Effects of the ‘Framework For Case Analysis’ in pre-service teachers’ professional ethics education

Year 2024, , 410 - 438, 31.10.2024

Gamze Tezcan

https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.1406671

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of the framework proposed for professional ethics courses in teacher education on the pre-service science teachers’ analysis of cases involving ethical dilemmas. The research was designed as a case study. The study group was composed of nine (two males and seven females) pre-service science teachers. Participants were expected to analyze the cases in the ethical dilemma case analysis form without and with the framework. The data were subjected to descriptive analysis within the scope of the steps of the framework. It was found that the framework makes pre-service science teachers to better define the case, produce more than one option for the solution of the case, and evaluate these options by considering their teacher identities and various sources. The decisions taken by the pre-service teachers during the analysis changed and the moral level of their decisions increased when they used the framework.

Keywords

Case analysis, Ethics education, Teacher education

‘Örnek Olay Analiz Çerçevesi’nin öğretmen adaylarının mesleki etik eğitimindeki etkileri

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, mesleki etik dersinde kullanılması önerilen ‘Örnek Olay Analiz Çerçevesi’nin fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının, etik ikilem içeren örnek olayları çözümlemeleri üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesidir. Araştırma, nitel araştırma desenlerinden durum çalışması olarak tasarlanmıştır. Çalışma grubunu, Eğitimde Etik ve Ahlak dersini alan ve çalışmaya katılmaya gönüllü dokuz (iki erkek, yedi kadın) ortaokul fen bilimleri dersi öğretmen adayı oluşturmuştur. Katılımcılardan, araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilmiş etik ikilemler formunda yer alan ortaokul öğretmenlerinin karşılaşabilecekleri etik ikilemleri içeren sekiz örnek olayı, ‘Örnek Olay Analiz Çerçevesi’ kullanmadan ve kullanarak çözümlemeleri istenmiştir. Veriler betimsel analize tabi tutulmuştur. Sonuç olarak, çerçevenin öğretmen adaylarının olayı daha iyi tanımlamalarına, olayın çözümü için birden fazla seçenek üretmelerine yol açtığı anlaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, öğretmen adayları çerçeve sayesinde, bu seçenekleri öğretmen kimliklerini ve çeşitli kaynakları göz önünde bulundurarak değerlendirmişlerdir. Öğretmen adaylarının aldıkları kararlar çerçeve kullandıklarında değişmiş ve kararların ahlaki düzeyi yükselmiştir.

