Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite

Virtue Signaling in Incidents of Violence Against Women: An Analysis on Social Media from a Critical Perspective

Year 2024, Volume: 09 Issue: 20, 172 - 203, 31.01.2024
https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1408109

Abstract

This study aims to reveal how individual virtue signaling (VS) behavior is exhibited on social media through the discourse of 'say no to violence against women.'The universe of the research consists of social media posts associated with the discourse against violence against women, and the sample is formed by the posts sent on November 25, the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, with the hashtag #KadınaŞiddeteHayır on X.com. The data obtained were evaluated using qualitative and quantitative content analysis methods, based on Tosi and Warmke's (2016) description of VS forms, Hill and Fanciullo's (2023) characterization of VS, and the classification of VS features by Philips (2020) and Shatz (n.d.), and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. According to the findings, tweets that fit the VS description were predominantly performed in the form of 'piling on,' and the predominant VS feature exhibited was 'cold-hearted.' The analysis conducted based on VS features revealed that virtue signaling is exhibited on social media in superficial, repetitive, and insincere forms. In the conclusion, all the findings obtained were discussed from different perspectives regarding the concept of VS. Research on virtue signaling is still relatively new, and there hasn't been a study specifically addressing VS behavior exhibited through posts against violence towards women. In this regard, this study possesses originality by providing a preliminary assessment within the scope of the impact of VS-themed discourses on social media on reducing violence against women and raising awareness, and contributes to the literature.

