Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Ulusal Bütçe Sürecine Vatandaş Katılımı Ve Araçlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2023, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 111 - 131, 20.04.2023
https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1177164

Abstract

Bugüne kadar kamu bütçe sürecine vatandaş katılımına ilişkin deneyimlerin çoğunun yerel yönetimler düzeyinde gerçekleştiği görülmektedir. Ancak günümüzde Dünya Bankası ve IMF gibi uluslararası kuruluşlar tarafından ulusal bütçe sürecinde katılımcı bir yaklaşım sergilenmesi gerekliliğine ilişkin vurgu artmaktadır. Ulusal bütçe sürecine vatandaş katılımının sağlanabilmesi için yasama organlarının, yürütme organlarının ve yüksek denetim kurumlarının bütçe sürecinin farklı aşamalarına ilişkin çeşitli mekanizmalar geliştirmeye başladığı görülmektedir. Ulusal bütçe sürecine vatandaş katılım düzeyini araştırmak için “Uluslararası Bütçe Ortaklığı (IBP)” tarafından “Açık Bütçe Anketi (OBS)” araştırması yapılmaktadır. Bu araştırma ulusal bütçe sürecine vatandaş katılımını küresel düzeyde ölçen tek araştırmadır. OBS 2021 sonuçları, araştırmaya dahil edilen ülkelerin büyük çoğunluğunun bütçe sürecine vatandaş katılımı konusunda iyi durumda olmadığını göstermektedir. Bu çalışma ile ulusal bütçe sürecine vatandaş katılımını sağlayan araçların neler olabileceğinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.

References

  • Anderson, M. & Mossialos, E. (2019). Beyond Gross Domestic Product for New Zealand’s Wellbeing Budget, The Lancet Public Health, 4(7), 320-321.
  • Barth, J. (2006). Public policy management councils in Brazil: How far does institutionalised participation reach? Public Administration and Development, 26(3), 253–263.
  • Ciconello, A. (2008). Social participation as a democracy-consolidating process in Brazil. From Poverty to Power, 12. de Renzio, P. & Wehner, J. (2015). The Impacts of Fiscal Openness: A Review of the Evidence, GIFT.
  • Demirbaş, T. (2012). The Role of Parliamentary Websites in the Budget Process: The Case of the Turkish Parliament, M. Z. Sobacı (Ed.), (E-Parliament and ICT-Based Legislation: Concept, Experiences and Lessons içinde), Information Science Reference.
  • Effective Institutions Platform. (2014). Supreme Audit Institutions and Stakeholder Engagement Practices: A Stocktaking Report.
  • GIFT. (2015). The Time Is Now: Advancıng Public Participation In Government Fiscal Policy And Budget Making, Global İnitiative on Fiscal Transparency.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2008). Open Budgets Transform Lives: The Open Budget Survey 2008, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2015). The Open Budget Survey 2015, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2018). The Open Budget Survey 2017, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2020). The Open Budget Survey 2019, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2022). The Open Budget Survey 2021, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • Kang, Y. K. & Min, S. Y. (2013). Public Participation in the Budget Process in the Republic of Korea, PREM Notes, The World Bank, 3.
  • Lloyd, K. R. Schofield, J. & Fershau, J. (2005). Pre-budget Consultations in British Columbia, Canadıan Parliamentary Revıew, 43-48.
  • Marchessault, L. (2014). Public Participation and the Budget Cycle: Lessons from Country Examples, Retrieved from Country Examples.
  • Mutluer, K., Öner, E. & Kesik, A. (2005). Bütçe Hukuku, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Najimi, B. (2018). Gender and Public Participation in Afghanistan, Canada:Palgrave Macmillan.
  • OECD. (2003). Promise and problems of edemocracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement. France.
  • OECD. (2007). Role of the Legislature in the Budget Process: Recent Trends and Innovations, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(3), 1-26.
  • OECD. (2011). Public Sector Integrity in Brazil: Case Study 3.
  • OECD. (2012). OECD integrity review of Brazil: Managing risks for a cleaner public service. OECD Publishing. OECD. (2019). Budgeting and Public Expenditures in OECD Countries.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2008). Open Budgets Transform Lives: The Open Budget Survey 2008, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • Page, K. (2015). Public Participation in Federal Fiscal Policy and Budget Processes in Canada, Global İnitiative on Fiscal Transparency.
  • Presidency of the Republic of Brazil. (2021). The federal government is composed of ministries, secretariats and special organs, Brazil. Struić, G. & Bratić, V. (2018). Public Participation in the Budgetary Process in the Republic of Croatia, Public Sector Economics, 42 (1), 67-92.
  • Tanaka, S. (2007). Engaging the Public in National Budgeting: A Non-Governmental Perspective, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(2), 139-177.
  • Tellier, G. (2019). Canadian Public Finance, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • The Movement for Canadian Literacy. (2006). Pre-budget Consultations April 19.
  • USAID. [U.S. Agency for International Development]. (2013). Civil Society and Citizens in the External Audit Process. Belgrade. Zhang, Y. & Liao, Y. (2011). Participatory Budgeting in Local Government: Evidence from New Jersey Municipalities, Public Performance and Management Review 35(2), 281–301.
  • Wampler, B. (2007). A Guide to Participatory Budgeting”, A. Shah (Ed.), The World Bank, (Partıcıpatory Budgetıng kitabı içinde).
  • Wampler, B. (2013). Participation, Transparency and Accountability: Innovations in South Korea, Brazil, and the Philippines. Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency. Wellbeing Budget.

