LEADERSHIP IN MUSIC TEACHING (THE CASE OF MERSIN PROVINCE)

Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 128 - 139, 27.12.2017

Ayhan Demirci , Abdullah Çalışkan , Taner Çatı

https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.356948

Abstract

This research aims to identify the leadership approaches of music
teachers who work in schools and to demonstrate the effect of
leadership approaches on the consistency
of purpose and
communication/cooperation in school.
It is also the purpose of this research to determine whether the music
teachers' leadership approaches vary according to their demographic characteristics.

            The study was organized
into four chapters. In the first part of the study, the purpose of the
research, its limitations, and the key definitions of research are explained.
In the second part of the study, the concepts of "Leader" and
"Leadership" were discussed with the finest details, the leadership
styles and theories of leadership were discussed, the differences between
leadership and management were examined and the importance of leader's
organization was emphasized. In the third part of the study, the researcher's
universe and sample are specified, and necessary explanations about the
collection and analysis of the data are mentioned. In addition, the findings in
the research were evaluated and interpreted. In the fourth part of the study,
the results were evaluated and proposals were made to the practitioner and researcher.

Keywords

Consistency of Purpose, Communication / Cooperation, Leadership

References

• Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 440.
• Ahearn, K. K., Ferris, G. R., Hocwarter, W. A. (2004). Leader Political Skill and Team Performance, Journal of Management, 30(3),309-327.
• Bass, B. M. (1987). From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision, Organizational Dynamics, 18 (3), 19-31.
• Beyer, J. M., Browning, L. D. (1999). Transforming An Industry In Crisis: Charisma, Routinization, And Supportive Cultural Leadership.Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 483– 520.
• Costley, D. L., Santana, C. - Todd, R. (1994). Successful Organisation, Human Relations in Organizations, 5(1), 280.
• Crowther, F., Kaagen, S., Ferguson, M., ve Hann, L. (2002). Developing teacher leaders, How teacher leadership enhances school success, 8(2), 211-220.
• Çalışkan, A . (2015). Örgütsel Adaletin Örgütsel Bağlılığa Etkisi: Etik İkliminin Aracılık Rolü. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 1 (2), 115-141.
• Danielson, C. (2006). Teacher Leadership That Strengthens Professional Practice, Leadership, 1(1), 65-84.
• Dimock, V. B., McGree K. M. (1995). Leading Change From The Classroom, Teachers As Leaders, SDL Issues, 4.
• Fiedler, F. E. (1968). Social Science Paper BacksGroup Dynamics: Research and Theory Personality and Situational Determinants of Leadership Effectiveness, 20(5), 369.
• Frost, D., Durrant, J. (2003). ,Teacher Leadership, rationale, strategy and impact, School Leadership Management, 23, (2), 173-186.
• Harris, A. (2005). Reflections on Distributed Leadership. Management in Education, 19, 10- 12.
• Hemphill, J. K., Coons, A. E. (1957). Development of the Leader Behaviour, Description Questionnaire, Leader Behavior, 196-202.
• Ivancevich, J. M., Matteson, M. T. (2002). Organizational Behavior and Management, New York: McGraw-Hill Irvin.
• Judge, T. A., Fluegge, E. W., Hust, C., Livingston, B. (2006). Charismatic and Transformational Leadership A Review and Agenda for Future Research, Zeitschrift für Arbeits, Organisationspsychologie, 50(4), 205.
• Kantos, Z. E. (2011). Örgüt Metaforlarında Liderlik: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme, Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 135-158.
• Krill, T. L., Carter, R. I. ve Williams, D. L. (1997). An exploration of the leadership practice enabling others to act: A case study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 38(4), 42-49.
• Leithwood, K., Reihl, C. (2005). What Do We Already Know About Educational Leadership, A new Agenda for Research in Educational Leadership, 12-27.
• Little, J. W. (1990). The Persistence of Privacy, Autonomy and İnitiative in Teacher’s Professional Relations, Teachers College Record, 91, 50-53.
• Mintzberg, H. (1992). Five Ps for Strategy in The Strategy Process, Prentice-Hall International Editions, Englewood Cliffs NJ 12-19.
• Murphy, J. (2005). Leader Roles in Organisation, Connecting Teacher Leadership and School Improvement. 14, 155-156.
• Northcraft, G. B. (1994). A Management Challenge, Organizastional Behaviour, 3, 241-251.
• Pellicer L.O., Anderson L.W. (1995). A Handbook for Teacher Leaders, Corwin Press, California 10, 12.
• Pisapia, J. (2009). The strategic leader, Charlotte, Information Age Publishers. Rauch, C.F., Behling, O. (1984). Functionalism: Basis for Alternate Approach to the
• Study of Leadership, International Perspectives on Managerial Behavior and Leadership, 3, 46-50.
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The Leader’s New Work, Building Learning Organizations, Sloan Management Review.
• Smith, B. N., Ray V. M. ve Kuzmenko, T. N. (2004). Transformational and Servant Leadership: Content and Contextual Comparisons, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4), 86-90.
• Tannenbaum R., Weschler, I. R., Massarik, F. (1961). Leadership and Organization, A Behavioural Science Approach, 22.
• Ward, L., & Parr, J. (2006). Authority, volunteerism, and sustainability, Creating and sustaining an online community through teacher leadership, Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5, 109-129.
• Woods, R. H. (1999). Human Resources in the New Millenium, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 18, 444.