References

  • Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Yıldırım, E., Bayraktaroğlu, S. (2002). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: SPSS Uygulamalar. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitapevi.
  • Ateşman, E. (1997). Türkçede Okunabilirliğin Ölçülmesi, Dil Dergisi, 58(Ağustos 1997), 71-74.
  • Applebaum, B. (2021). The Non-Performativity of White Virtue-Signaling: Insights for Social Justice Pedagogy, Philosophy of Education, 77(3), 42-58. DOI: 10.47925/77.3.042.
  • Bartholomew, J. (2015a). Easy Virtue. The Spectator. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/easy-virtue Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2023.
  • Bartholomew, J. (2015b). I Invented ‘Virtue Signalling’. Now It’s Taking Over the World. The Spectator. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/i-invented-virtue-signalling-now-it-s-taking-over-the-world/. Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2023.
  • Bartholomew, J. (2018). The Awful Rise of ‘Virtue Signalling’. The Spectator. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-awful-rise-of-virtue-signalling Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2023
  • Berthon, P. R., Ferguson, S. L., Pitt, L., Wang, E. J. (2021). The Virtuous Brand: The Perils and Promises of Brand Virtue Signaling. Business Horizons, 66(5). DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.10.006.
  • Bezirci, B., Yılmaz, A. E. (2010). Metinlerin Okunabilirliğinin Ölçülmesi Üzerine Bir Yazılım Kütüphanesi ve Türkçe İçin Yeni Bir Okunabilirlik Ölçütü. DEÜ Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(3), 49-62.
  • Bowman, S. (2016). Stop Saying Virtue Signalling. Adam Smith Institute. https://www.adamsmith.org/blog/stop-saying-virtue-signalling. Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2023.
  • Castells, M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political And Social Science, 616(1), 78-93.
  • Coppola, W. (2021). What If Freire Had Facebook? A Critical Interrogation of Social Media Woke Culture Among Privileged Voices in Music Education Discorse. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 20(1), 16-52. DOI:10.22176/act20.1.16.
  • Feró, D., Bajusz, O. (2018). Progressivist Gender-Based Activism as a Means of Social Antagonism in Hungary Through Two Case Studies. Sociologia, 60(1), 177-193. DOI:10.2298/SOC1801177F.
  • Fuchs, C. (2020). Sosyal Medya: Eleştirel Bir Giriş. D. Saraçoğlu ve İ. Kalaycı (Çev.). İstanbul: NotaBene Yayınları.
  • Glen, C. L. (2015). Activism or Slacktivism? Digital Media and Organizing for Social Change. Communication Teacher, 29(2), 81-85. DOI:10.1080/17404622.2014.1003310.
  • Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. S., Leech, N. L. (2015). Uygulamada Araştırma Yöntemleri: Desen ve Analizi Bütünleştiren Yaklaşım. S. Turan (Çev.). Ankara: Nobel Kitap.
  • Goldhill, O. (2019). Socrates’ Ancient Philosophy Shows Why Moral Posturing on Social Media is so Annoying. Quartz. https://qz.com/1599699/socrates-shows-why-moral-posturing-on-social-media-is-so-annoying/. Erişim Tarihi: 11.01.2024.
  • Gray, J. (2018). Performing Wokeness. The Harvard Crimson. https://www.thecrimson.com/column/better-left-unsaid/article/2018/10/1/gray-performing-wokeness/ Erişim Tarihi: 09.12.2023.
  • Grohmann, S. (2022). Objects of Virtue: “Moral Grandstanding” and the Capitalization of Ethics Under Neoliberal Commodity Fetishism. Journal of Critical Realism, 22(1), 27-48. DOI: 10.1080/14767430.2022.2095120.
  • Gürel, E., Nazlı, A. (2019). Dijital Aktivizm: Change.org Kampanyaları Üzerine Bir Analiz. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(4), 187-206.
  • Hamilton, A. (2019). Virtue Signalling and Other Slimy Words. Eureka Street, 29(5), 12-14.
  • Hill, J., Fanciullo, J. (2023). What’s Wrong with Virtue Signaling? Synthese, 201, 117. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04131-4.
  • Kalina, P. (2020). Performative Allyship. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 11, 478-481. DOI:10.47577/tssj.v11i1.1518.
  • Krispenz, A., Bertrams, A. (2023). Further Basic Evidence fort the Dark-Ego-Vehicle Principle: Higher Pathological Narcissism is Associated with Greater Involvement in Feminist Activism. Current Psychology. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-023-05451-x.
  • Levy, N. (2020). Virtue Signalling is Virtues. Synthese, 198, 9545-9562. DOI:10.1007/s11229-020- 02653-9.
  • Lippitt, J. (2023). Kierkegaard, “the Public”, and the Vices of Virtue-Signaling: The Dangers of Social Comparison. Religions, 14(11). DOI: 10.3390/rel14111370.
