Akademisyenlerin bakış açısıyla okul dışı öğrenme ortamları

Year 2023, , 28 - 49, 31.01.2023

Ayşegül Aslan , Demet Batman , Ümmü Gülsüm Durukan

https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.1182732

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, akademisyenlerin okul dışı öğrenme ile ilgili düşüncelerinin, farkındalık ve okul dışı öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenme faaliyeti düzenleyebilme yeterliklerinin okul dışı öğrenme ortamları (ODOÖ) dersi verme deneyimine sahip olma durumu açısından belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Durum çalışması ile yürütülen çalışmanın araştırma grubunu Türkiye'deki devlet üniversitelerinde eğitim fakültelerinin fizik, kimya, biyoloji ve fen bilgisi eğitimi programlarında görev yapan 56 akademisyen oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak, “Okul Dışı Öğrenme Ortamları Düzenleme Ölçeği” ile dört soru içeren bir form kullanılmıştır. Ölçekten elde edilen bulgulara göre, ODOÖ dersi verme deneyimi olan akademisyenler için ortalama puan 4,41 ve deneyimi olmayan akademisyenler için ortalama puan 3,82 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen nitel bulgular irdelendiğinde akademisyenler okul dışı öğrenme faaliyetleri kapsamında çoğunlukla çevre eğitimi, astronomi, canlılar ve yaşam ile geri dönüşüm konularını tercih etmişlerdir. Öğrenme ortamı olarak da genellikle bilim merkezi, geri dönüşüm tesisi ve gözlem evi gibi farklı türdeki mekânların kullanılmak istendiği görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak, akademisyenlerin okul dışı öğrenme faaliyeti gerçekleştirebilme düzeyleri yüksek olmasına rağmen yürüttükleri eğitim öğretim faaliyetlerinde bu faaliyetlerden yeterli düzeyde yararlanmadıkları görülmektedir.

Keywords

Akademisyen, Görüş, Okul dışı öğrenme, Okul dışı öğrenme faaliyetleri

Academics’ perspective on out-of-school learning environments

Abstract

This study aims to ascertain academicians' opinions about out-of-school learning, awareness of it, and competency to plan learning activities in such situations for the purpose of teaching in out-of-school learning environments (OSLEs). The research group of this study, which was conducted as a case study, consists of 56 academics in the physics, chemistry, biology, and science education programs of education faculties in Türkiye. The Out-of-School Learning Environments Regulation Scale and a form containing four questions were used to data collection. The results from the scale, the average score was calculated as 4.41 for academics with experience in teaching OSLEs and 3.82 for academics without such experience. The qualitative results indicate that academics mostly prefer to focus on environmental education, astronomy, living things and life, and recycling issues through out-of-school learning activities and use different types of OSLEs such as science center, recycling facility and observatory. To conclude, despite the academics' high level of competency in performing out-of-school learning activities, it is evident that they underutilize these activities in their teaching.

