholar
• 16. Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA. 2007;298(21):2482-4. google scholar
• 17. Akyol A, Karahan İ. Is YouTube a quality source of information on sarcopenia? Eur Geriatr Med 2020;11(4):693-7. google scholar
• 18. Şahin A, Şahin M, Turkcu FM. YouTube as a source of information in retinopathy of prematurity. Ir J Med Sci 2019;188(2):613-7. google scholar
• 19. Singh SK, Liu S, Capasso R, Kern RC, Gouveia CJ. YouTube as a source of information for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Otolaryngol 2018;39(4):378-82. google scholar