İNGİLİZCE DERSLERİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILANAN ARAÇSALLIĞI ARTIRMANIN DERS BAŞARISI, TUTUM VE CAN SIKINTISINA ETKİLERİ

Year 2020, Volume: 33 Issue: 3, 874 - 916, 07.12.2020

Gülnihal Aytekin Yüksel , Altay Eren

https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.669567

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, dokuzuncu sınıf öğrencilerinin İngilizce derslerinde öğretilen konulara ilişkin algıladıkları araçsallığı artırmanın, ders başarısı, tutum ve can sıkıntısına etkilerinin incelenmesidir. Çalışmada ön-test, son-test kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Batı Karadeniz Bölgesinde yer alan küçük bir ildeki Anadolu Lisesinden, toplam 93 dokuzuncu sınıf öğrencisi kolayda örnekleme yoluyla seçilmiştir. Öğrenciler ya deney gruplarına (kapsamlı bilgilendirilen grup, n = 30; yüzeysel bilgilendirilen grup, n = 30) ya da kontrol grubuna (n = 33) rastgele biçimde atanmışlardır. Veriler, Algılan Araçsallık Ölçeği, Can Sıkıntısı Ölçeği ve İngilizceye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği aracılığıyla elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin İngilizce ders başarılarının değerlendirilmesi için bir başarı testi de geliştirilmiştir. Verilerin kapsamlı biçimde analiz edilmesi amacıyla, bir dizi kovaryans analizi ve tekrarlı ölçümler için kovaryans analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, kapsamlı bilgilendirilen gruptaki öğrencilerin, yüzeysel bilgilendirilen grup ve kontrol grubundaki akranlarına göre, İngilizce derslerinde öğretilen konuları gelecek amaçlarına ulaşmada daha önemli olarak algıladıklarını göstermiştir. Sonuçlar, kapsamlı bilgilendirilen gruptaki öğrencilerin diğer çalışma gruplarındaki akranlarına göre, İngilizce derslerine yönelik olarak daha olumlu tutuma sahip olduklarını, daha az düzeyde can sıkıntısı hissettiklerini ve daha başarılı olduklarını da göstermiştir.

Keywords

Algılanan araçsallık, tutum, can sıkıntısı, İngilizce dersi, başarı

THE EFFECTS OF INCREASING PERCEIVED INSTRUMENTALITY OF ENGLISH CLASSES ON COURSE ACHIEVEMENT, ATTITUDE, AND BOREDOM

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effects of increasing ninth-grade students’ perceived instrumentality of the topics taught in English classes on their course achievement, attitude, and boredom. A pre-test, post-test quasi-experimental design with control group was used in the study. A total of 93 ninth-grade students conveniently sampled from the Anatolian High School of a small city located in the Western Black Sea Region. Students were randomly assigned to either experimental groups (i.e., comprehensively informed group, n = 30; superficially informed group, n = 30) or control group (n = 33). The data were obtained through the Perceived Instrumentality Scale, Boredom Scale, and Attitude towards English Scale. Additionally, an achievement test was developed to assess students’ graded performance regarding English classes. A series of univariate analyses of covariance and repeated measures analyses of covariance were conducted to analyze the data comprehensively. The results showed that students in the comprehensively informed group perceived the topics taught in English classes more important to attain their future goals than their counterparts in the superficially informed group and control group. The results also demonstrated that students in the comprehensively informed group held more positive attitudes, felt lower levels of boredom, and had higher achievement scores regarding English classes than their counterparts in other study groups.