Keywords

Etik eğitimi, Öğretmen eğitimi, Örnek olay analizi

References

• Australian Capital Territory. (2006). Teachers’ code of professional practice. https://www.education.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/17692/TeachersCode_ofProfession Practice.pdf .
• Aydın, İ. P. (2002). Yönetsel mesleki ve örgütsel etik [Managerial professional and organizational ethics] (3rd Ed). PegemA.
• Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., Heyward, P. D’Olimpio, L., Ailwood, J., Eacott, S., Smith S., Peters, M. & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1178-1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1880387
• Cesur, S. (1997). The relationship between cognitive and moral development (Unpublished master’s thesis). Boğazici University.
• Cesur, S. & Topçu, M. S. (2010). A reliability and validity study of the Defining Issues Test: the relationship of age, education, gender and parental education with moral development. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice , 10(3), 1681-1696.
• Childhood Education International (2020). International Principles of Practice for Educators. https://ceinternational1892.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/IPPE.pdf
• Clancy, R.F. (2021). The Development of a Case-Based Course on Global Engineering Ethics in China. International Journal of Ethics Education, 6, 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-020-00103-1
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd Ed.). Sage.
• Creswell, J. W. & Creswell J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (6th Ed.). Sage.
• Cummings, R., Maddux, C. D., & Cladianos, A. (2010). Moral reasoning of education students: The effects of direct instruction in moral judgment development theory and participation in moral dilemma discussion. Teachers College Record, 112, 621-644.
• Decker, D. M., Wolfe, J. L., & Belcher, C. K. (2022). A 30-Year Systematic Review of Professional Ethics and Teacher Preparation. The Journal of Special Education, 55(4), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466921989303
• Gao, R., Liu, J. & Yin, B. (2021). An expanded ethical decision-making model to resolve ethical dilemmas in assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100978
• Higher Education Institution. (2018). Science Teaching Undergraduate Program. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/Fen_Bilgisi_Ogretmenligi_Lisans_Programi.pdf
• Joyce, K. A., Darfler, K., George, D., Ludwig, J. & Unsworth, K. (2018). Engaging STEM ethics education. Engaging, Science, Technology and Society, 4, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2018.221
• Juujärvi, S., Myyry, L. (2022). Online dilemma discussions as a method of enhancing moral reasoning among health and social care graduate students. International Journal of Ethics Education, 7, 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-022-00143-9
• Korkut, Y., & Aktaş, A. (2019). Teaching Psychology ethics in Turkey: The evaluation of a study in terms of adoption of ethical behavior, moral values and ethical rules. Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 3(2), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.5455/kpd.2602443816052019m000011
• Krawczyk, R. M. (1997). Teaching ethics: Effect on moral development. Nursing Ethics, 4, 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/096973309700400107
• Malone, M. (2020). Ethics education in teacher preparation: a case for stakeholder responsibility. Ethics and Education, 15(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2019.1700447
• Malta Ministry of Education and Employment (2012). The council for the teaching profession in Malta: teachers' code of ethics and practice. https://education.gov.mt/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/New-Code-of-Ethics-Doc-EN.pdf
• Mathur, S. R., & Corley, K. M. (2014). Bringing ethics into the classroom: making a case for frameworks, multiple perspectives and narrative sharing. International Education Studies, 7(9), 136-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n9p136
• Maxwell B. & Schwimmer M. (2016) Professional ethics education for future teachers: A narrative review of the scholarly writings. Journal of Moral Education, 45(3), 354-371. http://doi.org.10.1080/03057240.2016.1204271
• Metcalf, T. (2022). The case for philosophy as a general-education requirement. Teaching Philosophy, 45(3), 299-326. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil2022414163.
• Ministry of National Education. (2015).Ethical Principles for Education and Training Service Providers Circular. https://personel.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2016_06/02032141_mesleki_etik_ilkeler.pdf
• Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. University of Minnesota Press.
• Rest, J. R., & Narváez, D. (1994). Summary: What’s possible?. In Rest, J. R., & Narváez, D. (Eds). Moral development in the professions (pp. 225-236). Psychology Press.
• Rest, J. R., Thoma, S. J., Narvaez, D., & Bebeau, M. J. (1997). Alchemy and beyond: indexing the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 498-507.
• Schlaefli, A., Rest, J. R., & Thoma, S. J. (1985). Does moral education improve moral judgment? A meta-analysis of intervention studies using the Defining Issues Test. Review of Educational Research, 55, 319-352. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543055003319
• Sosa, D. (1993). Consequences of consequentialism. Mind, 102(405), 101-122.
• Staller, K. M. (2021). Big enough? Sampling in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 20(4), 897-904. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211024516
• Şahin, S., Atasoy, B & Somyürek, S. (2010). Cases method in teacher education. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 253-277.
• Tatto, M. T. (2021). Professionalism in teaching and the role of teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 20-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1849130
• Tezcan, G., & Güvenç, H. (2020). Middle school teachers’ professional ethical dilemmas. PAU Journal of Education, 49, 439-460. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.588753
• Tirri, K., & Kuusisto, E. (2022). Teachers’ professional ethics: Theoretical frameworks and empirical research from Finland. Brill.
• Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning qualitative research: Design and decision making for new researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920967174.
• Turkish Psychologists Association [TPA] (2004). Turkish psychologists association ethics regulation. https://psikolog.org.tr/belgeler/etik-yonetmeligi-qbf8w.pdf
• United States of America National Education Association [NEA]. (1975). Code of ethics. http://www.nea.org/home/30442.htm
• Yin,R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th Ed.). Sage.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research in social sciences] (11th Ed.) Seçkin.
• Warnick, B. R. & Silverman, S. K. (2011). A framework for professional ethics courses in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110398002