Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

An examination of statistical literacy models and their components

Year 2015, , 16 - 28, 30.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.181131

Abstract

In this study, statistical literacy which is gaining importance day by day, statistical literacy models and components are examined. The common goal of these models is to understand how students solved statistical problems. Statistical literacy a new contruct within statistics education and therefore to learn about it, in order to improve assessment and training required special attention to the interference. In recent years, statistical issues in mathematics education programs are given a lot of space than its predecessors. That’s why statistical models and components have become important. In this study, two models are used to develop statistical literacy examined the models components, similar and different aspects were investigated. This study will create an awareness statistical literacy models and components. At the same time it will be useful for both researchers and teachers for overcoming the difficulties encountered in the teaching of statistics.

References

  • American Statistical Association. (2005). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education: College report. Alexandria: Author.
  • Best, J. (2004). More damned lies and statistics: How numbers confuse public issues. California, CA: University of California Press.
  • Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • delMas, R. C. (2002). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and learning: A commentary. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3).http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n3/delmas_discussion.htmladresinden elde edildi.
  • Callingham, R., & Watson, J. M. (2005). Measuring statistical literacy. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6 (1),29, 19-47.
  • Gal, I. (1995). Statistical tools and statistical literacy: The case of the average. Teaching Statistics, 17, 97–99.
  • Gal, I. (2002). Adult statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1-25.
  • Gal, I. (2004). The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking. İçinde, Ben-Zvi, D.,& Garfield, J.(Ed.),Statistical Literacy - Meanings, Components, Responsibilities (pp.47-78). America: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Hooke, R. (1983). How to tell the liars from the statisticians. New York, NY: Marcel, Dekker.
  • Lehohla, P. (2002). Promoting statistical literacy: A South African perspective. İçinde B. Phillips, (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conferences on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg, the Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
  • Makar, K., & Rubin, A. (2009). A framework for thinking about informal statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(1),82–105.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2009).Matematik dersi (6-8. sınflar) öğretim programı ve matematik dersi (9-12.sınıflar) öğretim programı.http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim-programlari/icerik/72 adresinden elde edildi.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2013). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı ve ortaöğretim matematik dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) öğretim programı.http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/guncellenen-ogretim-programlari/icerik/151adresinden elde edildi.
  • Moore, D.S. (1998). Statistics among the liberal arts. Joumal of the American Statistical Association, 93(444), 1253-1259.
  • Moore, D (1990) Uncertainty. İçinde L Steen (Ed. ), On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy (pp. 95-137). Washington, DC: National Academy Pres.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  • Rumsey, D. J. (2002). Discussion: Statistical literacy: Implications for teaching, research and practice. International Statistical Review, 70, 32–36.
  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. İçinde F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 957–1009). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Shaughnessy, J. M., & Pfannkuch, M. (2004). How faithful is old faithful? Statistical thinking: A story of variation and prediction. Mathematics Teacher, 95(4),252–259.
  • Snell, L. (1999). Using Chance media to Promote Statistical Literacy. Statistical Meetings, Dallas, TX.
  • Wallman, K. K. (1993). Enhancing statistical literacy: Enriching our society. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(421),1-8.
  • Watson, J. M. (1997). Assessing statistical literacy using the media. İçinde I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 107–121). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press & The International Statistical Institute.
  • Watson, J. M., & Callingham R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2),3–46.
  • Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

İstatistiksel okuryazarlık modelleri ve bileşenlerinin incelenmesi

Year 2015, , 16 - 28, 30.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.181131

Abstract

Bu çalışmada gün geçtikçe önem kazanan istatistiksel okuryazarlık, istatistiksel okuryazarlık modelleri ve bileşenleri incelenmiştir. Bu modellerin ortak amacı öğrencilerin problemleri nasıl çözdüğünü anlamaktır. İstatistiksel okuryazarlık, istatistik eğitimi araştırmalarında yeni bir konudur. Bu yüzden bu konuda öğrenme, değerlendirme ve öğretimi geliştirmek için yapılan girişimlerin ortaya konulmasına ihtiyaç vardır. Son yıllarda istatistik konularının matematik öğretim programımızda daha çok yer almaktadır. Bu nedenle istatistik öğretiminde öne çıkan model ve bileşenleri daha önemli hale getirmiştir. Çalışmada istatistiksel okuryazarlığı geliştirmek için kullanılan iki model incelenmiş, bu modellerin bileşenleri, benzer ve farklı yönleri ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırmanın, istatistiksel okuryazarlık modelleri ve bileşenleri hakkında farkındalık oluşturacağı istatistik öğretiminde zorlukların aşılmasında hem araştırmacı hem de öğretmenlere ışık tutacağı düşünülmektedir.

References

  • American Statistical Association. (2005). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education: College report. Alexandria: Author.
  • Best, J. (2004). More damned lies and statistics: How numbers confuse public issues. California, CA: University of California Press.
  • Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • delMas, R. C. (2002). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and learning: A commentary. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3).http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n3/delmas_discussion.htmladresinden elde edildi.
  • Callingham, R., & Watson, J. M. (2005). Measuring statistical literacy. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6 (1),29, 19-47.
  • Gal, I. (1995). Statistical tools and statistical literacy: The case of the average. Teaching Statistics, 17, 97–99.
  • Gal, I. (2002). Adult statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1-25.
  • Gal, I. (2004). The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking. İçinde, Ben-Zvi, D.,& Garfield, J.(Ed.),Statistical Literacy - Meanings, Components, Responsibilities (pp.47-78). America: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Hooke, R. (1983). How to tell the liars from the statisticians. New York, NY: Marcel, Dekker.
  • Lehohla, P. (2002). Promoting statistical literacy: A South African perspective. İçinde B. Phillips, (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conferences on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg, the Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
  • Makar, K., & Rubin, A. (2009). A framework for thinking about informal statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(1),82–105.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2009).Matematik dersi (6-8. sınflar) öğretim programı ve matematik dersi (9-12.sınıflar) öğretim programı.http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim-programlari/icerik/72 adresinden elde edildi.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2013). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı ve ortaöğretim matematik dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) öğretim programı.http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/guncellenen-ogretim-programlari/icerik/151adresinden elde edildi.
  • Moore, D.S. (1998). Statistics among the liberal arts. Joumal of the American Statistical Association, 93(444), 1253-1259.
  • Moore, D (1990) Uncertainty. İçinde L Steen (Ed. ), On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy (pp. 95-137). Washington, DC: National Academy Pres.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  • Rumsey, D. J. (2002). Discussion: Statistical literacy: Implications for teaching, research and practice. International Statistical Review, 70, 32–36.
  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. İçinde F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 957–1009). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Shaughnessy, J. M., & Pfannkuch, M. (2004). How faithful is old faithful? Statistical thinking: A story of variation and prediction. Mathematics Teacher, 95(4),252–259.
  • Snell, L. (1999). Using Chance media to Promote Statistical Literacy. Statistical Meetings, Dallas, TX.
  • Wallman, K. K. (1993). Enhancing statistical literacy: Enriching our society. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(421),1-8.
  • Watson, J. M. (1997). Assessing statistical literacy using the media. İçinde I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 107–121). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press & The International Statistical Institute.
  • Watson, J. M., & Callingham R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2),3–46.
  • Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Timur Koparan

Publication Date July 30, 2015
Acceptance Date July 15, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015

Cite

APA Koparan, T. (2015). İstatistiksel okuryazarlık modelleri ve bileşenlerinin incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Education, 4(3), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.181131

Turkish Journal of Education is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0