In the Spirit of Quality Student Teachers’ English Proficiency and Pedagogical Skills: Teacher Educators and School Principals’ Perception

Year 2016, , 157 - 169, 31.07.2016

Urip Sulistiyo Amirul Mukminin , Yanto Yanto

https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.81461

Cited By: 2

Abstract

The aim of this research was to document information on English teacher education program at one state-owned university in Jambi, Indonesia in order to better prepare student teachers with sufficient knowledge and skills they need to teach. Information was gathered from school principals’ and teacher educators’ perceptions on beginner teachers’ English proficiency and pedagogical skills. This research employed qualitative method that used document analysis and interviews for data collection. Interviews with principals and teacher educators were used to obtain data and evidence about the beginner teachers’ language proficiency and preparedness to teach and document analysis was used to explore the content of the English teacher education curriculum that covers English proficiency and teaching skill related courses. The results showed that school principals did not always perceive the English proficiency and teaching skills of new teachers to be adequate for entering the teaching profession. In contrast, teacher educators gave a view that pre-service teachers who had completed an English teacher education program were equipped with adequate language knowledge, language proficiency, and language teaching skills. This research makes recommendations to improve the quality of this program, in particular, program curriculum content reform for developing language knowledge and language teaching skills.

Keywords

knowledge base for language teachers, English proficiency, teaching skill

References

• Abednia, A. (2012). Teachers’ professional identity: Contribution of a critical EFL teacher education course in Iran. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 706–717.
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2).
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publication.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage
• Day, R. (2012). Models and the knowledge base of second language teacher education. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL, 11(2), 1–13.
• Day, R. R. & Conklin, G. (1992). The knowledge base in ESL/EFL teacher education. Paper presented at the TESOL Conference.
• Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. New York, NY: Open University Press.
• Faez, F. (2011). Points of departure: Developing the knowledge base of ESL and FSL teachers for K-12 programs in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 48–82.
• Freeman, D. (2009). The scope of second language teacher education. In A.
• Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to language teacher education (pp. 11–19). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Irmawati, D. K. (2014). Models of TEFL teachers’ professional development. Paper presented at the TEFLIN International Conference, Solo, Indonesia.
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). Boston: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Kyriacou, C., Hulthgren, A., & Stephens, P. (1999). Student teachers’ motivation to become a secondary school teacher in England and Norway. Teacher Development, 3 (3), 373-381.
• Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative data analysis: Conceptual and practical considerations. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 20(2), 133–139.
• Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Luciana. (2006). Developing standards for language teacher education programs in Indonesia: Professionalizing or losing in complexity. TEFLIN Journal, 7(1), 19–28.
• May, T. & Cantley, C. (2001). Social research: Issues, methods, and process (3rd ed.). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
• Moore, K. D. (2007). Classroom teaching skills. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
• Mukminin, A., Ali, R. M., & Ashari, M. J. (2015). Voices from Within: Student Teachers’ Experiences in English Academic Writing Socialization at One Indonesian Teacher Training Program. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1394-1407. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss9/2
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing, retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
• Rahayu, P. S. & Hizriani, N. (2014). English teachers’ professional development at Hulu Sungai Selatan. South Kalimantan. Paper presented at the TEFLIN International Conference, Solo, Indonesia.
• Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond training: Perspectives on language teacher education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Richards, J. C. (2010). Competence and performance in language teaching. RELC Journal, 41(2).
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
• Shulman, L. S. & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257–271.
• Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. London, England: Sage Publications
• Turner, D.W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: a practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754-760.