  • Massey-Abernathy, A., Haseltine, E. (2019). Power Talk: Communication Styles, Vocalization Rates and Dominance. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48, 107-116.McMullan, J. (2020). A New Understanding of ‘New Media’: Online Platforms as Digital Mediums. Convergence, 26(2), 287-301. DOI: 10.1177/1354856517738159.
  • Miles-Hercules, D., Muwwakkil, J. (2021). Virtue Signaling and the Linguistik Repertoire of Anti-Blacness: or, “I Would Have Voted for Obama for a Third Term”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 31(2). DOI: 10.1111/jola.12320.
  • Neuman, W. L. (2009). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri. S. Özge (Çev.). İstanbul: Yayın Odası.
  • Nielsen, R.K., Cornia, A., Kalogeropoulos, A. (2016). Challenges and Opportunities for News Media and Journalism in an Increasingly Digital, Mobile, and Social Media Environment. SSRN, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2879383. Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2023.
  • Paşalı Taşoğlu, N., Çağlayan, S. (2021). Dijital Siyasal İletişimde Gösterişçi Duyarlılık Davranışı ve ABD Eski Başkanı D. J. Trump’ın Politik Söylemleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme. T. Yazıcı, İ. Karlı, Z.B. Dondurucu içinde, Dijitalleşen Dünyada Siyasal İletişim (s. 493-552). Konya: Literatürk Academia.
  • Paşalı Taşoğlu, N., Çağlayan, S. (2022). Gösterişçi Duyarlılık Sergileme ya da Duyar Kasma: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve. Selçuk İletişim, 15(2), 833-859. DOI: 10.18094/josc.1027163.
  • Philips, H. (2020). Performative Allyship is Deadly. Forge. https://forge.medium.com/performativeallyship-is-deadly-c900645d9f1f Erişim Tarihi: 09.12.2023.
  • Skoric, M.M. (2012). What is Slack About Slacktivism? Methodological and Conceptual Issues in Cyber Activism Research, Inter-Asia Roundtable 2012. https://ari.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/InterAsiaRoundtable-2012.pdf#page=83 Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2023.
  • Shatz, I. (t.y.). Virtue Signaling: When People Try to Show Their Goodness. https://effectiviology.com/virtue-signaling/ Erişim Tarihi: 09.12.2023.
  • Shrimsley, R. (2019). Once You’re Accused of Virtue-Signalling, You Can’t Do Anything Right. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/cf4d3d5c-7129-11e9-bf5c-6eeb837566c5. Erişim Tarihi: 11.01.2024.
  • Thompson, J., B. (2019). Medya ve Modernite. S. Öztürk (Çev.). İstanbul: Kırmızı Yayınları.
  • Tilakkumar, N. (2020). Who is Your Performative Wokeness for? Why Virtue Signalling is Problematic? The Release. https://therelease.co.uk/who-is-your-performative-wokeness-for Erişim Tarihi: 06.12.2023.
  • Tosi, J., Warmke, B. (2016). Moral Grandstanding. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 44(3), 197-217. DOI:10.1111/papa.12075.
  • Trenz, H. (2009). Digital Media and the Return of the Representative Public Sphere. Working Paper, 6, 1-21.
  • Tuckwell, W. (2022). Virtue Signalling to Signal Trustworthiness, Avoid Distrust, and Scaffold Self-Trust. Social Epistemology. DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2022.2150989.
  • Twitter.com (2023). https://twitter.com/Write/status/1674221120495685635. Erişim Tarihi: 25.11.2023.
  • Van Dijk, J. (2016). Ağ Toplumu. Ö. Sakin (Çev.). İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınevi.
  • Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A., Kemper, J.A. (2020). Brands Taking a Stand: Authentic Brand Activism or Woke Washing? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4). DOI: 10.1177/074391562094735.
  • Wallace, E., Buil, I., de Chernatony, L. (2018). Consuming Good on Social Media: What Can Conspicuous Virtue Signalling on Facebook Tell Us About Prosocial and Unethical Intentions? Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 577-592. DOI:10.1007/s10551-018-3999-7
  • Warmke, B., Tosi, J. (2020). Moral Grandstanding and Virtue Signaling: The Same Thing? Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/moral-talk/202008/moral-grandstanding-and-virtue-signaling-the-same-thing Erişim Tarihi: 09.12.2023.
  • Yang, G. (2016). Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of #BlackLivesMatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13-17. DOI:10.17645/mac.v4i4.692.
  • Yılmaz Sert, N. (2014). Yeni Medyada Aktivist Hareketler Örnek İnceleme: Türkiye’de LGBTT Aktivizmi. İ. Sayımer (Ed.) Yeni Medya Araştırmaları: Kavramlar, Uygulamalar, Tartışmalar içinde (s. 283-336). Konya: Literatürk Academia Yayınları.
  • Yujie, Z., Al Imran Yasin, M., Alsagoff, S., Hoon, A. (2022). The Mediating Role of New Media Engagement in This Digital Age. Frontiers in Public Health, 2022(10). DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.879530.

