Measurement of Diabetic Patients’ Knowledge About Diabetic Foot Wound and Evaluation of Foot Care Practices

Year 2020, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 22 - 29, 23.04.2020

Bayram Colak , Ramazan Duran Furkan Necmettin Can Serdar Yormaz Abdul Wali Zaland Ersagun Taşdelen Nur Dilara Sarıhan Mehtap Arslan Merve Nur Öztürk , Anıl Furkan Akbaş , Ayşe Nur Aslan Onur Elagöz Barış Lök Yasemin Özşen Ceren Ersoy Kamile Marakoğlu Mustafa Şahin

https://doi.org/10.25048/tudod.628593

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Aim: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), a complication of diabetes, is a preventable condition that results in limb losses and even death. With
the training given to diabetic patients, DFU occurrence rate is reduced by 50%. In this study, we aimed to measure the knowledge level
of diabetic patients about foot care and the correct application skills of informed patients. In addition, we aimed to investigate the
importance of education in the development of diabetic foot wound by including the patients with DFU in the study.

Material and Methods: Diabetic patients who received diabetes education in the family medicine clinic and who were followed up
for DFU in the general surgery clinic were evaluated. Questionnaires about the level of knowledge about DFU and the level of correct
application were applied to the patients about the level of knowledge about DAY and the level of correct application. The patients with
DFU were compared with nonDFU patients.

Results: The rate of DFU was found to be significantly higher in the patients who had low level of education, who had been smoking,
who had been diabetic for more than 10 years, who did not go to regular control, who could not regulate blood sugar, who did not meet
daily diet, and who had not received diabetes education. It was found that the answers and daily practices of DFU-developed patients in
their knowledge-level questionnaire were statistically significantly incorrect compared to the other patients.

Conclusion: Patients do not have enough knowledge about diabetic foot care. The rate of application of this information in daily life is
very low in people who have been given diabetic foot training. This situation increases the risk of DFU occurrence in diabetic patients

Keywords

diabetic foot, survey

Diyabet Hastalarının Diyabetik Ayak Ülseri Hakkında Bilgi Düzeylerinin ve Ayak Bakımı Uygulamalarının Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Diyabetin komplikasyonlarından birisi olan diyabetik ayak yarası (DAY) uzuv kayıpları ve hatta ölümle sonuçlanan önlenebilir
bir tablodur. Diyabetik hastalara verilen eğitimlerle DAY gelişme oranı %50 azaltılabilmektedir. Çalışmada diyabetik hastaların ayak
bakımı hakkındaki bilgi düzeylerini ve bilgilendirilmiş hastaların doğru uygulama becerilerini ölçmeyi amaçladık. Ayrıca DAY gelişmiş
hastaları da çalışmaya dahil ederek diyabetik ayak yarası gelişmesinde eğitimin önemini araştırmayı amaçladık.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Aile hekimliği polikliniğinde diyabet eğitimi alan ve genel cerrahi kliniğinde DAY nedeniyle takip edilmiş
diyabetik hastalar değerlendirildi. Hastalara DAY hakkındaki bilgi düzeylerini ve doğru uygulama düzeylerini ölçen soruları içeren
anketler yapıldı. DAY gelişmiş ve gelişmemiş hastalar karşılaştırıldı.

Bulgular: Eğitim düzeyi düşük, sigara kullanan, 10 yıldan daha uzun süredir diyabetik olan, düzenli kontrole gitmeyen, kan şekeri
regülasyonu sağlanamamış, günlük diyete uymayan, diyabet eğitimi almamış hastalarda DAY gelişme oranının istatistiksel olarak
anlamlı düzeyde yüksek olduğu tespit edildi. DAY gelişmiş hastaların bilgi düzeyleri ölçümü anketine verdikleri cevapların ve günlük
uygulamalarının da diğer hastalara göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde yanlış olduğu tespit edildi.

Sonuç: Hastalar, diyabetik ayak bakımı ile ilgili yeterli bilgi düzeyine sahip değiller. Diyabetik ayak eğitimi verilmiş kişilerde de bu
bilgilerin gündelik hayatta uygulama oranı çok düşüktür. Bu durum diyabetik hastalarda tek başına DAY oluşma riskini artırmaktadır

