The effect of an eight-week proprioception training program on agility, quickness and acceleration

Year 2015, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 26 - 30, 13.11.2015

Cengiz Taskın , Yonca Bıcer

https://doi.org/10.15314/tjse.81867

Cited By: 4

Abstract

The effect of an eight-weeks proprioception training programme on agility, quicknessand acceleration in this study which aims at determining the effect of an 8-weeks proprioceptive training on agility, quickness and acceleration, 13 students studying at the school of physical education and sports, aged 23.46 ± 2.57 on average, participated as an experimental group. 13 students studying at the school of physical education and sports, aged 22.39 ± 1.56 on average, also took part in this study as a control group. In the training program for developing proprioception, a multi-directional, inclined balance board was used for anterior/posterior, lateral/medial, clockwise and anti-clockwise movements. An eight-weeks training program, which comprised of 5 sec warm-up, 20 sec proprioceptive training and 5 sec cooling in a day, was performed for total 30 second for 3 days in a week. The first5 metersfor quickness, 10 and15 metersfor acceleration and for t-test for agility were considered, the measurements were obtained as pre-test and post-test ones. For the experimental group, before and after the training, the values were measured as5 metersfor quickness, 10 and15 metersfor acceleration and 1.09±0.05 sec and 1.03±0.05 sec, 1.92±0.11 sec and 1.80±0.11 sec, 2.61±0.12 sec and 2.48±0.08 sec, 10.69±0.64 sec and 10.13±0.35 sec for agility respectively. When compared to the values of quickness, acceleration and agility for the experimental group, a significant difference was found out (P<0.05). For the control group, before and after the training, the values were also given as5 metersfor quickness, 10 and15 metersfor acceleration and 1.05±0.08 sec and 1.04±0.05 sec, 1.88±0.05 sec and 1.89±0.08 sec, 2.53±0.11 sec and 2.52±0.12 sec, 10.26±0.54 sec and 9.97±0.34 sec for agility respectively. When compared to the values of quickness, acceleration and agility for the control group, no significant difference was found out (P>0.05). In conclusion, it was determined that an 8-weeks proprioceptive training developed the characteristics of quickness, acceleration and agility.

Keywords

Acceleration; agility; proprioception; quickness

References

• Arslan F, Kaya M, Taskin H. The effect of an eight week proprioception training programme on knee joint proprioception in taekwondo athletes. International SportMed Journal, 2013; 14(3): 99-102.
• Ageberg E, Roberts D, Holmstrom E, Friden T. Balance in single-limb stance in healthy subjects - reliability of testing procedure and the effect of short-duration submaximal cycling. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2003; 27(1): 14.
• Balter ST, Stokroos RJ, Akkermans E, Kingma H. Habituation to galvanic vestibular stimulation for analysis of postural control abilities in gymnasts. Neurosci Lett, 2004; 366: 71-75.
• Bloomfield J, Polman R, O’donoghue P, Mcnaughton L. Effective speed and agility conditioning methodology for random ıntermittent dynamic type sports. J Strength Cond Res, 2007; 21(4): 1093–1100.
• Ferdjallah M, Harris GF, Smith P, Wertsch JJ. Analysis of postural control synergies during quiet standing in healthy children and children with cerebral palsy. Clinical Biomechanics, 2002; 17, 203-10.
• Hazar F, Taşmektepligil Y. The effects of balance and flexibility on agility in prepuberte period. Spormetre, 2008; 4(1), 9- 12.
• Hoffman MA, Payne VG. The effects of proprioceptive ankle disk training on healthy subjects. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 1995; 21(2): 90-93.
• Holm I, Fosdahl MA, Friis A, Risberg MA, Myklebust G, and Steen H. Effect of neuromuscular training on proprioception, balance, muscle strength, and lower limb function in female team handball players, Clin J Sport Med, 2004; 14(2): 88-94.
• Huston JL, Sandrey MA, Lively MW, Kotsko K. The effects of calf-muscle fatigue on sagittal-plane joint-position sense in the ankle. J Sport Rehabil, 2005; 14: 168-84.
• İnal HS. Spor Biyomekaniği - Temel Prensipler. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Evi, 2004.
• Lephart SM, Giraldo JL, Borsa PA. Knee joint proprioception: A comparison between female intercollegiate gymnasts and controls, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 1996; 4: 121-24.
• Lephart SM, Pincivero DM, Giraldo JL. The Role of Proprioception in the management and rehabilitation of athletic injuries. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1997; 25(1): 130-37.
• Panics G, Tallay A, Pavlik A, Berkes I. Effect of proprioception training on knee joint position sense in female team handball players. Br J Sports Medicine, 2008; 42: 472-76.
• Pauloe K, Madole K, Garhammer J, Lacourse M, Rozenek R. Reliability and validity of the T-test as a measure of agility, leg power, and leg speed in college-aged men and women. J Strength Cond Res, 2000; 14: 443–50.
• Salaj SS, Milanovic D. AndJukic I. The effects of proprioceptive training on jumping and agility performance. Kinesiology, 2007; 39(2): 131-41.
• Semenick D. The T-test. NSCA J, 1990; 12: 36–37.
• Swanik C, Lephart S, Giannantonio F. Re-establishing proprioception and neuromuscular control in the ACL - injured athlete. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 1997; 182-206.
• Waddington G, Adams R, Jones A. Wobble board (ankledisc) training effects on the discrimination of inversion movements. Aust J Physiother, 1999; 45(2): 95-101.