Kadına Yönelik Şiddet Olaylarında Gösterişçi Duyarlılık: Eleştirel Perspektiften Sosyal Medya Üzerine Bir Analiz

Year 2024, Volume: 09 Issue: 20, 172 - 203, 31.01.2024
https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1408109

Abstract

Bu çalışma, bireysel gösterişçi duyarlılık (GD) davranışının ‘kadına yönelik şiddete hayır’ söylemi üzerinden sosyal medya ortamında nasıl sergilendiğini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmanın evrenini "kadına yönelik şiddete hayır" söylemiyle özdeşleşen sosyal medya paylaşımları, örneklemini ise X.com üzerinden 25 Kasım Kadına Yönelik Şiddete Karşı Uluslararası Mücadele Günü kapsamında #KadınaŞiddeteHayır etiketi ile 25.11.2023 tarihinde gerçekleştirilen paylaşımlar oluşturmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda elde edilen veriler nitel ve nicel içerik analizi yöntemi dâhilinde, Tosi ve Warmke (2016)’nin GD biçimleri betimlemesi, Hill ve Fanciullo (2023)’nun GD karakterleri tanımlaması ve Philips (2020) ile Shatz (t.y.)’ın GD özellikleri sınıflandırmasından yararlanılarak tanımlayıcı istatistikler ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre GD tanımlamasına uyan tweetlerin ağırlıklı olarak ‘tekrarlama’ biçiminde gerçekleştirildiği ve ‘soğuk kalpli’ GD özelliği sergilediği tespit edilmiştir. GD özelliklerine göre gerçekleştirilen analiz sonucunda ise gösterişçi duyarlılığın yüzeysel, tekrar içeren, samimi olmayan şekillerde sosyal medya ortamında sergilendiği belirlenmiştir. Sonuç bölümünde, erişilen tüm bulgular, GD kavramına dair farklı bakış açıları dâhilinde tartışılmıştır. Gösterişçi duyarlılığa dair gerçekleştirilen araştırmalar henüz çok yeni olup, kadına yönelik şiddete karşı gerçekleştirilen paylaşımlar üzerinden sergilenen GD davranışını ele alan bir çalışmaya rastlanılmamıştır. Bu doğrultuda bu çalışma, sosyal medyada yer alan GD içerikli söylemlerin kadına yönelik şiddeti azaltma ve farkındalık kazandırma yönündeki etkisi kapsamında bir ön değerlendirme sağlayarak literatüre katkı sağlayacak bir özgünlüğe sahiptir.