Keywords

diyabetik ayak, anket, DAY

References

• 1) World Health Organization (WHO). Diabetes Mellitus, 2017. Erişim: 15.01.2018. http:// www.who. int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs312/en/.
• 2) Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, et al. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb; 28(2): 169-80.
• 3) Lavery LA, Peters EJ, Williams JR, Murdoch DP, Hudson A, Lavery DC. Reevaluating the way we classify the diabetic foot: restructuring the diyabetic foot risk classification system of the International Working Group on the diyabetic foot. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(1):154-6.
• 4) Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet 2005; 366: 1719-24.
• 5) Reiber GE, Vileikyte L, Boyko EJ, del Aguila M, Smith DG, Lavery LA, Boulton AJ. Diabetes Care 1999;22(1):157-62.
• 6) Tentelouris N, Al-Sabbagh S, Walker MG, Boulton AJM, Jude EB. Mortality in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients After Amputations Performed From 1990 to 1995. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1598-1604
• 7) Armstrong DG, Cohen K, Courric S, Bharara M, Marston W. Diabetic foot ulcers and vascular insufficiency: our population has changed, but our methods have not. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011; 5: 1591_5.
• 8) Dorresteijn JA, Kriegsman DM, Assendelft WJ, Valk GD. Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;16(12):CD001488
• 9) Anselmo MI, Nery M, Parisi MC. The effectiveness of educational practice in diyabetic foot: a view from Brasil. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2010;2(1):45.
• 10) Demiraslan H, Karaca Z ve Bayram F. Diyabetik Ayak Ülserleri. Turkiye Klinikleri J Endocrin-Special Topics 2008;1(1)
• 11) Ortegon MM, Redekop WK, Niessen LW. Cost-Effectiveness of Prevention and Treatment of the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:901-907
• 12) Mata-Cases M, Roura-Olmeda P, Berengué-Iglesias M, Birulés-Pons M, Mundet-Tuduri X, Franch-Nadal J, Benito-Badorrey B, Cano-Pérez JF; Diabetes Study Group in Primary Health Care (GEDAPS: Grup d’Estudi de la Diabetis a l’AtencióPrimària de Salut, Catalonian Society of Familyand Community Medicine). Fifteen years of continuous improvement of quality care of type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care in Catalonia, Spain. Int J Clin Pract 2012; 66: 289-98.
• 13) Gordois A, Scuffham P, Shearer A, Oglesby A, Tobian JA. The health care costs of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the US. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1790-5.
• 14) Batkın D, Çetinkaya F. DiabetesMellitus Hastalarının Ayak Bakımı ve Diabetik Ayak Hakkındaki Bilgi, Tutum ve Davranışları, Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi (Journal of HealthSciences) 2005; 14: 6-12.
• 15) Nather A, Cao S, Chen JLW, Low AY. Prevention of diabetic foot complications. Singapore Med J 2018; 59(6): 291-294.
• 16) Barbui EC, Cocco MI. Knowledge of the diabetic patient on foot care. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2002; 36: 97-103.
• 17) Jan YK, Struck BD, Foreman RD, Robinson C. Foot care knowledge and practices and the prevalence of peripheral neuropathy among people with diabetes attending a secondary care rural hospital in Southern India. J Family Med Prim Care 2013;2(1):27‐32.
• 18) Timar-Banu O, Beauregard H, Tousignant J, Lassonde M, Harris P, et al. Development of noninvasive and quantitative methodologies for the assessment of chronic ulcers and scars in humans. Wound Repair Regen 2001; 9 (2): 123–132
• 19) Desalu OO, Salawu FK, Jimoh AK. Diabetic foot care: self reported knowledge and practice among patients attending three tertiary hospıtalin Nigeria. Ghana Med J 2011;45(2):60‐5.
• 20) Yastı AÇ, Kendirci M, Küçük ÖK, Güldoğan CE. Diyabetik Ayak Yaralı Hastaların Ayaktan Takibi ve Sonuçları. S.B Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi 2012; 45 (3) :100-104.
• 21) Abu‐Qamar MZ. Knowledge andpractice of foot self‐care among Jordanians with diabetes: an interview‐based survey study. J Wound Care 2014;23(5):247‐50.
• 22) Aypak C, Koç A, Yıkılkan H, Görpelioğlu S. Diyabetik ayak bakımı: aile hekimliği polikliniğine başvuran hastalar tarafından bildirilen uygulama durumu. Cumhuriyet Tıp Dergisi 2012;34:423‐8
• 23) Müftüoğlu O, Karatürk N, Bozat T, Genç H, Yalçın S. Diabetik ayak enfeksiyonları; Bakteriolojik analiz. Türk Diabet Yıllığı. 1988-1989, 7: 7-15.
• 24) Lasker RD. The diabetic control and complications trial. Implications for policy and practice. N Eng J Med 1993;329(14):1035‐6.
• 25) Hasnain S, Sheikh NH. Knowledge and practices regarding foot care in diabetic patients visiting diabetic clinic in Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. J Pak Med Assoc 2009;59(10):687‐90.
• 26) Vatankhah N, Khamseh ME, Noudeh YJ, Aghili R, Baradaran HR, Haeri NS. The effectiveness of foot care education on people with type 2 diabetes in Tehran, Iran. Prim Care Diabetes 2009;3(2):73‐7.
• 27) Schmidt S, Mayer H, Panfil EM. Diabetes foot self‐care practices in the German population. J Clin Nurs 2008;17(21):2920‐6.
• 28) Donohoe ME, Fletton JA, Hook A, Powell R, Robinson I, Stead JW, Sweeney K, Taylor R, Tooke JE. Improving foot care for people with diabetes mellitus‐‐a randomized controlled trial of an integrated care approach. Diabet Med 2000;17(8):581‐7.
• 29) Dorresteijn JA, Kriegsman DM, Assendelft WJ, Valk GD. Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;16:12.