Keywords

Academics, Opinion, Out-of-school learning, Out-of-school learning activities

References

• Anderson, D., Kisiel, J., & Stroksdieck, M. (2006). Understanding teachers’ perspectives on field trips: Discovering common ground in three countries. Curator - The Museum Journal, 49(3), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00229.x
• Aslan, A., & Arslan, Ş. (2021). Video destekli okul dışı öğrenme etkinlikleri: "Fiziksel ve kimyasal değişimler" konusu örneği [Video-assisted out-of-school learning activities: The example of “physical and chemical changes”]. In S. Karabatak (Ed), Education & Science 2021-III (pp 283-302). Efe Academic.
• Aslan, A., & Demircioğlu, G. (2019). Etkileşimli sınıf dışı kimya ortamı tasarımı ve katılımcıların deneyimlerinden ortamın etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi [Design of an interactive classroom chemistry environment and evaluation of the effectiveness of the environment from the experiences of the participants]. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Faculty, 16(1), 278-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.23891/efdyyu.2019.126
• Ateşkan, A., & Lane, J. F. (2016). Promoting field trip confidence: Teachers providing insights for pre-service education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02619768.2015.1113252
• Aytaçlı, B. (2012). A detailed analysis on case study. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education Journal of Education Sciences, 3(1), 1-9.
• Batman, D. (2020). Investigation of physics teachers’ views about the out-of-school learning environments. Journal of Research in Informal Environments, 5(1), 59-79.
• Batman, D., Aslan, A., & Durukan, Ü. G. (2022). The investigation of physics, chemistry and biology course contents in out-of-school learning environments guidebooks based on learning outcomes and learning environments. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 37(2), 485-522. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020065266
• Bolat, Y., & Köroğlu, M. (2020). Out-of-school learning and scale of regulating out-of-school learning: Validity and reliability study. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 5(13), 1630-1663.
• Bozdoğan, A. E. & Kavcı, A. (2016). The effects of out of class teaching activities to secondary school students’ academic achievement in science course. Gazi Journal of Educational Science, 2(1), 13-30.
• Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498419
• Buldur, S., & Bursal, M. (2015). The impact levels of career choice reasons of preservice science teachers and their future career expectations. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 9(1), 81-107. https://doi.org/10.17522/nefefmed.89578
• Büyükkaynak, E., Ok, Z., & Aslan, O. (2016). Science teachers’ views on out-of-school learning environments in science education. Kafkas University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, 1, 43-60. https://doi.org/10.9775/kausbed.2016.032
• Carrier, S. J. (2009). The effects of outdoor science lessons with elementary school students on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173683
• Carrier, S. J., Tugurian, L. P., & Thomson, M. M. (2013). Elementary science indoors and out: Teachers, time, and testing. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2059-2083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9347-5
• Clarke Vivier, S., & Lee, J. C. (2018). Because life doesn't just happen in a classroom: Elementary and middle school teacher perspectives on the benefits of, and obstacles to, out-of-school learning. Issues in Teacher Education, 27(3), 55-72.
• Cox Petersen, A. M., Marsh, D. D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L. M. (2003). Investigation of guided school tours, student learning, and science reform recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 200-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10072
• Çiçek, Ö., & Saraç, E. (2017). Science teachers' opinions about experience in out of school learning environments. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 18(3), 504-522.
• Davey, L. (1990). The application of case study evaluations. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 2, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.7275/02g8-bb93
• Demircioğlu, G., & Aslan, A. (2018). A review on Turkish graduate studies performed on out-of-school learning environments. Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Social Sciences Journal of Social Sciences, 8(16), 379-402.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). Handbook of qualitative research (5th Ed). Sage.
• DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355562
• Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107-113.
• Dori, Y. J., & Tal, R. T. (2000). Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environmental awareness. Science Education, 84(1), 95-113.
• Durukan, Ü. G., Aslan, A., & Bozdoğan, A. E. (2022). Reflections from an out-of-school learning course: The development of pre-service science teachers. Participatory Educational Research, 9(4), 422-444. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.98.9.4
• Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1
• Faria, C., & Chagas, I. (2012). School-visit to a science centre: Student interaction with exhibits and the relevance of teachers’ behaviour. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 11(3), 582-594.
• Füz, N. (2018). Out-of-school learning in Hungarian primary education: Practice and barriers. Journal of Experiential Education, 41(3), 277-294. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1053825918758342
• Garner, N., & Eilks, I. (2015). The expectations of teachers and students who visit a non-formal student chemistry laboratory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 1197-1210. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1415a
• Garrity, J., Pastore, K., & Roche, A. (2010). An evaluation of the effectiveness of science field trips and hands-on classroom activities at the Maria Mitchell Association. Nantucket: Worcester Polytechnic Institute. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/212977569.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2022
• Gülen, G., & Bozdoğan, A. E. (2021). The evaluation of the use of school gardens by science teachers in their lectures. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 6(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.52797/tujped.925015
• Güler, T. (2009). The effects of an ecology based environmental education on teachers’ opinions about environmental education. Education and Science, 34(151), 30-43.
• Karademir, E. (2013). Determination of objectives realization at outdoor science education activities of teachers and pre-service teachers by the theory of planned behavior within the scope of science and technology lesson (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University.
• Karakuş, M., Turhan Türkkan, B., & Karakuş, F. (2017). Determining science and elementary mathematics teachers’ views on interdisciplinary approach. Elementary Education Online, 16(2), 509-524. https:// doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.304714
• Koosimile, A. T. (2004). Out-of-school experiences in science classes: Problems, issues, and challenges in Botswana. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 483-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000097415
• Kreuzer, P., & Dreesmann, D. (2017) Exhibitions and beyond: The influence of an optional course on student teachers’ perceptions and future usage of natural history museums. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(8), 651-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1400803
• Kuralay, B. (2022). The effect of online workshops associated with exhibitions at science centers on the conceptual understanding levels of density of secondary school students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Uludağ University.