Evaluation of Citizen Participation and Tools in the National Budget Process

Year 2023, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 111 - 131, 20.04.2023
https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1177164

Abstract

According to recent observations, most of the occurrences related to citizen participation in the public budget process have realized at the level of local governments. However, there is an increasing emphasis on the necessity of adopting a participatory approach by international organizations such as the World Bank and the IMF. It has been observed that legislative and executive bodies and supreme audit institutions have started to develop various mechanisms regarding various stages of the budget process in order to ensure citizen participation in the process of creating the national budget. As a data collection instrument, the "Open Budget Survey (OBS)" have been developed by the "International Budget Partnership (IBP)" is utilized to investigate the level of participation of citizens in the national budget process. This research is a unique study that measures citizen participation in the national budget process at a global level. The OBS 2021 results indicate that the majority of the countries included in the survey do not have a good level of citizen participation in the budget process. In this study, it is aimed to investigate possible mechanisms that ensure citizen participation in the national budget process.

References

  • Anderson, M. & Mossialos, E. (2019). Beyond Gross Domestic Product for New Zealand’s Wellbeing Budget, The Lancet Public Health, 4(7), 320-321.
  • Barth, J. (2006). Public policy management councils in Brazil: How far does institutionalised participation reach? Public Administration and Development, 26(3), 253–263.
  • Ciconello, A. (2008). Social participation as a democracy-consolidating process in Brazil. From Poverty to Power, 12. de Renzio, P. & Wehner, J. (2015). The Impacts of Fiscal Openness: A Review of the Evidence, GIFT.
  • Demirbaş, T. (2012). The Role of Parliamentary Websites in the Budget Process: The Case of the Turkish Parliament, M. Z. Sobacı (Ed.), (E-Parliament and ICT-Based Legislation: Concept, Experiences and Lessons içinde), Information Science Reference.
  • Effective Institutions Platform. (2014). Supreme Audit Institutions and Stakeholder Engagement Practices: A Stocktaking Report.
  • GIFT. (2015). The Time Is Now: Advancıng Public Participation In Government Fiscal Policy And Budget Making, Global İnitiative on Fiscal Transparency.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2008). Open Budgets Transform Lives: The Open Budget Survey 2008, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2015). The Open Budget Survey 2015, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2018). The Open Budget Survey 2017, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2020). The Open Budget Survey 2019, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2022). The Open Budget Survey 2021, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • Kang, Y. K. & Min, S. Y. (2013). Public Participation in the Budget Process in the Republic of Korea, PREM Notes, The World Bank, 3.
  • Lloyd, K. R. Schofield, J. & Fershau, J. (2005). Pre-budget Consultations in British Columbia, Canadıan Parliamentary Revıew, 43-48.
  • Marchessault, L. (2014). Public Participation and the Budget Cycle: Lessons from Country Examples, Retrieved from Country Examples.
  • Mutluer, K., Öner, E. & Kesik, A. (2005). Bütçe Hukuku, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Najimi, B. (2018). Gender and Public Participation in Afghanistan, Canada:Palgrave Macmillan.
  • OECD. (2003). Promise and problems of edemocracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement. France.
  • OECD. (2007). Role of the Legislature in the Budget Process: Recent Trends and Innovations, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(3), 1-26.
  • OECD. (2011). Public Sector Integrity in Brazil: Case Study 3.
  • OECD. (2012). OECD integrity review of Brazil: Managing risks for a cleaner public service. OECD Publishing. OECD. (2019). Budgeting and Public Expenditures in OECD Countries.
  • International Budget Partnership. (2008). Open Budgets Transform Lives: The Open Budget Survey 2008, International Budget Partnership, Washington DC.
  • Page, K. (2015). Public Participation in Federal Fiscal Policy and Budget Processes in Canada, Global İnitiative on Fiscal Transparency.
  • Presidency of the Republic of Brazil. (2021). The federal government is composed of ministries, secretariats and special organs, Brazil. Struić, G. & Bratić, V. (2018). Public Participation in the Budgetary Process in the Republic of Croatia, Public Sector Economics, 42 (1), 67-92.
  • Tanaka, S. (2007). Engaging the Public in National Budgeting: A Non-Governmental Perspective, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(2), 139-177.
  • Tellier, G. (2019). Canadian Public Finance, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • The Movement for Canadian Literacy. (2006). Pre-budget Consultations April 19.
  • USAID. [U.S. Agency for International Development]. (2013). Civil Society and Citizens in the External Audit Process. Belgrade. Zhang, Y. & Liao, Y. (2011). Participatory Budgeting in Local Government: Evidence from New Jersey Municipalities, Public Performance and Management Review 35(2), 281–301.
  • Wampler, B. (2007). A Guide to Participatory Budgeting”, A. Shah (Ed.), The World Bank, (Partıcıpatory Budgetıng kitabı içinde).
  • Wampler, B. (2013). Participation, Transparency and Accountability: Innovations in South Korea, Brazil, and the Philippines. Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency. Wellbeing Budget.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Economics
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Vuslat Güneş 0000-0001-8201-6847

Early Pub Date April 2, 2023
Publication Date April 20, 2023
Submission Date September 19, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Güneş, V. (2023). Ulusal Bütçe Sürecine Vatandaş Katılımı Ve Araçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Economics and Innovation, 9(1), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1177164

International Journal of Economics and Innovation

Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Economics, 61080, Trabzon/Türkiye
28816