References

  • Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Yıldırım, E., Bayraktaroğlu, S. (2002). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: SPSS Uygulamalar. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitapevi.
  • Ateşman, E. (1997). Türkçede Okunabilirliğin Ölçülmesi, Dil Dergisi, 58(Ağustos 1997), 71-74.
  • Applebaum, B. (2021). The Non-Performativity of White Virtue-Signaling: Insights for Social Justice Pedagogy, Philosophy of Education, 77(3), 42-58. DOI: 10.47925/77.3.042.
  • Bartholomew, J. (2015a). Easy Virtue. The Spectator. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/easy-virtue Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2023.
  • Bartholomew, J. (2015b). I Invented ‘Virtue Signalling’. Now It’s Taking Over the World. The Spectator. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/i-invented-virtue-signalling-now-it-s-taking-over-the-world/. Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2023.
  • Bartholomew, J. (2018). The Awful Rise of ‘Virtue Signalling’. The Spectator. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-awful-rise-of-virtue-signalling Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2023
  • Berthon, P. R., Ferguson, S. L., Pitt, L., Wang, E. J. (2021). The Virtuous Brand: The Perils and Promises of Brand Virtue Signaling. Business Horizons, 66(5). DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.10.006.
  • Bezirci, B., Yılmaz, A. E. (2010). Metinlerin Okunabilirliğinin Ölçülmesi Üzerine Bir Yazılım Kütüphanesi ve Türkçe İçin Yeni Bir Okunabilirlik Ölçütü. DEÜ Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(3), 49-62.
  • Bowman, S. (2016). Stop Saying Virtue Signalling. Adam Smith Institute. https://www.adamsmith.org/blog/stop-saying-virtue-signalling. Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2023.
  • Castells, M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political And Social Science, 616(1), 78-93.
  • Coppola, W. (2021). What If Freire Had Facebook? A Critical Interrogation of Social Media Woke Culture Among Privileged Voices in Music Education Discorse. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 20(1), 16-52. DOI:10.22176/act20.1.16.
  • Feró, D., Bajusz, O. (2018). Progressivist Gender-Based Activism as a Means of Social Antagonism in Hungary Through Two Case Studies. Sociologia, 60(1), 177-193. DOI:10.2298/SOC1801177F.
  • Fuchs, C. (2020). Sosyal Medya: Eleştirel Bir Giriş. D. Saraçoğlu ve İ. Kalaycı (Çev.). İstanbul: NotaBene Yayınları.
  • Glen, C. L. (2015). Activism or Slacktivism? Digital Media and Organizing for Social Change. Communication Teacher, 29(2), 81-85. DOI:10.1080/17404622.2014.1003310.
  • Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. S., Leech, N. L. (2015). Uygulamada Araştırma Yöntemleri: Desen ve Analizi Bütünleştiren Yaklaşım. S. Turan (Çev.). Ankara: Nobel Kitap.
  • Goldhill, O. (2019). Socrates’ Ancient Philosophy Shows Why Moral Posturing on Social Media is so Annoying. Quartz. https://qz.com/1599699/socrates-shows-why-moral-posturing-on-social-media-is-so-annoying/. Erişim Tarihi: 11.01.2024.
  • Gray, J. (2018). Performing Wokeness. The Harvard Crimson. https://www.thecrimson.com/column/better-left-unsaid/article/2018/10/1/gray-performing-wokeness/ Erişim Tarihi: 09.12.2023.
  • Grohmann, S. (2022). Objects of Virtue: “Moral Grandstanding” and the Capitalization of Ethics Under Neoliberal Commodity Fetishism. Journal of Critical Realism, 22(1), 27-48. DOI: 10.1080/14767430.2022.2095120.
  • Gürel, E., Nazlı, A. (2019). Dijital Aktivizm: Change.org Kampanyaları Üzerine Bir Analiz. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(4), 187-206.
  • Hamilton, A. (2019). Virtue Signalling and Other Slimy Words. Eureka Street, 29(5), 12-14.
  • Hill, J., Fanciullo, J. (2023). What’s Wrong with Virtue Signaling? Synthese, 201, 117. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04131-4.
  • Kalina, P. (2020). Performative Allyship. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 11, 478-481. DOI:10.47577/tssj.v11i1.1518.
  • Krispenz, A., Bertrams, A. (2023). Further Basic Evidence fort the Dark-Ego-Vehicle Principle: Higher Pathological Narcissism is Associated with Greater Involvement in Feminist Activism. Current Psychology. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-023-05451-x.
  • Levy, N. (2020). Virtue Signalling is Virtues. Synthese, 198, 9545-9562. DOI:10.1007/s11229-020- 02653-9.
  • Lippitt, J. (2023). Kierkegaard, “the Public”, and the Vices of Virtue-Signaling: The Dangers of Social Comparison. Religions, 14(11). DOI: 10.3390/rel14111370.
  • Massey-Abernathy, A., Haseltine, E. (2019). Power Talk: Communication Styles, Vocalization Rates and Dominance. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48, 107-116.McMullan, J. (2020). A New Understanding of ‘New Media’: Online Platforms as Digital Mediums. Convergence, 26(2), 287-301. DOI: 10.1177/1354856517738159.