• Lindemann Matthies, P., & Knecht, S. (2011). Swiss elementary school teachers’ attitudes toward forest education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42(3), 152-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2010.523737
• Metin, M. (2020). The effect of a trip organized in planetarium on science course on academic success, interest and motivation of 7th year students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gaziosmanpaşa University.
• Metz, D. (2005). Field based learning in science: Animating a museum experience. Teaching Education, 16(2), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210500122733
• Mierdel, J., & Bogner, F. X. (2021). Investigations of modellers and model viewers in an out-of-school gene technology laboratory. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 801-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09871-3
• Miglietta, A. M., Belmonte, G., & Boero, F. (2008). A summative evaluation of science learning: A case study of the Marine Biology Museum “Pietro Parenzan” (South East Italy). Visitor Studies, 11(2), 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355984
• Ministry of National Education [MoNe] (2019, May 15). Okulum Bursa-Okul dışı öğrenme ortamları kılavuzu [My school is Bursa-Out-of-school learning environments guidebooks]. Website of the Bursa Provincial Directorate of National Education. https://bursa.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/Okul%20D%C4%B1%C5%9F%C4%B1%20%C3%96%C4%9Frenme%20Ortamlar%C4%B1%20-%20ORTA%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M.pdf.
• Nielsen, W. S., Nashon, S., & Anderson, D. (2009). Metacognitive engagement during field-trip experiences: A case study of students in an amusement park physics program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 265-288. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20266
• Ocak, İ., & Korkmaz, Ç. (2018). An examination of the views of science and pre-school teachers on nonformal learning environments. International Journal of Field Education, 4(1), 18-38.
• Okur Berberoğlu, E., & Uygun, S. (2013). The effect of outdoor education on environmental knowledge, awareness, and attitude: Case study within in-service teachers. Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 2(2), 65-81.
• Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097– 1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660311005
• Öner, G. (2015). Examination of the opinions of social studies teachers about outdoor history teaching. Turkish History Education Journal, 4(1), 89-121. https://doi.org/10.17497/tuhed.185618
• Özyıldırım, H., & Durmaz, H. (2022). Effects of interdisciplinary approach supported field trip as an out-of-school activity on the behaviours of prospective teachers. Trakya Journal of Education, 12(1), 522-541. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.986827
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd Ed). Sage.
• Pekin, M., & Bozdoğan, A. E. (2021). Examining secondary school teachers' self-efficacy in organizing trips to out-of-school environments in terms of different variables: Sample of Tokat province. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 10(17), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.956719
• Piscitelli, B., & Anderson, D. (2001). Young children's perspectives of museum settings and experiences. Museum Management and Curatorship, 19(3), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770100401903
• Plummer, J. D. (2009). Early elementary students' development of astronomy concepts in the planetarium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 192-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20280
• Randler, C., Kummer, B., & Wilhelm, C. (2012). Adolescent learning in the zoo: Embedding a non-formal learning environment to teach formal aspects of vertebrate biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 384-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9331-2
• Richmond, D., Sibthorp, J., Gookin, J., Annarella, S., & Ferri, S. (2018). Complementing classroom learning through outdoor adventure education: Out-of-school-time experiences that make a difference. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 18(1), 36-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2017.1324313
• Saraç, H. (2017). Researches related to outdoor learning environments in Turkey: Content analysis study. Journal of Education Theory and Practical Research, 3(2), 60-81.
• Sellmann, D., & Bogner, F. X. (2013). Climate change education: Quantitatively assessing the impact of a botanical garden as an informal learning environment. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 415-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.700696
• Stamer, I., David, M. A., Höffler, T., Schwarzer, S., & Parchmann, I. (2021). Authentic insights into science: Scientific videos used in out-of-school learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 43(6), 868-887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1891321
• Strauss, L., & Terenzini, P. (2007). The effects of students’ in-and out-of-class experiences on their analytical and group skills: A study of engineering education. Research in Higher Education, 48(8), 967-992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9057-4
• Sturm, H., & Bogner, F. X. (2010). Learning at workstations in two different environments: A museum and a classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(1-2), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.09.002
• Şentürk, E., & Özdemir, Ö. F. (2014). The effect of science centres on students' attitudes towards science. International Journal of Science Education (Part B), 4(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2012.726754
• Tahancalio, S. (2019). A study on professional development toward science centers: Change in science teachers' awareness about science centers and ways of conducting science center visits. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University.
• Tal, T., & Morag, O. (2009). Reflective practice as a means for preparing to teach outdoors in an ecological garden. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9131-1
• Tasdemir, A., Kartal, T., & Ozdemir, A. M. (2014). Using science centers and museums for teacher training in Turkey. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0085-x
• Tatar, N., & Bağrıyanık, K. E. (2012). Opinions of science and technology teachers about outdoor education. Elementary Education Online, 11(4), 883-896.
• Thomas, G. (2010). Facilitator, teacher, or leader? Managing conflicting roles in outdoor education. Journal of Experiential Education, 32(3), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590903200305
• Türk, C., & Kalkan, H. (2015). The effect of planetariums on teaching specific astronomy concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9516-6
• Türkmen, H. (2018). Perspectives of secondary school teachers about out-door teaching. Journal of Ege Social Science, 1(1), 12-26.
• Türkmen, H., & Köseoğlu, P. (2020). Perspectives of academicians about science teaching in informal setting. Amasya Education Journal, 9(1), 65-92.
• Wünschmann, S., Wüst-Ackermann, P., Randler, C., Vollmer, C., & Itzek-Greulich, H. (2017). Learning achievement and motivation in an out-of-school setting—Visiting amphibians and reptiles in a zoo is more effective than a lesson at school. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 497-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9513-2
• Yıldırım, A. (2022). Erken çocukluk döneminde yaratıcılık ve yenilikçi düşünme [Creativity and innovative thinking in early childhood]. In A. Simsar & V. Yalçın (Eds) Erken çocukluk döneminde 21. yüzyıl becerileri [21st century skills in early childhood] (1st Ed.) (pp 9-34). Nobel.