Analysis of badminton competitions in 2012 London Olympics

Year 2014, Volume: 16 Issue: 3, 55 - 60, 07.01.2015

Mert Aydogmus , Erkal Arslanoglu Omer Senel

Abstract

In this study, the general analysis of 2012 London Olympics Badminton matches are aimed to be made. In this analysis, the physical characteristics of the Olympic players, the average match and rally durations, the countries which have participated by rally stroke points and the distributions of the medals were studied. The official website of 2012 London Olympics were used as a means of collecting data and during the matches, the results and analysis of a total 189 matches published on this site were recorded and evaluated. The study was carried out by using the data which belong to a total of 170 players (90 women and 80 men) who participated from 52 countries. Descriptive statistical analysis of data (mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values, percentage distribution) was done by using SPSS 17.0 for Windows. As a result of this research, the mean total match duration in singles and doubles categories were determined as; for males 45.12±13.24 minutes, 39.37±11.46 minutes, for females 37.7±12.46 minutes, 42.27 ±8.94 minutes respectively. The longest rally mean durations of competitions in man and women singles were respectively 38.4±16.22 seconds, 34.6±8.15 seconds; in men doubles, in women doubles and in mix doubles were respectively 38.18±15.13, 48.16±11.8 and 23.19±9.15 seconds. When the highest rally strokes, with average of 53,39±15,7 strokes, took place in the women doubles, it was followed by women  singles (41,39±10,6), men singles (38.66±13.26), men doubles (36.74±12.58) and mix doubles (35.43±8.67). When looked at the data obtained in this study, it is observed that the highest mean match durations are in men singles and the longest mean rally durations and the highest mean rally strokes are in women doubles categories.  As a conclusion, according to the 2012 London Olympics analysis, badminton coaches must revise technical, tactical, conditional elements of badminton and they have to prepare special schedules for category properties.    

Keywords

Badminton; 2012 London Olympic Games; match analysis.

References

• Arslanoğlu E, Arslan Y, Şenel Ö. Analysis of badminton competitions In 2008 Beijing Olympic Games and comparison with the 2004 Olympic Games. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2009; 7(2):77-84.
• Aydoğmuş M. Badmintonda Farklı Skor Sistemlerinin Oyuncuların Bazı Yorgunluk Parametreleri Üzerindeki Etkileri. G.Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara, 2002.
• Aydoğmuş M, Şenel Ö, Bukan N, Güzel NA. Farklı skor sistemlerine badminton oyuncularinin fizyolojik ve metabolik cevaplari. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2006; 11(2):11-18.
• Baron R, Petschnig R, Bachl N, Raberger G, Smekal G, Kastner P. Catecholamine excretion and heart rate as factors of psychophysical stress in table tenis. Int J Sports Med, 1992; 13(7): 501-505.
• Cabello D, Cruz JC, Padial P. Estudio de la Frecuencia Cardiaca y Acido Lactico en Badminton. In: VIII Congresso Europeo de Medicana del Deporte, Granada, October, 1995 (Cited in Cabello and et al 2003).
• Cabello D, Gonzales JJ. Analysis of the characteristics of competitive badminton. Br J Sports Med, 2003; 37: 62-66.
• Cinemre A, Açıkada C, Hazır T, Şenel Ö. Evaluation of lactate and heart rate values of young badminton players during the match. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Science, 2002; 13(4):22-31.
• Demirci N. A’dan Z’ye Spor. Neyir Yayıncılık ve Matbaacılık, Ankara, 1995.
• Faccini C, Dal Monte A. Physiologic demands of badminton. The Am J of Sports Med, 1996; 24:64-68.
• Faude O, Meyer T, Rosenberger F, Fries M, Huber G, Kindermann W. Physiological characteristics of badminton match play. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2007; 100:479–485.
• http://www.olympic.org/Documents/Reports/Official%20Past% 20Games%20Reports/Summer/ENG/2012-RO-S- London_official_results.pdf
• Ming CL, Keong CC, Ghosh AK. Time motion and notational analysis of 21 point and 15 point badminton match play. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering, 2008; 2(4):216-222.
• Omosegaard B. Physical Training for Badminton. Denmark. Melling Beck, 1996.
• Revan S, Aydoğmuş M, Balcı SS, Pepe H, Eroğlu H. The evaluation of some physical and physiological characteristics of Turkish and foreign national badminton team players. Nigde University J of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2007; 1(2):1-8.
• Şenel Ö, Eroğlu H. 2004 Atina Olimpiyat Oyunları badminton müsabakalarinin analizi. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2005; 10(4):49-58.