Keywords

Perceived instrumentality, attitude, boredom, English class, achievement

References

• Afshari, M., Shirzadifard, M., & Jahromi, R. G. (2018). Future time perspective and academic achievement: Mediating role of long-term self-regulation and perceived task instrumentality. Developmental Psychology, 14(54), 121-134. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behaviour. In D. Albarracin, B.T. Johnson, and M.P. Zanna, (Eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes (pp. 173-221), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Aksoy, O. (2018). Lise öğrencilerinin İngilizce ders başarılarını yordayan değişkenler: Boylamsal bir analiz. Doktora Tezi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bolu. Allport, G.W. (1967). Attitudes. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 1-13). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Altunay, U. (2004). Üniversite İngilizce hazırlık öğrencilerinin İngilizceye yönelik tutumlarıyla, sınavlar, okulun fiziksel koşulları ve ders programları ve uygulanışı ile İlgili görüşleri arasındaki ilişkiler. XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı (6-9 Temmuz 2004), İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya. Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 287-309. Baş, G. ve Beyhan, Ö. (2012). İngilizce dersinde yansıtıcı düşünme etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına ve derse yönelik tutumlarına etkisi. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 128-142. Belton, T., & Priyadharshini, E. (2007). Boredom and schooling: a cross‐disciplinary exploration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(4), 579-595. Bernaus, M., & Gardner, R. C. (2008). Teacher motivation strategies, student perceptions, student motivation, and English achievement. The Modern Language Journal, 92(3), 387-401. Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Hill,P ., & Pincas, A. (1997). Teaching english as a foreign language. Routledge, UK: University of London Institute of Education. Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York, NY: Longman. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Chi, M. T. (2009). Active‐constructive‐interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in cognitive science, 1(1), 73-105. Chiaburu, D. S., & Lindsay, D. R. (2008). Can do or will do? The importance of self-efficacy and instrumentality for training transfer. Human Resource Development International, 11(2), 199-206. Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 248-263. Clair, T. St., Cook T. D., & Hallberg, K. (2014). Examining the internal validity and statistical precision of the comparative interrupted time series design by comparison with a randomized experiment. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(3), 311-327. Creten, H., Lens, W., & Simons, J. (2001). The role of perceived instrumentality in student motivation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.). Trends and prospects in motivation research. (pp. 37-45). Dordrecht, NL: Springer. Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. De Bilde, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory. Learning and Instruction, 21, 332-344. Demir Ayaz, A., Özkardaş, S. ve Özturan, T. (2019). Challenges of English language teaching in high schools in Turkey and possible suggestions to overcome them. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 41-55. Demirpolat, B. C. (2015). Türkiye’nin yabancı dil öğretimiyle imtihanı: Sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Ankara: Seta Vakfı Yayınları. Doğru, E. (2014). Hayal aktivitelerinin üniversite öğrencilerinin İngilizce derslerine yönelik başarı, ilgi ve tutumları üzerine etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bolu. Dube, S. R., & Orpinas, P. (2009). Understanding excessive school absenteeism as school refusal behavior. Children and Schools, 31(2), 87-95. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 21(3), 215-225. Education First (2018). EF English proficiency index. Retrieved from https://www.ef.com/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/downloads/full-reports/v8/ef-epi-2018-english.pdf Education First (2019). EF English proficiency index. Retrieved from https://www.ef.com/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/downloads/full-reports/v9/ef-epi-2019-english.pdf Elmalı-Özsaray, A. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinin İngilizce dersine ilişkin başarıyla ilgili duyguları, bilgiye yönelik merakları ve ders başarısı arasındaki ilişkiler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bolu. Elyıldırım, S., & Ashton-Hay, S. (2006). Creating positive attitudes towards English as a foreign language. In English Teaching Forum (Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 2-21). US State Department. Eren, A. (2009). Exploring the effects of changes in future time perspective and perceived instrumentality on graded performance. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(3), 1217-1248. Eren, A. (2013a). Öğretmen adaylarının can sıkıntısıyla başa çıkma stratejilerinin görünümleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(2), 69-90. Eren, A. (2013b). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of instrumentality, boredom coping strategies, and four aspects of engagement. Teaching Education, 24(3), 302-326. Eren, A. (2016). Unidirectional cycles of boredom, boredom coping strategies, and engagement among prospective teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 19(4), 895-924. Eren, A. ve Coşkun, H. (2015). Time perspectives and boredom coping strategies of undergraduate students from Turkey. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 14(1), 53-75. Eren, A. ve Coskun, H. (2016). Students' level of boredom, boredom coping strategies, epistemic curiosity, and graded performance. Journal of Educational Research, 109(6), 574-588. Faisal, R. A. (2019). Influence of personality and learning styles in English language achievement. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(8), 304-324. Fakeye, D. O. (2010). Students’ personal variables as correlates of academic achievement in English as a second language in Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences, 22(3), 205-211. Fallis, R. K., & Opotow, S. (2003). Are students failing school or are schools failing students? Class cutting in high school. Journal of Social Issues, 59(1), 103-119. Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N. D. (1986). Boredom proneness - the development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(1), 4-17. Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinician sand researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532-538. Field, A. (2014). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. London, UK: Sage. Fisherl, C. (1993) Boredom at work: a neglected concept. Human Relations, 46(3), 395–417. Fryer, L. K., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., & Sherlock, Z. (2017). Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and human task partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 461-468. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London, UK: Edward Arnold. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Gömleksiz, M. N. (2003). İngilizce duyuşsal alana ilişkin bir tutum ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 215-226. Gömleksiz, M. N. ve Elaldı, Ş. (2011). Yapılandırmacı yaklaşım bağlamında yabancı dil öğretimi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 6(2), 443-454. Graesser, A. C., & D’Mello, S. (2012). Emotions during the learning of difficult material. In B. Ross (Ed.). Psychology of learning and motivation. (Vol. 57, pp. 183-225). Academic Press. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2007). Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision. Psychological Science, 18(1), 88-94. Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 462-482. Hamilton, J. A., Haier, R. J., & Buchsbaum, M. S. (1984). Intrinsic enjoyment and boredom coping scales: Validation with personality, evoked potential and attention measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(2), 183-193. Husman, J., Derryberry, W. P., Crowson, H. M., & Lomax, R. (2004). Instrumentality, task value, and intrinsic motivation: Making sense of their independent interdependence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(1), 63-76. Husman, J., Hilpert, J. C., and Brem, S. K. (2016). Future time perspective connectedness to a career: the contextual effects of classroom knowledge building. Psychologica Belgica, 56(3), 210. Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational psychologist, 34(2), 113-125. Kazazoğlu, S. (2003). Türkçe ve İngilizce derslerine yönelik tutumun akademik başarıya etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(170), 294-307. Kırkgöz, Y. (2010). Teaching English at primary education: From policy planning to practice. Handbook for Teaching Foreign Languages to Young Learners in Primary Schools, 23-41. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. Kline, R. B. (2016). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford. Lens, W. (1988). The motivational significance of future time perspective: The homecoming of a concept. Psychologica, 1, 27-46. Malka, A., & Covington, M. V. (2005). Perceiving school performance as instrumental to future goal attainment: Effects on graded performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 60-80. Mann, S., & Robinson, A. (2009). Boredom in the lecture theatre: An investigation into the contributors, moderators and outcomes of boredom amongst university students. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 243-258. Maroldo, G. K. (1986). Shyness, boredom, and grade point average among college students. Psychological Reports, 59(2), 395-398. MEB (2012). 12 yıl zorunlu eğitim. http://www.meb.gov.tr/duyurular/duyurular2012/12yil_soru_cevap lar.pdf adresinden 31 Ağustos 2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir. Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 9-33. Miller, R. B., Debacker, T. K., & Greene, B. A. (1999). Perceived instrumentality and academics: The links to task valuing. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 26, 250-260. Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 388-422. Morgan, C. T. (1961). Introduction to psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. C. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168-183. Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Daniels, L. M. (2010). What to do when feeling bored? Students' strategies for coping with boredom. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 626-638. Özçetin, N., & Eren, A. (2010). The effects of perceived instrumentality and future time perspective on students' graded performance and attitudes regarding English class. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 1(4), 40-47. Özüdoğru, F. ve Adıgüzel, O. C. (2015). Evaluatıon of Primary school 2nd grade English language teaching curriculum. Turkish Studies, 10(11), 1251-1276. Parker, A., & Paradis, E. (1986). Attitude development toward reading in grades one through six. Journal of Educational Research, 79(5), 313-315. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-106. Peteranetz, M. S., Flanigan, A. E., Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. K. (2018). Career aspirations, perceived instrumentality, and achievement in undergraduate computer science courses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 27-44. Proust, J., and Fortier, M. (2018) (Eds.). Metacognitive diversity: An interdisciplinary approach. London, UK: Oxford University Press. Puruhito, K., Husman, J., Hilpert, J. C., Ganesh, T., & Stump, G. (2011, October). Increasing instrumentality without decreasing instructional time: An intervention for engineering students. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. F2J-1- F2J-6). IEEE. Rostami, M., Hejazi, E., & Lavasani, M. G. (2011). The relationship between gender, perception of classroom structure, achievement goals, perceived instrumentality and academic achievement in English course third grad middle school students (English as second language). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 703-712. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. Schuitema, J., Peetsma, T., & Van der Veen, I. (2014). Enhancing student motivation: A longitudinal intervention study based on future time perspective theory. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(6), 467-481. Shaw, S. (1996) Boredom, stress and social control in the daily activities of adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 28(4), 274-292. Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2000). Wanting to have vs. wanting to be" The effect of perceived instrumentality on goal orientation. British Journal of Psychology, 97,335-351. Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you'll know what you learn! British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 343-360. Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Lacante, M. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16(2), 121-139. Şahin, H., Çelik, F. ve Çatal, Ö. G. (2019). 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflarda İngilizce öğrenme sürecinde karşılaşılan sorunların incelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (47), 123-136. Teimouri, Y., Goetze, J., & Plonsky, L. (2018). Second language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1-25. Tsai, H. J. (2015). Exploring college students’ motivational beliefs in ability-grouped English classes in Taiwan, Doctoral dissertation, Durham University. Tuncer, M., & Akmençe, A. E. (2018). Lise öğrencilerinin İngilizce dersine yönelik motivasyon durumları. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(7), 197-207. Tvedt, M. S., Bru, E., & Idsoe, T. (in press). Perceived teacher support and intentions to quit upper secondary school: Direct, and indirect associations via emotional engagement and boredom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1659401 Van Calster, K., Lens, W., & Nuttin, J. R. (1987). Affective attitude toward the personal future: Impact on motivation in high school boys. The American Journal of Psychology, 1-13. Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. (2003). Competitively contingent rewards and intrinsic motivation: Can losers remain motivated? Motivation and Emotion, 27(4), 273-299. Van Tilburg, W. A., & Igou, E. R. (2012). On boredom: Lack of challenge and meaning as distinct boredom experiences. Motivation and Emotion, 36(2), 181-194. Vodanovich, S. J. (2003). Psychometric measures of boredom: A review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 137(6), 569-595. Vodanovich, S., & Kass, S. (1990) A factor analytic study of the boredom proneness scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(1/2), 115–123. Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. London, UK: Prentice Hall. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265-310. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-Value theory of achivement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol: 25, 68-81. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002) (Eds.). Development of achievement motivation. New York, NY: Academic Press. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288. Zhou, H., & Shi, G. (2019, August). A study of emotional practice in college English teaching. In 2019 5th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2019) (pp. 645-648). Paris: Atlantis Press.