  • Miles-Hercules, D., Muwwakkil, J. (2021). Virtue Signaling and the Linguistik Repertoire of Anti-Blacness: or, “I Would Have Voted for Obama for a Third Term”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 31(2). DOI: 10.1111/jola.12320.
  • Neuman, W. L. (2009). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri. S. Özge (Çev.). İstanbul: Yayın Odası.
  • Nielsen, R.K., Cornia, A., Kalogeropoulos, A. (2016). Challenges and Opportunities for News Media and Journalism in an Increasingly Digital, Mobile, and Social Media Environment. SSRN, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2879383. Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2023.
  • Paşalı Taşoğlu, N., Çağlayan, S. (2021). Dijital Siyasal İletişimde Gösterişçi Duyarlılık Davranışı ve ABD Eski Başkanı D. J. Trump’ın Politik Söylemleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme. T. Yazıcı, İ. Karlı, Z.B. Dondurucu içinde, Dijitalleşen Dünyada Siyasal İletişim (s. 493-552). Konya: Literatürk Academia.
  • Paşalı Taşoğlu, N., Çağlayan, S. (2022). Gösterişçi Duyarlılık Sergileme ya da Duyar Kasma: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve. Selçuk İletişim, 15(2), 833-859. DOI: 10.18094/josc.1027163.
  • Philips, H. (2020). Performative Allyship is Deadly. Forge. https://forge.medium.com/performativeallyship-is-deadly-c900645d9f1f Erişim Tarihi: 09.12.2023.
  • Skoric, M.M. (2012). What is Slack About Slacktivism? Methodological and Conceptual Issues in Cyber Activism Research, Inter-Asia Roundtable 2012. https://ari.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/InterAsiaRoundtable-2012.pdf#page=83 Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2023.
  • Shatz, I. (t.y.). Virtue Signaling: When People Try to Show Their Goodness. https://effectiviology.com/virtue-signaling/ Erişim Tarihi: 09.12.2023.
  • Shrimsley, R. (2019). Once You’re Accused of Virtue-Signalling, You Can’t Do Anything Right. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/cf4d3d5c-7129-11e9-bf5c-6eeb837566c5. Erişim Tarihi: 11.01.2024.
  • Thompson, J., B. (2019). Medya ve Modernite. S. Öztürk (Çev.). İstanbul: Kırmızı Yayınları.
  • Tilakkumar, N. (2020). Who is Your Performative Wokeness for? Why Virtue Signalling is Problematic? The Release. https://therelease.co.uk/who-is-your-performative-wokeness-for Erişim Tarihi: 06.12.2023.
  • Tosi, J., Warmke, B. (2016). Moral Grandstanding. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 44(3), 197-217. DOI:10.1111/papa.12075.
  • Trenz, H. (2009). Digital Media and the Return of the Representative Public Sphere. Working Paper, 6, 1-21.
  • Tuckwell, W. (2022). Virtue Signalling to Signal Trustworthiness, Avoid Distrust, and Scaffold Self-Trust. Social Epistemology. DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2022.2150989.
  • Twitter.com (2023). https://twitter.com/Write/status/1674221120495685635. Erişim Tarihi: 25.11.2023.
  • Van Dijk, J. (2016). Ağ Toplumu. Ö. Sakin (Çev.). İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınevi.
  • Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A., Kemper, J.A. (2020). Brands Taking a Stand: Authentic Brand Activism or Woke Washing? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4). DOI: 10.1177/074391562094735.
  • Wallace, E., Buil, I., de Chernatony, L. (2018). Consuming Good on Social Media: What Can Conspicuous Virtue Signalling on Facebook Tell Us About Prosocial and Unethical Intentions? Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 577-592. DOI:10.1007/s10551-018-3999-7
  • Warmke, B., Tosi, J. (2020). Moral Grandstanding and Virtue Signaling: The Same Thing? Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/moral-talk/202008/moral-grandstanding-and-virtue-signaling-the-same-thing Erişim Tarihi: 09.12.2023.
  • Yang, G. (2016). Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of #BlackLivesMatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13-17. DOI:10.17645/mac.v4i4.692.
  • Yılmaz Sert, N. (2014). Yeni Medyada Aktivist Hareketler Örnek İnceleme: Türkiye’de LGBTT Aktivizmi. İ. Sayımer (Ed.) Yeni Medya Araştırmaları: Kavramlar, Uygulamalar, Tartışmalar içinde (s. 283-336). Konya: Literatürk Academia Yayınları.
  • Yujie, Z., Al Imran Yasin, M., Alsagoff, S., Hoon, A. (2022). The Mediating Role of New Media Engagement in This Digital Age. Frontiers in Public Health, 2022(10). DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.879530.
There are 48 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Communication and Media Studies (Other)
Journal Section Makale
Authors

Sema Çağlayan 0000-0002-5715-8744

Publication Date January 31, 2024
Submission Date December 21, 2023
Acceptance Date January 19, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 09 Issue: 20

Cite

APA Çağlayan, S. (2024). Kadına Yönelik Şiddet Olaylarında Gösterişçi Duyarlılık: Eleştirel Perspektiften Sosyal Medya Üzerine Bir Analiz. TRT Akademi, 09(20), 172-203. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1408109